❦ 9 juillet 2020 13:12 +05, Илья Шипицин:
> do you think does it make sense to use scripted brew instead of travis
> plugin ?
>
> if so, we can try to "brew instal blah-blah-blah || ok, we failed, lets'
> update and install one more time"
I have also hit the problem several time. Brew upstream
пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 14:21, Vincent Bernat :
> ❦ 9 juillet 2020 13:12 +05, Илья Шипицин:
>
> > do you think does it make sense to use scripted brew instead of travis
> > plugin ?
> >
> > if so, we can try to "brew instal blah-blah-blah || ok, we failed, lets'
> > update and install one more tim
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 09:43:22AM +0300, gers...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Shimi Gersner
>
> haproxy supports generating SSL certificates based on SNI using a provided
> CA signing certificate. Because CA certificates may be signed by multiple
> CAs, in some scenarios, it is neccesary fo
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 09:43:23AM +0300, gers...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SMALL: ssl: Support SAN extension for certificate
> generation
We commonly use the 'MINOR' tag instead of 'SMALL' here.
> The use of Common Name is fading out in favor of the RFC recommended
>
Hello HAProxy community,
I wanted to compare how the newly released HAProxy 2.2 (Congrats!) behaves
under heavy load so I've ran some tests on my x86_64 and aarch64 VMs:
https://medium.com/@martin.grigorov/compare-haproxy-performance-on-x86-64-and-arm64-cpu-architectures-bfd55d1d5566
Without muc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
> > I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
> > Fedora 32 and rawhide. Is there any new build options or dependencies to
> be
> > aware of? I'm looking at the
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:17:33AM -0500, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> > Ryan,
> >
> > Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
> > > I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
> > > Fedora 32 and rawhide. Is there any
Hello,
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 08:08, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally pushed this fix in the 2.0. Note the same bug affected the HTTP
> proxy
> mode (using http_proxy option). In this case, the connection retries is now
> disabled (on the 2.0 only) because the destination address i
he-he, brew bundle is deprecated (does not work)
https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/148454/brew-bundle-reporting-error-unknown-command-bundle
пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 14:55, Илья Шипицин :
>
>
> пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 14:21, Vincent Bernat :
>
>> ❦ 9 juillet 2020 13:12 +05, Илья Шипицин:
>>
I attached a patch which speeds up osx builds by 10 minutes,
сб, 11 июл. 2020 г. в 00:48, Илья Шипицин :
> he-he, brew bundle is deprecated (does not work)
>
>
> https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/148454/brew-bundle-reporting-error-unknown-command-bundle
>
> пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 14:55, Ил
instead of disabling Lua support, is it possible to build against Lua-5.3 ?
I recall there's Lua-5.3 on Fedora-33
пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 21:20, Ryan O'Hara :
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
>> Ryan,
>>
>> Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
>> > I'm currently pac
Lukas,
Am 10.07.20 um 21:04 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
>> I finally pushed this fix in the 2.0. Note the same bug affected the HTTP
>> proxy
>> mode (using http_proxy option). In this case, the connection retries is now
>> disabled (on the 2.0 only) because the destination address is definitely
>> lo
❦ 11 juillet 2020 00:48 +05, Илья Шипицин:
> he-he, brew bundle is deprecated (does not work)
>
> https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/148454/brew-bundle-reporting-error-unknown-command-bundle
It's very old. It has been added back at some point. Here is upstream
recommending its use: https:
13 matches
Mail list logo
