On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Baptiste wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder why the code send the TCP port in the DNS query...
>>> I'm currently installing an opnsense and I'll try to reproduce the
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> I've not used FreeBSD since 5.4 version :)
>>>
>>> Baptiste
>>
Grace Le
Sales
manager
Skype:
graceliyan09
whatsapp: +86-136 3284
7386Mobile:+86 136 3284 7386
Email:
gr...@aopvision.com
**SHENZHEN
ANNIDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. (aopvision)Add:2F, D Block, No.7
Building East, Shangxue Hi-tech Industrial
Hi,
I've read the HAProxy 1.5 Configuration Manual, and I find restrictions for
connection numbers, session numbers, etc. However, I notice that there is
not any restriction to control the flow rate as they focus more on the
numbers rather than the flow rate. I know that iptables can realize this
i am not sure what i am doing wrong, but i keep getting errors in my
browser when trying to browse to my site. i just moved from an old OS
and HAProxy instance to current, and may have issues with config
directives to work out. please be patient :)
just about every third request works.
Hello All,
First time caller, short time listener. So this is the deal.
My organization was running a CentOS box with Piranha on it to work as our load
balancer between our two web servers. Well the CentOS box was a Gateway
workstation from 2000 and it finally gave up the
On 8 Sep 2015 20:07, "Daniel Zenczak" wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> First time caller, short time listener. So this is the
deal. My organization was running a CentOS box with Piranha on it to work
as our load balancer between our two web servers. Well the
Piranha is a front end for LVS (layer 4 load balancing)
So I'm assuming that all your Piranha box was doing was forwarding
port 443 & 80 to your two servers...
So just set up HAProxy in TCP mode for port 80 & 443.
Test it , and then when you are happy point your DNS at it.
On 8 September
Malcolm,
The Piranha gui had some configurations about Virtual IPs and I am not
sure how that works or how it is different than HAProxy. The firewall had some
rules that pointed website requests to the virtual ips.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Turnbull
Op 8-9-2015 om 17:39 schreef Baptiste:
Hi Piba,
Finally, Willy fixed it in a different (and smarter) way:
http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=07101d5a162a125232d992648a8598bfdeee3f3f
Baptiste
Hi Baptiste,
Just compiled latest snapshot + the list of patches from today and now
it
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> All load balancers work in roughly the same way:
>
> You have a Virtual IP on the load balancer that the clients talk to,
> and the load balancer is configured to talk to multiple Real
> IPs/Backend Servers.
> Your
On 8 September 2015 at 20:56, Daniel Zenczak wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for the response. That old gateway workstation is
> not going to be used anymore (the HDDs failed on it and the RAID board
> didn’t warn/detect/tell us when it happened).
Daniel,
All load balancers work in roughly the same way:
You have a Virtual IP on the load balancer that the clients talk to,
and the load balancer is configured to talk to multiple Real
IPs/Backend Servers.
Your old config probably had one VIP for HTTP and one for HTTPS.
HAProxy is very easy
> On 30 авг. 2015 г., at 22:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:40:18AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Ok, you may be hitting a bug. Can you provide haproxy -vv output?
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you mean? I get the following warning when trying to use this
> On 8 сент. 2015 г., at 17:26, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Can you please apply the following patch to contrib/halog/Makefile not to
> override $CC (on some systems compiler is called "cc", not "gcc"):
>
> --- Makefile.orig 2015-09-08
Hi Dmitry,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:25:33PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>
> > On 30 ??. 2015 ??., at 22:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:40:18AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Ok, you may be hitting a bug. Can you provide haproxy -vv output?
Hi Piba,
Finally, Willy fixed it in a different (and smarter) way:
http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=07101d5a162a125232d992648a8598bfdeee3f3f
Baptiste
Op 8-9-2015 om 13:16 schreef ruoyu Zhang:
Hi,
I've read the HAProxy 1.5 Configuration Manual, and I find
restrictions for connection numbers, session numbers, etc. However, I
notice that there is not any restriction to control the flow rate as
they focus more on the numbers rather than the
Op 8-9-2015 om 14:17 schreef Brendan Kearney:
listen https 192.168.120.2:443
remove the address and port from the listen directive above, as
currently it will bind port 443 twice, once with once without ssl
offloading, leading to unpredictable results..
bind 192.168.120.2:443 ssl crt
18 matches
Mail list logo