On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:34:34AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> well, I am going to play with cron jobs say "after haproxy-2.0 release"
OK, that works for me!
> as for being good citizens, when I look at
>
> https://travis-ci.org/openssl/openssl/builds
>
> (25k builds 1hr each ), I'm sure
пт, 14 июн. 2019 г. в 01:27, Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:28:19PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > or we can drop boringssl build in favour of Manu :)
> > >
> > > I suggest to drop BoringSSL. It's not intended to be used outside of
> > > Google anyway. So if it breaks the user
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:28:19PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > or we can drop boringssl build in favour of Manu :)
> >
> > I suggest to drop BoringSSL. It's not intended to be used outside of
> > Google anyway. So if it breaks the user gets to keep both pieces and can
> > report the issue in
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 22:25, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
> Willy,
>
> Am 13.06.19 um 19:11 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> > чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 22:07, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:01:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> >>> "everything enabled" is impossible. 51degrees may be enabled
Ilya,
Willy,
Am 13.06.19 um 19:11 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 22:07, Willy Tarreau :
>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:01:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
>>> "everything enabled" is impossible. 51degrees may be enabled in two
>>> mutually exclusive ways. it doubles number of
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:01:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> "everything enabled" is impossible. 51degrees may be enabled in two
> mutually exclusive ways. it doubles number of build configurations.
It's not big deal, the haproxy-specific code remains the same and only
the 51D-specific one
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 06:28:09PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> I'm unhappy with that patch:
>
> a) It makes unrelated changes to the OpenSSL version (that should be a
> separate patch).
I'm also at fault here because I saw this and didn't bother that much,
being busy on other stuff :-/
> b)
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 21:28, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
>
> (removed Ben and Christopher from Cc, as this no longer about 51d)
>
> Am 13.06.19 um 17:01 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> > please find "travis-ci + 51degree" patch attached.
>
> I'm unhappy with that patch:
>
> a) It makes unrelated changes to
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 21:28, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
>
> (removed Ben and Christopher from Cc, as this no longer about 51d)
>
> Am 13.06.19 um 17:01 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> > please find "travis-ci + 51degree" patch attached.
>
> I'm unhappy with that patch:
>
> a) It makes unrelated changes to
Ilya,
(removed Ben and Christopher from Cc, as this no longer about 51d)
Am 13.06.19 um 17:01 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> please find "travis-ci + 51degree" patch attached.
I'm unhappy with that patch:
a) It makes unrelated changes to the OpenSSL version (that should be a
separate patch).
b) It
Cc: ??? ; Christopher Faulet
; HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:57:04PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Also, after thinking earlier about making it more obvious that it is a
> dummy library, I have at
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:57:04PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Also, after thinking earlier about making it more obvious that it is a dummy
> library, I have attached a patch which adds "(dummy library)" to the output
> of REGISTER_BUILD_OPTS macro.
Ah perfect, I also wanted to do it but
-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: 13 June 2019 16:30
To: Ben Shillito
Cc: ??? ; Christopher Faulet
; HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:21:36PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Thanks both
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:21:36PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Thanks both,
>
> Ilya, I will take a look at that now.
I suspect it's totally unrelated, the failure was on this reg test and
may be just a race :
## Test case: reg-tests/checks/4be_1srv_health_checks.vtc ##
## test results
Cc: Ben Shillito ; Christopher Faulet
; HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
Ben,
I enabled "trie" on one build configuration and ... it failed
https://travis-ci.com/haproxy/haproxy/jobs/207816969
it never failed before. can you have a look ?
(a
Ben,
I enabled "trie" on one build configuration and ... it failed
https://travis-ci.com/haproxy/haproxy/jobs/207816969
it never failed before. can you have a look ?
(also, it did NOT fail in my own fork)
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 20:03, Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:01:14PM +0500,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:01:14PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> please find "travis-ci + 51degree" patch attached.
applied, thanks Ilya.
willy
please find "travis-ci + 51degree" patch attached.
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 19:06, Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:02:33PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > Yes, I agree the paths in the dummy library should match that of the
> actual library. And yes, that patch is good
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:02:33PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Yes, I agree the paths in the dummy library should match that of the actual
> library. And yes, that patch is good with me.
Thanks for the fast response, now merged.
Willy
: 13 June 2019 14:59
To: Ben Shillito
Cc: ??? ; Christopher Faulet
; HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
Ben,
what do you think of this one ?
Willy
This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If
you
Ben,
what do you think of this one ?
Willy
commit 5e4c5003c5cd5709e599aedbfdd5ef223dd3dc79
Author: Willy Tarreau
Date: Thu Jun 13 15:56:10 2019 +0200
CLEANUP: 51d: move the 51d dummy lib to contrib/51d/src to match the real
lib
This way the directory structure remains the same
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:59:33PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Thanks for the link, that's useful. Looks like the path to the source is the
> issue.
>
> It should be "51DEGREES_SRC=contrib/51d/pattern" rather than
> "51DEGREES_SRC=contrib/51d/src/pattern".
That's what I just noticed as well,
c: Willy Tarreau ; Christopher Faulet ;
HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 17:09, Ben Shillito
mailto:b...@51degrees.com>>:
In Travis the contrib version would be fine. But if you are testing something
which will late
ROXY_DATE=\"2019/06/11\" -c
> -o src/da.o src/da.c
>
> make: *** No rule to make target 'contrib/src/trie/../cityhash/city.o',
> needed by 'haproxy'. Stop.
>
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> is documentation correct ? or I should use some different way
н [mailto:chipits...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 June 2019 11:31
To: Ben Shillito
Cc: Willy Tarreau ; Christopher Faulet ;
HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 15:25, Ben Shillito
mailto:b...@51degrees.com>>:
Hi,
The docs are co
n.com/company/2171864>
>
> [image: Find out More] <https://51degrees.com/emailsig.aspx>
>
>
>
> *From:* Илья Шипицин [mailto:chipits...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 13 June 2019 11:07
> *To:* Ben Shillito
> *Cc:* Willy Tarreau ; Christopher Faulet ;
> HAProxy
> *Subj
y Tarreau ; Christopher Faulet ;
HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
Ben,
what is the proper way of building 51degree ?
I added "USE_51DEGREES=1 51DEGREES_SRC=contrib/51d/src/pattern" (as I seen in
documentation)
gcc -Iinclude -Iebtree
lto:w...@1wt.eu]
> Sent: 12 June 2019 17:07
> To: Ben Shillito
> Cc: Christopher Faulet ; HAProxy <
> haproxy@formilux.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:49:37PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
>
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: 12 June 2019 17:07
To: Ben Shillito
Cc: Christopher Faulet ; HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:49:37PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> While I was work
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:49:37PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> While I was working on the HTX changes, I thought it was probably a good time
> to also implement the dummy library as I had my brain in 'HAProxy mode'.
Ah, excellent, thank you :
$./haproxy -vv|grep -i 51d
Feature list : +EPOLL
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:52:53AM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> This unfortunately fell down our list of priorities in the last few weeks.
Oh I certainly can understand, and I'm sorry I forgot abou
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:52:53AM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> This unfortunately fell down our list of priorities in the last few weeks.
Oh I certainly can understand, and I'm sorry I forgot about it so I didn't
ping you earlier.
> However, as this is a bit more urgent now with
287152
E: b...@51degrees.com
T: @51Degrees
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: 12 June 2019 09:14
To: Ben Shillito
Cc: Christopher Faulet ; HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 06
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 06:20:16PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Le 24/04/2019 à 17:56, Ben Shillito a écrit :
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > Thanks for the update. We will take a look and get a patch over to you.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Ben, the function _51d_fetch() is not HTX aware. Take
> a
Hi Max,
I'll respond on some points here.
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 06:03:58PM +0200, Massimiliano Bellomi wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> here Massimiliano, from Scientiamobile Engineering team.
>
> We started working on your suggestions.
>
> Doing this, I noticed that *send_log()* seems not
Hi Christopher,
here Massimiliano, from Scientiamobile Engineering team.
We started working on your suggestions.
Doing this, I noticed that *send_log()* seems not working if called inside
module's init function.
e.g.
*send_log(NULL, LOG_NOTICE, "WURFL: Loading module v.%s\n",
# Please type your reply above this line #
You are registered as a cc on this help desk request and are thus receiving
email notifications on all updates to the request.
Reply to this email to add a comment to the request.
--
Aaron Park, May 7, 15:30
Hi Christopher,
thanks for all suggestions : I'll be working on a patch to address the
various issues.
Yes, the callback should be called (once with an existing header, once with
a non existing one) as that is code to be tested as well : I'll include
this issue in the patch.
Best
-Paul
On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:56:06PM +, Ben Shillito wrote:
> Thanks for the update. We will take a look and get a patch over to you.
Thank you Ben,
Willy
Le 24/04/2019 à 17:56, Ben Shillito a écrit :
Hi Willy,
Thanks for the update. We will take a look and get a patch over to you.
Hi,
Ben, the function _51d_fetch() is not HTX aware. Take
a look at other HTTP sample fetches in src/http_fetch.c.
David, the same is true for the function
Le 23/04/2019 à 11:10, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 06:45:22PM +0200, Paul Stephen Borile wrote:
Hi Willy,
fine for me, thanks for the adjustments and no problem backporting this to
1.9.
I also confirm that the contact email address is working correctly.
Fine
: HAProxy
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 06:45:22PM +0200, Paul Stephen Borile wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> fine for me, thanks for the adjustments and no problem backporting
> this to 1.9.
> I also confirm that th
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 06:45:22PM +0200, Paul Stephen Borile wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> fine for me, thanks for the adjustments and no problem backporting this to
> 1.9.
> I also confirm that the contact email address is working correctly.
Fine thank you. I could finish the polishing (add
Hi Willy,
fine for me, thanks for the adjustments and no problem backporting this to
1.9.
I also confirm that the contact email address is working correctly.
Thanks!
-Paul
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 4:46 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 02:46:17PM +0200, Paul
Sorry, with the patches this time.
Willy
>From 806aebcba5b7c5e3b780c63ff37a54b38a510e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:12:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] WIP: wurfl: pass -fPIC when compiling
---
contrib/wurfl/makefile | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 02:46:17PM +0200, Paul Stephen Borile wrote:
> please find attached to this email the 6 patches that cover various areas
> of restyling of
> the WURFL device detection feature for HAProxy. All patches can be back
> ported to 1.9 if necessary.
> Last patch is a
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 02:46:17PM +0200, Paul Stephen Borile wrote:
> Hi All, Willy,
>
> please find attached to this email the 6 patches that cover various areas
> of restyling of
> the WURFL device detection feature for HAProxy. All patches can be back
> ported to 1.9 if necessary.
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
