Hi Olivier, Willy,
Just to confirm, as expected it (c3500c3) indeed works for me :).
Thanks for the quick fix!
Regards,
PiBa-NL (Pieter)
Op 25-3-2020 om 17:16 schreef Willy Tarreau:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:08:03PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
That is... interesting, not sure I reached
Hi Willy,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:03:56PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:40:33PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> > I think I figured it out, and commit
> > 69664419d209d2f64dbcd90f991e7ec2efff2ee2
> > should fix it, at least now I can do a full svn checkout.
> >
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:40:33PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> I think I figured it out, and commit 69664419d209d2f64dbcd90f991e7ec2efff2ee2
> should fix it, at least now I can do a full svn checkout.
>
> Can you confirm it does the trick for you ?
Olivier, I think you made a last minute
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:08:03PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> That is... interesting, not sure I reached such an outstanding result.
Oh I stopped trying to guess long ago :-)
> This is now fixed, sorry about that !
Confirmed, much better now, thanks!
Willy
Hi guys,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:42:14AM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
(...)
> > Hope you have an idea where to look. Providing captures/logs is a bit
> > difficult without some careful scrubbing..
I think a good test would be to just revert that patch, or selectively
each one of the 3 lines
Hi,
Patch rebase from master.
> Le 6 mars 2020 à 17:06, Emmanuel Hocdet a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Patch proposal.
> I will update the documentation if this feature is approved.
>
++
Manu
0001-MINOR-ssl-skip-self-issued-CA-in-cert-chain-for-ssl_.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi there,
A couple of patches here to cleanup and fix some bugs introduced
by 13a9232ebc63fdf357ffcf4fa7a1a5e77a1eac2b.
Baptiste
From 801e4f1d7ad1f9858f4b646fc4badebab3b46715 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Baptiste Assmann
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:53:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] CLEANUP:
btw, is there some tool to test at least RFC 7230 compliance ?
also, there are various specific implementation like MAPI / MS RPC which
might require some testing tool as well
inspired by h2spec actually. can/should we add some HTTP/1.1 tests as well ?
ср, 25 мар. 2020 г. в 11:02, Willy Tarreau
Hi Pieter,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:42:14AM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:14:46AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> > Hi List, Willy,
> >
> > Today i thought lets give v2.2-dev5 a try for my production environment ;).
> > Soon it turned out to cause
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:06:27PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> btw, is there some tool to test at least RFC 7230 compliance ?
Not that I'm aware of, especially given the complexity of the HTTP/1
specs which try to cover all known use cases and implementations.
> also, there are various specific
10 matches
Mail list logo
