[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8234) DistributedFileSystem and Globber should apply PathFilter early

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8234: - Attachment: HDFS-8234.3.patch Attaching rebased patch. Please review. > DistributedFileSystem and Globber

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-10191) [NNBench] OP_DELETE Operation is'nt working

J.Andreina created HDFS-10191: - Summary: [NNBench] OP_DELETE Operation is'nt working Key: HDFS-10191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10191 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8935) Erasure Coding: createErasureCodingZone api should accept the policyname as argument instead of ErasureCodingPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8935: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Erasure Coding: createErasureCodingZone api should accept the

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8935) Erasure Coding: createErasureCodingZone api should accept the policyname as argument instead of ErasureCodingPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8935: - Attachment: HDFS-8935.1.patch Attaching an initial patch. Please review. > Erasure Coding:

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9393) After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9393: - Attachment: HDFS-9393.3.patch Updated the patch fixing whitespace. Testcase failures are unrelated Please

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7447) Number of maximum Acl entries on a File/Folder should be made user configurable than hardcoding .

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15059466#comment-15059466 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-7447: -- Thanks [~qwertymaniac] for the clarifications. I'll close this jira.

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-7447) Number of maximum Acl entries on a File/Folder should be made user configurable than hardcoding .

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina resolved HDFS-7447. -- Resolution: Not A Problem > Number of maximum Acl entries on a File/Folder should be made user >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9393) After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9393: - Attachment: HDFS-9393.2.patch Updated the patch with latest code. Please review. > After choosing favored

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9393) After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15035635#comment-15035635 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9393: -- Testcase failures are unrelated. Please review. > After choosing

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9495) Data node opens random port for HTTPServer, not configurable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15035334#comment-15035334 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9495: -- Currently in DatanodeHttpServer, we are passing the port as 0 (which

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9393) After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9393: - Attachment: HDFS-9393.1.patch uploaded a patch , where changes are done by passing a fresh {{chosenNodes}}

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9393) After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9393: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9393) After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy

J.Andreina created HDFS-9393: Summary: After choosing favored nodes, choosing nodes for remaining replicas should go through BlockPlacementPolicy Key: HDFS-9393 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9393

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9364) Unnecessary DNS resolution attempts when creating NameNodeProxies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14989117#comment-14989117 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9364: -- bq. I think it's theoretically possible for a misconfigured cluster to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9364) Unnecessary DNS resolution attempts when creating NameNodeProxies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14988984#comment-14988984 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9364: -- [~xiaochen] ,thanks for raising this issue.Patch looks good to me. I

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9219: - Attachment: HDFS-9219.3.patch Updated the patch with GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(..) instead

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9219: - Attachment: HDFS-9219.2.patch Updated the patch , including a testcase. Please review. > Even if

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9322) Keep order of addresses to nameservice mapping from configuration file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14980102#comment-14980102 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9322: -- That was good catch [~ravwojdyla]. At nameservice level order is

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8545) Refactor FS#getUsed() to use ContentSummary and add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8545: - Attachment: HDFS-8545.6.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] for the review comments. I have updated the patch.

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.6.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] for the review comments. Updated the patch please review

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8545) Refactor FS#getUsed() to use ContentSummary and add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8545: - Attachment: HDFS-8545.7.patch Attaching a patch, fixing checkstyle errors. Please review. > Refactor

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979772#comment-14979772 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9044: -- Failures are unrelated to this patch. Please review. > Give Priority

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.6.patch > Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: (was: HDFS-9044.6.patch) > Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8631) WebHDFS : Support list/setQuota

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968574#comment-14968574 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8631: -- bq.So I used "9223372036854775807" as default value and this is same

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9070) Allow fsck display pending replica location information for being-written blocks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14966196#comment-14966196 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9070: -- Thanks [~demongaorui]. Updated patch looks good to me. > Allow fsck

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8631) WebHDFS : Support list/setQuota

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14963013#comment-14963013 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8631: -- Thanks [~surendrasingh] for the patch. It looks great. I have few

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9234) WebHdfs : getContentSummary() should give quota for storage types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962173#comment-14962173 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9234: -- Thanks [~surendrasingh] for the patch . It looks overall good. One

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8673) HDFS reports file already exists if there is a file/dir name end with ._COPYING_

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962168#comment-14962168 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8673: -- I am just worried that, it would break existing behavior of

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9070) Allow fsck display pending replica location information for being-written blocks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962176#comment-14962176 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9070: -- Thanks [~demongaorui] ,recent changes Looks good. Some nits: 1.

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9219: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9219: - Attachment: HDFS-9219.1.patch Attached an initial patch . Please review. > Even if permission is enabled

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8545) Add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path, apart from getting by default from root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14958576#comment-14958576 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8545: -- bq. On a second thought, along with new overloaded API, how about

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8545) Add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path, apart from getting by default from root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8545: - Attachment: HDFS-8545.5.patch > Add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path, apart from

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8545) Refactor FS#getUsed() to use ContentSummary and add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8545: - Summary: Refactor FS#getUsed() to use ContentSummary and add an API to fetch the total file length from a

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.5.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] for the review comments. Have updated the patch. Please

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14954480#comment-14954480 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9219: -- Thanks [~liuml07] for the comments. Check on SuperUserPrivilege is

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9070) Allow fsck display pending replica location information for being-written blocks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14950132#comment-14950132 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9070: -- Hi [~demongaorui] ,thanks for the patch. It looks good overall . I

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14950148#comment-14950148 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9219: -- Thanks [~liuml07] for checking this issue. I forgot to mention the

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9219) Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission.

J.Andreina created HDFS-9219: Summary: Even if permission is enabled in an environment, while resolving reserved paths there is no check on permission. Key: HDFS-9219 URL:

[jira] [Moved] (HDFS-9218) BlockPlacementPolicy related logs should contain the details about the filename and blockid

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina moved YARN-4244 to HDFS-9218: Key: HDFS-9218 (was: YARN-4244) Project: Hadoop HDFS (was: Hadoop YARN) >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14908123#comment-14908123 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9044: -- [~vinayrpet] and [~szetszwo] , can you please have a look at this jira

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8673) HDFS reports file already exists if there is a file/dir name end with ._COPYING_

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14907731#comment-14907731 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8673: -- bq.if there is exception during uploading .copying file, HDFS will

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8673) HDFS reports file already exists if there is a file/dir name end with ._COPYING_

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14906296#comment-14906296 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8673: -- [~airbots], , Thanks for the patch. The patch looks good to me , but

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14904366#comment-14904366 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9044: -- Checkstyle comments can be ignored , as all the 9 parameters of the

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9071) chooseTargets in ReplicationWork may pass incomplete srcPath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14904511#comment-14904511 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9071: -- Thanks [~He Tianyi] for reporting this issue, that was a good catch.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9123) Validation of a path ended with a '/'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14904042#comment-14904042 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9123: -- Thanks [~jojochuang] . That was a good catch. I have few comments .

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.4.patch Updated the patch. Please review. > Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9123) Validation of a path ended with a '/'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14904229#comment-14904229 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9123: -- @Steve Loughran, that was a good point. In this testcase, test will

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.3.patch Fixed checkstyle and findbug errors. Updated the patch. Please review. >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14902475#comment-14902475 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9044: -- Testcase failures are unrelated. Checkstyle comments can be ignored ,

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.2.patch Updated the patch fixing the checkstyle and javadoc warnings. Testcase

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Attachment: HDFS-9044.1.patch Updated an initial patch ( for choosing good favored nodes as target with

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14746939#comment-14746939 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9073: -- Testcase failures are unrelated. Please review. > Fix failures in

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9072) Fix random failures in TestJMXGet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14746937#comment-14746937 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9072: -- Testcases failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory ,

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14747196#comment-14747196 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9073: -- Thanks [~ste...@apache.org] for the commit > Fix failures in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Description: Passing Favored nodes intention is to place replica among the favored node Current behavior

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9072) Fix random failures in TestJMXGet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14747198#comment-14747198 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9072: -- Thanks [~ste...@apache.org] for the commit > Fix random failures in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9044) Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9044: - Summary: Give Priority to FavouredNodes , before selecting nodes from FavouredNode's Node Group (was: If

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9074) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9074: - Resolution: Implemented Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Fixed as part of HDFS-9073. Hence

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9072) Fix random failures in TestJMXGet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9072: - Attachment: HDFS-9072-01.patch Updated the patch. Please review. > Fix random failures in TestJMXGet >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9072) Fix random failures in TestJMXGet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9072: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Fix random failures in TestJMXGet >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9073: - Attachment: HDFS-9073.1.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] Updated the patch , after the fix of HDFS-9067. Please

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9073: - Attachment: HDFS-9073.2.patch Updated the patch. Please review. > Fix failures in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9073: - Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Fix failures in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9074) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9074: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9074) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9074: - Attachment: HDFS-9074.1.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] Updated the patch , after the fix of HDFS-9067. Please

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9043) Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14742983#comment-14742983 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9043: -- Thanks [~aw] for the comments. bq. The given trunk patch appears to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9074) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14743226#comment-14743226 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9074: -- Thanks [~ste...@apache.org] for looking at this issue. > Fix

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9074) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14743228#comment-14743228 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9074: -- Current patch Updated in HDFS-9067 seems to fix all jmx related

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9072) Fix random failures in TestJMXGet

J.Andreina created HDFS-9072: Summary: Fix random failures in TestJMXGet Key: HDFS-9072 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9072 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8545) Add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path, apart from getting by default from root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14742956#comment-14742956 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8545: -- Thanks [~wheat9] for the review comments. bq.My question is whether

[jira] [Reopened] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina reopened HDFS-9073: -- Reopening as the fix for HDFS-9067 does not apply. > Fix failures in

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

J.Andreina created HDFS-9073: Summary: Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction Key: HDFS-9073 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8780) Fetching live/dead datanode list with arg true for removeDecommissionNode,returns list with decom node.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14742881#comment-14742881 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8780: -- TestCase failures are unrelated. Please review. > Fetching live/dead

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-9073) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistLockedMemory#testReleaseOnEviction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina resolved HDFS-9073. -- Resolution: Duplicate Resolving this as duplicate to HDFS-9067 . As the fix will be on same utility

[jira] [Moved] (HDFS-9074) Fix failures in TestLazyPersistReplicaPlacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina moved HADOOP-12410 to HDFS-9074: --- Key: HDFS-9074 (was: HADOOP-12410) Project: Hadoop HDFS (was: Hadoop

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8780) Fetching live/dead datanode list with arg true for removeDecommissionNode,returns list with decom node.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8780: - Attachment: HDFS-8780.3.patch Updated the patch fixing checkstyle comments. Testcase failures are

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9036) In BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup#chooseLocalStorage , random node is selected eventhough fallbackToLocalRack is true.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9036: - Attachment: HDFS-9036.2.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] for the review comments. Updated the patch. Please

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9042) Update document for the Storage policy name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9042: - Attachment: HDFS-9042.1.patch Attached an initial patch. Please review. > Update document for the

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9042) Update document for the Storage policy name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9042: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Update document for the Storage policy name >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8975) Erasure coding : Fix random failure in TestSafeModeWithStripedFile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14740430#comment-14740430 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8975: -- Failures are unrelated Please review. > Erasure coding : Fix random

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9043) Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9043: - Attachment: HDFS-9043-branch-2-1.patch HDFS-9043-branch-2.7.0-1.patch

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9043) Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9043: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8780) Fetching live/dead datanode list with arg true for removeDecommissionNode,returns list with decom node.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8780: - Attachment: HDFS-8780.1.patch Updated an initial patch. Please review. > Fetching live/dead datanode list

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8780) Fetching live/dead datanode list with arg true for removeDecommissionNode,returns list with decom node.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8780: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Fetching live/dead datanode list with arg true for >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8780) Fetching live/dead datanode list with arg true for removeDecommissionNode,returns list with decom node.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8780: - Attachment: HDFS-8780.2.patch Updated the patch fixing checkstyle comments. Testcase failures are

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8853) Erasure Coding: Provide ECSchema validation when creating ECZone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8853: - Attachment: HDFS-8853-HDFS-7285-06.patch Sorry for the delay [~zhz] . Testcase failures are unrelated to

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9043) Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation

J.Andreina created HDFS-9043: Summary: Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation Key: HDFS-9043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9043 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9042) Update document for the Storage policy name

J.Andreina created HDFS-9042: Summary: Update document for the Storage policy name Key: HDFS-9042 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9042 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8975) Erasure coding : Fix random failure in TestSafeModeWithStripedFile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8975: - Attachment: HDFS-8975-HDFS-7285-02.patch Thanks [~walter.k.su] for the review comments. Udpated the patch

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9036) In BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup#chooseLocalStorage , random node is selected eventhough fallbackToLocalRack is true.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9036: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > In BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup#chooseLocalStorage , random

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9036) In BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup#chooseLocalStorage , random node is selected eventhough fallbackToLocalRack is true.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9036: - Attachment: HDFS-9036.1.patch Attached an initial patch . Please review. > In

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-9044) If favored nodes are not available, then should fall back to regular BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup

J.Andreina created HDFS-9044: Summary: If favored nodes are not available, then should fall back to regular BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup Key: HDFS-9044 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9044

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9043) Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-9043: - Description: 1. command is wrong {noformat} $HADOOP_PREFIX/bin/hdfs dfsadmin -refreshNameNode :

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9043) Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14738797#comment-14738797 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9043: -- Thanks [~aw] for the comments. I agree with your point . Shall we

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8853) Erasure Coding: Provide ECSchema validation when setting EC policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14740135#comment-14740135 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-8853: -- Thanks [~zhz] for the commit . > Erasure Coding: Provide ECSchema

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9036) In BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup#chooseLocalStorage , random node is selected eventhough fallbackToLocalRack is true.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14740131#comment-14740131 ] J.Andreina commented on HDFS-9036: -- Testcase failures are unrelated . Please review. > In

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8545) Add an API to fetch the total file length from a specific path, apart from getting by default from root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] J.Andreina updated HDFS-8545: - Attachment: HDFS-8545.4.patch Thanks [~vinayrpet] for the review comments. I have updated the patch

  1   2   3   4   5   >