, March 02, 2009 1:17 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
I was monitoring CPU usage at the machine...
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:10:19 -0500
From: kil...@righttorule.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
Also the cpu number
When we have both of our 32 slot servers full, and the arena server we are
using about 10mbps of bandwidth which is about 1.1mb/s. SRCDS doesn't seem
like it scales well bandwidth utilization wise since I think one full 32
slot will use around 2.5mbps but you can limit the bandwidth that passes
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET and this is what Microsoft says about it.
The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) was developed jointly by Intel and
Microsoft to meet the timing requirements of multimedia and other
time-sensitive applications. Originally, the HPET was called the Multimedia
Timer (MM
:26 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET and this is what Microsoft says about it.
The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) was developed jointly by Intel and
Microsoft to meet the timing requirements of multimedia
unnecessary.
Again with the 1000 fps bullshit?
From: tur...@undergamer.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:34:42 -0600
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
Answers:
1. Only Intel, and only certain motherboards.
2. HPET only gives your processor advanced timing to achieve
bullshit?
From: tur...@undergamer.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:34:42 -0600
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
Answers:
1. Only Intel, and only certain motherboards.
2. HPET only gives your processor advanced timing to achieve 1000fps.
Yes,
you
At 10:26 AM 3/2/2009, CLAN RCR wrote:
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET and this is what Microsoft says about it.
The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) was developed jointly by Intel and
Microsoft to meet the timing requirements of multimedia and other
time-sensitive applications. Originally, the
I see you have experience with Nvidia's 690G.
LOL.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:10:50 -0500
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com; hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
From: g...@velocity-servers.net
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
At 10:26 AM 3/2/2009, CLAN RCR wrote:
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET
Message-
From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of CLAN RCR
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:26 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET and this is what
: g...@velocity-servers.net
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
At 10:26 AM 3/2/2009, CLAN RCR wrote:
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET and this is what Microsoft says about it.
The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) was developed jointly by Intel and
Microsoft to meet the timing
APIC interrupt routing.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:10:50 -0500
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com; hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
From: g...@velocity-servers.net
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
At 10:26 AM 3/2/2009, CLAN RCR wrote:
Hey Midnight, I looked up HPET and this is what
If you were choosing an os for a new server would it be 2003 or 2008
Box specs are
Core2Duo E6600 (2 x 2.4Ghz)
2048MB DDR2 RAM
250GB 7200RPM SATA2 HD
I like 2008 but I would like to hear what the experts have to say.
P.S.
msleeper take it easy on a noob
Sorry Forget to add I would be running l4d/TF2 servers
Quoting mu...@anbservers.net:
If you were choosing an os for a new server would it be 2003 or 2008
Box specs are
Core2Duo E6600 (2 x 2.4Ghz)
2048MB DDR2 RAM
250GB 7200RPM SATA2 HD
I like 2008 but I would like to hear what the
Server 2003 will do you fine - tried and true my friend... tried and true.
Also - depending on how many gameservers you will be running from this box,
you'll want much more RAM, at least 4096MB I would say.
Good luck!
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, mu...@anbservers.net wrote:
Sorry Forget to
The question would be... why do you need server 2008? It will eat more ram
and have more processes doing hell knows what right out of the box.
And I personally don't see a difference between the two. It's possible to
run 1000 FPS servers on server 2003.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM,
2008. Hands down.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, mu...@anbservers.net wrote:
If you were choosing an os for a new server would it be 2003 or 2008
Box specs are
Core2Duo E6600 (2 x 2.4Ghz)
2048MB DDR2 RAM
250GB 7200RPM SATA2 HD
I like 2008 but I would like to hear what the experts have
what about core?
Thank you,
Alec Sanger
P: 248.941.3813
F: 313.286.8945
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:01:34 -0500
From: 1nsane...@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
The question would be... why do you need server 2008? It will eat more ram
and have
Well let me ask you this.
How many l4d servers to you think I can run on this box with 2003/2008?
Off topic:
I know my ded server company is on this list and I assume they are
reading this.
Please be advise you will be getting a call Monday about your response
to ticket 5367.
Quoting
2008. Better Kernel (google for the details), supports HPET (though
only really needed for 1000fps servers). 2003 does not.
Cc2iscooL wrote:
2008. Hands down.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, mu...@anbservers.net wrote:
___
To unsubscribe,
4-5 concurrently. I think your RAM is fine since your CPU is so small.
mu...@anbservers.net wrote:
Well let me ask you this.
How many l4d servers to you think I can run on this box with 2003/2008?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences,
...@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
4-5 concurrently. I think your RAM is fine since your CPU is so small.
mu...@anbservers.net wrote:
Well let me ask you this.
How many l4d servers to you think I can run on this box with 2003/2008
in running any server above 100 fps/tickrate.
It can cause networking issues for clients.
(There is a big difference between tickrate and framerate, as well.)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:47:54 -0500
From: mu...@anbservers.net
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
If you
complex (yeah, right) AI Director.
1000 FPS!!! servers are a joke.
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:23:36 -0800
From: mido...@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
4-5 concurrently. I think your RAM is fine since your CPU is so small.
mu...@anbservers.net wrote
usage.
L4D does not tax the CPU at all, despite all the hype about the
amazingly complex (yeah, right) AI Director.
1000 FPS!!! servers are a joke.
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:23:36 -0800
From: mido...@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
4-5
.
(There is a big difference between tickrate and framerate, as well.)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:47:54 -0500
From: mu...@anbservers.net
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
If you were choosing an os for a new server would it be 2003 or 2008
Box specs
I hate to sound like a newbie and ask this here, but I can't really find a
concise answer in layman's terms to my question.
How much bandwith(in megabytes if possible) would I need for a 16-20 slot
TF2 server and would my residential connection be able to support that sort
of traffic.
I have a
My servers tend to average about 10kbyte/sec per slot out. I never paid any
attention to
in. :)
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:02:46PM -0500, Frank Dragonsdoom V wrote:
I hate to sound like a newbie and ask this here, but I can't really find a
concise answer in layman's terms to my question.
mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
1000FPS? n00bs!
You clearly haven't seen the 2000FPS servers (I so WISH I was kidding...)
I played TF2 on a server running at 20FPS without any problems. I don't see
why people bother with 1000FPS servers. However you can sell a 1000FPS
server
Oh great, I would be dumb enough to reply to a existing thread on someone
elses problems wouldn't I?
Sorry about that, but at least I am not spamming up people's inboxes...
-Dragonsdoom
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
are a joke.
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:23:36 -0800
From: mido...@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
4-5 concurrently. I think your RAM is fine since your CPU is so
small.
mu...@anbservers.net wrote:
Well let me ask you
That's kinda the point. You don't want to go over 40-50% CPU usage or
you will soon start seeing bad performance.
You can add 2GB so you have 4GB and then run 8-10 servers, but you'll be
pushing your luck.
Blood Letter wrote:
Are you joking?
I ran 4 L4D servers on an old dual core athlon,
Also the cpu number in the stats query isn't the best
Midnight wrote:
That's kinda the point. You don't want to go over 40-50% CPU usage or
you will soon start seeing bad performance.
You can add 2GB so you have 4GB and then run 8-10 servers, but you'll be
pushing your luck.
Blood
Nonsense! It once said that the CPU usage was 125% That is clearly accurate.
But in regards to FPS and CPU usage. You can use task manager too. If its
boosted the general CPU usage will be the same regardless of what fps_max is
set to.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:10 PM, [ЯтR] The-/iller
...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Dragonsdoom V
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 3:03 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
I hate to sound like a newbie and ask this here, but I can't really find
a
concise answer
2009 17:16:06 -0800
From: mido...@gmail.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
That's kinda the point. You don't want to go over 40-50% CPU usage or
you will soon start seeing bad performance.
You can add 2GB so you have 4GB and then run 8-10 servers
I was monitoring CPU usage at the machine...
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:10:19 -0500
From: kil...@righttorule.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
Also the cpu number in the stats query isn't the best
Midnight wrote:
That's kinda the point. You don't
36 matches
Mail list logo
