Eric O'Brien eri...@extramonday.com wrote:
Also, isn't EXIF data stored as Extended File Attributes?
No, exif data is included in the image file.
All you need is for one program or one file transfer process to
fail to manage that data correctly and the next thing you know,
your images
Hi, I've created a small installer for Hugin 2010.1 (taken from
http://lemur.dreamhosters.com/hugin/ builds). It could work with any
new releases.
I've added the ability to download from internet the Autopano and
Panomatic control point generators on-the-fly during the install
process.
I'd like
On Aug 28, 12:03 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
We have avoided putting lots of screenshots in the help manual as is
increases the download size of the Hugin package (on Linux, the
manual is actually bigger than everything else).
I agree with you Bruno! could we instead follow the
On Fri 27-Aug-2010 at 21:40 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
I still think it is a mistake in terms of usability to assume that the EXIF
data is there and is always valid.
Hugin doesn't rely on the EXIF angle of view calculation, it just
increases the probability of a good fit - The Assistant
Ah OK guys
Thanks for this, I will dig deeper into the documentation.
Eric B
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:57 AM, thePanz thep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 12:03 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
We have avoided putting lots of screenshots in the help manual as is
increases the
Hi,
On August 28, 2010 05:52:17 am thePanz wrote:
Hi, I've created a small installer for Hugin 2010.1
Cool. What installer framework did you use?
I'd like to know where (in the rewindows registry) Hugin stores its
settings: I'd like to provide a full-clean uninstall and to update
settings
On August 28, 2010 07:19:07 am Bruno Postle wrote:
On Fri 27-Aug-2010 at 21:40 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
I still think it is a mistake in terms of usability to assume that the
EXIF data is there and is always valid.
Hugin doesn't rely on the EXIF angle of view calculation, it just
increases
I'm glad 0.7.x came up in the discussion. I've been doing some regression
testing (downloading back releases of ubuntu and their hugin releases) and
tried 0.7.x beta on 8.04. The result was much better than the current one.
I've just began to move through ubuntu's releases one by one to see
On Sat 28-Aug-2010 at 09:14 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
So what is it that has changed between 0.7.0 and now to cause
Dale's projects not to work recently? I don't like regressions...
Different control point generators or different control point
generator parameters.
..or I seem to remember
On August 28, 2010 10:01:02 am Dale Beams wrote:
I'm glad 0.7.x came up in the discussion.
you were the one who mentioned it right at the beginning of this thread [0].
I've been doing some regression
testing (downloading back releases of ubuntu and their hugin releases) and
tried 0.7.x beta
Different control point generators or different control point
generator parameters.
For the given example images, it works flawless if autopano-sift-c is
called without the --projection parameter. If invoking autopano-sift-c
with --projection parameters it generates many wrong control points
On Fri 27-Aug-2010 at 23:03 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Fri 27-Aug-2010 at 08:49 -0400, Eric Brackenbury wrote:
Would it be possible to include the GUI result in the help documentation as
some folks can misinterpret instruction.
We have avoided putting lots of screenshots in the help manual
On August 28, 2010 03:06:11 pm T. Modes wrote:
Different control point generators or different control point
generator parameters.
For the given example images, it works flawless if autopano-sift-c is
called without the --projection parameter. If invoking autopano-sift-c
with --projection
Hullo Thomas, All,
On Aug 29, 5:06 am, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
Different control point generators or different control point
generator parameters.
For the given example images, it works flawless if autopano-sift-c is
called without the --projection parameter. If invoking
14 matches
Mail list logo
