On August 28, 2010 07:19:07 am Bruno Postle wrote: > On Fri 27-Aug-2010 at 21:40 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >I still think it is a mistake in terms of usability to assume that the > >EXIF data is there and is always valid. > > Hugin doesn't rely on the EXIF angle of view calculation, it just > increases the probability of a good fit - The Assistant recalculates > the angle of view and discards the EXIF-based assumption during > optimisation. > > Hugin used to assume all photos were initially 50° and this worked > ok.
This sounds reasonable and I've been hitting the wrong nail. So what is it that has changed between 0.7.0 and now to cause Dale's projects not to work recently? I don't like regressions... Yuv
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
