Hello,
Bellow is a comment I made regarding this bug which is sent out the
hugin-bug-hunters team. I am posting it here as well as other might have
more insight.
The bug is:Camera response not assigned to the correct
image?https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/679337
= report:==
On Nov 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Hi all,
six subjects related to the upcoming release cycle
1. 2010.4beta1 tarball
2. 2010.4beta1 binaries
3. dedication
4. translations
5. general clean up
6. plan
1. 2010.4beta1 tarball
I've branched out 2010.4 last
On Nov 23, 2010, at 4:50 PM, michael crane mick.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, November 23, 2010 5:23 am, Yuval Levy wrote:
On November 22, 2010 06:17:38 pm michael crane wrote:
as I understand things you are not such a hot coder so why are we
waiting
on you ?
good question indeed. why
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Gerhard Killesreiter
gerh...@killesreiter.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Patterson schrieb:
Here http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/cactus.jpg is
what I was able to come up with.
That looks pretty good to me
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter
gerh...@killesreiter.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I've come across two photos that I took and was wondering if Hugin would
be the right tool to merge them into one.
The photos have been taken
On Feb 16, 2010, at 3:39 AM, John McAllister
sp...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
The mean and maximum errors you report are huge.
They should, ideally, be less than one.
You can find rogue points by looking at the CP lists associated with
the image pairs.
These lists can be sorted by
Hello Jeffrey,
It seems you may have a separate lens assigned to each image. If you hop
back over to the Camera Lens tab:
1. select all images
2. click the change lens button
3. set all images to the same lens (probably 0 if you only have one)
That should reduce the number of entries
Hello,
On Dec 8, 2009, at 3:17 AM, bruno.postle
brunopos...@googlemail.com wrote:
We should be able to release 2009.4.0 final soon, though it would be
nice to have a positive report that 2009.4.0_rc3 builds on Windows
first.
When that is done we want to look at branching the current
On Nov 9, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I gave Hugin 0.8 2 images - sigma 8mm f/3.5 from canon t1i
and this came out.
crazy stuff! strange lines and stuff.
www.vrlog.net/temp/weird.jpg
any idea what i'm doing wrong? :-)
thanks,
Jeffrey
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech
saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports
which are caused by using some forbidden characters inside makefile
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
On Sep 30, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Bruno Postle wrote:
So do we want a 2009.4.0 release with cpclean and lens-calibration
very soon? or merge the deghosting project and delay the release as
a result?
the conservative me says release now that we can and merge
Hi All,
Based on the responses from this thread I can glean the following:
- Masks should be stored as vector paths and attached to the project
(pto) files
- Editing the masks in the preview is desirable.
- positive masking is as useful as negative masking.
Strange that those three
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Hi all,
cpclean is a button in the Hugin GUI that prunes outlaying CPs by
statistical methods. It has been written by Thomas Modes' and it works
like Bruno's tried and tested CLI tool ptoclean. A useful addition IMO.
It has
Dale,
Can you confirm as well that if you upgrade to libpano SVN 1056, that your
problem is fixed?
- Gerry
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Gerry Patterson wrote:
I have the latest version of both hugin 4437 and libpano 1055 and I
can't
reproduce
Hello,
Before loading the images, open up the preferences and uncheck the
align images after loading option in the assistant tab.
Next load the images as normal.
Then switch to the images tab and create the control points. Once
done, you should be able to now save the pto file and post the
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Metzler
ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
Hello,
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2720906group_id=77506atid=550441
is closed, being marked as fixed in rev 4219.
It is not. If I open the testcase from Ubuntu LP in hugin
no
problems once, hugin removes the reported invalid CPs.
Andreas, would you please provide the test case that is causing the failure
for you?
Thank-you,
- Gerry
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.dewrote:
Am Sonntag 13 September 2009 schrieb Gerry Patterson:
On Sun
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:56 AM, John Isner john.is...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me rephrase my original question: Can focus stacking be done using
only the GUI front end (hugin.exe)?
Let me rephrase my answer:
Align_image_stack does the following:
1. creates control points
2.
. So I must be doing something wrong. Or perhaps this is the problem
pointed out by Y. Tennevin (below). But being a Hugin dummy, I have no
idea how to control luminance optimization through the front end.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Gerry Patterson
thedeepvo...@gmail.comwrote
as well?
- Gerry
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
As for luminance optimization, so long as you don't hit optimize in the
photometric panel you should be ok. At least as far as I understand
everything.
The parameters you should
On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:21 PM, perkin-warbeck john.is...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm using hugin on Windows. I read the tutorial A greater depth of
field in macro photography which is linked to on the sourceforge
tutorials page (http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/index.shtml)
but I could
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:56 PM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Hello,
I am confused. Would one not be able to continue development in the
same branch that Dev made the initial changes in? Why is another
branch needed? I apologize if I am missing something obvious.
Gerry
are you talking
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Me again...
I've looked at the options of most EXE provided by hugin, but none seem to
expose how to get the control point distance.
I also looked into the math to redo the calculations manually. I quickly
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:43 AM, RueiKe ruei...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have found in the past sporadic control points that show very large
errors, but when reviewed look normal. I have included a screen
capture a href=http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo All,
I have tried to build svn 4242 on a Fedora 11 x86_64 system, but it
fails with some undefined references which I have been unable to track
down.
Here is the output from the cmake command...
[te...@phenom
2009/8/16 Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) jean.luc.cou...@gmail.com
Hi,
I've a reproductible crash in the preferences with SVN version.
Steps:
File - Preferences
SelectControl points detector tab
I've autopano-SIDT-C-(Default) as the conttrol point generator
I click Edit and got the crash.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sun 16-Aug-2009 at 06:27 -0700, John wrote:
For example, I always thought that if one had a 6 megapixel camera
(CCD or CMOS) of 3000 by 2000 pixels, that would be the resolution
of the image.
Just to add to what
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
jean.luc.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I get (sometimes) a SIGNSEGV while opening a project.
The best way to reproduce it is using the following steps:
- Launch hugin
- In the assistant : Load images...
- I don't insert any image
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sun 16-Aug-2009 at 11:23 -0700, pld wrote:
What I would like to do is to be able to process the RAW files in
UFRaw, and then use Hugin to correct for lens distortion parameters to
match the output produced by the
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:44 PM, slaterson
campbell.christop...@gmail.comwrote:
i converted my project to jpg to upload. it can be downloaded here:
https://rcpt.yousendit.com/726357889/d3635cbcd4b284c9118a79dd55e85e9e
i ran a test on the jpgs it stitches perfectly, just as i expected the
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM, slaterson
campbell.christop...@gmail.comwrote:
will send it tomorrow morning... this is from an hdr pano, there are
actually three raws, each of the raws was exposed several times and
fused.
thanks
Ah, I was wondering how the exposure was so evenly lit.
On Aug 12, 2009, at 5:33 PM, slaterson
campbell.christop...@gmail.com wrote:
i am working on a 360x180 pano using a fisheye lens. i have cropped
the nadir shot heavily as well as the bottom 'row' of photos to remove
the tripod. when i show the pano in the preview window, everything
pixels.
Harry
2009/8/7 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com
mailto:thedeepvo...@gmail.com
On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Doug doug_bainbri...@onetel.com
mailto:doug_bainbri...@onetel.com wrote:
Thanks Gerry and Harry,
I've followed your advice
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Doug doug_bainbri...@onetel.com wrote:
J. Schneider wrote:
Doug schrieb:
Thanks Harry.
I've tried -s 2 and -s 3, both were worse than earlier results.
As a further check I tried putting in all control points manually; that
was almost as bad.
Hello,
Instead of using autopano-sift-c, try using 'align_image_stack'. You should
then be able to pass the resulting tiff files to enfuse directly. I believe
there is an option to generate a .pto which you can view as well.
If you want to continue using autopano-sift-c and these images were
On Aug 7, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Milo van der Linden milovanderlin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a small request, do not no where to file it, so excuse me if
this is the wrong channel.
I want to distribute a hugin project to others, therefor I keep all
files in one directory, images plus
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Nicolas Pelletier
nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com wrote:
Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
Upgrade exiftool not working.
Had 774, changed for 782.
do I understand right that exiftool 774 could read info out of a Canon
50D and exiftool 782 could not?
Sorry, was not
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sat 01-Aug-2009 at 11:44 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote:
So back to the original post, the link in the news section for the
0.8.0 release still points to the 0.7.0 release notes.
Thanks, fixed.
I do not appear
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Hi all,
I just merged the nona-gpu branch into trunk. This is a present for
Andrew on a very special day for him :)
Details of how I made the merge are documented at
Hi All,
One of the more recent commits appears to have given the preview images in
the images tabs, super powers. When a pano with linked images is dragged
around in the fast preview, the preview images in the tab will grow a little
bit. Then grow a little bit more on the next drag. They can
I would guess this has to an unintentional encoding setting for the
font used by the exif info patch I put in. I'll check in a fix shortly
Gerry
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Ad Huikeshoven ad.huikesho...@gmail.com
wrote:
The latest built kills itself during startup complaining about
Hello,
The link for the release notes of 0.8.0 on the website for Hugin
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/ is pointing to 0.7.0. This should probably
be updated.
- Gerry
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello,
I was wondering when the branch, or tag was going to be created for the
0.8.0 release was going to be created. This was done for the 0.7.0 release
and I think it would be a good idea. It frees up trunk for active
development and still allows critical bug fixes to be made to the current
On Jul 19, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Hi all
I might be missing something, but here is the process how I see it and
how I just did it.
1. we play on TRUNK for as long as we want, fixing bugs, adding
features
(and new bugs), etc.
2. once in a while, we
On Jul 19, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Bart van Andel bavanan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just uploaded the GIMP .xcf as well, in case someone feels like
working some more on it. File is here (right click, save as):
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/2009.07.19%20Hugin%20website%20mockup.xcf
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:31 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
I think this case is very rare, because this one works only if the
second image has some EXIF data (make, model, focal length) to make
the comparision. But in this case the chances are high, that also the
exposure time
Hugin contains an executable designed for this: align_image_stack
http://wiki.panotools.org/Align_image_stack
Regards,
- Gerry
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Jan Dittrich jan_c_dittr...@arcor.dewrote:
Hello,
I made a series of images from the same standpoint. There is a bit
Hi All,
Will working on a fix for 2805120
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2805120group_id=77506atid=550441(https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2805120group_id=77506atid=550441)https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2805120group_id=77506atid=550441I
came across
Hello,
I have checked a fix into SVN for this problem.
- Gerry
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 11-Jun-2009 at 23:18 +0200, Yuval Levy wrote:
A 0.8.0 release is overdue. The sooner the better. I suggest being very
strict about what bugs or
Hi All,
Just so I understand, any bugs that are marked '9' prioity and are 'open',
need to be fixed before the 0.8.0 release?
If that is the case, I see three.
I am next to useless on OSX only bugs as I don't have that platform. But I
can take a look at the rest.
Best Regards,
- Gerry
uploaded the requested pto files.
Regards,
Rick
On Jun 4, 9:30 pm, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
OK. Looks like I need to have a fairly large test case on hand. Would
you
attach a .pto file of your 4, 18 and 76 image panos?
Best Regards,
- Gerry
Hello,
Can anyone point me to a recent description of the pto file format? I did
some hunting around a found a few things that aren't clear. For instance,
what does 'p' do in an 'm' line?
- Gerry
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Regards,
- Gerry
2009/6/2 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
2009/6/2 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Crash? My memory is fuzzy, I don't remember a crash. Is there a bug
report
in the tracker on this I can check?
- Gerry
2009/6/2 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov
Hello,
Just posting my findings...
I believe I am seeing this problem under linux. If I load a pano project
and open the fast preview window. There is a slight delay and then I can
smoothly move the pano around as excepted. If I then re-optimize the pano
and try to drag around, the performace
, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Just posting my findings...
I believe I am seeing this problem under linux. If I load a pano project
and open the fast preview window. There is a slight delay and then I can
smoothly move the pano around as excepted. If I then re
Hi all,
I hope I didn't give anyone the wrong idea. I almost always shoot bracketed
sets with a tripod. As such, fusion before blending makes sense for me,
too. However, I have been burned before by not considering how others
shoot, so I was just presenting a case when one would possibly want
Hello,
There are cases when one photographs hand-held and the different exposures
are not aligned well enough to be fused first.
Best Regards,
- Gerry
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:50 PM, DaveN tahoedave...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't know if this has been asked before (hard question to ask in a
Hello,
As for multiple select, I was thinking of allowing the user to drag a box
around a group of CPs to multi-select the enclosed ones. I find after I run
the control point generators on my fisheye images, I usually end up with
large bunch of CPs near the center of the image. There are times
Hello,
From what I can remember of hugins internals, every time you tick a box on
the optimizer tabs, a bunch of things happen.
The panos entire state is duplicated and store away, to allow for undo/redo.
All of the other tabs are notified the pano's state has changed and they
each may or may
Hello,
It has annoyed me that the EXIF info was not displayed anywhere for images
loaded into Hugin. Below is a link to a patch that will display EXIF info
when an Image is select in the Images Panel. I have uploaded it to the
patch area of source forge. I didn't want to commit it to the tree,
the entires for libhuginjhead.
If this causes you problems. I'll try to revert the last commit.
Best Regards,
- Gerry
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Commited. Rev 3843
Best Regards,
- Gerry
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Harry van der
break
him, I'll commit it to the tree.
Best Regards,
- Gerry
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 13-May-2009 at 20:48 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote:
I have ready a patch that fixes the add time-series of images button for
files of types other than jpg
it was put in, so I
am pretty sure it should build on other systems. However, I haven't played
with OpenBSD(perhaps I should try that some time...) :-)
Best Regards,
- Gerry
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2009-05-07, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo
Hello Stuart,
Would please do another SVN update? You make also have to re-run cmake,
although that should happen automatically when ever changes are made to the
cmakelist.txt files. To re-run cmake you should just have to type:
'cmake .' in a terminal window
After that you should be able to
Hello Peter,
I am assuming that is 360x180 not 360x1880. :-)
You can create quick time VR files (.mov) using Bruno's
Panotools-Scripthttp://search.cpan.org/dist/Panotools-Script/module.
The relevant script is erect2qtvr. It is certainly scriptable
and you end up with a selfcontained .mov file
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:05 PM, James Legg lankyle...@gmail.com wrote:
Ideas are what I need at the moment. Perhaps when this thread has more
responses you could summarise the ideas on the wiki? That would
Hello James,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:48 AM, James Legg lankyle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
* In a panorama composed from multiple brackets, you can filter
the images used in the previews, so that only one bracket shows.
This is a good idea!
* The model will be used
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:05 PM, James Legg lankyle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:33 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote:
Would it make sense to be allow control of the blending and fusing
order for the output. When I was looking at this earlier, there were
two areas that needed
Hello,
I was looking at the code base and found an old Doxygen file and noted that
there are areas of the code that have been commented specifically for
doxygen. I spent sometime and was able to generate a set of API docs based
on this information. It is not complete as new code which has been
Hello,
Is your image stored in a path that contains spaces or special characters?
Are you using a shell script to call image_align_stack?
- Gerry
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:05 PM, cri cr...@libero.it wrote:
Today I tried to use the command align_image_stack to align three
photos. When I
Hello,
Yuval, have you taken a look at git http://git-scm.com/? Much of the
workflow you suggest lends itself to a DVCS model (Distributed Version
Control). I use git along with 'tailorhttp://progetti.arstecnica.it/tailor'
to hack on Hugin. When I was working on bugs, I would create a branch
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Yuval Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EXPERIMENTAL FEATURE RELEASES
I intend to release a windows binary installer of the
gsoc2008_integration branch soon. If there are no objections I'll call
it 0.8.0alpha1.
in its current state it includes fast preview and
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Pablo d'Angelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could then merge the gsoc_integration branch into the trunk and
contine developing the new functionality for the 0.8 release.
Any objections?
ciao
Pablo
Hi all,
I haven't been watching the GSOC integration
Hello,
I haven't looked yet, but it may be a lack of support in the metadata
handling library: exiv2. I am not sure what version people are using when
building hugin.
- Gerry
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Yuval Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaroslav.Beran wrote:
Well, here is exiftool
Bruno,
This is great! Thank-you very much for your tireless efforts on getting
this release out.
I also want to send a big thank you to all the other developers and testers
in the hugin-ptx community.
Best Regards,
- Gerry
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
76 matches
Mail list logo
