...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
test it by using a map of the world projected using an equirectangular as input
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Federico Perazzi
federico.pera...@gmail.com wrote:
I also thought about it, but results look unexpected.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Fisheye
, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
test it by using a map of the world projected using an equirectangular as
input
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Federico Perazzi
federico.pera...@gmail.com wrote:
I also thought about it, but results look unexpected.
On Thu, Jan 10
header lines are below. However, I
don't understand m2 p0.00784314 parameters in the m-line - they are
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list
of generation of an equi panorama. I tried understanding it
many times, but still i am not getting it.
Are you interested in creating the panorama or the software that
creates the panorama?
--dmg
Can anyone here, show or point me exactly to that part in code which
applies distortion
projection
between fisheye or rectilinear and most projections. This is partially
because it
has the property x = \lamba and y = \phi
--dmg
Kay
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
What do you want to do? You should post to the libpano mailing list, though.
--dmg
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:16 AM, tartarus zyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
For some reason I have to use libpano13.dll in my own program, so I download
the source code of libpano 2.9.18, and compile it on Ubuntu
Particularly relevant with respect to in-software lens corrections
http://www.canonrumors.com/tech-articles/this-lens-is-soft-and-other-myths/
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other
.
But for this project to succeed, it needs a student who is currently a
member of the
hugin community and understands the current workflow.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software
to showcase a panorama in the splash screen
is a good thing too.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
Merging the test suite is also in my list of todos. Currently I am
trying to help Jim with the upgrades to PTtiff2psd.
What do you suggest we do? Do you want me to branch it?
-dmg
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 03-Mar-2011 at 12:10 -0800, Daniel M
Hi,
please type:
hg branch
and if you are not in libpano then:
hg update -C libpano
and try again
I suspect you are in a branch.
--dmg
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Teodora Chitiboi
teodora.chiti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I succesfuly downloaded libpano but now I can't seem
, the slowdown is far less
noticeable). I really think this is more of a solution in search of a
problem than a practical advancement in programming technology. But
Vigra does work
For these reasons I find it difficult to understand and maintain if I
am not the original author.
--
--dmg
I guess I can't see it unless I join :(
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Friends-Hugin-3796430
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
hg up -C BRANCH_NAME
Do not do -C, use -c. If you use -C it will blindly remove your local
changes. -c will warn you if you have
uncommitted ones.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received
it looks like you would benefit from a way to record the tilt and roll
of the camera.
--dmg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
(which is a pain).
--dmg
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org
grammar we have. I think all we
need (when I see is all the tools) is to:
* consider the first string (before the fist whitespace) to be the
line identifier.
Ignore any other line.
--dmg
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you
Try the following:
cmake CMakeLists.txt
make
./testparser testFiles/84-84bw.pto
Thanks for the pointer to the 'j' variable.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
Thanks! I think I am going to use this repo instead, since it is a
hugin compatibility issue.
--dmg
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On February 1, 2011 11:49:23 am D M German wrote:
in the move from SVN to Mercurial, what happened with libpanorama?
http
structure. In other words, if the order
of the lines changes in the file (the k-lines), will their meaning
change?
--dmg
--
--
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org/
http://silvernegative.com/
dmg (at) uvic (dot) ca
replace (at) with @ and (dot) with .
--
You received
. I have the feeling that IO will increase nona's time,
but that is only a hunch:
http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/test.zip
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
Thanks Harry, I'll be able to do some more tests with my desktop (my
ubuntu laptop freezes sometimes in some strange
bug of X11 and hugin, but I don't think it is a hugin bug).
--dmg
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi mac users,
This new 2010.5.0
for me.
--dmg
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:27 PM, D M German d...@uvic.ca wrote:
This morning I was able to build hugin, then I pull the change by
T. Modes and cmake complaints that it can't find boost:
I have checked my installed libraries, and boost is there (as I said, it
was there this morning
...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Nice, but dump.h should be commited too :)
...
Done
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
an (outdated) debian/
subdirectory, I guess this was an error?
The change to PTcommon.h? Debugging code. I want to know how stable
the transformations are.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I have committed the changes to SVN.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:57 AM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
To be honest, I don't know how it got in. I noticed after the commit,
but it was too late last night.
I am going to delete it. I must have added it by accident.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:47 AM
Unfortunately input projections are not dynamically loaded by hugin.
hugin needs to be updated to take advantage of the new projection. I
think T. Modes was working on it.
--dmg
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo All,
Built libpano13-2.9.17 svn1311
, but that projection will remain
untouched, for compatibility purposes.
--dmg
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
A look at the wiki and I see the new projections have not been added.
where, exactly? :) maybe i'm looking in the wrong place...
--
You
and is capable of outputting different formats.
PTmender is, I presume, 4-5 times faster than nona.
--dmg
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that Nona is better.
Are they equivalent, or is one superior? Or does it depend on what
email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message
oh, if I remember correctly, nona does multithreading. But I am not an
expert, so I'll let Pablo and those who know nona
describe it.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:23 AM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
If you need the speed, and are willing to deal with TIFF output only,
then yes. Otherwise still to nona
Yes, nona is multithreaded. As far as I know, ptmender doesn't perform the
photometric (vignetting white balance) corrections as nona does.
ciao
Pablo
This is correct. PTmender simply does remapping and nothing else.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You
:
http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/test_grid.zip
It looks as if, in the case of the 2 rectangular images, there is
scaling, but not in the squarish image.
In the code, the scale of the image is normalized as 1/2 the smallest
of dimensions. This means the image is not scaled with respect
...and abandon the a,b,c polynomial while we are at it. There are
definitely better lens models, the question is do we need the pain involved
with changing from the existing model?
We can leave it as is, and provide a better model, but what would the
alternatives be?
--dmg
--
Bruno
Well, it is satisfying to know that the code we wrote works even
though we could not test it ;)
Using Sov image, I passed it through hugin. You will see that the
stereographic is almost a match for this lens:
http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/samyang.jpg
Sov, use this lens as stereographic. I
Oleg,
would you mind sending me a photo with prominent straight lines? Like
a building shot straight forward.
I will interested to look into this lens type, and potentially add a
new projection.
We believe it is a stereographic type of lens.
--dmg
It probably can be used to obtain a,b,c
)
* Convert to equirectangular
* Rotate (yaw)
* Convert to output
* Input projection (usually fisheye or rectilinear)
* Scaling
* Radial correction
* Tilt (not hugin accessible)
--dmg
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Joshua Stults joshua.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
What order does Hugin apply rotations
Oops, Sorry, I left some lines I should have deleted: this is the
correct order. Disregard my previous message:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:10 PM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Hi Joshua,
The code you need is in panotools, in particular adjust.c
SetInvMakeParams, SetMakeParams
If you look
options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
I only changed the focal length to 207 mm, and I don't see any problem
with the result:
http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/rip2.jpg
--dmg
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Olivier Croquette ocroque...@free.fr wrote:
Thanks for the numerous answers. I didn't know Bruno's tutorial yet,
so I tried
What part of hugin do you want to automatize?
Bruno has been creating scripts to create automatic panoramas for some time.
--dmg
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jan Martin
janmar...@diy-streetview.org wrote:
Hi all,
you might already know that I am working on a streetview rig at
http
Yes, that is what his scripts do: panotools script.
--dmg
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Jan Martin
janmar...@diy-streetview.org wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I have a .pto file and need to stitch it.
Output needs to be an equirectangular .jpg file at 95% quality.
Right now I use a Perl script
://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http
, 1989.
libpano transforms point by point in an inverse manner: given a
coordinate in the output point, it finds the points in the photo from
which to compute it. math.h contains the equations.
You don't need to understand the full engine.
-dmg
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:31 AM, kfj
this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin
, to place the fold into the exact corners of a room?
and (considering that there will be considerable image stretching
involved) will the 3 planes still come together?
Bart: thank you for your advice to start a new thread, it was a good
idea.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http
://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
I think we (libpano) should rename that function to make it clear that
it belongs to libpano: panoQueryFOVLimits
--dmg
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Mon 12-Apr-2010 at 15:24 -0700, hans wrote:
I am trying to build hugin on SUSE 11.2 with this script
then create the scripts.
The scripts should be generic enough to test both nona and PTmender.
Start with the equirectangular, and then I'll get you some fisheye photos.
how does it sound? Questions?
--dmg
I would very much like the opportunity to be a help in libpano
development.
Best
it is not difficult. Start by creating a new input projection in
libpano. Once that is done
it will relatively trivial to add support in hugin. THe user can then
choose the model
that best suits the lens.
--dmg
The choice which model is 'best' for a given lens can be left to the
user to decide, or it can
options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
using such huge panoramas for? 50k
pixels would translate to more than 3 meters at 300dpi.
--dmg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
Hi everybody,
I think it would be great if the build scripts of hugin should force
this version
--dmg
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Mon 01-Feb-2010 at 22:14 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
A libpano13-2.9.17_beta1 (first beta snapshot) tarball has been
I found that the export to PTmender script does not include the
parameters of the projection.
Also, it would be nice if nona embedded the script in the output file
(the way that PTmender does).
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you
The real challenge is finding out what the math being their transformation is.
If it is just a matter of changng the names of the variables, that is
relatively trivial.
Also, remember that we have two types of transformations, Tr, and T.
--dmg
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Zoran Zorkic zo
the problem lies.
Can GLX be disabled from command line?
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
Thanks Zoran.
PTmender is significantly faster than Nona. that is true.
--dmg
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net wrote:
On Jan 28, 8:07 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
But I want to fix the problems. So if we can find a good test case
that shows the bug, I'll take care
(=2.9.16).
So people who package libpano with hugin, please be aware of this issue;
--dmg
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo Harry, Tom,
On Jan 19, 7:14 am, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
I built the libpano13 on the latest
You must rebuild the makefile.
Try deleting Makefile from the main directory, and run configure again
--dmg
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo All,
On Jan 18, 10:50 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sun 17-Jan-2010 at 15:36 -0800, Daniel M
We rarely change the Makefile files. It is not needed to delete the
Makefile, actually,
but just to run ./bootstrap which takes care of everything.
But run it only if you have build problems. It should only be needed
when we modify configure.ac or Makefile.am
-dmg
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:45
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin
Please try again. Notice that I have bumped the version number to
2.9.16, given that it contains some few features.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:04 PM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Let me look into it.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo Daniel,
On Jan 18, 11:45
-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/panotools-devel
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
oh, I think I get it. Are you installing libpano? only when it is
installed, the pano13 directory is created.
--dmg
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:22 PM, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Isn't that a problem of configuring the compilation environment?
libpano installs in pano13. In my opinion
computer without any problem.
--dmg
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
For me [tm] 1203 works
1214 doesnt.
assert(sizeof(panoFormatNames) == PANO_FORMAT_COUNT * sizeof(int
, not floats.
A quick hack that will allow you to continue your work is to divide the
values in the sliders by 10 (specify 20 instead of 2) and then divide in
your code by the same factor.
yes, a hack, but at least you can keep working...
--dmg
Thomas -- Tom
Thomas On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12
input field works good.
Thomas
thanks Thomas,
I was discussing with Tom that the sliders might have to be scaled
to be logarithmic. Once we have the
completed the implementation of the projection parameters we can
explore the best solutions.
--dmg
--
You received this message because you
with the cropped-sensor body.
And yes, except for a blind person, anybody will recognize that
difference, even of photos at the same aperture because
colour rendition, sharpness and contrast. Try it.
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 9:20 PM, RueiKe ruei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I just tried Live View on the D3. No impact on the mirror lock up.
Too bad. At high speed, it can induce significant camera shake.
Rick
I can confirm that the 1ds3 brackets up to 7 shots, from 1/3 to up to
3
be a factor for me would be
the ability to lock up the mirror for an entire bracket series. Is it
really necessary to meter between brackets, especially in manual
mode? Is there some other technical limitation for this?
the 5dII does this when you enable live view.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
been moved too far.
My experience with the tilt model was not so good. I have prepared a
nice testset with the aerial images posted earlier, and it works quite
well with the XYZ mode. I'll give more details later.
ciao
Pablo
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
Hi Bruno,
did you try optimizing using the tilt model? Tx, Ty and Ts (try those
before you try Tz).
I'll be curious to see what happens.
Could you post the script so I can try it? Thanks!
--dmg
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at 00
them
to its appropriate list. Otherwise they just linger in this one.
I'll fix it then.
--dmg
I'm not sure if I asked the questions already:
do we still need the workaround around line 138 in
src/hugin_base/panotools/PanoToolsOptimizerWrapper.cpp
#ifdef HasPANO13
// work around a small
at the PDF I sent, the scale
is a factor by which the field of view of the lens is multiplied in
those computations.
As I said, I am not sure what use it might have. But the feature is
there now. Perhaps for mosaic mode we
need to redesign the libpano internal model. we'll see.
--dmg
Here are examples of the use:
This photo was not remapped:
But this one was:
http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/floorInput.jpg
and this is the output, merged (difference mode):
http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/merged.jpg
It was optimized using:
# specify variables that should
optimizing?
--dmg
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Rogier Wolff
rew-googlegro...@bitwizard.nl wrote:
Hi,
I was reading stuff about tilt transformations and was wondering if
it would help me build a fitting pano for a bunch of pictures I took.
If it doesn't... this might serve as a hint
, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
dmg wrote:
Hello,
I am confused. Would one not be able to continue development in the
same branch that Dev made the initial changes in? Why is another
branch needed? I apologize if I am missing something obvious.
Gerry
are you talking libpano
just integrated.
--dmg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post
this interact with James' new layout (the j parameters in the
.pto files) ?
Is this read by libpano tools? I doubt it. In that case, not at all.
Yuv
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Remember that the PTO files are not compatible with libpano. One needs
to use the export feature in
hugin.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
dmg wrote:
how does this interact with James' new layout (the j parameters in the
.pto files) ?
Is this read
optimized).
Anybody has any clue?
Thanks!
--
--
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org/
http://silvernegative.com/
dmg (at) uvic (dot) ca
replace (at) with @ and (dot) with .
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
it is
useful for those of us who
want to use the command line interfaces.
--dmg
Thank you so much.
Best regards.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
, this is unstable libpano.
-dmg
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Alex Romosanromo...@sycorax.lbl.gov wrote:
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) jean.luc.cou...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Hugin freezes in the optimisation step.
I ran it in gdb and got forst the following message with some trace
elements
taken place
(by scanning each row/column
of pixels until the first non-empty is found. It is not done using
calculations from the input parameters.
--dmg
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Bruno Postlebr...@postle.net wrote:
On Thu 13-Aug-2009 at 16:34 -0500, dev g wrote:
By default, panotools
in a function you should also restore the old value at
the end (this is the main function of the inserted lines).
I agree that libpano is wrong in doing this. But I rather remove the setlocale
than adding 40 setlocales in _every return_.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
the program correctly rejects those.
Hi Tom,
would pictures of a wall help? What would be the ideal type of photos?
Tiles of a bathroom? Books in a bookshelf?
--dmg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin
in the old PTstitcher.
I agree it would be a good idea to resurrect this feature.
-dmg
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other
to
implement a slant transformation
for the last 2-3 weeks. He can probably expand/elaborate on this.
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin
quite easy to see what
the alpha channel does.
Does this help you?
Best,
Bart
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free
/SquarePanorama.html
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
Thanks! This is great help isolating the problem. It sounds like it is
an enblend issue
with some features of these images.
--dmg
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:42 AM, slatersoncampbell.christop...@gmail.com wrote:
removing all three 'ring' images gets rid of the black areas.
however, the final
?
This will allow us to know if it is a bug in the Lambert, hugin or
your processing ;)
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic
Have you tried outputing independent images and then feeding them
manually to enblend?
Your problem looks like a masking problem.
-dmg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic
for the time being just output separate images and look at them.
If you like them then run enblend -h and it it will be self-descriptive.
--dmg
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM,
slatersoncampbell.christop...@gmail.com wrote:
i haven't tried that. happy to try it, but need a little help
represented in a format wider than its semantic type is con‐
verted to its semantic type. Then determination is based on the type of
the argument.
-dmg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
not available in my area :(
can you describe it?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Tim timnug...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody know how they did this? I think it looks great.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/zanelowe/2009/04/dizzee_rascal_exclusive.html
Tim
--
--dmg
---
Daniel M. German
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo