convert my CR2s
without patching the EXIF data). One could possibly even think up more
complex behaviour along these lines, but I don' want to go over the
top... what do you think?
thanks in advance
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
usin hugin 2010.1.0.5118 for Windows, maybe it's a known problem?
With reagrds
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org
On Sep 14, 2:48 am, Eugeni Dodonov eugeni.dodo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am struggling with Hugin while trying to create a vertical panorama
...
I downloaded the images and my hugin processed them without any
problems, I didn't have to do anything to them previously, but maybe
the sending
(quote: compiling hugin yourself is
fairly extreme behaviour...) - and I'm on Windows, where things are
even more complicated...
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
panorama, and if you need output that looks 'flat', you can make a
cylindrical image from a strip around the horizon.
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available
I just downloaded Hugin_2010.2.0-rc1 for windows and the hfov of the
stereographic image is correct with this version. Now I wish I'd
waited another day before making all that noise... maybe it's still
helpful since 2010.2.0 might take a while to trickle down...
with regards
KFJ
--
You received
specific ptx mailing list? In this list I put it
under the heading:
hugin: actual hfov for stereographic image larger than specified
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
, and that the workaround needed until
someone maybe makes the effort to include additional syntax into
enfuse is not really a great bother.
With regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
file: .libs/libpano13.dll.a
.libs/file.o: In function `panoImageRead':
C:\msys\1.0\home\kfj\C\libpano13-2.9.17/file.c:2433: undefined
reference to `pan
oPPMRead'
.libs/ColourBrightness.o: In function `OutputPhotoshopCurve':
C:\msys\1.0\home\kfj\C\libpano13-2.9.17/ColourBrightness.c:412:
undefined
On Sep 18, 11:47 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Hi KFJ,
did you try using cmake?
I did not, and I gave it some thought, even looked at cmake's website.
I admit I did not look very intensely, but I got the feeling that it
is more something for MSVC users - please correct me if I'm wrong.
Also I
package
sudo dpkg -i /usr/BUILD/BuildPano13/libpano13-2.9.17-Linux.deb
...
but something more minGw-ish? any suggestions?
With regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
and
Linux-compatible.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx
that the CMakeLists.txt is maybe insufficient for my purpose.
Maybe it would help you to look at that as well?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available
want it to. Then all
would be together and maybe I could write a little text on how I did
it.
Haven't done much testing on whether the new stuff does what it
should, only briefly called all EXEs without arguments and got their
help messages and saying they are 2.9.17 indeed.
with regards
KFJ
really tested it much, either.
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx
surfaces that aren't parallel to the object
plane) will often come out wrong. You can possibly avoid some of the
worse-looking problems by using smartblend in preference to enblend,
but there's only so much you can do.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
. the lengthy process of
putting images into a temporary directory runs, but after that, the
CPG terminates very suddenly)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
suppose the PTxxx executables link in the static
version?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post
happens. I've downloaded
hugin-2010.2.0_rc1.tar.gz as my starting point.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org
PTinfo.exe
PToptimizer.exe
PTtiffdump.exe
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send
what to make of it. But I don't think it's a feature.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post
wonder if there's going to be any echo?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group
as I can make my
way. I really appreciate some newer features - like the fast preview,
mosaic mode or the masking tool, and I'm well willing to struggle up
the learning curve to get things working. And I'll look into what I
can do to make the problems that bug me go away.
with regards
KFJ
--
You
')
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
threading,
by configuring it like:
./configure --enable-threading=no --disable-posix-sem
which at least makes the configure run through, but then subsequently
the make fails.
Has anyone been there? and then done what?
momentarily stalled
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
actually change in the
'development' process. Safer to only copy carefully selected tags to
the JPEG file, like the hugin workflow does.
A finer grained selection of tags is possible too.
... so I think it's not only possible but necessary
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because
when and when not) - so far I haven't found
anything crucially wrong with it. But I think the CPG deployment needs
some finetuning ;)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently
algorithm (correct me if I'm wrong).
I hope this will sort out the CPG issues with your installer! Thanks
for caring about the Windows side of things, it's about time a recent
version of hugin becomes available to Windows users by a route they
feel comfortable with.
with regards
KFJ
--
You
additional degrees of freedom!
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email
On Sep 25, 2:52 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
This is an older version of match-n-shift, recent versions use
autopano-sift-c directly instead of generatekeys/autopano.
Thanks for pointing that out. Where could I get a recent version of it
anyway?
KFJ
--
You received
, to prevent future confusions like KFJ had.
Excellent! Now it all runs smoothly. Your solution to omit the
'Autopano-SIFT-C (multirow/stacked)' entry is actually the cleanest
solution, since the creation of panoramas from brackets with special
treatment for stacks is something quite advanced anyway. Best
On Sep 25, 9:28 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On September 24, 2010 10:13:27 am kfj wrote:
Alternatively, I tried to compile the libilm code without threading,
may be OK for the exercise, but for all practical purpose please do not
distribute binaries castrated this way.
ha ha
may or may not have any of
the CPGs, since the user can choose which to install).
I still feel the initial install is better off lean, but I it's just
my personal preference.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
\hell.TIF S:\Bilder
\hell0001.TIF' failed.
which isn't particularly helpful. Any ideas?
This is not a new problem; I tried with an older hugin version and it
behaves the same way.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other
?
In the dialog to create the final panorama, there's a section where
you can check whether you want a Panorama, warped individual images,
an expoure fusion etc.
Your problem sounds as if you hadn't checked 'panorama' as output but
'individual images'
KFJ
--
You received this message because you
.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx
, it'd be so much more my style - but I'm only human and my
Windows system is running so smoothly I can't get myself to invest a
couple of weeks to recreate my software environment in Linux. And now
I even have hugin 2010.2.0, and it works well so far!
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message
On Sep 27, 1:11 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sun 26-Sep-2010 at 10:20 -0700, kfj wrote:
The matching of every photo with every other photo is 'expensive' in
computation, particularly with projects with hundreds of photos.
Worse than that, nearly all the comparisons between
, but it should have a way of
automatically assigning images to stacks (like, three in a row), and
further down the line there should be an option which images (first,
second etc.) from a stack should be used to do the yaw, pitch and roll
calculations with.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message
a fair number
of CPs, and if you have a few misses, just do the statistical cleanup.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
something else which you didn't mention?
hope to be up and running soon on Kubuntu 10.10 :)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
;)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
with --
fullscale. SURF is supposed to be scale-invariant, but you can always
try to give it a helping hand ;)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available
On 13 Okt., 18:36, Bernd Hohmann hohm...@harddiskcafe.de wrote:
On 13.10.2010 11:54, kfj wrote:
Reverting to full frame fisheye and reoptimizing v+a,b,c created fine
output.
If you just use 6 around and sky, you cannot expect to generate
reliable a, b and c data. They will depend on your
on it ;) - and it's mkdir -p, so
I did not mention every parent directory, either.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
(bash
history, recording of the sessions) - maybe they could help figuring
out what goes wrong?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
far without major problems, but I
don't have anything on Kubuntu 10.10 to look at the panoramas now -
all the viewers I tried won't compile either. I might have to run
FSPViewer in a vboxed Windows. Any better suggestions?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
with wxWidgets-related code, which is
one reason for my suspicions about the wxWidgets code used per default
by Kubuntu 10.10. Look at this:
make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/kfj/src/panoglview/pglv.hg/src'
if g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\panoglview\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\panoglview\ -
DPACKAGE_VERSION
experienced contributors before moving ahead with your stuff?
oops... maybe I've been barking up the wrong tree all along. Sorry for
all the noise I created because of my naively following the wiki and
installing Dale's packets. I'll start afresh.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because
eventually...
I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
On 17 Okt., 12:16, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.
still no joy with panoglview. Does this look familiar to anyone:
k...@anja:~/src/panoglview/pglv.hg$ panoglview ~/Bilder/*4/*_fused.tif
The program 'panoglview' received an X
,
probably for that reason. Maybe that's the problem here as well, it's
still the same machine after all?!
Is there a ready-made package of panoglview anywhere? I just can't get
the thing to build or run.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 17 Okt., 13:21, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
spherical 360X180 panorama.
I used the 'sherical' setting for my image, since it's a spherical
panorama, after all. Using the equirectangular setting, it displays
correctly now
for me. Until then
I've found a manageable alternative - I revisited Fulvio Senore's
website and noticed him mentioning that FSPViewer works under wine.
Tried that, works fine.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
for enblend.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx
up with another few good panorama
viewers!
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group
on?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
, panoglview performs sluggishly anyway - it doesn't
pan smoothly. So I'll stick with FSPViewer for the time being.
Thanks for your effort trying to help!
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group
every now and
then, knowing that many more of them won't help you that much, you can
maybe live with it more easily ;)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
On 19 Okt., 16:24, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
KFJ,
Do you have a video card with GL, such as Nvidia, etc. which you don't
have the drivers loaded? PanoGLView will perform slowly if you don't
have the right drivers for you video card.
I have chipset graphics. intel 945 GM
On 20 Okt., 18:19, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
math.h
math.c, rather? No math.h in the libpano sources.
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
conceptually to decribe
the visual field, and effortlessly connect with terms like viewing
angle.
The question is really, do you find a term that reflects the scene (3D
or at least a spherical surface) or one that reflects the rendition
(2D flat panoramic image)?
with regards
KFJ
--
You received
On 21 Okt., 02:06, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT), kfj wrote:
That doesn't work too well. I can only sort on one column at a time.
Furthermore, if I'm trying to delete all points between images 0 and
3, sometimes image 0 is the left image
On 13 Okt., 21:23, Jan Martin janmar...@diy-streetview.org wrote:
HI all,
I have 8 images around with hfov of 50 degrees and one fisheye with hfov
with 120 degrees for the Zenith.
So autopano-sift-c 2.5.2 fails, because it assumes all image
- having the same hfov.
- having the same
stacks'. If the sky's all right now, that was your problem. I think
I've had the same, and it took me quite some time figuring it out, but
that was what it was.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software
processing them with wine/Picasa, to see if that is the case.
I did my test with hugin 2010.3.0 on Kubuntu 10.10.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available
Länge and Breite, which are more evocative and shorter than the
latin-derived terms longitude and latitude...
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
wheel like in a pano viewer) looks pretty outdated.
Now let's just hope that all these good ideas aren't snatched away and
patented by some big company leaving us lot to look for legal
loopholes to still provide the features to the free software
community...
with regards
KFJ
--
You received
, you think that the enfused
image is what you actually had in mind while the tonemapped HDR isn't
quite there.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
abbreviation for newsgroup.
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx
On 24 Okt., 15:18, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
I just heard the bell announcing a meeting of the mind. We're pretty much on
the same page, KFJ. BTW, darf ich Deinen echten Namen wissen?
Ich heiße Kay.
Same page... suppose so. I'd thought that as well. I didn't sign in
with my full
things like hugin-ptx were just called that?! Maybe I'm old-
fashioned... I read it with my browser.
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
the wrestling with
hugin's plethora of options ;)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post
On Oct 26, 11:58 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
besides the completely different GUI toolkit (wxWidgets for Hugin and Qt for
Panini), I don't think that fusing the two projects is wishful. They are two
different applications, one deals with compositing a single output image out
of
On Oct 27, 2:02 pm, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
- And --hard-mask is really for focus stacks, it will, as you noticed,
produce artifacts when it is used for exposure fusion.
Yes, but it's doing something very different to the sky and to a
lesser extent the (bright)
On 1 Nov., 01:02, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Sorry, we are really suffering from a lack of documentation
considering how often we get requests for features that already
exist.
I think this is true. It's sad, but true. An undocumented feature
might as well not be there. Someone has
exposure brackets. Focus stacks are less frequently
done. I think your problem would have been more quickly analyzed if
you had mentioned that you're trying to make a focus stack;)
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
On 4 Nov., 14:55, Simon Oosthoek soml...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi all
I just noticed that hugin's latest release was reviewed for lwn.net.
This artical is still subscriber only, but I think this list should get
access and it's not like I'm posting it on slashdot ;-)
( Free Link:
On 6 Nov., 06:36, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I've posted a bunch of the panorama, exposure fused, and exposure
fused panorama shots I've been working on
tohttp://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landscapes/4851912_oeCNm#1079379436_dCVAv
(#9-15). These are the ones I was making so much
On 6 Nov., 01:41, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Where do I have to give them separate fake EV values?
In the exif of the photos?
In some input field in Hugin?
You don't have to change anything in your images, though that works
just the same. It's enough to go to the 'camera and lens'
saturation as your criterion), the effect is often astonishingly good.
Try playing with that! as the manual says, perfect alignment comes
with the technique free of charge.
with regards
KFJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic
On 10 Nov., 21:37, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
...
you may want to play a little bit more with these control, and with different
sizes of input images and output projections, before coming to such
conclusions.
I did. And thought about it some more. Finally the penny dropped.
Thanks for
stumbled upon some constructs I've failed to find
documentation for so far. The syntax I am refering to comes along as a
comment, but it seems to contain relevant information nevertheless.
Examples are
#-hugin cropFactor=1.60931
(in a pto file generated by hugin)
#-imgfile 2856 4290 /home/kfj/Bilder
On 11 Nov., 19:28, bruno.postle brunopos...@googlemail.com wrote:
The #-hugin lines are used by the hugin GUI to store non-critical
metadata as key=value pairs. Your parser should at least preserve
them, though we don't have a spec.
No spec... sigh :-(
A common problem.
So what
On 11 Nov., 21:02, Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, PTGui, PTStitcherNG, and possibly others, use #-imagefile lines
for the source image dimensions and file names (though I believe both
still accept a name at the end of the o line). So if you want to
handle PTGui project
Hi all!
I've stubled upon a behaviour of match-n-shift I wasn't aware of which
took me quite some time to figure out (if my analysis is right, after
all)
I was calling match-n-shift on two images, and it kept calling align-
image-stack on them, which failed miserably, since the images were,
it.
here's the protocol:
k...@anja:~/Bilder$ match-n-shift -a -o ais.pto i1.tif i2.tif
align_image_stack -f 50 -p ais_stack_0.pto /home/kfj/Bilder/i1.tif /
home/kfj/Bilder/i2.tifoops?!
...
k...@anja:~/Bilder$ exiftool i1.tif | grep Exposure
Exposure Time : 1/50
Exposure
On 16 Nov., 23:06, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
match-n-shift hasn't had -b or -c options for a long time.
This printing of sourcecode is something that you see with compiled
perl .exe files on Windows. I'm surprised to see it on Linux.
You're not using an ancient Windows .exe
On 18 Nov., 02:19, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Thank you, Kay, for motivating me to keep slightly better documentation of
what I'm doing. [0] is for you. I'll try to stay on the ball and record
similar bits of information over time.
Hooray! This is good news indeed. I'll have a good
On 18 Nov., 14:11, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
The 'stitch now' behavior is
that it starts the prefix entry pre-populated.
I beg to differ. If I call 'stitch now', the prefix entry is
unpopulated (like, empty) - and it's been so ever since I've been
using hugin. Maybe I'm doing
On 18 Nov., 14:46, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
indeed it is [0], committed 17 hours ago and for a while still the utmost
bleeding edge.
Unless I state something different, I always refer to the bleeding edge with
my
comments.
[gulp] - just swallowed my words ;-)
bleeding edge up
On 21 Nov., 22:41, john doe guerrerodelu...@gmail.com wrote:
Iḿ really interested in both gawk and that ptsed tool you mentioned...didnt
know about it..
What platform are you on?
I have used awk/gawk a lot when I was still working as a programmer,
so I can probably help if your efforts
On 22 Nov., 10:53, paul womack pwom...@papermule.co.uk wrote:
back in the day (g)awk was useful (and I used it).
it is still on every UNIX-like system, ready to go. Ubiquitous.
Allowed me to just write a five-liner to be run from the shell
to make my point.
However, with perl now so mature
Hi all!
I've come to a point with my Python pto parser project where I have a
functioning scanner which can handle all pto syntax I'm aware of and
presents the scan as an object containing the pto file's content in a
structured form to be analyzed and modified.
The scan is syntactic so far, and
On 22 Nov., 21:13, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
It says User does not exist and I realize that I asked you for the wrong
field. When I look at my SF page it has a User ID *and* a Username. It's the
Username that I need, sorry.
Okay. But having followed the procedure you proposed, I
you KFJ..
im trying with qt4 right now.
I find it very hard to give you advice on that, because I'm an ex-pro
and have been using and programming computers quite intensely for some
30 years now. So I can't really judge what is good for a beginner. If
you are serious and want to learn a powerful
On 23 Nov., 20:34, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
I am sorry to read that the OpenID procedure was a pointless detour. Since I
already had an SF account when I linked my OpenID to it, my experience was
completely different. Had I known that I was sending you to such a dreadful
nightmare,
On 23 Nov., 20:34, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
well, if the legalese is what bothers you; and you have already been through
LP's legalese... try there?
Okay, here's what happened: I reread SFs tcs, couldn't get myself to
agree to them, reread launchpad's, found them fair enough and
1 - 100 of 869 matches
Mail list logo
