Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] Testing of Activities

I posted issues for each indicating the results of the tests. Tony On 04/19/2017 08:50 PM, Walter Bender wrote: Do you have the details re the broken activities? regards. -walter On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Tony Anderson > wrote:

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] Testing of Activities

Do you have the details re the broken activities? regards. -walter On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > I spent the last two plus days testing the 137 activities with > repositories in github/sugarlabs. > > Of these, 103 work on Ubuntu 16.04 sucrose.

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

Hi Sebastian! On 17 July 2016 at 03:14, Sebastian Silva wrote: > El 15/07/16 a las 07:37, Dave Crossland escribió: > > Alright! Back to this whole Sugar Network thing that I feel like I don't > totally understand :) I have some immediate practical questions I hope you

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

El 15/07/16 a las 07:37, Dave Crossland escribió: > Alright! Back to this whole Sugar Network thing that I feel like I > don't totally understand :) I have some immediate practical questions > I hope you can answer :) > > Where is the source code? https://notabug.org/school-network is gone. > >

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On 15 July 2016 at 08:43, Tony Anderson wrote: > A lot of questions. I believe Sebastian Silva would be your best source. > Sure! My email is in reply to his, and I expect he will answer these questions on this list when he has time? :)

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

Hi On 15 July 2016 at 04:29, Tony Anderson wrote: > This proposal needs some details. > I agree > ASLO supported many functions including the developer hub, authentication, > and so on. A simple static site that is functionally equivalent is > ambiguous. > Yes. Since

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

Hi, Dave A lot of questions. I believe Sebastian Silva would be your best source. Tony On 07/15/2016 02:37 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi! On 15 July 2016 at 00:14, Sebastian Silva > wrote: > I am proposing a simple static

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

Hi! On 15 July 2016 at 00:14, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > I am proposing a simple static site that hosts xo bundles, that is > > functionally equivalent to the php5 codebase. > > Aleksey had proposed this: > http://school-network.org/hub/?view=Catalog=activity=featured

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

Hi Dave This proposal needs some details. ASLO supported many functions including the developer hub, authentication, and so on. A simple static site that is functionally equivalent is ambiguous. Aleksey's proposal has been implemented and is on-line (sugar network). Is this what you are

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

El 14/07/16 a las 11:43, Dave Crossland escribió: > We need a plan to move off this php5 codebase. > > I am proposing a simple static site that hosts xo bundles, that is > functionally equivalent to the php5 codebase. > Aleksey had proposed this:

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

I don't know where this (as well as many of Sugar's APIs) are documented. It would be best to look at the original PHP code as well as the clients' intent: - http://git.sugarlabs.org/slo-activities/mainline/blobs/master/site/app/webroot/services/update-aslo.php -

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On 14 July 2016 at 13:13, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > The build utilities for XO laptops hook into ASLO to download applications. > Cool! > Some sort of backward compatible API should be made for that. > Sure. Where is the API documented?

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On 14 July 2016 at 14:22, Tony Anderson wrote: > The obvious question is why? What functionality do we add for our users by > rewriting everything in Python 3? > The functionality of being able to run the software, because the underlying Python 2 packages are going away.

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

Hi, Dave The obvious question is why? What functionality do we add for our users by rewriting everything in Python 3? Tony On 07/14/2016 06:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: On Jul 14, 2016 12:26 PM, "Tony Anderson" > wrote: > > The

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

ASLO isn't just a site for manual downloads. The build utilities for XO laptops hook into ASLO to download applications. Some sort of backward compatible API should be made for that. On Jul 14, 2016 12:43 PM, "Dave Crossland" wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2016 12:26 PM, "Tony Anderson"

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On Jul 14, 2016 12:26 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote: > > The problem is ASLO, our primary interface and support for our user community. > > If we are going the github route, we need to set up a means for updated versions of Activities to be made into bundles and installed on

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

The problem is ASLO, our primary interface and support for our user community. If we are going the github route, we need to set up a means for updated versions of Activities to be made into bundles and installed on the ASLO repository. Presumably documentation (but no code) would be required

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On Jul 14, 2016 8:15 AM, "Sam Parkinson" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: >> >> >> On 14 July 2016 at 07:13, Sam Parkinson wrote: >>> >>> What do you mean? ASLO is based on very old

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: On 14 July 2016 at 07:13, Sam Parkinson wrote: What do you mean? ASLO is based on very old technology, which is going to get broken. 10/10 would love to improve ASLO. I actually did an

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On 14 July 2016 at 07:13, Sam Parkinson wrote: > What do you mean? ASLO is based on very old technology, which is going to > get broken. > > 10/10 would love to improve ASLO. I actually did an "ASLO2" effort a > while ago, although that failed for reasons that are

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: Apparently, it is another victim to 'deprecation'. Possibly the most important feature of Sugar today is that it is based on Python 2.7 which is not being 'enhanced'. What do you mean? ASLO is based on very old

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

ASLO, which is our most used service to our user-base, is back online, but is not operational. Yesterday, it reported a long list of error messages. Apparently, it is another victim to 'deprecation'. Possibly the most important feature of Sugar today is that it is based on Python 2.7 which is

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Editor Application

Alan, Now you are a editor, a great task to do, should be update the screenshots in the activities, and add a link to a page in the wiki for every activity without a website. Is not needed you do all the work, but may be is a good task to coordinate with other volunteers. What you think? Regards,

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Editor Application

@lists.sugarlabs.org; raf...@activitycentral.com Subject: Re: [IAEP] ASLO Editor Application Alan, Now you are a editor, a great task to do, should be update the screenshots in the activities, and add a link to a page in the wiki for every activity without a website. Is not needed you do all the work

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Editor Application

Hi Alan. On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Name: Alan Aguiar Mail: alan...@hotmail.com Activities: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/user/418 GIT: http://git.sugarlabs.org/~alanjas SugarLabs activities:

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Editor Application

Hi Alan. Welcome you are now an ASLO editor. thank you very much! Regards! Alan ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] Result of test activities on Sugar 0.94.1

Alan: This is a very nice set of tests. Since I last responded to your previous set of tests; I have continued to work on very recent activities versus Soas-v5; Trisquel 5 Sugar (Toast) and SoaS-v6 using a live CD and XO-1 and XO-1.5 with the latest software. [1] I tested activities using

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] XOplanet

Hello all. I really don't know, but we can ask in olpc-uruguay. cheers!. Rafael Ortiz On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: maybe dirakx knows more about who maintain xoplanet On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:35:45AM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: This

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] XOplanet

maybe dirakx knows more about who maintain xoplanet On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:35:45AM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: This community portal in Spanish looks very similar to ASLO in scope and design: http://xoplanet.blogspot.com/ I wonder who maintains it, and if we could get in touch

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Reviews

Aleksey, I would agree that checking the user agent is not the best idea. I'd go for a more conventional spam-prevention technique, like making the user do a simple arithmetic problem. Just as long as its enough to discourage spammers but not annoying to commenters. James Simmons On Mon, Nov

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Reviews

Wade, My guess is that we get few reviews because you need to create an account on ASLO before you can do it. A normal Activity user has no other use for such an account. If you could post a review without logging in perhaps more people would do it. I'd love to see more reviews of my own

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Reviews

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that we get few reviews because you need to create an account on ASLO before you can do it.  A normal Activity user has no other use for such an account.  If you could post a review without logging in perhaps

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Reviews

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 05:37:49PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that we get few reviews because you need to create an account on ASLO before you can do it.  A normal Activity user has no other use for such an

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] [NOMINATION] Skype-1

I guess its another point for future policy[1] for ASLO editors, should we allow non-FOSS software on ASLO. [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:14:56AM -0500, Sugar Labs Activities wrote: New activity was nominated to be public. Name:

Re: [IAEP] [ASLO] [NOMINATION] Skype-1

Hi, I guess its another point for future policy[1] for ASLO editors, should we allow non-FOSS software on ASLO. Even in the unlikely event that we decided to allow non-FOSS software on ASLO, we are legally unable to distribute Skype because its copyright license doesn't allow us to. The

Re: [IAEP] ASLO testing

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:42:50PM -0700, Josh Williams wrote: If you have a minute please test: http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ Bugs fixed since last round of testing: 1. # of Activities downloaded number added 2. Fixed pagination for long search results 3.

Re: [IAEP] ASLO testing

If you have a minute please test: http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ It's the first time I come into this page, and it looks very cool! I have two complains though: the color scheme looks nice, but the contrast level (mostly the light blue text) seems a little low to me:

Re: [IAEP] ASLO updates

[cc += dfarning, alsroot, syst...@] El Wed, 14-10-2009 a las 17:47 -0700, Josh Williams escribió: I've made some bug fixes to the new ASLO design, I've tested it lightly and it seems to work in all major browsers (even ie6). If you have a few moments, please test it out (download/upload

Re: [IAEP] ASLO updates

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:42:15AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: [cc += dfarning, alsroot, syst...@] El Wed, 14-10-2009 a las 17:47 -0700, Josh Williams escribió: I've made some bug fixes to the new ASLO design, I've tested it lightly and it seems to work in all major browsers (even

Re: [IAEP] ASLO updates

El Thu, 15-10-2009 a las 07:34 +, Aleksey Lim escribió: We just tried to utilize AMO feature when it lets user download public .xos from mirror sources and from files/ for other cases. Recently all .xo were downloaded from files/(even after creating symlink in /upload to files/).. and it

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Suggestion

Hi all, Let me finalize this What tags we should use for GCompris/Fructose/etc discussion :) New AMO version and incoming ASLO v3 version have collections feature https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections I think we can move tags GCompris and Fructose(Core, etc) to collections

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Suggestion

On 11 Jun 2009, at 08:37, Aleksey Lim wrote: Hi all, Let me finalize this What tags we should use for GCompris/Fructose/ etc discussion :) New AMO version and incoming ASLO v3 version have collections feature https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections I think we can move tags

Re: [IAEP] ASLO Suggestion

I think the Recommended activities are still those which were uploaded early just to test the the recommendations worked. IIRC, for a long time search was more broken than recommendations Thus, search got the love. That being said, modifying and updating recommendations are handled through a

Re: [IAEP] ASLO - rebranding

Hey, That is awesome! david On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Josh Williamsj...@tucson-labs.com wrote: Hi everyone, I've been working on the css for ASLO, you can see where I'm at http://activities-devel.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ . I've tried to make this fairly consistent with the design

Re: [IAEP] ASLO vs. Activities Portal

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote: To me, Portal is the weak word in Sugar Activities Portal. Portal doesn't give the warm, learning, discovery place like the word Library. So I would propose Sugar Activities Library. A place to check out activities and

Re: [IAEP] aslo mockup

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 07:22:42AM -0700, Josh Williams wrote: Hey everyone, I've created another mock up for aslo, that's more inline with the HIG, uses our color palette, and excludes gradients and rounded corners. Please let me know what you think.

Re: [IAEP] aslo mockup

Hi Josh, On 21 Mar 2009, at 14:22, Josh Williams wrote: Hey everyone, I've created another mock up for aslo, that's more inline with the HIG, uses our color palette, and excludes gradients and rounded corners. Please let me know what you think. As per my quick irc comment about the

Re: [IAEP] aslo categories

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote: I don't know what the solution is, but I have issues with the above taxonomy. Is art music? Is music art? Where does synth lab fit it? Art, music, programming, science? Is a memorize a game when you are making math

Re: [IAEP] aslo categories

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 19:07, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me (I could be wrong) that the Mozilla add-ons can appear in multiple categories. Some systems build the categories dynamically from tags, of course the key with that is to limit the tag vocabulary. OSX widgets

Re: [IAEP] aslo categories

The offered categories are not a taxonomy but rather a set of tags. Presumably activities would be tagged with multiple of these if appropriate. Have you ever looked at the amo site to see how the Firefox add-ons appear there? You can see add-ons under multiple of the descriptions they provide.

Re: [IAEP] aslo categories

On 18 Mar 2009, at 17:47, Walter Bender wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: [snip] So, summing up so far, this could give us something like: Art Communication Games Geography Literacy Maths Music

Re: [IAEP] aslo categories

Peace... I wasn't trying to derail the use of categories; just trying to go further if and when we can. The evidence of the web suggests that search will trump categories in the end, but we can get quite far with pretty much any taxonomy at this scale. -walter On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM,