[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John S. Giltner, Jr.) writes:
I'm not sure, but I beleive that HP-UX and Solaris (it was
originally called SunOS) came out in early 80's (82'ish) and that
AIX did not come out until a few years later (86'ish). DMV systems
were already in place by then.
a minor sunos
A RS/6000 is not a mainframe.
Are we sure about that anymore?
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:33:47 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The ROTs are fine (old and current), but there is really only one
thing that matters and you may be paging, or you may not be
Are you meeting your SLAs?
Mark
Hello Mark,
of course, to meet SLAs is the first and last
Yes Ed,
It's a good redbook to begin at GDPS world! ;-)
Chr.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Dave Myers wrote:
- Forwarded by Dave Myers/sesg/Star on 12/26/2005 01:42 PM -
Dave Myers/sesg/Star
12/21/2005 02:57 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Need some RVA T82 GEN ADVICE - RECALL those brain cells ;o)
I am looking for confirmation that I am making the correct IOGEN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver
[ snip ]
I know its a legal issue we won't solve here, but I think
this raises an interesting question regarding how long is
long enough to keep looking and how quick is quick enough to
satisfy
Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
Bruno,
The software to do CVS (Custom Volume Size) is included with the Resource
Manager package of software - always included with every purchase. It's kind
of free because the Resource Manager suite is mandatory software with every
Lightning or USP you buy.
I
Good morning all, I'm having some problems assembling David Coles Scheduler
(CBT tape #388) on an OS/390 1.2 system.
Here's the error -
#REGS GEN=ON,(BASE1REG,R12),(BASE2REG,R11),(BASE3REG,R7)
ASMA089E *** ERROR *** Arithmetic expression contains illegal delimiter or
ends
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 10:50 -0600, John Benik wrote:
The 9740's failed with several hardware errors from bad cards
to cap door problems, and pass thru port problems.
We're not anywhere *near* your size, and have a single 9740 with no
passthru. The box replaced a 9310 when we upgraded to 9840C.
I'm not sure on what you say about comparing the names.
But, when you use HCD to build and download an IOCDS (IOCP) to
the machine, you have to select which CPC definition to build /
download. The different CPC definitions in the IODF would have
different I/O devices defined to
I have gotten the following message a number of times from one of our
CICS/TS 1.3 regions (on z/OS 1.4)
+IEW2166S 02C6 OFFSET WAS SPECIFIED AS A NEGATIVE NUMBER OTHER THAN -1.
It appears that this is the GETE function of the IEWBIND. Does this
indicate a bad load module? If so, is there a simple
I browsed many documents, but still doubt:
What ICSF version should I use on z/OS V1R4 and z9 machine with
CryptoExpress2 cards ?
It seems to be HCR770B, can anybody confirm this ?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For
Anyone remember seing a PATCH that was for removing a tape from
a connected set? I know I have it someplace but just can't find it.
I've got a tape that RECYCLE thinks is a member of a connected set but when
I do a LIST TTOC on it there is no previous or subsequent tape indicated.
Tom
as400 wrote:
Well, thanks for this information..I really appreciate it...
And lastly, can Solaris (UNIX) be ran on a Mainframe or not? Because
you said:
would say that most of the systems were mainframe based (IBM and
Unisys) and non-Unix based OS's:
Please advise.
what you mean by
Hi Dave.
Hopefully somebody else will be able to give more/better information but
my old grey matter tells me that you can't do that. Years ago we
upgraded from a T82 to an X82 because the T82 still only supported 256
logical devices and we were running out of addresses. We upgraded to
the X82
Ain't no need to be politcally correct. Today is Christmas. In the US,
it's a Federally recognized Holiday, since 1870, by the name Christmas.
You can wish me Happy Holidays, Season's Greetings, whatever. But, I say
to
you, Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas to you and every one on the list
I have an LPAR running z/OS 1.4 with CICS TS 2.2. I am unable to shutdown
any CICS region in this LPAR using the console command F CICSREGION,CEMT P
SHUT (or SHUT I). It is as if the command is not being received by the CICS
region. No modify commands for CICS work (ie F CICSREGION,CEMT I TASK).
I seem to recall thought processes of just how hard it would be to
actually recover information from such a tape without intimate knowledge
of exactly how the tape was created and the record layout(s) of the
tape.
Add in the propriety nature of tools such as DFDSS (and equivalent),
many of us
Hi all,
If someone could write me offline to help me understand how to do contract
work, I would appreciate it.
I have been trying to find a job for over 18 months and cannot seem to find
anything. I now have a possibility of obtaining contract work. I just have
not done this and need to
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
as400 wrote:
Hello-
Dispatchers who enter license plate numbers or license numbers to query
about our personal records get authorized to access the DMV databases
in order to do those tasks. My question is, do those records on the DMV
database stored on a DB2 or
Hello all
I have a VSAM file defined in a cics 3.1.0 region . The file is owend by CICSA
and is accessed
with remote definition from CICSB and CICSC. I have ZOS1.4 on Z890.
This has been working fine fore three weeks now.. BUT,,
After I recycled CICSA , my customer began to complain that
It's possible I saw a photograph of this thing in an IBM catalogue around 1971.
IBM used to produce a hand-held card punch. This was a frame that held a
single punch card.
The cards were special stock with each chad partly pre-punched - behind each
row was a slot
running the width of the
No messages received for several days. Checking that I am still
subscribed and everything is working.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On 27 Dec 2005 18:38:07 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henry Law wrote:
I found a strange plastic device in a colleague's
cupboard at IBM some
years ago; I've had one attempt at identifying it within
the company and
Hi Dave,
Seasons greetings to you. Wow an RVA, now theres a blast from the past,
but dont worry I remember this box from 1992 when it was an Iceberg
The complete set of manuals for an RVA of this time period is:
* IBM RAMAC Virtual Array Storage Planning, Implementation and Usage
Guide,
Skip Robinson wrote:
We have not had ANY token ring applications for years except as required
for mainframe interconnection. Our network folks would be happy to see its
demise altogether.
It have been possible for years (since G5 AFAIK) to get rid of TR, even
for SE-HMC connections.
AFAIR
I haven't really been paying very much attention to this topic since it's
not at all my forte - if anything is. However, I'm struck by the seeming
fact that there is no current general solution to the tape set-up problem.
If there were and some users were allowed to use the required procedure and
Is the console defined to the CICS you are trying to shut down?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Peter Ten Eyck
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 8:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Can not shutdown CICS region
I have
How about a relocate ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Strange message from a CICS region.
I have gotten the following message a
ISTR CICS needed a terminal definition to represent the console.
Been too long now, my memory leaks.
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and
as400 wrote:
Can anyone please be able to post screenshots of Mainframe OSs like
z/OS, z/VM running Linux and so on?
Do those really look like the typical green screen or they look like a
GUI?
Thanks..
Traditional IBM mainframe OS's look like a green screen, just like the
screens you
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
IBM has withdrawn from marketing and service a product called
Optimization Subroutine Library, a set of mathematical routines for use
in FORTRAN and C/C++ programs. IBM doesn't seem to have a
Try putting a MEND after the macro just to see if someone messed up the
macro construction. - Paul Hanrahan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kinney, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
as400 wrote:
Can anyone please be able to post screenshots of Mainframe OSs like
z/OS, z/VM running Linux and so on?
Do those really look like the typical green screen or they look like a
GUI?
A typical mainframe screen isn't GUI, but at the same time is far from being
the 'green screen' of
On 28 Dec 2005 09:24:47 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Andrews) wrote:
Candidates for U.S. President must have been citizens at birth. Postal
workers must be U.S. citizens, or have permanent resident status.
Or more precisely:
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the
Hi Kevin,
A couple of thoughts.
1) I don't know how new or old the CBT tape's copy of SCHEDRUN and my
maclib are, but you can find the most recent copies of both at my
website: www.comesoft.com. Click on Downloads, then on Free Utilities.
2) If the files from my website still don't work,
as400 wrote:
Well, thanks for this information..I really appreciate it...
And lastly, can Solaris (UNIX) be ran on a Mainframe or not? Because
you said:
would say that most of the systems were mainframe based (IBM and
Unisys) and non-Unix based OS's:
Please advise.
It depends on your
On 28 Dec 2005 09:30:35 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy
Robertson) wrote:
So, did anyone get anything good???
A new nephew!!!
Great!
Over the years I got a nephew and a granddaughter (age 3) on Dec 26
(age 13), a grandson on December 21 (age 6), and a granddaughter who
will be 5 tomorrow.
As far as the z8 is concerned, you're going to have to wait until IBM announces
it.
Have you tried Hesh Wiener ( http://www.tech-news.com ) for pricing?
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
Oddly, the CICS list stopped sending mail too at about the same time...
Both have started again...at about the same time. What's that all about?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mueller, David
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Hi,
Maybe the FIXCDS function would work:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2R440/1.8.2
For example:
FIXCDS Y VOLSER DISPLAY - Displays the type Y dump volume record
FIXCDS X VOLSER DELETE - Deletes a type X backup volume record from the
BCDS
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005
Greetings all,
I need to delete a catalog entry for a dataset that has MIGRAT as the
volume, but no longer exists.
I've searched the Access Methods and HSM manuals, but haven't found anything
other than
NOSCRATCH affects the DFSMShsm delete function interaction for VSAM
base clusters
Hi, All,
Doing some year-end cleanup and encountered a catalog entry for a
non-existent dataset: HLQ.MLQ.LLQ(0) (yes, the parentheses were part of
the DSN). While I was able to delete the entry by specifying HLQ.MLQ.*
for the entryname in the IDCAMS DELETE NOSCRATCH command, I'm curious how
In a message dated 12/28/2005 12:38:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oddly, the CICS list stopped sending mail too at about the same time...
Both have started again...at about the same time. What's that all about?
Haven't gotten the final results. Lots of
Hello,
I am getting the follwoing abend:
IEC212I
414-08,IGG0201B,DBM05310,DFDSS,XRSDLOG,687C,SYSS45,SSUXRSP.XRS999.XRSLOG01
The IBM documentation is not very descriptive. Can anyone help me to
understand/solve the problem?
TIA
Regards
Jon
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Hello,
I am getting the follwoing abend:
IEC212I
414-08,IGG0201B,DBM05310,DFDSS,XRSDLOG,687C,SYSS45,SSUXRSP.XRS999.XRSLOG01
The IBM documentation is not very descriptive. Can anyone help me to
understand/solve the problem?
TIA
Regards
Jon
A co-worker and
golf-partner of mine got a kidney early
Monday morning.
I got to see my (estranged) 16-year old boy,
for the first time since October 2004.
He finally doesn't believe all the ex says
about him.
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
Radoslaw,
As I said - It's kind of free. Kind of like ICKDSF and DFSMSdfp are free
with MVS.
The boxes will work problem free without Resource Manager Software, but
there is no Remote Console or Web Access without the Resource Manager
Software. That means you would need to call an Engineer to
David Cole wrote:
1) I don't know how new or old the CBT tape's copy of SCHEDRUN and my
maclib are, but you can find the most recent copies of both at my
website: www.comesoft.com.
That should be: www.colesoft.com!
--
Yes a console is defined. Right now we are thinking it may be related to
our security manager setup...more to come.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Look for errors in SYSLOG and SYSOUT (CEMT ? Message destination, I
forget the proper name). It sounds like it's SOS or on the way down
already.
I'd bet the C CICSREGION command would work, but get a dump first if
you care.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
In a message dated 12/28/2005 1:16:24 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That should be: www.colesoft.com!
Netnanny probably cut him off at the passvbg...then adware and
spyzapper kick in and 15 minutes later find out it's a
The tapes were, for most reasonable purposes and definitions,
'encrypted'. Without the 'keys' (creation trail and layouts), the data
is useless. Of course, the data could always be recovered just like any
encryption scheme can be broken given enough resources.
The strength of any encryption
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:06:46 -0600, Peter Ten Eyck wrote:
Yes a console is defined. Right now we are thinking it may be related to
our security manager setup...more to come.
Are you issuing the CICS modify commands from a z/OS Master console or are
you issuing the modify commands from an SDSF
Make that ME, not HIM.
Original message
From: Ted MacNEIL A co-worker and
golf-partner of mine got a kidney early
Monday morning.
I got to see my (estranged) 16-year old boy,
for the first time since October 2004.
He finally doesn't believe all the ex says
about him.
-teD
Me? A
On 28 Dec 2005 11:51:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The strength of any encryption system is often measured in the amount of
time it would take to crack the key and decrypt the data. For example,
current estimates as to the length of time is would take to crack a 256 bit
AES key are in the
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:52:47 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
No, that letter goes all the way back to the 3271, 3272 and 3275, long
before the 3274. I vaguely recall that A was LU0, including BSC, B was
SNA and C was local non-SNA, but ICBW.
...
I don't
At 12:46 -0600 on 12/28/2005, Eatherly, John D [IT] wrote about
Warning: PTF's require HDS microcode, which is not availab:
Just wanted to pass on a heads up on some APARs that require HDS
microcode on DASD. And that microcode will not be available until the
2nd week in January.
Was there
At 11:34 -0500 on 12/26/2005, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: Merry Christmas!:
Christmas is not a holy day for me. There are multiple unrelated
holidays around this time of year. Wishing happy holiday
acknowledges the fact that there is more than one religion.
Including one holiday
At 13:14 -0500 on 12/28/2005, Jill Grine wrote about Delete
non-existent dataset with volume MIGRAT:
Greetings all,
I need to delete a catalog entry for a dataset that has MIGRAT as the
volume, but no longer exists.
I've searched the Access Methods and HSM manuals, but haven't found anything
*
Just as a word to the cautious - I would not IPL any system that accesses
the HDS storage subsystem while an HDS microcode update is taking place.
*
On 12/28/05, Eatherly, John D [IT] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to pass on a heads up on some APARs that require HDS
microcode on
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/27/2005
at 10:17 AM, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Candidates for U.S. President must have been citizens at birth.
No. But the governator isn't old enough to be grandfathered in.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/27/2005
at 05:22 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
or I have a Unisys xxx running MCP (I think that is the OS name).
That depends on *which* Unisys processor. The lines inherited from
Burroughs run a system called MCP. The lines inherited from UNIVAC
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/27/2005
at 06:08 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Traditional IBM mainframe OS's look like a green screen,
Traditional? MVS has supported color displays for decades. Even for
monochrome, it's more likely to be amber than green.
--
Shmuel
Couple of key items. One, cracking a cryptogram is a well know process. But I
am not aware of any such algorithm that can identify the *meaning* of a
character string. Is that an area code, a PIN, or a record type descriptor?
There *is* a difference between data and information.
Another, I
Hi,
We just went to LPAR mode from basic mode. We have a 2066-002 (z800)
that is about 350 MIPS. We currently only have a single LPAR, but we
wish to CAP the LPAR at 200 MIPS. (for ISV charging purposes)
Is this easy to do? How? Can it be done without a POR or IPL?
Thanks for any help!
If you send picture from msys for operator, it is fully graphical. What is
screenshot of OS ? :)
On 12/28/05, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/27/2005
at 06:08 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Traditional IBM mainframe OS's look
Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, best wishes for an
environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive,
gender neutral celebration of the WINTER SOLSTICE holiday, practiced within the
most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also remember that we now, unfortunately, have to protect data from
possible internal threats as well. I read of one recent event where an
ex-employee was attempting to extort money from his old employer by holding
backup tapes with data on them and threatening to let
Yes. Assuming your micro code is anywhere near up to date, this is an
entry in the activation profile on the HMC, but is easily changed on the
fly (CHANGE LPAR CONTROLS).
You actually have two caps to choose from. One is a 'soft' cap ('Defined
Capacity') that uses a rolling four hour average.
Here is compelling evidence why auditors should *never* be permitted to
make security 'requirements'. Never. Only see that due diligence is
done.
What we have is a serious case of auditors going wild using only garbled
media reports as justification.
Wholesale encryption just does not make
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ABN Tape - Found
Here is compelling evidence why auditors should *never* be
permitted to
Ron,
To be honest fair and 100% accurate you should said it is delivered
with Resource Manager, which is usually ordered with the box. Analogy
to ICKDSF is not good: I cannot get rid of ICKDSF when buying MVS.
I can omit Resource Manager when I buy HDS box. We did it *everytime* we
bought HDS
Martin, Mike wrote:
Hi,
We just went to LPAR mode from basic mode. We have a 2066-002 (z800)
that is about 350 MIPS. We currently only have a single LPAR, but we
wish to CAP the LPAR at 200 MIPS. (for ISV charging purposes)
Is this easy to do? How? Can it be done without a POR or IPL?
Mueller, David wrote:
I'm not sure on what you say about comparing the names.
But, when you use HCD to build and download an IOCDS (IOCP) to
the machine, you have to select which CPC definition to build /
download. The different CPC definitions in the IODF would have
different I/O devices
Storage encryption standards coming soon?
12/19/05
Proposed standards for protecting data on disk or tape are gathering
steam within the IEEE and could be supported in products as soon as
next year, according to proponents.
Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
Doing some year-end cleanup and encountered a catalog entry for a
non-existent dataset: HLQ.MLQ.LLQ(0) (yes, the parentheses were part of
the DSN). While I was able to delete the entry by specifying HLQ.MLQ.*
for the entryname in the IDCAMS DELETE NOSCRATCH
R.S. wrote:
Someone provided DSN in apostrophes. Been there, seen that, even 9+
character qualifiers.
|Command - Enter / to select action Message
Volume
| Tracks % XT Device Dsorg Recfm Lrecl Blksz CreatedExpires
Referred
Discussed multiple times in past. See archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0102L=ibm-mainD=0P=118438
Requires connect and logon using special RACF group ARCCATGP.
Tom Longfellow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 13:14 -0500 on
Radoslaw,
Fair enough comments. As for customer's opening the storage and using the
SVP, I guess you have some agreement with your local reseller that allows
you to do this.
As for the Speed of RM - you're right, but HDS stopped shipping Remote
Console with the 9900V.
Ron
-Original
I wouldn't IPL or Boot any system that is accessing ANY vendor's storage
when microcode is being updated. :(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Gasior
Sent: Thursday, 29 December 2005 4:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
A RS/6000 is not a mainframe.
Are we sure about that anymore?
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
Well, that depends on how you define mainframe. When I go to IBM's
Web site and click on mainframes, I don't see any RS/6000's. However,
some of the higher end
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/27/2005
at 05:22 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
or I have a Unisys xxx running MCP (I think that is the OS name).
That depends on *which* Unisys processor. The lines inherited from
Burroughs run a system
I did this to myself earlier today. It took hours to understand
and generate a small test case. I managed do delete a data set
but leave the catalog entry. When I subsequently tried to
allocate the data set, ALLOCATE apparently succeeded with RC=0,
but LISTDSI( ... FILE ) fails with RC=16
Texas Yankee wrote:
I have no experience in the zOS environment - any suggestions on an FTP
program to transfer large volumes of zOS report data files, on a regular
basis (daily) from the zOS environment to a Windows file system? Thanks!
z/OS comes with a ftp client that can ftp to a
On Dec 27, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
I haven't really been paying very much attention to this topic
since it's
not at all my forte - if anything is. However, I'm struck by the
seeming
fact that there is no current general solution to the tape set-up
problem.
If there were and
On Dec 28, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Hal Merritt wrote:
Here is compelling evidence why auditors should *never* be
permitted to
make security 'requirements'. Never. Only see that due diligence is
done.
What we have is a serious case of auditors going wild using only
garbled
media reports as
I will like to safely remove a library from LINKLIST and stick library in
its users JCL (as STEPLIB).
Is there a way to collect statistics - who used modules from given LINKLIST
library ?
Is therea command to identify current users of modules from given LINKLIST
library ?
Shmuel Koller
Hal Merritt wrote:
Here is compelling evidence why auditors should *never* be permitted to
make security 'requirements'. Never. Only see that due diligence is
done.
in addition to working on x9.59 financial industry retail payment
standard ...
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#x959
Greetings,
I am in need of Type 19 Direct Access Volume SMF
Records To Test DAF.
Cheers,
Michael
http://www.geocities.com/michaeljosephcleary/
===
Instructions:
1) Creat the SMF file with IFASMFDP and XMIT the SMF
file (JCL below)
2) do a binary transfer of the
Hal Merritt wrote:
Here is compelling evidence why auditors should *never* be permitted to
make security 'requirements'. Never. Only see that due diligence is
done.
recent backbround on part of the issue
Merchants unsecure, poll
http://www.crime-research.org/news/28.12.2005/1723/
from above:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:38:39 +0100, Jon Renton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the follwoing abend:
IEC212I
414-08,IGG0201B,DBM05310,DFDSS,XRSDLOG,687C,SYSS45,SSUXRSP.XRS999.XRSLOG01
The IBM documentation is not very descriptive. Can anyone help me to
understand/solve the problem?
92 matches
Mail list logo
