Hello all,
I expect Bill will be disappointed to read the questions regarding COBOL.
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,18288578%5E15306%5E%5Enbv%
5E,00.html
Regards
Bruce Hewson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
DCOLLECT also
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 7:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Automating ISMF
i'd like to automate a query to list all accessible DASD
For this sort of thing there is a lot of goodness on the CBT tape
(www.cbttape.org) - including programs to list DASD information and
sample DCOLLECT reports.
The latter is probably your best bet.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
I assume you saw the paragraph,
Under questioning from Senator Fielding, Mr Farr agreed the local project
was based on old technology, but it is still very widely used for large
mainframe applications.
Any guess about what the author of this article things about THAT platform
(he asked
Bill Klein wrote:
I assume you saw the paragraph,
Under questioning from Senator Fielding, Mr Farr agreed the local project
was based on old technology, but it is still very widely used for large
mainframe applications.
Any guess about what the author of this article things about THAT
On 28/02/06, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: Isn't COBOL the most primitive language in use ? OK, I assume Basic
(BASIC ?) is not in use. Isn't COBOL unpopular on other platforms ?
Visual BASIC still seems quite popular... OK, so it's not basic BASIC,
but it's basically the same.
(OK, I'll
BTW: 3494 Library ID is not hardcoded in metal. It can be easily changed
from operator panel (although requires Service logon). It is quick and
easy. Is it the option for you to chaneg LIB ID instead of IODF ?
BTW2: AFAIR It is not required to code LIB ID in IODF at all. Having ID
is more
When I went through altitude chamber training, the instructor expalined that as
external pressure decrease, gases in the body would try to expand. As internal
pressure grew, they would exit the body any way they could. If you could smell
the gases, it meant your oxygen mask was not on
If you could smell the gases, it meant your oxygen mask was not on
properly and you would be well advised to deal with it quickly.
This smells the same to me. If someone can convince a privileged
product into giving them information they cannot get on their own,
then
there is a security
On 2/27/2006 4:04 PM, Bob Henry wrote:
I'm migrating to z/OS 1.6 from an OS/390 2.10 system where I had batch
jobs set up to issue MVS Modify commands to CICS. In the 1.6 system I
receive an IEE345I MODIFY AUTHORITY INVALID, FAILED BY MVS error using a
batch job which includes something like:
I believe the esoteric must be defined as it is interegated before the SMS
routines take control. We have a few Esoterics with only one device in them
used as a placeholder to keep from having JCL errors in our legacy JCL.
We override the UNIT in our SMS routines, but this is takes effect after
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
snip
Note: Data that is to be processed using the Encryption Facility
Client cannot be
-- snip --
I was told that in order to do this the secondary volume labels' must be
clipped before I can bring them online but by clipping them I also
loose the
primary-secondary volume relationships. Besides using another lpar or
other
3rd party utilities to run the backups, how does one
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/26/2006
at 04:12 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mss/3850 provided simulated 3330s (icebergs) staged from tape
cartridges.
3330 was Merlin.
later there was a mss/3850 option that would use 3350 drives for
staging the simulated 3330 data.
But not
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/26/2006
at 06:49 PM, Thomas Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I must say that I don't understand You both.
That says more about you than about us ;-)
If You don't want to support the code then don't.
And that avoids the interruptions how? And what happens if
Many news media have style guidelines that call for long (more than four
letters?) acronyms to be written in lower case, because they feel that
otherwise the look of the long strings of caps is distracting to readers.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Just about choked on my beer ...
Support is planned for up to 4 TB of real memory on a single z/OS image.
This is expected to allow the use of up to 512 GB of real memory on a single
z/OS image on IBM System z9T servers and up to 256 GB on z990 servers.
Yep - definitely need that. Well, maybe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Changing an IODF in batch
snip
Ok, I get it now. In fact I didn't even think about such scenario, I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Hewson
Hello all,
I expect Bill will be disappointed to read the questions
regarding COBOL.
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,18288578%5E15306%5E%5Enbv%5E
,00.html
Family First Senator
Sorry fogot this cutie - yet another over-loaded (IBM) TLA.
WLM execution delay monitoring services are planned to be mapped to
appropriate Application Response Measurement (ARM) services. This is
expected to simplify the EWLM instrumentation of subsystems that are already
instrumented with WLM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
[ snip ]
BTW: Isn't COBOL the most primitive language in use ?
I believe Assembler is the most primitive language in use, regardless of
platform.
-jc-
Depends on exactly what simplifying has been done; it needn't necessarily
equate to dumbing down. OTOH, including the phrase for the new generation of
IT professionals has started alarm bells ringing in my head.
Jon
snip
Increased focus on simplifying z/OS for the new generation of IT
On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:36 AM, Bill Klein wrote:
---SNIP
P.P.S. Any news writer who spells it Cobol shows how
knowledgeable they
are about the language.
Or knows the current sad state of affairs with the new one. Sorry
Bill, hero worship is over in
My understanding is you can allow a unit to be coded in UNIT=unit which is not
defined to HCD but only handled by SMS.
We have some of these. We had to add them to our Thruput Manager parameters in
order to avoid an error when it analyzes the jobs.
TM UNIT HANDLE UNIT(PTMP) AS(SYSALLDA) /*
Radoslaw:
*BEFORE* changing devicetype for an Adabas database, be very sure that you
run (or someone else has run) the Adabas verification utilities, ADAACK,
ADADCK, ADAICK -- **and** that any and all errors are corrected/eliminated.
I *still* wish I had done that myself 10 years and 28 days
In a message dated 2/28/2006 4:45:01 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW: Isn't COBOL the most primitive language in use ? OK, I assume Basic
(BASIC ?) is not in use. Isn't COBOL unpopular on other platforms ?
Not so sure that's all bad. With precompilers pretty
Hi,
I loved the Health Checker prototype and have found the full Health
Checker for z/OS very useful as well if slightly more work to get going.
I have had conversations with a couple folks who have tried to convince
me to explore the OMEGAMON z/OS Management Console. I went back and
read over
Still don't see anything about support for the VSAM IMBED, REPLICATE, and
KEYRANGE attributes being withdrawn. Does anyone know? Can anyone say?
Haven't we been warned long enough (wasn't that way back in
OS/390 R10)?
Not that I expect it to still be an issue for us by then, but we still have
Jon Brock wrote on 02/28/2006 09:23:41 AM:
Depends on exactly what simplifying has been done; it needn't
necessarily equate to dumbing down. OTOH, including the phrase for
the new generation of IT professionals has started alarm bells
ringing in my head.
It shouldn't. It is talking about
When Binder and I were both very young (well, at least Binder), I was
delighted to get messages such as IEW2413I 5690 SECTION x FROM DATASET
y IS A DUPLICATE AND HAS NOT BEEN ADDED. I had long wanted to know this
sort of information. A few releases later, I noticed I was no longer
getting this
I successfully used a 'D A,L' as a batch JCL command which tells me that
the MVS side is ok, right? I actually have multiple 'F CICSxx,'CEMT INQ
TAS'' commands in a job which get directed to multiple CICS regions (jobs,
not stc). If the CICS region is not active, I get an IEE341I NOT ACTIVE
In a recent note, Chase, John said:
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:03:38 -0600
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
Note: Data that is to be processed using the Encryption Facility
Client cannot be created using compression.
Hi, Bob.
Does APAR OA09652 describe your environment?
Regards,
Peggy
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:36:40 -0600, Bob Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I successfully used a 'D A,L' as a batch JCL command which tells me that
the MVS side is ok, right? I actually have multiple 'F CICSxx,'CEMT INQ
TAS''
I've noticed that the initial-upper-rest-lower style for acronyms appears to
have originated in the UK. The BBC refers to Nato, Nasa, and Cobol
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4021093.stm as an example).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am running z/OS 1.7 and TS 1.3 and I was able to run the job below and
it functioned properly...
// JOB (000),'',
// MSGCLASS=X,CLASS=C,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// NOTIFY=SYSUID
//BR14 EXEC
If you CLIP the secondary DASD, just remember that a subsequent RESYNC will
not copy the label since that wasn't changed on the primary subsystem. You
may want to CLIP it back.
I believe that RESYNC will copy any tracks which have been modified on
the source OR target. Ron Hawkins, can you
Well, shouldn't they be known as the Bbc then?
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:27:46 -0800, Ray Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that the initial-upper-rest-lower style for acronyms appears
to
have originated in the UK. The BBC refers to Nato, Nasa, and Cobol
Volume Name J00092
Storage Pool Name EXCHANGE-3592
Device Class Name 3592
Estimated Capacity 307200.0
Scaled Capacity Applied -
Pct Util 30.8
Volume Status FILLING
Volume . . . . . . : J00092 VOL1 volser : Rack number :
J00092
Media name . . . . : 3592
I think the OP stated that only acronyms 4 characters or longer were
converted to lowercase (i'm quite sure that had the BBC been the BBBC, the
cut-off would have been 5 characters ...)
Chris Hoelscher
IDMS DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-710-3038
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
On 2/28/2006 10:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The good intention was to dispel the expectation, or wishful thinking,
that the EFC could invert all transformations performed by ICSF.
Clearly it fell short of the mark insofar as it easily misled you
and me. A clarification might be helpful,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Henry
I successfully used a 'D A,L' as a batch JCL command which
tells me that the MVS side is ok, right? I actually have
multiple 'F CICSxx,'CEMT INQ TAS'' commands in a job which
get directed to multiple
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:58:05 -0500, Chris Hoelscher wrote:
I think the OP stated that only acronyms 4 characters or longer were
converted to lowercase (i'm quite sure that had the BBC been the BBBC, the
cut-off would have been 5 characters ...)
Yes, I saw that, but I've upped the ante (or
BBC is an abbreviation, not an acronym.
On 28/2/06 16:55, Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, shouldn't they be known as the Bbc then?
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:27:46 -0800, Ray Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that the initial-upper-rest-lower style for acronyms
Hi All:
The following message was posted on VSE-L by Mr. Dave Stuart. He has
authorized me to also post it on IBM-MAIN.
Regards,
Gene
Morning all,
Yes, the subject line is correct. Were you an IBM 705 Programmer?
Why, you ask, would I be looking for a 705 Programmer? Well, personally, I
am
Hi, All,
Is there an easy way to find any short blocks that might exist in a
FB dataset? We don't have DITTO (IBM File Manager), and I haven't found
a way with File-Aid yet.
TIA,
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
The following command
MN JOBNAMES,T
turns on messages IEF403I, IEF404I.
The messages appear in job output, as well as hardcopy log (syslog in
this case).
However, when the console from which the command is entered is switched
off, the messages are turned off.
I can enter the command from master
Nigel Hadfield writes
BBC is an abbreviation, not an acronym.
There is no viable way to distinguish abbreviations and acronyms.
Traditionally, acronyms were viewed as a pronounceable subset of
abbreviations; and this distinction certainly makes BBC an abbreviation and
COBOL an acronym.
Craddock, Chris wrote:
It would be folly to depend on information hiding as the only security
strategy, especially as the feature has only lately been grafted on and
is (ahem) less than bullet proof. But at the same time, adding another
layer of Kevlar to the vest may look like a fine idea if
In a recent note, Walt Farrell said:
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:08:09 -0500
On 2/28/2006 10:47 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
The good intention was to dispel the expectation, or wishful thinking,
that the EFC could invert all transformations performed by ICSF.
Clearly it fell
Is The IBM Encryption Facility for z/OS different from ICSF?
If so, I'm quite wrong.
Yes. ICSF is the encryption component of the operating system, no extra
cost.
The IBM Encryption Facility for z/OS is a cost program which includes a
facility to copy and encrypt a sequential dataset, and
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Walt Farrell said:
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:08:09 -0500
On 2/28/2006 10:47 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
The good intention was to dispel the expectation, or wishful thinking,
that the EFC could invert all transformations performed by ICSF.
Activate MONITOR independent of a console was an enhancement to z/OS
R7 as part of the console restructure.
David Hom did a nice presentation at SHARE in Boston 2881 Now Playing at
a Screen Near You:
z/OS Console Restructure that mentioned this. Sure enough it is in the
R7 documentation.
We
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:37 -0500, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I believe that RESYNC will copy any tracks which have been modified on
the source OR target. Ron Hawkins, can you confirm?
I dont think so ( i am not Ron)
A cestpair resynch in a pprc IBM disks environment will only synch
We should rename this list to LOD - List Of Digression...
Thanks,
Jim Weidt
Senior Systems Engineer
Jostens Inc.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail
communication and any attached documentation may be privileged,
confidential or otherwise protected from
We're looking at merging two RACF databases. As part of our initial
analysis we are interested in placing RACF into a coupling facility. We
are curious about changes in RACF performance using the structures.
Better? Worse? No appreciable difference? Are there any published
documents
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 10:21 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
But, in this case, I'm afraid the potential
resource consumption increases of MLS might be more like strapping an
extra 100 Lb (45.359 Kg) pack on your back! Tough choice
Depending on your naming conventions and willingness to cut
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Encryption Facility Client
SNIP
The compression is pretty well documented in the zSeries
Thanks to Tom Schmidt over on the CICS list! This was one of those can't
see the forest ... problems. I spent hours looking at RACF profiles, CICS
definitions, reading MVS doc, etc. I think I was getting close when I
discovered that the job was running in a JOBCLASS with AUTH=IO and when I
Alan,
We did this years ago and found no appreciable performance difference.
It did improve our security adminstration as there was only one point of
maintenance. As always depending on your setup UMMV.
Thanks,
Fletch 817-3545
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Hi,
I have to run some reports against a weeks worth of SMF data (3 LPAR's,
24 hr per day). Do I need to pre-allocate a MFRx for each interval ?
or is there a way to allocate 1 dataset and have all the reports written
to it ?
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse
Dean,
are you talking about running the Post Processor, PGM=ERBRMFPP ?
If so, my RMF User's Guide, Chapter 17, says that you can use a DDname of PPRPTS
instead of having MFRx DDs allocated, one for each interval.
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
Mainframe Systems Services
National Semiconductor Corp.
No, I can't. The job I used many, many moons ago does not work as I
remembered.
What I recall doing was to pry the covers off of the IMS utility
DFSUOCU0, which did exactly what was desired. That is, completely
replaced a target PDS with a source PDS. Worked great, and I used it
extensively to
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:35:58 -0500, Dean Montevago
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have to run some reports against a weeks worth of SMF data (3 LPAR's,
24 hr per day). Do I need to pre-allocate a MFRx for each interval ?
or is there a way to allocate 1 dataset and have all the reports
I have to ask, WHY?
Unless you really meant RECFM=FBS.
No access method I know of cares about short blocks in the middle of the
file. They just deal with it. If you really don't want any short
blocks, use IEBGENER or either of the sort products to copy it to a new
file. That would take no
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:23:17 -0600, Blaicher, Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to ask, WHY?
Unless you really meant RECFM=FBS.
No access method I know of cares about short blocks in the middle of the
file. They just deal with it. ...
I'm probably way out of date, but I thought IPCS
On 2/28/2006 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're looking at merging two RACF databases. As part of our initial
analysis we are interested in placing RACF into a coupling facility. We
are curious about changes in RACF performance using the structures.
Better? Worse? No appreciable
Well. We are still using an old RAMAC and use IXFP.
I do have a question on IXFP Can a pack name be renamed on the fly?
Thanks,
Desi de la Garza
Systems Programmer
Bexar County Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL
I do not think this
was widely publicized and I know it will cause us concern for a while.
Is anyone addressing this with IBM and are you finding the same story.
IBM has a life-cycle site.
They DO announce at least three years before support is dropped.
I remember hearing about IXFP a long time
de gustibus non est disputandum
IMPORTANT
The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and
may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review,
-Snip--
I believe that RESYNC will copy any tracks which have been modified on
the source OR target. Ron Hawkins, can you confirm?
-Snip-
Kinda depends whether you are talking about Trucopy of Shadowimage...
That is true for Trucopy (see below from the manual):
-
If the RCU accepts write
de gustibus non est disputandum
I'd better tell our APPDEV people QUICK.
Our company is doing quite well.
And, our bread--butter application is CICS/COBOL.
COBOL (while I haven't programmed in it for over 20 years) is alive and kicking.
Even some of our web-weenies know how to, at least, read
From: Fenner, Jim
de gustibus non est disputandum
Indeed.
And it could probably be added that this is about as comprehensible as most
of the correspondence I get from the ATO ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
If it's no longer supported does that mean I can quit paying for it?
They still support the hardware, though. What sense does it make to
support the hardware but not the software that makes it usable?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No ignorance there, Pat.
If you wrote a program that only worked with a given blocksize, then
short blocks becomes a problem. Even then, you still have to write the
program to work with a short block because the last block may not be
full.
My ignorance will now show. How do you get short
I can't find the announcement that shows where IXFP is withdrawn. Can
somebody point me to it?
Thanks.
Rex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
They still support the hardware, though. What sense does it make to
support the hardware but not the software that makes it usable?
THAT does not make sense!
I missed that because we got off of RAMAC ICEBERG aeons ago.
We were on ESS (Shark) in September 2000.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic
You didn't say if this was for a small file, or if you only need to do it
once, but under those conditions you might try this.
Run IEBPTPCH on the dataset using just ' PRINT TYPORG=PS,TOTCONV=XE' for
printing in hex, and allocate SYSUT2 to an output dataset that you can
later edit with ISPF.
I can't find the announcement that shows where IXFP is withdrawn. Can
somebody point me to it?
I am not at work, but I can give you the steps I used to find it.
Go to www.IBM.com
Enter ILC on the search tab (Information Life Cycle)
[If my memory has not failed me, you will see a list of all the
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:53, Chase, John wrote:
Is there an easy way to find any short blocks that might exist
in a FB dataset? We don't have DITTO (IBM File Manager),
and I haven't found a way with File-Aid yet.
The BLKSIZE2 program in file 183 of the CBT tape prints the size of each
INFO REFCARD
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Hi Jim,
You may want to call STK ( Sun ). They have a product called: SVAA (
Shared Virtual Array Administrator ).
According to their website, the supported storage systems are: V-Series
(SVA) or RVA, any model.
HTH
Glenn Miller
In a recent note, Greg Price said:
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:46:59 +1100
I can only think that the CSECT order is different in the two modules.
For programs with a large number of CSECTS it would be tiresome
to compare. If this is the problem then how about relinking with a
series
As Brian mentioned, DB2 uses the XTIOT, which is stored in non-contiguous
storage, above the 16 MEG line. However, in z/OS 1.4 and before, the DSAB
chain, which is used to manage all allocations, was still below the 16 MEG
line, which limited the the total number of allocations available.
Can anyone shed some light on the feature of erasing data on DASD? I
am just curious thats all.
For instance does it erase one track at a time or a range of tracks
(or ?), once the command has been issued
does it tie up the channel until the command ends ? (or is it
asynchronous?) Is there
In a message dated 2/28/2006 6:59:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
INFO REFCARD
++
Like it says at the bottom of each post send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
For
BTW there was an item in an IBM pub that at first attempted (IMO) to
come across as an article of fact finding as it turned out it was an
ad for FDR erase product. It was cleverly disguised, IMO but after
reading about the page after page of platitudes it was, come to find
out, an ad from the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/28/2006
at 11:44 AM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BTW: Isn't COBOL the most primitive language in use ?
No. Not even close.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/28/2006
at 08:00 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I believe Assembler is the most primitive language in use, regardless
of platform.
C is considerably more basic than HLA. In fact, any assembler with a
decent macro facility is higher level than C.
--
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/27/2006
at 02:40 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok. I give up. You probably weren't refering to Alaska, Above the
Knee, or a type of automatic rifle. What is AK in this context?
It's an abbreviation for an Yiddish phrase for an old person, roughly
On Feb 28, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Bruce Black wrote:
BTW there was an item in an IBM pub that at first attempted (IMO)
to come across as an article of fact finding as it turned out it
was an ad for FDR erase product. It was cleverly disguised, IMO
but after reading about the page after page of
Just about choked on my beer ...
Support is planned for up to 4 TB of real memory on a single z/OS
image.
This is expected to allow the use of up to 512 GB of real memory on a
single
z/OS image on IBM System z9T servers and up to 256 GB on z990 servers.
Yep - definitely need that. Well, maybe
Walt Farrell wrote:
In a more normal shop, I personally don't see much of an exposure.
True, but not much consolation to the guy who got fired when I showed
management one of his, er, impolite (ok, unprintable) dsnames. :-)
I think I ran into it while investigating a full vtoc, which turned
While FDR's got a fine product, I'm still curious as to what the native Erase
on Scratch process from IBM provides. I mean, does it do a single pass, or is
it DoD compliant? Does it run a byte-by-byte erasure or a block/track/cylinder
overwrite of binary 0's and 1's? How much CPU overhead is
At 11:53 -0600 on 02/28/2006, Chase, John wrote about Finding
embedded short blocks:
Hi, All,
Is there an easy way to find any short blocks that might exist in a
FB dataset? We don't have DITTO (IBM File Manager), and I haven't found
a way with File-Aid yet.
TIA,
-jc-
There is no
When I tried the link below, it just asked me to sign in (which I did) but then
didn't open the actual document. Do I have to request access to the document
specifically? And if so, do you know the process? Thanks.
Jack Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've been reviewing vol6 via ibm's
95 matches
Mail list logo
