Guys,
these are incomplete, and will provide an incorrect result if you were in
Darwin (NT) or Adelaide (SA) in Australia.
Regards
Bruce Hewson
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:48:38 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:22:41 -0500, John P Kalinich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris,
That's what Fred Brooks, Jr. who was in charge of the IBM 360 project said in a
speech. I just tried to transcribe it because I thought it was so interesting.
He has a nice way of talking about things which may explain his use of the
word magic.
I understand your point. I always
Hi,
A little REXX Code for TimeZone Offset.
signal on syntax
/*
||
||
On 10/11/2006 8:17 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Yes, they are in separate libraries. I tried copying OTHRPROG into
my.library.one, and that did NOT solve the problem.
Apparently that's not how CALL works, at least not based on my
experimentation. Could I have fat-fingered it?
I can't re-write
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Russell Witt
Not only are there many IBM APAR's on the subject of rewinds,
but you should also check if the devices are defined as
AUTOSWITCHABLE. If they are AUTOSWITCHABLE and the
VERIFY_POLICY is set to YES
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 07:05 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
We don't seem to be able to find where VERIFY_POLICY is set
Have a look at ALLOCxx in parmlib John - and be (a little) liberal in
the interpretation.
Shane ...
--
For
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/11/2006
at 05:27 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And even to organize CBT in individual programs, rather than tape
images?
Are you volunteering to do the grunt work? It would take far more
effort than you realize. Currently the CBT is organized by
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 10/10/2006
at 05:20 PM, Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The thing that gets me is the MIPS. You can go from a machine that
has a single processor at 100 mips. To a processor that has 4 cpus
at 100 mips each and they call it 400 mips. Depending on you
workload type
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/11/2006
at 03:38 PM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would like to be able to cause a load module executed with a CALL
statement in TSO to find (with LINK or LOAD - don't know, it's not
my code) a load module that is in a private load library. **Other
than
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 07:05 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
We don't seem to be able to find where VERIFY_POLICY is set
Have a look at ALLOCxx in parmlib John - and be (a little)
liberal in the
Hi,
When setting up system data sets, I noticed two special things:
1, Take PROGXX parmlib member as an example. When adding a
data set to APF list here, volume serial number should also be specified
plus
dsname.
In my opinion, it's because at the earlier stage of IPL CAS(Catalog Address
Charles Mills wrote:
while SOMEPROG is executing, it would like to LOAD or LINK OTHRPROG.
OTHRPROG is in SOME.OTHER.LIBRARY that is not in my STEPLIB or link pack
concatenation ...
What can I do so that SOMEPROG can find OTHRPROG?
The answer does not seem to be TSOLIB.
Perhaps SOMEPROG
I'm feeling under the weather today and our zSeries is pegged at 100%,
so I thought I'd ask a curiousity question here. I hope you don't mind.
I have never considered COBOL to be a language which would normally be
used to write a program which would cause high CPU utilization (as in
percentage).
Good day to all.
We are preparing for ZOS 1.7 and need to move a ton of maintenance for our
1.4 system prior to the IPL. The philosophy in play here was developed
under the cloak of secrecy and, personally, it's been a long time since
I've had to clone a new set of residence packs. Would anyone
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:38:08 +0800, Johnny Luo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When setting up system data sets, I noticed two special things:
1, Take PROGXX parmlib member as an example. When adding a
data set to APF list here, volume serial number should also be
specified plus dsname.
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:33:19 -0700, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Simplest, since you say you want to use a TSO call
command, why not
CALL libraryname(pgmname) 'parms'
??
I am doing that. I guess I was not clear. I issue
CALL my.library.one(SOMEPROG)
And it works just
certainly would explain the fact that TSOLIB doesn't solve the problem
Would that also explain why copying the modules into the CALL library does
not solve the problem?
BTW, YES, STEPLIB solves the problem in batch.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I'm not naïve about personalities, especially programmer personalities. I
founded, built, and sold a successful enterprise software company. I simply
did not include in the thread all of the people complexities. I restricted
the thread to my technical problem at hand. The facts are as I presented
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:15:36 -0500, Daniel A. McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day to all.
We are preparing for ZOS 1.7 and need to move a ton of maintenance for our
1.4 system prior to the IPL. The philosophy in play here was developed
under the cloak of secrecy and, personally, it's
RE: Archives
I will do so, Tom. Thank you for your advice.
(like many, I don't often think of that first)
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you aim at nothing you will hit it every time.
- Zig Ziglar
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:15:36 -0500, Daniel A. McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day to all.
We are preparing for ZOS 1.7 and need to move a ton of maintenance for our
1.4 system prior to the IPL. The philosophy in play here was developed
under the cloak of secrecy and, personally, it's
Daniel A. McLaughlin wrote:
Good day to all.
We are preparing for ZOS 1.7 and need to move a ton of maintenance for our
1.4 system prior to the IPL. The philosophy in play here was developed
under the cloak of secrecy and, personally, it's been a long time since
I've had to clone a new set
Not odd at all. We have COBOL jobs that do that. We have 1 particular
job that walks an IDMS database and formats the records for pushing out
to MQSeries. When they run this thing, I can almost see the lights dim.
The COBOL takes 50% of the machine and MQ takes the other 50%. 14 hours
later,
snip
I have never considered COBOL to be a language which would normally be
used to write a program which would cause high CPU utilization (as in
percentage). But I've noticed lately that many of our batch COBOL
programs can run our z890 (capacity 250) at over 20% CPU as shown by
SDSF. And I don't
Charles Mills wrote:
Would that also explain why copying the modules into the CALL library
does not solve the problem?
Yes. When DCB=CVTLINK is specified, CSV ignores all the TCBJLB fields which
point to tasklib DCBs and goes directly to the system libraries (LPA,
link-list).
BTW, YES,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Curiousity: CPU % for COBOL program
snip
Not unusual at all. Poorly written code in
Without the souce code I can't make any intelligent suggestions.
However, if you can find a copy of The Elements of
Programming Style it will give several examples of bad vs good code
and how to get from here to there.
IIRC, at one time there were (at least) three versions. One each for
COBOL,
Hi.
In general I have seen that most of the problems of performance and
consumption of CPU in program Cobol Batchy must to problems with the I/O in
archives VSAM. Very good improvements are obtained with adjustment of
buffers and sizes of CI in the definition of clusters. Also the performance
Hi All. It's me again. I am not at my main site, so I am depending on the
WEB for FDR documentation. I KNOW that IBM has a website that holds FDR
doc. I'm having trouble finding it; just the LasCon website (which is
good) and the Innovations website that has a lot of advertisement but not
John, I presume you've checked the compiler options and the run time
options. Do you have a copy of the COBOL Performance Tuning manual.
Jim McAlpine
On 10/12/06, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
It is in ALLOCxx and it is actually VERIFY_VOL POLICY(YES)
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com
On 11 Oct 2006 14:51:15 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Evans-Young) wrote:
Absence or presence of REPLY-TO affects differently
those of us who read the list via USENET. If there's no
REPLY-TO, TO is the munged e-mail address of
I have used Omegamon to look at batch CPU usage. Sometimes most of the
CPU is in the Cobol (or whatever) main module, sometimes there is
inter-module calling, sometimes systems services like IDGZILLA show up.
I think if one module in a call-each-other job lags on a non-LE compiler
when the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Curiousity: CPU % for COBOL program
John, I presume you've checked the compiler options and
en, I think CPU high is very common if there is just one job running. In batch
windows, CPU is always above 80%.
Program will get the CPU and donnot lose CPU until it need to do IO or system
want to dispatch other job. Extremely, bad program is in loop and it will
occupy the CPU.
So you can
VERIFY_VOL POLICY(YES|NO) was new in z/OS 1.7, and the default is YES
Russ, do you have any idea if this affects programs like FDRABR and
COPYCAT which create multiple files in the same program execution? The
text refers to passed and RETAINed tapes, but it is not clear about
multiple
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:38:58 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
VERIFY_VOL POLICY(YES|NO) was new in z/OS 1.7, and the default is YES
I found it in my z/OS 1.6 manual. Unless it came in via PTF and there
was a manual update as well.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems
Bruce McKnight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Greetings all!
Does anyone know why this happens?
Job A opens a dataset with DISP=OLD. Job B submitted after Job A also
tries to open the same dataset with DISP=OLD. Sometimes Job B just
sits and waits for Job A
On Tuesday, 10/10/2006 at 05:20 EST, Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The thing that gets me is the MIPS. You can go from a machine that has a
single processor at 100 mips. To a processor that has 4 cpus at 100 mips
each and they call it 400 mips. Depending on you workload type that may
Thank you for sharing your feedback regarding NaSPA's Technical Support
magazine. Going digital was not an easy decision for the association.
For 20 years we have provided mainframe professionals a vehicle for members
to share their experiences with their peers. This has NOT changed. NaSPA
plans
Bollocks.
I've seen an IBM internal analysis of a Websphere Application Server
implementation that was
37x cheaper on Intel than on zSeries.
That's 37 _TIMES_ - not 37%!
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
Charles Mills wrote:
Apparently that's not how CALL works, at least not based on my
experimentation. Could I have fat-fingered it?
Sine the earliest days of TSO, CALL has used the dataset as a TASKLIB when
it attaches the user program, and this effect is propagated down to lower
task levels.
In your description below, did you actually issue TSOLIB ACT
DS('SOME.OTHER.LIBRARY') before attempting the CALL
my.library.one(SOMEPROG) command?
On 10/11/06, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Simplest, since you say you want to use a TSO call
command, why not
CALL
VERIFY_VOL POLICY(YES|NO) was new in z/OS 1.7
Sorry, spoke too fast. It was introduced in z/OS 1.5
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:
I was going to use TRSMAIN to pack some SMF Data from TAPE data set to dasd for
FTP process. However the documentation for TRSMAIN states it cannot use tape.
I do not understand why this is the case. What is special about TRSMAIN and
tape processing. I would have thought it would just be
How can I clean this up?
Mark, since the USERMOD was not successfully applied because of the
error, you cannot use RESTORE to remove the USERMOD from the target
zone. What I suggest may seem a little ugly and dangerous for some, but
I think it is the least amount of work for you at this
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/11/2006
at 07:50 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I could imagine a more robust design.
It sounds like the problem is in the packaging rather than in SMP/E.
Did you have a SUP on the second sysmod?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
REDO won't change the DD name to the correct value; I believe that once
the value is set, UCL or RESTORE is the ONLY solution.
Correct you are, only UCLIN or RESTORE can solve this problem. APPLY
processing is what it is, and it will not update the SYSLIB ddname.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM,
Devices with three digit product codes were originally EAM (electrical and
mechanical) equipment, e.g. 029 was a keypunch, 088 was a collator
(match/merge), . The first computers, which used vacuum tubes, also
used three digits, e.g. I used a 604 which was an EAM computer with about
16
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/11/2006
at 05:27 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And even to organize CBT in individual programs, rather than tape
images?
Are you volunteering to do the grunt work? It would take far more
effort than you realize. Currently the CBT is organized by
John
I'm home-bound all the time which means that all my reading is done online
and Google is my friend.
Using IBM COBOL Performance Guide I discovered IBM Enterprise COBOL
Version 3 Release 1, Performance Tuning with my first hit, which was
Hi All. Last night we had no midnight operator and this hung the system
for 3 hours. Can I dynamically increase this? Once again thanks all. We
are OS390 V2R10 and have CA SYSVIEW.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
Confidentiality Notice
Russ, do you have any idea if this affects programs like FDRABR and
COPYCAT which create multiple files in the same program execution?
The text refers to passed and RETAINed tapes, but it is not clear
about multiple OPENs.
We have the default of YES, so I GTF traced a multiple file create on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Curiousity: CPU % for COBOL program
John
I'm home-bound all the time which means that all
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Black
VERIFY_VOL POLICY(YES|NO) was new in z/OS 1.7, and the
default is YES
Umm, it's documented in the z/OS 1.5 MVS Init Tuna Ref
We're currently on 1.5 (enroute to 1.7) but have never coded an
Lindy
This may help.
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/701/701_1415bx11.html
The 701 system appears to incorporate a 711 card reader. There's a hint as
to where the 2 x 36 = 72 comes from so that only 72 columns can be read.
Maybe Fred was so relieved that he had more than 72 columns,
YES
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rich Tabor
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Allocating STEPLIB in TSO
In your description below, did you actually issue TSOLIB ACT
Joes can be dynamically increased with a $TOUTDEF command. I would also
investigate what was generating all the SYSOUT. JES2 creates one JOE for every
SYSOUT in a job. So if you have a SYSOUT=A and a SYSOUT=B that is 2 JOES for
that job. You also create jobs depending on the OUTPUT
I must admit that my definition of mainframe may be tainted. NaSPA
stopped being a mainframe magazine several years ago.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
right church, wrong pew.
S/3.
The later devices from that division had no cards -- S/34 S/36 S/38 AS/400
iSeries.
Cards were almost square and had circular holes like the old Univac
machines, but quite smaller. The column sets were in two rows.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Paul
Comments are embedded.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, 12 October, 2006 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: What's a programming language (was: Google ... )
...
Re-read carefully
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NaSPA is Alive
I must admit that my definition of mainframe may be tainted. NaSPA
stopped
I am (was, actually, having solved the problem differently for now) trying
to run a compiled Rexx program under TSO and force it to use the Alternate
Library rather than the Rexx Library (which was link-listed) for test
purposes, to duplicate a customer problem.
The symptoms are/were:
- When the
Kirk
Thanks - but read my post again, by the RPG range from S/360 Model 20 to
iSeries, I refer to the whole nave and the trancepts too.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Kirk Talman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, 12
Shmuel
In other words a What do you ***really*** want to do? conversation.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, 12 October, 2006 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Allocating
I must admit that my definition of mainframe may be tainted. NaSPA
stopped being a mainframe magazine several years ago.
I dropped my membership years ago, after being a fairly active member,
because the magazine started to heavily focus on non-MVS systems and
became of little use to me. I
No. Three rows of 32. The cards are 3 1/4 by 2 3/4. I have some in my
archive.
Kirk Talman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
10/12/2006 10:50
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
where it abends with an 0C4/11
You cannot have your ESTAE in effect when running in LE code. LE requires
its own ESTAE to be in effect. Form my SHARE presentation at
Greetings,
I am trying to convert a JES2 EXIT2 to EXIT52. When I enable the
exit,
it gives me:
*** INCORRECT JCL/JECL RETURNED BY EXIT 2/52
**
$HASP106 JOB DELETED BY JES2 OR CANCELLED BY OPERATOR BEFORE EXECUTION
This exit is supposed to scan JOB cards
Mark wrote:
I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
where it abends with an 0C4/11
LE calls the CEEBXITA routine and appears to process its recovery.
My asm ESTAE takes control and eventually returns back to
I know that someone has already given one of these references, but the two
places that I would start (given the information you have provided in the
thread) are:
The Performance tuning paper (which application programmers can EASILY read
and understand) at:
Try the home page. http://www.naspa.com/
ROGER B. LEGERWOOD
Enterprise Systems Architecture
Office of the Chief Technology Officer
(202) 727-6738
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bruce Black
Sent:
Currently the link (www.naspa.com/2020)
doesn't work but I sent them a message about it.
the link is working now.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL
Ginny,
I haven't messed around in this area in a long time, but if the CICS-DB2
attach hasn't changed, look at the startup values you are feeding CICS for
it's attachment to DB2. It used to be that CICS created a bunch of TCB's
for executing SQL. Each one of the TCB's would open a
forgive the history, but early in our marriage, my computer operator
wife (how we met is another story) got a job with a small insurance co
with a s/360-22 running some flavor of DOS (I think). She worked
overnight, and she loaded the card read, submitted the jobs, and took
out her novel.
Lizette -
I don't know why the documentation would say that, but I do exactly that
all the time.
Larre Shiller
US Social Security Administration
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V/M: (410) 965-2209
FAX: (410) 966-1936
www.ssa.gov
The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily
Radi,
I honestly don't think I would ever read a magazine online. I probably
won't renew when my subscription runs out. I can understand your reasons
for going that way, but I don't think I'll read it online. I know z/Journal
offered an online edition, but they still send you the magazine
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:50:11 -0500, Peter DeFabritus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, field X052JXWR is a pointer to the card you want to add. So you
need to do something like:
L R2,X052JXWR
MVC 0(80,R2),USRCARD
USRCARD DC CL80'// USER='
As you see, I would also
I still like MIPS. I know, I'm getting old! I believe everything you say
about MIPS being meaningless or whatever, but I still think that if you are
looking at 3 or 4 models of CPUs, the MIPS rating gives you a good feel for
how fast they are, especially if they are all in the same processor
I just finished upgrading our exits. I stuck with IPL's for the first
day or two. Then I got fed up and installed the $REPEXIT/$ADDEXIT jes2
exit 5 from the CBT tape.
Much easier, I should have installed this exit 5 years ago.
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:13:07 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just finished upgrading our exits. I stuck with IPL's for the first
day or two.
The good news is I made the changes and it's no longer giving me those
error messages.
The bad news is, now I'm getting S0C4's. I don't
Mark wrote:
Mark wrote:
I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
where it abends with an 0C4/11
LE calls the CEEBXITA routine and appears to process its recovery.
My asm ESTAE takes control and eventually
Our system. I am testing. And no, we have almost no non-IBM software.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy Wood
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Allocating STEPLIB in TSO
In a recent note, Robert Wright said:
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:33:07 -0400
Lizette Koehler wrote on 10/12/2006 10:57:25 AM:
I was going to use TRSMAIN to pack some SMF Data from TAPE data set
to dasd for FTP process. However the documentation for TRSMAIN
states it cannot use
Bill Klein wrote:
Mark,
Tom Ross has already responded that what you are trying to do is not the
right way to do it. To paraphrase, you are trying to use a screw-driver as a
hammer. It MIGHT work (in some cases) but it certainly is NOT the right way
to do this. What you need (or should do) is
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:47 -0400, Alan Altmark wrote:
The best measurement of performance is the one you use to determine how
much value you are getting from the box. You bought it for a reason. Are
you getting the number of transactions per second from YOUR applications
that you need
What a terrible thing to say about one's wife !
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 2:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another BIG Mainframe Bites the Dust
forgive the
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 14:25 -0500, Eric N. Bielefeld wrote:
I know that when I worked at PH Mining, we went from a MP2003 with 3
processors to a MP3000 with 1 processor.
...
When we had the MP2003 with 3 processors, we never had that problem.
Personally I reckon there should be no (sales)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:33:07 -0400, Robert Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lizette Koehler wrote on 10/12/2006 10:57:25 AM:
I was going to use TRSMAIN to pack some SMF Data from TAPE data set
to dasd for FTP process. However the documentation for TRSMAIN
states it cannot use tape.
I do not
Charles Mills wrote:
Our system. I am testing. And no, we have almost no non-IBM software.
I assume you know how to use GTF to trace exactly what's happening.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL
Try opentech's VDR TAPECOPY,I used it on my client and it works quite
efficiently .
On 10/12/06, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Black
VERIFY_VOL POLICY(YES|NO) was new in z/OS 1.7, and the
default is
At this point I am full tilt on the real problem (which has little to do
with STEPLIBs -- I just need to be able to switch libraries to test what I
was actually trying to test). I solved the STEPLIB problem by using
SETPROG LPA,ADD/DELETE and I'm too busy to debug TSO and Rexx. If Rexx won't
use
John,
Over the years I have seen plenty (more that 25) cobol programs than
can pin the needle for as long as they are running. This was on a
variety of COBOL compilers, This was also not a looping condition per
se. It was designed into the program and yes it was productive
computing.
Bruce,
This seems strange. We have had a couple of clients that have verified it
made a very big and noticable improvement when they turned off this option
with CopyCat. And CopyCat is simply doing OPEN TYPE=J after increasing the
file-sequence number for the next volume, and the allocation of
Greetings again,
I'm having a hard time getting this exit to work. My assembler skills
are pretty much non-existent. I'm trying convert an old JES2 EXIT2 to
work
as as an EXIT52. Following the manuals, IBM's sample exit and the old
exit,
I put this together. I yanked all the doc so it would
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:30:05 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$TRACE can be very helpful :) Just remember that it uses R0,R1,R14,R15
:))
I tried that too, but I couldn't get it to work. The manuals say to turn
trace ID 13 on for EXIT52, so I did. I set TRACE=YES on EXIT52 and got
- Original Message -
From: Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:39 PM
Subject: Allocating STEPLIB in TSO
I would like to be able to cause a load module executed with a CALL
statement in TSO to find (with LINK or LOAD -
97 matches
Mail list logo
