Edward Jaffe wrote:
Kelman, Tom wrote:
I thought this was interesting. What do you guys working in Georgia,
Virginia, and Idaho think about being in states which are less
developed and when are you going to start working for $1000/year?
[...]
As far as the numbers go, you couldn't survive
Perhaps best would be to simply delete the old CICS libraries.
That, together with the lack of APF authorization for user copies of
DFHSIP and related programs/tables, should absolutely prohibit the
old version(s) from being executed
It is what we do now.
Bottom line is that code can run above the bar if you put it there
yourself and if that code never gets interrupted, as z/OS interrupt
handler save areas are not yet enhanced for the larger registers, PSW,
etc.
The only thing that is not properly saved is the PSW. The registers
are
properly
As far as the numbers go, you couldn't survive anywhere in the United
States on $1000/yr. Heck, the federal minimum wage is currently $5.85/hr
which translates to $16,380 if you work 40 hours a week, fifty weeks per
year. Here in California, In-N-Out burger (http://www.in-n-out.com/)
starts
September 21st, 2007 - Platform Solutions, Inc. files response to IBM's
amended complaint:
In a spurious effort to call attention away from its own abusive and
predatory behavior by denigrating PSI's reputation, IBM, in its Amended
Complaint, has made the sweeping assertion that PSI's business
On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 13:20 -0500 on 09/26/2007, Chase, John wrote about Re: Writing
23FDs:
How long has it been since the last APAR against IEFBR14?
I think that there was only 1 and it was soon after OS/360 was
released. It added an instruction to
Hello there,
this is a minor issue, but I still want to understand what's wrong with what HC
says.
We have three z/OS.e 1.7 LPARs in basic Sysplex. HC complains that :
'CNZHF0003I
One or more consoles are configured with a combination of
message
scope and routing code values
First time I see attachments in an IBM-MAIN post.
Darren, did you lifted the limit on attachments on posts to IBM-MAIN?
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
PS: Darren is the IBM-MAIN caretaker... ;)
--
For IBM-MAIN
Kind of like an 029's undo...
-Original Message-From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew StittSent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 4:10
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Writing 23FDs
snip
The biggest pain was that ICCF editor had no undo command.
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 04:31 -0700, Walter Marguccio wrote:
HC has a different opinion, though.
Anyone can shed some light on this ?
It seems the HC authors don't consider a base sysplex a reasonable
arrangement.
Prepare yourself to be pilloried.
Shane ...
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 07:56 -0400, CICS Guy wrote:
Kind of like an 029's undo...
Yep, that would have been nice. I seem to recall plenty of redo ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Walter,
I thought a Sysplex master console *should* have MSCOPE=*ALL and its
route code 1-10,12-128 were more than appropriate. HC has a different
opinion, though.
Actually, *that* check says:
Checks that each MCS/SMCS/EMCS console is not defined with multi-system message
scopes AND receiving
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Test - Please ignore
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Please ignore it again
HTMLfont face=Tahoma size=1HRAVISO LEGAL brEsta mensagem é
destinada exclusivamente para a(s) pessoa(s) a quem é dirigida, podendo conter
informação confidencial e/ou legalmente privilegiada. Se você não for
destinatário desta mensagem, desde já fica notificado de
In a message dated 9/26/2007 10:21:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouldn't it depend on home many DD's were defined and the location of the
datasets?
My first post said that (in z/OS) you can't execute any code above the bar
unless you move it there yourself.
Hi all,
If i have an address space running with REGION=2M (or whatever), i would
like to find out how much of
these 2Mb are still available (i'm interested specifically in PVT).
I've done some tests with VMLIST but i'm problably doing something
wrong.
Here goes a piece of code :
Hallo,
Does CA-DISK provide some utility to inquire about dsns which have been
archived. I checked the doc but I did not find much info. I found something
about LISTDMS. I tried the command but it keeps searching for my userid. It
returns back with :
ADSDM484 3543 NO RECORDS
Dear Listers
I am quite new to automation using System Automation Netview. I am trying
to implement a simple scenario for the sake of understanding before I go to
real implementation. What I want to implement is trap a message like IEA631I
and make the automation issue an MVS command D
- Original Message
From: Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, *that* check says:
Checks that each MCS/SMCS/EMCS console is not defined with multi-system
message scopes AND receiving all routing codes (or all except routing code
11).
Correct. The only console in the sysplex
Does CA-DISK provide some utility to inquire about dsns
which have been archived. I checked the doc but I did
not find much info.
Look at the LISTD utility.
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-665-4231(v)
651-610-7670(p)
Hi,
You might like to consider examing the LDA control block (IHALDA in MODGEN)
pointed to by ASCBLDA.
This control block has various fields that describe the private area above and
below the line.
As for your VSMLIST attempt :
(1) You are not checking the RC from VSMLIST.
(2) STCM is not
A simpler way to do this is to just edit the SA message table to trap
your messages and execute whatever commands or clist you want.
In this case, CICS DFH* msgs are trapped and the clist KIXDOFEM is
executed by auto operator AUTCINT.
IF (MSGID='DFHAP0001' | MSGID='DFHSM0103') TEXT=MESSAGE
Willie,
DSNAME = O00130./
The command I tried is : LISTDMS ARC.
You can try LISTD DSNAME=(/) to see if you
can find any datasets. You need to point to
the correct files dataset if you have more
than one.
Regards,
John
--
, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:
In a message dated 9/26/2007 10:21:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouldn't it depend on home many DD's were defined and the location of the
datasets?
snip
The old trick of allocating vol specific temp dsn to turn on
Raymond Noal wrote:
Dear List:
An IBM 4361 Model Group 5 had the ECPS feature -
Extended Control Program Support (ECPS) -- offers VSE mode, VM/370 mode, and
MVS/370 mode. These modes provide microcode assists that make the system control
programs operate more efficiently.
ECPS was
William Donzelli wrote:
I have just started to fool around with a 4331-2 (and 3830), and the
IPL floppy is just plain tired. Not the drive, but the floppy media
itself! But then, what can one expect from a 30 year old disk.
Anyway, is there anyone out in IBM land that can write a 23FD 8 inch
OK ... Here is a real long shot ... I expect that I will be jumped
all over (But what the heck - live dangerously) as to why this is not
possible ... How about picking up an old Radio Shack TRS-80 on E-bay to
do the copying (TRS-80 used 8-inch drives).
.
The only reason I mention this is
Ah yes... the Model 2 had one built in, with an optional 3-bay extension.
Gary
On 9/27/07, Warner Mach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Donzelli wrote:
I have just started to fool around with a 4331-2 (and 3830), and the
IPL floppy is just plain tired. Not the drive, but the floppy media
In a message dated 9/27/2007 7:22:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't understand why you would want to turn on the DIRF bit. I used to
have to
Disables broken IXVTOCs
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
snip
OK ... Here is a real long shot ... I expect that I will be jumped
all over (But what the heck - live dangerously) as to why this is not
possible ... How about picking up an old Radio Shack TRS-80 on E-
bay to
do the copying (TRS-80 used 8-inch drives).
.
The only reason I mention this
Eileen
Please! - simpler?
Arun is new to automation and he/she is trying, as far as I can judge
since it is something with which I have never worked - but is supported by
your response, to use a technique for building message automation table
(MAT) entries.
It was indeed my reaction to
Arun
Please see my reply to Eileen.
You don't have to restart address spaces just for a simple change to the
message automation table (MAT). In the days when I used to have fun with
system automation there used to be a command for reloading the MAT. Surely
there still is. That may be all you
Gerhard Adam wrote:
As far as the numbers go, you couldn't survive anywhere in the
United States on $1000/yr. Heck, the federal minimum wage is
currently $5.85/hr which translates to $16,380 if you work 40 hours
a week, fifty weeks per year. Here in California, In-N-Out burger
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Gerhard Adam wrote:
As far as the numbers go, you couldn't survive anywhere in the
United States on $1000/yr. Heck, the federal minimum wage is
currently $5.85/hr which translates to $16,380 if you work 40 hours
a week, fifty weeks per year. Here in California, In-N-Out
Whoever did the math below greatly overestimated the minimum wage.
40 X 50 X $5.85 is $11,700, not $16,380.
40 X 50 X $9.50 is $19,000, not $26,600.
I should have commented on that yesterday, but when it was quoted again, I
couldn't let it go.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
In a message dated 9/27/2007 9:56:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't understand why you would want to turn on the DIRF bit. I used to
have to
I got it backwards. I also used to zap the DIRF bit on, then allocated a
meaningless temporary data set to
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:30:27 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
I see in the current New Yorker there is a movie coming out
called Outsourced, described as a comedy about a man whose
job is outsourced to India and he must go to India to train
his replacement. H. Barrel of laughs, I can see.
Gee,
Actually, i did not even know that you can generate messages using the
method that was listed. I just do the CICS automation around here and
other people do the heavy stuff.
However, we did not even start using the SA panels until we were forced
into it in release 2 (or maybe 1.3) - we just copied
India's per capita income may be less than $1,000 a year, but average salary
for IT newbie starts at $20,000 and for IT specialist (probably 15+ years
with specialization), in India, is 24 lakhs per annum, which translates to
$62,500 per annum at the current currency rate with an average of 12
Matthew Stitt wrote:
Because the FBA's and 8809's were boat anchors. And the 3350's and 3420
gave interchangeability with MVS.
With things connected to normal channels the sky was the limit with what
could be done with the 4331. Using the ICA severely limited your devices.
The 3350 and 3420
In a message dated 9/27/2007 10:42:03 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be turned on in
allocation and then turned off at the end of the allocation process. You
have to
turn it on by hand before you do the allocation in order to cause the
cleanup.
-snip
How long has it been since the last APAR against IEFBR14?
I think that there was only 1 and it was soon after OS/360 was
released. It added an instruction to clear R15 to the original BR 14.
---unsnip--
There
Edward Jaffe wrote:
I have family all over Virginia. Less developed is probably a good
thing. It's a beautiful state. Lots of history.
There's something very wrong with and/or not being stated in the premise
here. They probably need people in the United States because things
aren't working
--snip---
The DIRF (DADSM Interrupt Recording Facility) bit was once (and is
likely still) turned on prior to every DADSM VTOC update and turned
off after completion. If a new data set allocation happened and the
bit was on, DFP would rebuild the
Hi,
Is there a best practice to doing this ? I was thinking of allocating
two new larger files, reproing the contents and IPL'ing with the new
names. Does anything have to be done to the COMMDS prior to the IPL. If
this isn't a viable approach, does anyone have a better method.
TIA
Dean
Dean
I am trying to pull an RMF Post Processor report for CF paths.
I have the following control cards with the following message:
ERB103I PPS: OPTIONS IN EFFECT
ERB103I PPS: SYSOUT(R) -- SYSIN
ERB103I PPS: REPORTS(XCF) --
No IPL is required.
ACDS Reallocation Procedure
A1. Allocate spare ACDS.
A2. Issue SETSMS SAVEACDS(spare.acds) to copy ACDS to spare ACDS.
A3. Issue SETSMS ACDS(spare.acds) to activate spare ACDS.
A4. Reallocate ACDS.
Good afternoon all.
We are looking into the possibility of converting from Top Secret to
RACF for our security product on the mainframe, z/OS 1.7.
I am interested in hearing from anyone who has made this conversion.
What I would like to know from those that have are; timelines in getting
it
Thanks Terry !
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Traylor, Terry
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Increasing the size of the ACDS SCDS
No IPL is required.
ACDS Reallocation
In a message dated 9/27/2007 11:59:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aditor, and a third to address AMODE/RMODE issues, shortly after MVS/XA
hit the street.
There was no Eye Catcher, alignment something, and it was left out of
HBB4410.
Don't remember when but
We're currently converting. Contact me off list for specifics.
tb
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Richbourg, Claude
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Top Secret to RACF
In a message dated 9/27/2007 1:09:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this mean I do not have collection turned on for this particular
report? If not, what do I need to turn on in RMF to collect them?
Check your record collection. D SMF and see if you
Thanks Ed,
I do have 70-79 being collected. But cannot tell why I would not have 74-2 in
this set.
I was thinking perhaps there is an option in RMF that needs to be set on that
would produce this particular record.
Back to the RMF User's Guide.
Lizette
Check your record collection. D SMF
We installed a DS6800 to replace our Shark F20 a few weeks ago. We are
happy with the change overall and have seen good improvements in batch
times. However, we do have an issue with the Flashcopy.
On the F20 we did a nightly FDRABR flashcopy with parameter FCOPY=COPY
of about 64 3390-9
Monitor III is needed to collect the 74-2. Is it active in your system?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 3:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMF
Don,
yes III is running. Do you know specifically which options collects the 74-2?
I will be making some modifications and it would help to know what to add.
Lizette
Monitor III is needed to collect the 74-2. Is it active in your system?
I get this message every time I log out of ISPF
IRX0157E Routine EAGRTXTR of the run time processor EAGRTPRC was not found.,
This is my zOS17 system. Where can I find my REXX files?
JL
Jason Lowe - Mainframe Systems - Cornell Information Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(607) 255-7851
The
This is where EAGRTPRC is over here
,LOAD MODULE EAGRTPRC IS IN DDN LINKLIB SYS1.REXX.SEAGALT,
,LOAD MODULE EAGRTPRC IS IN DDN LPALIB(ALIAS OF EAGRTLIB),
, IS IN DATASET SYS1.REXX.SEAGLPA,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
EAGRTXTR should have been linked in with EAGRTPRC in sys1.rexx.seagalt
,** MAP EAGRTPRC,
,EAGRTALT 00 00061E RMODE ANY AMODE 31,
,EAGRTPRC 00,
,EAGRTPRA 04,
,
Correction: 4th paragraph should read:We do 2 flashes, 1 using FDRFLASH
with FCOPY=COPY to make full copies to be used by our TESTLPAR. The second
is FDRABR with the FCOPY=NOCOPY and these are used for our FDR disaster
backups.
According to the RMF manual:
Monitor III gathers data for this report automatically. If you want to
suppress gathering, you have to disable writing SMF record type 74.2.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette
Thanks John.
We've been using OECONSOL for several years now. Had one bug that the
author corrected and has been working well so far. I'll look into the Command
Generator capabilities.
OECONSOL is part of the Unix tools site.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/unix/bpxa1ty2.html
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 14:08 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I am trying to pull an RMF Post Processor report for CF paths.
Does this mean I do not have collection turned on for this particular report?
Do you have data for more than one system ???. Do you sort the data
before P/P ???.
Shane ...
Hello VM and Linux enthusiasts on IBMVM, IBM-MAIN, and LINUX-390...
The next in the series of Live Virtual Classes is planned
for Tuesday, Oct 2.
z/VM Security Architecture presented by Alan Altmark of IBM
Date: Tuesday, October 2
Start Time: 11:00 a.m. Eastern U.S./5:00 p.m. CET
Hi all,
Does anybody come across the requirement of moving virtual tapes from one lpar
to sysplex without import and export license in VTS. My environment is
currently using VTS/ATL with DFRMM to manage both physical and virtual tapes.
Could anybody give me some guardances on how to do it ?
Pamela wrote on 28/09/2007 07:26:37 AM:
Start Time: 11:00 a.m. Eastern U.S./5:00 p.m. CET
H - that sounds like , let's see, 01:00 Wednesday ...
Thanks, but I think I'll wait until it comes out on DVD.
Shane ...
--
For
I've done 11 of these in the past 2 years, it's mostly straight-forward and
so long as you plan it well, and make sure that you test, it should go very
smoothly. Typically, it takes about a month to perform the conversion. The
only really big problems I have run into were when there was user
September 25, 2007
TJX Settlement Shows Why Compliance Isn't Taken Seriously
At the beginning of the year, the TJX data breach was making
headlines. People were incensed about the massive amount of data lost
(46 million individual records) and the length of time that had
elapsed since the
68 matches
Mail list logo
