Anyone who elects to send the dates of their vacation, along with their phone
number and approximate home location to a public list is letting themselves in
for a lot more pain then just the annoyance of their fellow listees.
i
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:18:15 PM
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:55:40 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'll sometimes disable a lot of JCL with IF. Which is why I regret
>that "IF FALSE" is documented as not supported and unpredictable
>in behavior (although no error is reported and the construct has
>(almost) the intu
On 29 Jul 2008 07:11:55 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown,
John) wrote:
>Most email clients can filter them. Mine can, but apparently only if it
>is written in English with specific phrasing.
Most people don't want to filter "real" messages from co-workers who
turn the "out of office" assistant on
In a message dated 7/29/2008 7:29:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for IBM-MAIN. I remember the days when there were hundreds of
SHARE Posts and many replies to the posts. At my last SHARE in Baltimore I
think there were just 2 SHARE Posts and no replies.
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:40:47 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if there's a way this listserver could filter these
>> "out of the office" messages we keep getting.
>
>Probably not. I've never received one from the listserv itself; they
>always come directly from the absentee, addressed to m
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: (your name here) is out of the office.
>
> I wonder if there's a way this listserver could fil
On 29 Jul 2008 06:41:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
>> I wonder if there's a way this listserver could filter these
>> "out of the office" messages we keep getting.
>
>Probably not. I've never received one from the listserv itself; they
>always come directly from the absentee,
Mauri Kanter wrote:
Hi list:
We are issuing the command
MN JOBNAMES,T
from our COMMNDxx
In addition our CONSOLxx member contains
MONITOR(JOBNAMES-T)
for each defined console
Now, there are cases on which we want to IPL our DR site (a shadow image
copy of the first, using a different CPC)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
>
> I wonder if there's a way this listserver could filter these
> "out of the office" messages we keep getting.
Probably not. I've never received one from the listserv itself; they
always come directl
I wonder if there's a way this listserver could filter these "out of
the office" messages we keep getting.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IB
Tommy,
Do you have the storage group AUTO MIGRATE set to YES in ISMF?
IIRC, Backup and migrated datasets are deleted based on management class
values and ARCCMDxx settings for SMS datasets. For non-SMS, read up on
EXPIREBV for dataset backups. It has been awhile since I dealt with
this.
Bob
---
Hi Mauri,
Do you have MONITOR (JOBNAMES-T) specified in your HMC console definition, as
in:
CONSOLE DEVNUM(SYSCONS)
NAME(CNSS&SYSNAME.)
AUTH(MASTER)
ROUTCODE(1,2,10)
LEVEL(ALL,NB)
MONITOR(JOBNAMES-T)
MSCOPE(*)
CMDSYS(*)
Dick Bond
H
In a message dated 7/29/2008 6:55:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>The final check is when we look at the UCBMIDAW bit in the UCB involved.
If a channel program tried to use MIDAW and it was disabled on the system
level, IOS would fail the channel program with a
In a message dated 7/29/2008 3:25:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>Suppose someone who does not know that proc X is used by 10 other jobs with
>>overriding DDs in them decides to rearrange the DD statements within proc
X.
>Why ever would anyone do that?
Possi
Hi Mani.
Why don't you give the guys at Innovation a call, I'm sure they'll be only too
happy to help you out. Besides, that's what you pay them maintenance and support
for.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discu
Ed Finnell of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 07/28/2008 03:24:02 PM:
> In a message dated 7/28/2008 3:10:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> This may have happened when "SCIDS" was replaced by "Meet the Projects".
>
> >>
> Fraid it's more subliminal than th
Hi,
I was asked to investigate the conversion from CA-1 to DFSMSrmm.
I found a redbook that describes the procedure. The redbook (SG24-6241-01) is
from Decmber 2003.
Have there been any changes in RMM that have impact on this procedure?
Are there any other issues I should be aware of when
Lizette,
There are a number of checks that are done before the sort attempts to use
MIDAW. The final check is when we look at the UCBMIDAW bit in the UCB
involved. If a channel program tried to use MIDAW and it was disabled on the
system level, IOS would fail the channel program with a PGM CH
I will be out of the office starting 07/29/2008 and will not return until
09/01/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
The information in this email (and any attachments hereto) is confidential.
The IBM default for MIDAW is enabled. Did you updated PARMLIB?
For IECIOSxx.
MIDAW:
Use the MIDAW statement to enable or disable the MIDAW facility on a
system
Lizette Koehler wrote:
> I have a strange problem going on right now.
>
> We are in the process of upgrading our EMC dasd from DMX3000 to DMX4500. We
> have just recently got the DMX4500 connect but not setup to be used.
>
> For some reason we are having MIDAW activated on our systems that can
> s
Team,
I would appreciate if you provide me some sample jobs for FDR/ABR which
will migrate/recall dataset.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mani.
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the pe
I have a strange problem going on right now.
We are in the process of upgrading our EMC dasd from DMX3000 to DMX4500. We
have just recently got the DMX4500 connect but not setup to be used.
For some reason we are having MIDAW activated on our systems that can
support MIDAW. I did not issue a SE
Hi folks
Silly question probably, I'm sure I've seen this somewhere..
I can find out the date/time of the last IPL of an individual z/OS image (D
IPLINFO) but can I find out from anywhere (z/OS? HMC?) what was the date/time
of the last POR of the box?
Cheers
Brian
-
Martin,
still not sure that I get your point :-)
>I'm wondering whether one wouldn't be better off making the structures
>bigger and (perhaps) the buffer pools in the z/OS systems smaller.
>In other words, what are the trade offs for biasing towards space in the
>CF list structures vs biasing
Gibney, Dave wrote:
If you use the filezilla client, don't upgrade to the lastest release
just recently out. It's broken for SSL/TLS connections from both Vista
and XP
It appears that the Filezilla client (any version) does not support
client certificates. Is that correct?
--
Ulrich Boche
S
Hi
I have a little question on HSM,
1. how comes I set the "SETSYS INTERVALMIGRATION & SETSYS
MAXMIGRATIONTASKS(2)" but the interval migration never start?
2. how to check the backup dataset or migration dataset (ML2) will be
deleted by HSM, is there an detail report which shows all dataset AGE wi
Hi list:
We are issuing the command
MN JOBNAMES,T
from our COMMNDxx
In addition our CONSOLxx member contains
MONITOR(JOBNAMES-T)
for each defined console
Now, there are cases on which we want to IPL our DR site (a shadow image
copy of the first, using a different CPC) without any of the actu
Barbara, here's my point...
You can think of XCF as a queuing mechanism between members on
(potentially) different systems in the plex...
The mechanism has various queuing areas (whether it be "buffer pools" in
memory owned by XCF or coupling facility list structures).
Conventional wisdom has
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:58:53 EDT, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:
>
>
>In a message dated 7/28/2008 10:55:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>PaulG writes:
>>I certainly remember (though obviously not as clearly as Mr. Blair)
>a day and age when overriding DD statements were required to appear
>
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
