Hi,
I am getting the following error while Initrcon step(Initialize RECON /
Register Data Bases) of IMS IVP installation. This is the abend I get:
ICH70001I IBMUSER LAST ACCESS AT 11:21:24 ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2009
$HASP373 IV3F102J STARTED - INIT 1- CLASS N - SYS MVS1
IEA995I
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:06:20 +0530 SrinivasG sriniv...@infosys.com wrote:
:I am getting the following error while Initrcon step(Initialize RECON /
Register Data Bases) of IMS IVP installation. This is the abend I get:
:ICH70001I IBMUSER LAST ACCESS AT 11:21:24 ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2009
Hi,
We are planning two replace two z890 with one z10BC with a capacity equivalent
to the two z890’s.
T-Rex is currently licensed on only one z890, and Dino software want a hefty
upgrade fee.
Can anyone recommend a replacement for T-Rex.
We use it for catalog backups and for getting rid of
Hello Alan,
appreciate the advice, thank you. Bloody hard way to get a manual though...
Regards,
JC
= On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:43:57 +0200, J D Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote:
=
=I am looking for a document with the title How to activate GDDM-REXX
=LY33-6080.
=
=The various references to
I have already IPld. No clues from the NIP messages.
Regards,
Srinivas G
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 12:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ABEND=SFCA during
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:50 +0530 SrinivasG sriniv...@infosys.com wrote:
:I have already IPld. No clues from the NIP messages.
Did you CLPA? Show the NIP messages
Go to TSO and do
TEST 'SYS1.LINKLIB(IEFBR14)'
l 10.?+c8?+84?+650? xc l(256)
END
:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe
Just a simple question. In SVC00 I am not sure, but should the SVC numbers
be in order?
I always have mine from 200 to 255 in sequence. Your display looks like
they go in reverse order 255-200.
What version of IMS are you running? What version of operating system? z/OS
Vxxx
And to clarify,
If you have Mark Zelden's REXX IPLINFO you can look at the system after the
IPL and see whether or not MLPA was used, what SVCs are there, and so on to
ensure the parts are correct at IPL.
Next verify the Nuc
Attention: The SYS1.NUCLEUS must not have secondary extents. z/OS cannot
recognize
Hi,
Thanks everyone. There was a syntax error in the IEASVC00 Member. I removed the
last line with *** and IPLd.
I am now able to do the INITRCON.
Thanks everyone who replied. Even the local IBM folks could not help.
Special thanks to Lizette and Binyamin !!
Regards,
Srinivas G
IGC203 is in SYS1.NUCLEUS dataset.
That is not enough. If you just copied it in there you still need to
get it loaded. We use NUCLSTxx in .IPLPARM i.e.
BROWSESYS2.IPLPARM(NUCLST00)
Command ===
*
INCLUDE IGC236
I have found this error during IPL:
IEE252I MEMBER IEASVC00 FOUND IN CPAC.PARMLIB
IEA826I IEASVC00: SVC215: TYPE 6 ROUTINE DFHHPSVC NOT FOUND.
IEA826I IEASVC00: SVC203: TYPE 2 ROUTINE IGC203 NOT FOUND.
IEA823I IEASVC00: SVC202: SYNTAX ERROR AT .
IMS is 10.1 and ZOS is 1.10
And one last thought. Why did you code the SVC statement in 2 lines. I was
not aware you could do that, I did not see any information on continuation
lines for SVCxx.
In the MVS Init and Tuning it states
If you use multiple SVCPARM statements for the same SVC number, the
first valid
For those who have played with directory caching of non-load libraries, you
must not be using PDSEs. It would not work. I can't speak for what someone
who does not own this component stated about its behavior in the past, I
can only speak towards what its (unchanged) implementation is.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Russell Witt
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 11:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Are compression services (CMPSERVS) eligible for
zIIP/zAAP
execution?
Peter,
Just
Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote in message
news:of0f711657.9d415525-on8525762d.003f1e10-8525762d.00470...@us.ibm.c
om...
For those who have played with directory caching of non-load
libraries, you
must not be using PDSEs. It would not work. I can't speak for what
someone
who does not
Hi team,
There are more PROs when having separated LPARs for Test and Prod, the
most important is that you can test products, configurations, home made
applications and more in the TEST Lpar without disturbing the customer
service in the PROD Lpar, also you can migrate/upgrade the OS without
PTFs are available now
http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA28998
Thanks, Sam
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Traylor, Terry
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMS
All,
I've been googl'ing for a while now but in vain so far: Is it somehow
possible to write user-defined line commands?
I want to enter FOO in front of a line in EDIT and then a self-written
routine should be fired up that handles the line...
Any way?
Thank you,
Michael
Michael Knigge of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 09/10/2009 09:53:51 AM:
All,
I've been googl'ing for a while now but in vain so far: Is it somehow
possible to write user-defined line commands?
I want to enter FOO in front of a line in EDIT and then a
For a non-IBM vendor that does sub-capacity licensing how do you get the
data to them?
Send them the SCRT .csv file?
Send them a number and hope they trust you?
Do they actually alter the charges on a monthly basis?
If using SCRT data is it product specific (e.g. for a DB2 tool you use
SCRT
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:55:01 -0500, Brian Westerman
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com wrote:
Sorry for the blatant plug, but there also is SyzCmdZ which contains all of
the features of each of the command scripting products mentioned and many
more.
Info at WWW.SyzygyInc.NET
Brian
Wondering what report I can use that will capture any administraion done to
roles, e.g., adding, deleting etc.
Note, I need the report that shows the administration of the role itself not
the
one that shows when users are added or removed from roles.
TIA
The whole combined versus separate TEST and PROD LPARs was interesting. I
can't imagine not having them separate (with shared DASD for at least the load
libraries), but then it's just what I'm used to.
So here's a question... Anyone out there have DEV/TEST not only in a separate
LPAR, or
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:08:48 -0500, John P Kalinich jkali...@csc.com wrote:
Michael Knigge of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 09/10/2009 09:53:51 AM:
All,
I've been googl'ing for a while now but in vain so far: Is it somehow
possible to write user-defined line
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:41:25 +0300, #1490;#1491;#1497; amp;#1489;#1503;
#1488;#1489;#1497; gad...@malam.com wrote:
Hi,
We are planning two replace two z890 with one z10BC with a capacity
equivalent to the two z890s.
T-Rex is currently licensed on only one z890, and Dino software want a
hefty
So here's a question... Anyone out there have DEV/TEST not only in a
separate LPAR, or even a separate machine, but in a separate data
center? We have our primary data center in Lakewood, CO (near Denver)
and our alternate data center (DR site) in Scottsdale, AZ. So about
1000 miles apart.
It would depend on the vendor. I assume that you are currently on VWLC
(i.e. sub-capacity) pricing with your IBM software, so you're alreay
sending the SCRT reports to IBM. We also have a sub-capacity pricing
license with one of our vendors and we just copy them on the SCRT
reports. Since the
Ken Porowski wrote:
For a non-IBM vendor that does sub-capacity licensing how do you get the
data to them?
Send them the SCRT .csv file?
Send them a number and hope they trust you?
Do they actually alter the charges on a monthly basis?
If using SCRT data is it product specific (e.g. for a
First of all I should say thank you to Gerhard Postpischil for providing some
helpful background as to what TSSO is all about.
Gerhard has sent me a private message expressing umbrage over my post and
accusing me of not reading his post - the usual symptom of someone who has
actually failed to
On 2009-09-09 at 12:17, concerning CONVERTV to NONSMS error, Jim
McAlpine ji..mca...@gm..com wrote to IBM-Main:
I'm getting the following error converting a volume to nonsms -
ADR497E (001)-CATLG(05), A CATALOG ERROR OCCURRED WHILE CONVERTING
CLUSTER
DB2C.DSNDBC.DSNDB06.DSNOFX02.I0001.A001
Hi Frank,
Usually and is the way i've used, in the same location, separated
machines for prod and test. But, having them in separated location,
maybe due to costs or DR, i mean, DR locations are normaly used only
when the main location is being affected due to a disaster, so the DR
machine is
I think we did that at one place I worked in the ME. There were TEST and
PROD LPARs in the main centre, but there were other TEST and DR LPARs
located a few hundred kliks at our secondary data centre.
Generally, I don't think you have to have that much separation for pure
TEST/PROD, but I
http://www.share.org/www.share.org/Events/PastConferences/DenverWrapUpArticle/tabid/519/Default.aspx
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Thank you guys! That's exactly what I'm looking for!
Bye,
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:08:49 -0500, Steve R Wolf
srw...@ra.rockwell.com wrote:
We are a IMS TM shop. IMS has many dependant regions (each in it's own
address spaces). Each night we bounce the regions for DR purposes and
some twice for another purpose. Because the regions use cross
I guess IBM's letter generated some FUD
http://now.eloqua.com/e/es.aspx?s=1331e=328elq=afd32854d7c047509a3a5e1
65b96bd5a
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with
I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
There is VTAMAPPL.
We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc.
Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands.
Also used to automate
I'll have to search my LINKLIST, when we ran a FLEX it came from the ADCD libs.
I'll get back unless other posters know the origin.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:08
I'm involved in a discussion (read argument) with co-workers where I'm
currently doing a consulting gig.
Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are
RECFM=FB, LRECL=255 or RECFM=FB,LRECL=80?
I lean toward the VB-format, btt I have at least one person here
insisting
Never seen a problem with either format. Been around Rexx sin
Ricck,
Never seen a problem with either format. Been around Rexx since 1984
Scott J Ford
www.identityforge.com
From: Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday,
The rational choices are (IMHO) FB/80 or VB/255.
1. FB/255 makes no sense.
2. I tend to stick with FB/80 due to the use of ISPF edit -and- Mod 2/3/4
3270 emulation.
Hayim
_
Hayim Sokolsky, CISSP
Mainframe Security Architect
DTCC Corporate
For some command idea, here are some I've added;
If anyone else has some additional ones I'd love to hear about them.
* CL - Change to case of the word under the cursor to Lower case.
* CU - Change to case of the word under the cursor to Upper case.
* CP - Copy line(s) to multiple
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:32:02 -0400, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located?
That is an ADCD program.I have something on my web site and CBT file 434
called ACBCHECK. It's not the same as VTAMAPPL, but can serve a similar
purpose.
George.William wrote:
For some command idea, here are some I've added;
If anyone else has some additional ones I'd love to hear about them.
* CL - Change to case of the word under the cursor to Lower case.
* CU - Change to case of the word under the cursor to Upper case.
* CP -
The originally specified JCL isn't exactly correct. If you were to call for a
2nd
tape sometime before reaching file 10, the system would try to place that file
on the 1st (full) tape, due to the way this refer-back is coded. Also, if
allowed, there would be gaps in the file numbers (such as
I think the Lrecl80 came from the punch card days. The people I worked with
back in 1980 preferred the 80 byte record because they came from punch cards.
That plus the ease of seeing everything on one screen without having to scroll
back and forth was great. But those days were more due to
Seems that Eloqua is Firefox unfriendly, so this link can only be read
from a computer system running Windows and IE.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-- Opinions expressed by this poster may not reflect those of poster's
employer --
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thanks for the posting. I signed up.
At the last meeting of the Midwest Computer Measurement Group, which was
held in Milwaukee a month or so ago, Al Sherkow spoke, but not on Neon
zPrime. He was asked a lot of questions about it during his 2 hours, and it
was very interesting. He does
Thompson, Steve wrote:
Seems that Eloqua is Firefox unfriendly, so this link can only be read
from a computer system running Windows and IE.
I read it using Firefox 3.5.2 under Windows XP SP3.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles,
Ya, guess it is.
Actuall TJ is different from TF.
TF - Text Flow will 'flow' the indicated line and all subsequent lines
below it till the end of the paragraph.
TJ - Text Join, joins the indicated line and ONLY THE ONE LINE BELOW IT
and will not 'flow' to a 2nd line if the data is longer than
I'm involved in a discussion (read argument) with co-workers where
I'm
currently doing a consulting gig.
Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are
RECFM=FB, LRECL=255 or RECFM=FB,LRECL=80?
I lean toward the VB-format, btt I have at least one person here
insisting that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
I'm involved in a discussion (read argument) with co-workers where
I'm
currently doing a consulting gig.
Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are
RECFM=FB, LRECL=255 or
Anybody have feedback on this?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Clists use to parse to the end of the record. One could enter a command on a
line followed by comments, and clist would still parse to the end of record.
Back in the day, VB performed better.
With VLF, it pretty much doesn't matter. You indicated VLF is not a
consideration so it really comes
I was reading the Implementing System-Managed Storage book and came
accross Using Cache to improve performance, were it spoke about Dynamic
Cache Magagement. Is there still a benefit in implementing this?
PROS/CONS. Is anyone using this? Got any general guidelines for starting out?
TIA
Catalog Recovery + by Mainstar Software, they may be Rocket Software now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
I didn't attend Share, but was wondering if there is a site to get all of the
presentations.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Feedack on what?
What is your question?
--Original Message--
From: gsg
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Sent: Sep 10, 2009 18:04
Subject: Re: Sytem Managed Buffering
Anybody have feedback on this?
gsg wrote:
I didn't attend Share, but was wondering if there is a site to get all of the
presentations.
http://www.share.org
Click Proceedings.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
Thx , Ed...
I appreciate the url for Share since I wasnt able to attend.
Scott J Ford
www.identityforge.com
From: Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 6:21:43 PM
Subject: Re: Share Denver -
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:44:12 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I'm involved in a discussion (read argument) with co-workers where I'm
currently doing a consulting gig.
Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are
RECFM=FB, LRECL=255 or RECFM=FB,LRECL=80?
I lean toward the
Length schmength, it depends what's in it. I use any PDS as a clist
repository and allocate it whenever I need it.
Most of the time I like whatever fits on my screen but I keep a 300 lrecl
around in case I have a slew of really wide RACF commands, like a full width
alter of installation data.
o Industry standard? Not any more. (But I can remember when ISPF (at the
time SPF) panels were distributed as VB; IBM later switched to FB (circa
1980?).
Later, IIRC.
I think it came out with XA.
Also, that was the same time they renamed it and split out PDF.
-
Too busy driving to stop
Thanks for the link.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Check Tivoli Advanced Catalog Management from IBM -
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=897letternum=ENUS209-285opencm_mmc=5318-_-n-_-vrm_newsletter-_-10577_127721cmibm_em=dm:0:5357837
You might be pleased with what you find 'under the
Which is the same as Mainstar's Catalog Recovery Plus except that you also have
access through TEP (Tivoli Enterprise Portal).
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
That link was for Tivoli Advanced Allocation Management, which is a
similar product to CA-Allocate (aka VAM, aka Vantage SRM) and
BMC Resolve SRM (aka STOPX37).
Try this one: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/software/toolkit/acm.html
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems
GSG,
For IBM, SUN/STK and HDS there is still a small benefit. While everything
must go through cache with these controllers, DCME will influence where ICL
and BC IO is placed in the LRU queue so that it will be cast out sooner than
other normal IO.
You don't get a choice about whether it is
GSG,
The type 64 SMF record.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
gsg
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Sytem Managed Buffering
We are looking at
Some additional possible alternatives to Dino Software's T-Rex:
IBM: Tivoli Advanced Catalog Management for z/OS (as mentioned)
(possibly also Tivoli Advanced Audit for DFSMShsm, depending on
requirements)
ASPG: Catalog Information Manager (CIM)
CA: CREWS
Data Processing Techniques: DP Technician
Thank you Radoslaw Skorupka
So It always better to use PDSE with in the SYSPLEX boundaries to avoid any
corruption.
I don't understand why the vendors are populating the libraries in PDSE.
Mani.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
VB 255 gives you more flexibility, I just find that long character
strings are easier to code if you can use the whole 255 bytes.
So many times have novices asked me why their REXX was failing and it
was sequence numbers in 73-80. Can still happen for VB 255 but always
seems to be that folks
I agree with John, make the referback always to the previous step.
When I was doing a lot of tape stacking, I also had a placeholder
dataset for the first one on the initial tape.
I would generate the JCL using a REXX to build the STEPNAME referback
name and build a new job at step 255.
Use of
73 matches
Mail list logo
