We are developing a big batch COBOL program which uses lot of
storage. There are many arrays which are loaded from DB2 tables. The
number of occurrences for all these arrays which vary from run to run.
Hence we thought instead of using working storage section for these
arrays, we will use
hi,
Has anyone come across or heard of or actually worked on technical
design in mainframe where memory/address/data can be passed or
shared in parallel by two different jobs?
E.g. scenario is Job A executes program A and job B executes either
program A or another program B. Both jobs are
Apologies for the spam, folks, my Gmail got compromised, its back to
business now, but I cannot promise your addresses did not get harvested as
well.
I'm pretty disturbed about it, and quite upset as well.. mainly because it
spammed email addresses from family members who are no longer with us,
Amlan Prasad wrote:
hi,
Has anyone come across or heard of or actually worked on technical
design in mainframe where memory/address/data can be passed or
shared in parallel by two different jobs?
Yes. We do this with shared 64-bit virtual storage obtained via IARV64
REQUEST=GETSHARED
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:02:28 -0500 Amlan Prasad amlan...@msn.com wrote:
:We are developing a big batch COBOL program which uses lot of
:storage. There are many arrays which are loaded from DB2 tables. The
:number of occurrences for all these arrays which vary from run to run.
:Hence we thought
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:03:51 -0500 Amlan Prasad amlan...@msn.com wrote:
:Has anyone come across or heard of or actually worked on technical
:design in mainframe where memory/address/data can be passed or
:shared in parallel by two different jobs?
:E.g. scenario is Job A executes program A and
Meganen Naidoo pisze:
Hi everyone,
One of our smaller clients, running on a Z9-BC, encryption requirements is
for encryption of data at rest, encryption of tape data, support the
OpenPGP format and usage of digital certificates.
IBM's Encryption Facility for z/OS V1.2 has all of the required
John McKown speculates:
From what little I understand about the zBX is that the supported
software can use all the proprietary interfaces (like the high speed IP
transport between xSeries / pSeries / zSeries systems). I would
__guess__ that any x86 software OS (*BSD, Linux, Windows, VMWare, ...)
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Do you happen to know if SAS/C had access to the PDSE macro interfaces
()? That may be how SAS/C does it. As far as I know, these interfaces
allow you to replace or delete a member, as they provide the equivalent
services to the (PDS) macros like STOW.
Yep,
Yep, they have a low-level I/O library for BSAM etc
http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/sasc/doc/lr2/lrv2ch3.htm.
Pretty simple stuff. Most vendors that use IBM C/C++ have written their
own similar low level I/O library.
PDS's low-level access method is called BPAM, and that is not
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:31:08 -0400, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. So far, my best source is the reason I am
documenting them now: the paper called System-Managed CF Structure
Duplexing. I am in the process of identifying what should/should not be
duplexed and thought I would
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Yep, they have a low-level I/O library for BSAM etc
http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/sasc/doc/lr2/lrv2ch3.htm.
Pretty simple stuff. Most vendors that use IBM C/C++ have written their
own similar low level I/O library.
PDS's low-level access method is
In the above link you will notice functions called osbldl (which does a
BLDL) and osfind (which does a FIND)
and osstow (which does a STOW). So they handle PDS(E) just fine.
I stand corrected. But I really hate when BPAM is named BSAM (or QSAM). (I
didn't read further than the first two
Zaromil,
I get errors 99% through the download. I'll get it by other means. Thanks for
the pointer.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Zaromil Tisler
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 5:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:44:13 -0500 Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
:But I really hate when BPAM is named BSAM (or QSAM).
There is very little difference (from the programmers view) between BSAM and
BPAM. QSAM and BSAM, on the other hand, are quite different.
--
Binyamin Dissen
hi all,
we need to know in realtime how close the system is to its cpu peak
interval/time (meaning that peak time representing the z user's major
invoice factor).
does anybody have an idea on how to EASILY determine key information in the
field of cpu load etc., such as via reading control
also, as some very wise people on this list and other lists/papers have
pointed out Know thy data some of our worst dasd response time issues were
eliminated by simply looking at the logical volume placement and the data
sets there on. Moving some DB2 indexes into different array groups and/or
off
This invoice factor is a number that is caluleted reading milions of SMF
recods. Why don't you just keep this number in your product DB ad let your
customer enter this once a month?
ITschak
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Dr. Stephen Fedtke
max_mainframe_...@fedtke.com wrote:
hi all,
we
Timothy Sipples pisze:
While the X86 blades are in the Statement of Direction category, there's
quite a bit more information already about the Power blades. They are
exactly the same PS701 Power blades that are available for IBM's
BladeCenter, same AIX, same PowerVM. If you've already got PS701
What? Millions of type 89 SMF records. Nah, about 12,000 a month. Or report
on SMF70LAC field in type 70 records, I do this daily for one of my
customers.
Cheers, Paul Gillis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Itschak
It seems the symptoms have led me to draw wrong conclusions. The fact that
ISPF reports the PDSE *in use* the moment I stepped over remove() in the
debugger led me to believe that remove() was causing the PDSE to be locked
and the following fopen() to fail. But some experimentation shows that
Ok. Suggest him to read those 12K records on product startup ;-)
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Paul Gillis pgil...@pc-link.com.au wrote:
What? Millions of type 89 SMF records. Nah, about 12,000 a month. Or report
on SMF70LAC field in type 70 records, I do this daily for one of my
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:33:34 -0500, Jim Marshall jim.marsh...@opm.gov
wrote:
IBM is Hiring! Interview with us on July 27th in McLean,VA.
... As the planet becomes smarter, we have a chance to create meaningful
progress and change the way the world works for the better. At IBM
Global Business
That may be true but someone else is displaying signs of MPD switching
between Anton and Mohammed. No wonder the recruiter just freaked out.
Mohammad
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:31:20 -0600, Anton Britz antonbr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Somebody in IBM is trying to generate a false perception of
I seem to recall the JWT (job wait time) parameter was an IPL only type of
change. However, I see some evidence ( a redbook) that it can be changed on the
fly with a SET SMF=xx command.
This seems to have been the case for some time. Anyone recall when this
happened?
Thanks
NOTICE: This
In the RCT are the following variables.
RCVUICA DCH'0' - UIC AVERAGE
RCVCPUA DCH'0' - CPU AVERAGE
RCVCPUAA DCH'0' - processor usage average
I think these will meet your needs.
Chris Blaicher
Phone: 512-340-6154
Mobile: 512-627-3803
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:38:45 +0200, Dr. Stephen Fedtke
max_mainframe_...@fedtke.com wrote:
hi all,
we need to know in realtime how close the system is to its cpu peak
interval/time (meaning that peak time representing the z user's major
invoice factor).
does anybody have an idea on how to
In a30a9f528e618748a8ef5199e80c4a1c04cfc...@wkpp1infmb03.cbsh.com,
on 07/23/2010
at 03:48 PM, Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com said:
I believe that the KICKS you're talking about is designed to run on
Hercules an MVS/zOS emulator
No, Hercules is not an MVS/zOS emulator; it is a
Actually, you might find that the crypto card is a less expensive option. I am
told that software encryption/decryption is very costly in terms of CPU which
is why IBM offered the 'specialty engine' (crypto card).
Not sure where so many get the bizarre idea that encryption is cheap/easy. It
In
2016465832-1280165760-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-5717886...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 07/26/2010
at 05:36 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
I worked on the last MVS 3.8 (before qualifiers such as SE, SP, XA,
ESA, etc), before SE1 came along.
No. You've garbled
In bay145-w59e6c32ada4a649eed894ba3...@phx.gbl, on 07/26/2010
at 05:00 PM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com said:
Also, ISTR that when someone deleted procedure S, the process still
worked. In other words, the proc not found JCL error was still good
enough to drive allocation. But perhaps I'm
In 4c4afae2.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 07/24/2010
at 02:38 PM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com said:
I've been told that CICS on z/OS (we just migrated from VSE)
inherantly utilizes multiple CPs
That is correct; CICS has multiple tasks performing various overhead
functions.
In 4c4b0f3e.4090...@acm.org, on 07/24/2010
at 11:05 AM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org said:
Prior to relatively recent CICS support for multi-threaded
transaction code and prior to DB2 applications all transactions under
one CICS region were single threaded under one TCB effectively
limiting
-snip---
I seem to recall the JWT (job wait time) parameter was an IPL only type
of change. However, I see some evidence ( a redbook) that it can be
changed on the fly with a SET SMF=xx command.
This seems to have been the case
On 28 Jul 2010 21:07:47 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In ahir46pl6pf37rnd70alkbiutp8vv4h...@4ax.com, on 07/26/2010
at 11:47 AM, Howard Brazee howard.bra...@cusys.edu said:
I don't even like ordinary PDS. Other operating systems don't need
them.
ITYM that they call them
In a message dated 7/29/2010 8:27:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
hmerr...@jackhenry.com writes:
JWT (job wait time) parameter was an IPL only type of change. However, I
see some evidence ( a redbook) that it can be changed on the fly with a SET
SMF=xx command.
This seems to have been the
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:49:34 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In ahir46pl6pf37rnd70alkbiutp8vv4h...@4ax.com, on 07/26/2010
at 11:47 AM, Howard Brazee said:
I don't even like ordinary PDS. Other operating systems don't need
them.
ITYM that they call them something else.
I see it
Hal Merritt pisze:
Actually, you might find that the crypto card is a less expensive option. I am told that software encryption/decryption is very costly in terms of CPU which is why IBM offered the 'specialty engine' (crypto card).
That's absolutely untrue! Crypto cards are for secure key
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:13:44 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
-snip---
I seem to recall the JWT (job wait time) parameter was an IPL only type
of change. However, I see some evidence ( a redbook) that it can be
changed
I've written some articles (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chatul#My_contribs) for Wikipedia
and part of their process is for assessment. They don't have a lot of
editors familiar with old IBM hardware and software. In the short
term, I'm looking for people with the background to review or
Many times the amount of storage actually needed greatly exceeds expectations
and often sets a scalability cap. More, these kinds of programs are often a
huge PITA to run and keep running.
Of course, in storage table lookups with a good lookup strategy can be very
fast. But, then, a well
I don't see anything comparable in either Unix/Linux or Windows.
DLL's are comparable.
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
I'm looking for the control block and field name that contains the name of the
procedure (or the member name of the PROCLIB) used in a step.
I have an assemble program that displays the following for a job step:
JobName, StepName, ProcStep, ProgramName, UserID
And I would really like to round
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.comwrote:
Amlan Prasad wrote:
hi,
Has anyone come across or heard of or actually worked on technical design
in mainframe where memory/address/data can be passed or shared in parallel
by two different jobs?
Yes. We do
J,
This is what Pat describes as SIBLING PEND and it is easy to spot the
symptom because it shows up as Disconnect Time.
I sure IBM and EMC have something like HDS's Performance Monitor. It's a GUI
with exportable data that you can use to monitor skewed activity across the
parity groups that
I don't work for HDS but have worked with all three DASD types and agree
that HDS with Truecopy or BSM is your best bet.
2010/7/28 Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net
Tommy,
I have a suggestion. I would suggest that the USP-V is better than either
VMAX or DS8700.
But I work for HDS,
Unless you have to output all this data e.g. write it to a file, print it to a
report etc. DO NOT move all this data to the program. The cross memory move
from DBM1 to program address space can be prohibitive and that's not even
accounting for the processing cost. If there is something to be
instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5323 (20100729) __
The message was checked by ESET
I have a ZFS file which is larger than a 3390 mod 2 volume. I would like to
split this file to fit on 2 3390 mod 2 volumes. What would the best way to
do this.
We are z/OS V1R11. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank You
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This e-mail message and
Correction.
I have a ZFS file which is larger than a 3390 mod 3 volume. I would like to
split this file to fit on 2 3390 mod 3 volumes. What would the best way to
do this.
We are z/OS V1R11. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank You
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mark Steely mark.ste...@wnco.com wrote:
I have a ZFS file which is larger than a 3390 mod 2 volume. I would like
to split this file to fit on 2 3390 mod 2 volumes. What would the best
way to do this.
We are z/OS V1R11. Any help would be appreciated.
Just allocate a ZFS as multivolume enabled. Ask your SMS-Administration for the
correct dataclass.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chris Craddock
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 6:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5323 (20100729) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:08:05 -0500, Chris Craddock wrote:
Just make a bigger volume? Seriously, most USB memory sticks are way bigger
:-)
Yes, but z/OS doesn't support them.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Just make it SMS managed and go with multiple volumes.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5323 (20100729) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5323 (20100729
Hal and RS, I thought you might be interested to know that many of our
customers use the software based encryption and compression capabilities of
SecureZIP to significantly reduce the size of their encrypted files in storage.
In order to achieve this benefit, there is a need for the file to
Splitting a logically related file such as a ZFS might complicate your
backup/recovery strategy. Without some planning, you may incur a risk of
useless backups.
Going with a single, larger volume may be the easiest and safest. Of course, no
size fits all and YMMV.
HTH and good luck.
z/OS may not support USB, but it certainly supports larger volumes, as does any
recent DASD subsystem. Using small volumes for other that certain specific
uses (XCF CDSs, etc) is a waste of space, IMHO.
Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com 7/29/2010 12:16 PM
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:08:05
The Crypto card is not required, if you're using OpenPGP, however the work
that would be done on the card is done in software, which may or may not
provide acceptable performance. It really depends on your requirements.
The Crypto card is required if you're using the z Format and the RSA
Hal Merritt wrote:
Actually, you might find that the crypto card is a less expensive option. I am
told that software encryption/decryption is very costly in terms of CPU which
is why IBM offered the 'specialty engine' (crypto card).
Not sure where so many get the bizarre idea that encryption
OK, it's probably a stupid thought. But we are losing our laptop with the air
card. So we won't have a way to access our z system when not at home or where
there is wifi (assuming I take my own laptop around with me). So, with all
these new smartphones such as the Droid, I was wondering if that
We don't seem to have much to go on when evaluating the
cost/benefit/scalability of hardware vs software based solutions. All I was
able to find was this quote:
While low-volume traffic could be protected with software-based encryption,
the demand for fast hardware-accelerated encryption gave
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I don't see anything comparable in either Unix/Linux or Windows.
DLL's are comparable.
-
I'm not sure I follow this - just how are DLL's comparable to PDS's?
- Dave Rivers -
--
riv...@dignus.comWork: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe
instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5323 (20100729) __
The message was checked by ESET
Assuming you have no firewall issues...
Finding a 3270 emulator for Android will be the biggest problem. I've been
looking for one since I got an Android based phone without luck. The form
factor will be the next hurdle to get past. Granted, you won't be doing
heads down data entry, but it is
John,
There are VPN client software for windows mobile based phones. There are
TN3270 and telnet clients for most phones windows mobile, blackberry,
iphone, android etc. There are also VNC/RDP clients for most of these
phones.
Though all these exist, its very hard to use from handheld devices.
Here is a redbook on just this topic. It has support for iPhone and Droid.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg247836.html?OpenDocument
System z on the Go: Access z/OS from Smartphones.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
John,
acquired a Nokia N900 telephone last week and have been SSH and telneting
to my heart's content.
C3270 (sister of X3270) works also.
= OK, it's probably a stupid thought. But we are losing our laptop with the
= air card. So we won't have a way to access our z system when not at home
Take a look at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ24A5kE6XM VMware View on iPhone
Dennis Roach
GHG Corporation
Lockheed Martin Mission Services
Facilities Design and Operations Contract Strategic Technical Engineering
NASA/JSC
Address:
2100 Space Park Drive
LM-15-4BH
Houston, Texas 77058
Bruce Richardson wrote:
I'm looking for the control block and field name that contains the name of the
procedure (or the member name of the PROCLIB) used in a step.
I have an assemble program that displays the following for a job step:
JobName, StepName, ProcStep, ProgramName, UserID
JobName -
procedure name not available but
*
GET_SSIBJBID DS 0H jobnumber
L R1,16 --CVT
USING CVT,R1
L R1,CVTTCBP --TCB words
DROP R1
L R1,4(R1)
So, with all these new smartphones such as the Droid, I was wondering if
that device could be used to VPN into our LAN and then do 3270 emulation?
I know absolutely nothing about these devices.
Can they telnet into UNIX systems?
Since RUMBA and HOD can 3270-Interface with IE, I can give a
I'm not sure I follow this - just how are DLL's comparable to PDS's?
They hold more than one 'member' of executable run time modules, similar to
SEERUN, for example.
Even the name 'Dynamic Link Library' could be comparable.
But, remember 'comparable' does not mean exact.
They are also more
John,
Android apps like the free EasyTether Lite can be used to tether
your laptop to the cell data network on most Android phones.
The app is basically a NAT router written in Java, and doesn't require
you to root the phone. The free version of the app blocks https:
after a while, but other
Thanks for clarifying for me!
Frank
On 7/29/2010 at 7:04 AM, in message
20100729140617.08ea1f58...@smtp.patriot.net, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 4c4afae2.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 07/24/2010
at 02:38 PM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com
Sure. Heck, a single-level subdirectory is similar to a PDS! That's how I
describe them to the PC kids I work with...
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
snip
Somebody stated there were no equivalents on other OS's.
At the risk of being pedantic, I came up
Hi Bill,
If you follow the link in Jim's first post (this thread) to the posted jobs,
folks can still apply. I spot checked several and could have put in an app on
the spot - if I had wanted to.
HTH,
Linda Mooney
- Original Message -
From: Bill Fairchild
Hi Ken,
You're right about the list that was contained in the original post. However,
following Jim's link brings up a more detailed list. I didn't go all the way
through that list, but within the top third was a z/OS systems programmer
opening for maint and ISV product installs, etc.
The first thing you have to determine is the breakout of the DASD RT. What
is the RT and how much of it is due to connect vs. disc vs. IOSQ vs. pend.
From there you can start understanding if you have an I/O RT problem and
what might be causing it.
Joel Wolpert
Performance and Capacity
W dniu 2010-07-29 18:03, Mark Steely pisze:
I have a ZFS file which is larger than a 3390 mod 2 volume. I would like to
split this file to fit on 2 3390 mod 2 volumes. What would the best way to
do this.
We are z/OS V1R11. Any help would be appreciated.
1. Consider using bigger volumes
Disconnect time can also show up as synchronous remote copy (SRDF). If the
links are saturated it will elongate the DISC time and therefore the RT.
Joel Wolpert
Performance and Capacity Planning consultant
WEBSITE: www.perfconsultant.com
- Original Message -
From: Ron Hawkins
There is a TN3270 Lite app for the iPhone. Coincidentally, someone was
just showing it to me earlier today.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Access z/OS 3270
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:39:28 -0500, Rich Smrcina wrote:
There is a OpenVPN client for Android, but sadly it requires rooting the
device. An implementation of VNC is also available. An SSH client is
available which I've used, it is quite nice.
root? Would that be a synonym for jailbreak? Or
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/07/19/z196_mainframe_blade_interconnect/
As El Reg already reported, the System z11 machine will sport 96 cores and give
about 80 of them over to running either z/OS or Linux in a single system image
(rated at around 50,000 aggregate MIPS by our math) or
Joel,
That's when you start looking at the Type42 subtype 6 records. Read
disconnect time is reported separately, so you can establish if the problem
is TrueCopy links or Sibling Pend.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf
R.S. wrote:
Just curious: what is the difference? Nowadays I can have z10 and
Power baldes. In the future it will be possible to have z196 and zBX.
Is there any *technical* difference between z196 + zBX and z196 +
regular power blades?
z196+zBX is a trusted system of systems managed by the
Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/07/19/z196_mainframe_blade_interconnect/
And, yes that's zEnterprise 196 - without the characteristic slash used in IBM
mainframe names since a lot of us were babies and before some of you were born.
This is snide and ignorant gibberish --
It's the term in Android-land.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
root? Would that be a synonym for jailbreak? Or is it
from the Strine lexicon?
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
Dr. Stephen Fedtke wrote:
we need to know in realtime how close the system is to its cpu peak
interval/time (meaning that peak time representing the z user's major
invoice factor).
does anybody have an idea on how to EASILY determine key information in the
field of cpu load etc., such as via
In listserv%201007290954519942.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/29/2010
at 09:54 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I see it differently. I assume the something else in other OSes is
a directory or a folder.
Or something else.
Enough functional differences to not consider them
In listserv%201007200752424694.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/20/2010
at 07:52 AM, Etienne Thijsse e.thij...@chello.nl said:
Does anyone have an idea why fopen(//PDS(MEMBER), w+) fails,
while fopen (//PDS(MEMBER), w) succeeds?
Because you can't append to a member. You can update in place, but I
In 4c3da48f.40...@isis-papyrus.com, on 07/14/2010
at 01:50 PM, Miklos Szigetvari miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
said:
I thought to use SDSF REXX from program, but I think it is stupid to
communicate via REXX variables from a program
It's stupid to do it any other way from a program that
In listserv%201007291411530224.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/29/2010
at 02:11 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
said:
The rest I *think* you would have to look at JES2 macros.
No way. TIOT and SCT are all that you need, and JES2 doesn't track all
of those data.
--
In listserv%201007291045372971.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/29/2010
at 10:45 AM, Bruce Richardson bruce.richard...@arcelormittal.com
said:
I'm looking for the control block and field name that contains the
name of the procedure (or the member name of the PROCLIB) used in a
step.
Which procedure?
In
66388274-1278229443-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-15848985...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 07/04/2010
at 07:44 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
No, GML is a superset of script, by definition.
A superset includes all the functions/elements of the original set,
PLUS
It appears we can ALTER FREESPACE while a file is open to CICS (or anywhere
else, I assume). Is this an OK thing to do, so the next time the file is
reloaded it will use the new freespace values?
--
Frank Swarbrick
Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Development
FirstBank Data
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 5:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ALTER of open VSAM cluster
It appears we can ALTER FREESPACE while a file is open to CICS (or
anywhere
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:34:27 -0400, zMan wrote:
It's the term in Android-land.
So, a little of both, then, eh?
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
root? Would that be a synonym for jailbreak? Or is it
from the Strine lexicon?
Searching around, I discovered that on July
On 07/29/2010 06:26 PM, Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 5:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ALTER of open VSAM cluster
It appears we can
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
