Hello Michael,
I follow your example, but didn't work. The error is produce on second sentence
COPY:
ICE600I 0 DFSORT ICETOOL UTILITY RUN STARTED
ICE650I 0 VISIT http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR ICETOOL PAPERS, EXAMPL
ICE632I 0 SOURCE FOR ICETOOL STATEMENTS: TOOLIN
ICE630I 0 MODE IN
Note your output messages are truncated in your post. For example
EXAMPL. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
Hi,
We wanted to find out the Main memory usage of our production LPAR for a
particular day. We have allocated 15GB of main memory and we wanted to
find out this 15GB is enough or more memory need to added.
We have printed RMF Paging activity report but is there any specific
parameter needs to
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 02:12:04 -0500, Hilario G. wrote:
I follow your example, but didn't work. The error is produce on second
sentence COPY:
May you help me ?
Hilario,
Frank Yaeger answered your question twice:
8 Jul 2011:
Hi, Everyone.
We want to have ASG TMON for z/OS monitoring the utilization of Channel path
IDs defined in a parallel sysplex.
Because we are currently using VTS (Virtual Tape Server) to virtualize 3490E
tapes. All production LPARs within the parallel sysplex can have access to the
VTS tapes.
Hi all,
I have a small dilemma. I have designed and written a semi-new facility that
automatically sends the task condition codes (including the max CC) and stats
via email. I currently have it implemented and in Alpha testing in two modes.
We have provided this via a manual method (via
Brian Westerman wrote:
My dilemma is that I have been told that we will not be using both methods and
we have to choose one or the other. I asked everyone here and got almost an
even three-way split (option 1, option 2, and whats an exit?), so I thought
I would go out to the list and see how
For those what's an exit?, show them the exit ('door') :-D
Or as my boss likes to say Give me some of that money back! :-)
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
My understanding was that the EUT bit in PSA was added because the FRR
stack
was not saved. Perhaps it was not saved in EUT mode and the bit caused
even
EUT's to have their FRR stack saved?
You had mentioned in an earlier append that there was no (potential) CPU
switch if locked. Not true for
Just one addition:
We put the JOBLOGs for the important daily backup etc jobs into a
special SYSOUT class, and a JES writer sends this JOBLOGS automatically
to the originating user
On 7/19/2011 11:48 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
Hi all,
I have a small dilemma. I have designed and written
G'Day,
A tape dsn was expired by CA-1 and is in SCRATCH status. I cataloged the
tape dsn. However, when I try to REPRO the tape to another dsn SMS is
preventing me from using the tape:
IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING-
VOLUME REQUESTED BY SPECIFIC VOLUME
The z/OS 1.13 support (or lack of support if you choose to consider it
that) is entirely software-limited. There are no hardware limitations
involved here. For example, the hardware does support ETE's with 8-byte
entry point addresses. And of course the SVC new PSW is 16 bytes and has
On 7/19/2011 11:48 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
Hi all,
I have a small dilemma. I have designed and written a semi-new facility that
automatically sends the task condition codes (including the max CC) and stats via email.
I currently have it implemented and in Alpha testing in two modes. We
When the tape went SCRATCH to CA-1, OAM was also notified. IBM's rule is
that a tape in SCRATCH status cannot be called by specific volser. You
need to change the status within ISMF from SCRATCH to PRIVATE and then
you will be able to REPRO the tape. I would also suggest you change the
expiration
This morning's New York Times, which perhaps not quite all of you see, contains
a piece attributing IBM's unexpectedly good financial results to sales of new
mainframes.
John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
Russell,
Thanks for the advice. I have never done this before. I checked in ISMF. I
chose Option 10 then option 3 (Tape library), however I do not find an opton
to change the status of a tape.
Could you tell me how I can go about it?
Thanks for your patience.
--- On Tue, 19/7/11,
Technically I haven't any preference opinion for Your options. But You said: I
have found that sites don't like putting in exits if they can get around it.
This definitely sounds to me it excludes option 2.
Regards,
Thomas Berg
_
Thomas Berg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Daniel Allen
‰íz{S©ì}êÄÊ ŠxjǺà*'µéíO*^µìmþ™ZŠw!j» ´
jlj=”˜ÕÈ‘••±Á•Ì̽¹•É¹œÝ¡É”Ñ¡(½Á½•¹ÌÉ”±½…Ѹ…Ù¸44)¡Ù”‘½” ½”•… …¹¥Á¥¹Ì”¼¡”MÕ݉ÍÑ”
On 07/18/11 18:26, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 7/18/2011 12:55 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Are you saying that the processor starts fetching instructions for
the branch prior to executing it?
Absolutely! There is a multi-stage pipeline that allows the processor
to get ahead of the current
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 04:43:31 -0700, John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
G'Day,
A tape dsn was expired by CA-1 and is in SCRATCH status. I cataloged the
tape dsn. However, when I try to REPRO the tape to another dsn SMS is
preventing me from using the tape:
IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED
john_w_gilm...@msn.com (john gilmore) writes:
This morning's New York Times, which perhaps not quite all of you see,
contains a piece attributing IBM's unexpectedly good financial results
to sales of new mainframes.
from bloomberg/businessweek
IBM Gains After Raising Profit Forecast on
Mark,
I tried your suggestion, however when I type PRIVATE in the USE ATTR field it
keeps going back to scratch. I am sure I am doing something wrong. Where do I
type PRIVATE?
--- On Tue, 19/7/11, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
From: Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
Subject: Re: SMS
I use the following JCL to change the volume back to PRIVATE:
//STEP000 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
ALTER V292463 VOLUMEENTRY -
STORAGEGROUP(SGVTAPE2) -
NULLIFY(ERRORSTATUS) -
LOCATION(LIBRARY) LIBNAME($VTS0002)
/*
You need to change 292463 to your volser
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:43:15 -0700, John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Mark,
I tried your suggestion, however when I type PRIVATE in the USE ATTR field it
keeps going back to scratch. I am sure I am doing something wrong. Where do
I type PRIVATE?
From option 2.3 (MOUNTABLE TAPE),
snip
We wanted to find out the Main memory usage of our production LPAR for a
particular day. We have allocated 15GB of main memory and we wanted to
find out this 15GB is enough or more memory need to added.
We have printed RMF Paging activity report but is there any specific
parameter needs to
Mark,
I tried out your suggestion. I even activated the SMS environment. However
when I check in CA-1 it still shows the tape as scratch. Is there anything
else I need to do?
--- On Tue, 19/7/11, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
From: Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
Subject: Re: SMS
Hello Michael,
Pardon for the previos e-mail. Your example runs correctly. I adjust some
values and now it work.
Kind Regards.
Hilario G.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Mark,
I found my error. I did not enter the STORAGE GROUP name. All is fine. A
very big thank you.
Thanks John for your input. Alls well that ends well.
--- On Tue, 19/7/11, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
From: Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION - TAPE
To:
Changing the status in ISMF has no effect on CA1. To change it in CA1, use
the CA1 panels to update the EXPDT to a future date.
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan Goossen, ACS, CL
Tape Specialist
ACT Mainframe Storage Group
Personal: 651-361-4541
Department Support Line: 651-361-
John,
Even an easier way. Go into CA-1's ISPF interface and change the
expiration date to tomorrow. This will take it out of scratch status in
CA-1. Now you need to run CA-1's CTSSYNC program to update the SMS
status. JCL:
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=CTSSYNC
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
VERIFY
SYNC
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:08:56 -0700, John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Mark,
I tried out your suggestion. I even activated the SMS environment. However
when I check in CA-1 it still shows the tape as scratch. Is there anything
else I need to do?
CA-1 TMC is a separate entity from
I'm working on a project which involves converting a lot of VSAM
files. So far, I've restricted myself to using PDSes and REXX. Everybody
in my group (mainframe sysprogs) understands these. But, for my own
convenience, I'd like to use UNIX files. Why? Because I can create
really long file names,
John,
Fantastic. I will try this out the next time I have this situation. The tape
librarian had changed the status in TMS so I was too late.
Thanks a million.
--- On Tue, 19/7/11, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
From: John McKown joa...@swbell.net
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION - TAPE
Thanks Mark. All's clear. Thanks for bailing me out.
--- On Tue, 19/7/11, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
From: Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION - TAPE
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Tuesday, 19 July, 2011, 11:34 PM
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:08:56 -0700, John
Hi
Why don't you teach you group to Unix ? ;-)
If you don't want to keep this project for you, I would consider the 44
byte long MVS dataset names.
I always wanted to have an option, to assign long , descriptive alias
names to MVS datasets.
Maybe the jol can do this or the xjcl.
On
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:21:58 -0500, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
John,
Even an easier way. Go into CA-1's ISPF interface and change the
expiration date to tomorrow. This will take it out of scratch status in
CA-1. Now you need to run CA-1's CTSSYNC program to update the SMS
status. JCL:
And if anybody wonders *why* z/OS does not allow you to do a specific mount of
a SCRTCH tape:
Your SCRTCH tapes will probably have a 'Fast Ready Category' assiged in your
VTS. This means, that when you request a tape from such a category, you intend
to write new data on it and don't care about
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
One of my tasks is to teach the others in the group some UNIX. But I don't have
any guidance on how much to teach. Just enough to do what is needed? Or enough
to really use UNIX facilities to make like easier? I guess my boss will
In the IBM VTS, I tell ISMF to make a tape private, and then I can access
the virtual tapes data. (IE: it takes it out of fast ready status.)
I once wanted to clear the contents of a virtual scratch tape and ejected
and reinserted it. After reinserting, it still showed the old data.
Thank you
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:10 PM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 14:45 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com wrote:
In my 20 plus year career I have seen a lot more people with mainframe
backgrounds expressing a
Although the utility refers to the 3495/3494, it talks to OAM. If the
library is designed to work with OAM, it may pass the data to the library.
But in any case it will pass it to ISMF. We use it for tape in our MDL. It
updates ISMF, but we run an extra utility for the MDL to sync it to the
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:06:05 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
And if anybody wonders *why* z/OS does not allow you to do a specific mount of
a SCRTCH tape:
Your SCRTCH tapes will probably have a 'Fast Ready Category' assiged in your
VTS. This means, that when you
Sounds OK, but does your site have well-practiced backup, restore and DR
processes for Unix files?
Regards,
Mike Wawiorko
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: 19 July 2011 14:35
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote in message
news:1292462023506289.wa.markmzelden@bama.ua.edu...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:06:05 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
And if anybody wonders *why* z/OS does not allow you to do a specific
mount of a SCRTCH tape:
Your SCRTCH
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:04:00 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
One of my tasks is to teach the others in the group some UNIX. But
I don't have any guidance on how much to teach. Just enough to
do what is needed? Or enough to really use UNIX facilities to make
like easier?
It sounds like you will be
Thanks to all the folks who read my new paper,
Setting Up the IBM HTTP Server. And special
thanks for all the comments. I went from version
1.1 to version 1.4 of the document in a single
day!
The latest version is now available for free
from our website; go to:
W dniu 2011-07-19 16:06, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM pisze:
And if anybody wonders *why* z/OS does not allow you to do a specific mount of
a SCRTCH tape:
Your SCRTCH tapes will probably have a 'Fast Ready Category' assiged in your
VTS. This means, that when you request a tape from such a category,
R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote in message
news:4e2596f3.6080...@bremultibank.com.pl...
W dniu 2011-07-19 16:06, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM pisze:
And if anybody wonders *why* z/OS does not allow you to do a
specific mount of a SCRTCH tape:
Your SCRTCH tapes will probably have a 'Fast
Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:9592662387995973.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo@bama.ua.edu...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:04:00 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
One of my tasks is to teach the others in the group some UNIX. But
I don't have any guidance on how much to teach.
Not really. What we do is DFDSS full volume backups and restores. We
don't even attempt to do backups of individual UNIX files. We use
OpenTech's DRXpert to do incremental backups of z/OS datasets. We regard
UNIX as z/OS's red haired step child (as my boss puts it - he's a red
head).
On Tue,
I guess that so long as I use UNIX in a transient way, then no big
deal. It would be if I tried to leave stuff in UNIX for a long time
that others would get cranky.
One problem (which is likely due to a bad approach on my part) that I
have with PDSes right now is you cannot mod onto the end of a
Your colleagues need to learn about UNIX, and you should take every opportunity
to teach them what you know about it.
Like everyone else, they will learn best when either 1) they see a clear
reason/need to do so or 2) they find something appealing/cool/sweet about what
they are learning.
Thanks - I'll look at aliases. You mentioned the Binder, but these are text
files, not executable programs. Also, if it makes a difference, I am on z/OS
1.10 with little chance of upgrading anytime soon due to a problem with an OEM
product for which we dropped support (to save money). pay me
W dniu 2011-07-19 16:50, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM pisze:
[...]
That is different from CA-1. You only need autority to read the tape,
but CA-1 does not prevent you from reading it while it is SCRTCH.
Well... That means that anyone who is authorized toread the scratch can
read the tape, regardless
Ummm say doc (switching to Bugs Bunny accent) ... would that be
why Microsoft got a patent for PDSs ?? .. a concept that's been
around even before Microsoft.
From the 'Summary Of The Invention' for U.S. patent no. 6,594,674, 'System
and
method for creating multiple files from a single source
I'm going to patent the big toe. Everybody who walks must pay me a royality.
UPTSO is full of fools and failed engineers.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
Sir,
ROFL !! ... oh good ... it's just your big toes ... I'm going to
patent all my toes and even my fingers (in case I get slapped on
the wrist)
:-)
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
617-233-4130 (mobile)
636-294-1014(res)
j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email)
I think the ROT (rule of thumb) is that zero or near zero paging means that
there is ample real storage. If there is paging, then zero or close demand
page in rates indicate that there is no degradation.
Demand page in is synchronous which means that some workload(s) have to wait.
Page out
Chokalingam
dealing with memory is a bit more complex than with other resources.
I wrote a white paper about that 1 year ago. If you are interested I
can send it to you.
Let me know ...
Fabio
At 10:25 19/07/2011, you wrote:
Hi,
We wanted to find out the Main memory usage of our production
Personally I believe that exits are very expensive and introduce risk. But so
are long running tasks, and especially those looking at sensitive data. Both
are popular audit targets.
In addition, this sounds like one of those gee-whiz things that is a fad that
soon falls into disuse.
Easier for whom? I have not seen anything developed in Unix that communicates
with z/OS made easier by the implementation of Unix - more complex yes, less
visable yes, error messages none available, platform portable yes, but not
easier.
I do not find Unix commands easier than JES2 commands
I
CA1 controls access to tape by DSN. If you have authority for the DSN, you
can read it as scratch. CA1 also controls who has the ability to read
using BLP and foreign which is another way to bypass read scratch tapes.
These are the main security controls for CA1, but there are several
others.
I have run into a situation I have never seen before and did not think was
possible. I must be missing something, but I haven't got a clue as to what.
I have a batch program (A) that is re-entrant. However, statically linked to
it is a program (B) that is not re-entrant. When this program B
how about making sure the file is created? and put a header record in so it
ain't empty?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
RENT is honored--i.e. failed if violated--only if the load library is APF
authorized.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Gary DiPillo
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:50:20 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
RENT is honored--i.e. failed if violated--only if the load library is APF
authorized.
From:
z/OS V1R12.0 MVS Initialization and Tuning Reference
We ran into this a number of years ago. Even if a load module is linked RENT,
it is not loaded into fetch-only storage unless it is loaded from an
APF-authorized library. Normal APF authorization rules apply, so ANY
non-authorized library in the STEPLIB or JOBLIB etc. voids the APF
Skip,
Thanks.
I never new that. And it also explains why my customer did get the 0C4. His module, which calls my module, is APF authorized, but
his calling module was not re-entrant. So the linked stub did not fail, but the dynamically called module did.
I guess I have more reading to do
Peter,
That's pretty much my sad story. Passed my testing. Customer found the bug
for me. :(
Gary
On 07/19/2011 3:57 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
We ran into this a number of years ago. Even if a load module is linked RENT,
it is not loaded into fetch-only storage unless it is loaded
MVS will only load modules marked as re-entrant into key zero storage if
they are loaded from an APF authorized library. Modules loaded from
non-authorized libraries are loaded into program key (usually 8) key. Note
that it really isn't the library that is authorized, it is the full
Gil,
Thanks for the pointer. Since it is available in my V1R10 system, I may turn it on for my testing. It would be a good thing to be
sure that what is marked RENT really is, 'cause customers will use things in ways we may not have anticipated.
Regards,
Gary DiPillo
On 07/19/2011 3:55 PM,
This one touches my heart. As a brand new system programmer, I did the
same thing. In my case I inadvertently used JCL that specified RENT,REFR
even though I knew the program was neither. Testing went great. Then got
my first midnight phone call. Baptism by pager.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Re-entrant module stores into itself with no 0C4
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:50:20 -0700, Skip
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:39:43 -0500, Gary DiPillo wrote:
Can someone suggest how these programs that are marked as re-entrant can be
loaded and executed without error even though they are storing data within
themselves?
Classically, unless the program is loaded from an APF-authorized library,
IBM has asked me to do a LOAD MODULE REBUILD for IEAVNPF9 which lives in
SYS1.NUCLEUS.
Any one done this before and if so, how do I do it?
Thanks.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB
I would try LINK LMODS(IEAVNPF9) CHECK.
If that looks good, try it without check.
Cheers,
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John Norgauer
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SMPE how
I have a question no one seemed to ask: why the war on VSAM? There was
time back in the Dark Ages when nobody trusted VSAM, but I think we're
past that. It's free. It's pretty versatile considering that you can chose
between sequential data or indexed data with just a few definitional
On 7/19/2011 3:39 PM, Gary DiPillo wrote:
My presumptuous assumption was that RENT was always honored when
specified. Not the first time I've been WRONG!!
I only need to persuade myself to turn on REFRPROT, and I will do just
that once I'm sure I can get out of that choice safely and easily
--snip
In my 20 plus year career I have seen a lot more people with mainframe
backgrounds expressing a willingness to learn and integrate usage of
non-mainframe technology than I have seen people from an
I agree with Otto. What is so tough about creating JCL?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Schumacher, Otto
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Making Z/OS easier - Effectively
Thanks Alan,
Worked great.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! JN 2004
With PDS command do HIST on member name to see last PTF applied then
with SMP/E do APPLY CHECK S(ptf) and see what damage is caused. If it's not
too bad APPLY S(ptf) REDO.
In a message dated 7/19/2011 3:37:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu writes:
and if
On 7/19/2011 1:37 PM, Gary DiPillo wrote:
We don't need to discuss RENT and REFR, but I certainly need to read up on
them again. I'm sure that what I remember and what is true have long ago
drifted apart.
REFR modules are not allowed to update themselves.
It's widely believed that RENT
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:16:26 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r12.ieae200/progref.htm
Actually, it not that I think it is no good, I think it's a long time coming.
The problem is that I also know of at least one program
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:37:33 -0700, John Norgauer wrote:
IBM has asked me to do a LOAD MODULE REBUILD for IEAVNPF9 which lives in
SYS1.NUCLEUS.
Any one done this before and if so, how do I do it?
Not I.
It's a command, in SMPCNTL (not SMPPTFIN). Now, at least one of us
needs to read the
Not converting VSAM to something else. Doing some mass migrations, one
file at a time, from Data Accelerator compression to SMS compression.
Which requires: (1) EXPORT vsam cluster; (2) remove from Data
Accelerator; (3) add to SMS compression (using special data class); (4)
IMPORT the vsam
Just to be my usual self. In general in CS, reentrant does not mean
non-self modifying. Many programs which do not modify themselves are
still not reentrant due to uncoordinated updating of shared resources.
Likewise, if done properly a self modifying program can still be
reentrant.
ref:
Actually, at the time the standard was set, there was no such thing as
APF.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:16:26 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
Since this is an interim state and therefore temporary, you're entitled to
do it in the way that makes the most sense to you. In the meantime, just
be especially careful when crossing the street so as to dodge the
proverbial bus. ;-)
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Re-entrant module stores into itself with no 0C4
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:16:26 +, Gibney,
Problem Statement: We are attempting to estimate the number of compressed ML1
and ML2 data sets that will fit on EAV volumes.
For ML1 data sets, field UMDSIZE from IDCAMS DCOLLECT layout appears to be
reporting with reasonable numbers.
For ML2 the number does not seem close at all.
Test
John:
Thanks for the good information. I steered my client away from BDT when it was
first announced as being to expensive and did not meet all our needs as not all
the shops we talked to were IBM /or/ they were not likely to buy it as it was
expensive to small shops.
We ended up with the
Hi List,
The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not to
turn JSCBAUTH on, after having turned it off, has been repeated many times.
I wonder how the initiator manages to invoke PGM=apfpgm
LINK LMODS
++MOD .
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
617-233-4130 (mobile)
636-294-1014(res)
j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, July
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:46:20 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r12.ieae200/progref.htm
Actually, it not that I think it is no good, I think it's a long time
coming. The
problem is that I also know of at least one
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Re-entrant module stores into itself with no 0C4
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:46:20 +, Gibney,
On 19 July 2011 16:46, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:16:26 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
So although I think it's better that reentrant marked modules actually be
reentrant and might have been inclined to enforce that had I had a say in the
mythical man month
On 19 July 2011 20:59, Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov wrote:
The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not
to turn JSCBAUTH on, after having turned it off, has been repeated many times.
Hi Allan,
Thanks for your reply! I still have some questions. Please see below for
details.
snip
Our CPC (2094-S18-708) now has 8 Physical CP and has 1 production LPAR,
2 maintenance LPARs, 2 ICF LPARs and 2 test LPARs running at the moment.
Currently, all LPARs are equipped with shared CPs and
_June 2011 | TOP500 Supercomputing Sites_
(http://www.top500.org/lists/2011/06)
That's a whollottaflops...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
