As regards the HLQ part, we have successfully used a non-SYS1 SMS managed 4xm27
dataset for the non-prompt AUTOIPL Sadump:
AMDSADMP IPL=D3390,VOLSER=SD,
OUTPUT=(DBD36,PXSYS.OPER.SADMP),
DDSPROMPT=NO,
MINASID=ALL,
> I love it when you guys do that to me! :-) Especially as I was too
> fast to remedy the situation by reallocating everything before I had
> figured out what I should have answered those prompts with! Jim
> Mulder must be on vacation - I had hoped he could confirm this for me.
Vacation? Not
> >it runs with only a subset of it's LCPs enabled for interrupts
> I have a definite problem with the wording of this. 'Enabled for
> interrupts' in my book is quite independent of the logical/physical
> cp distinction. 'enabled for interrupts' is a 7 at the appropriate
> point in the psw (inst
Barbara Nitz writes:
>And coming from a z9 presumably to a z196, chances are very
>good that you would loose physical cps to keep money down.
It's not clear yet which z9 the original poster has. Moving from a z9 BC to
a z114, no. There are more capacity models in the z114 and more
configurable eng
Hi
I havent had a problem with this
/* REXX */
"FREE F(INDD1)"
"FREE F(OUTDD1)"
"FREE F(SYSIN)"
"ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR"
"ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR"
"ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') SHR"
"NEWSTACK"
V1 = " C I=((INDD1,R)),O=OUTDD1"
V2 = " SELECT M
Rob Schramm writes:
>If you upgrade to z10 / z114, you can use GCL (group capacity limits). It
>allows for better flexibility without having to "hard cap".
Though there are many excellent reasons to upgrade to a z114 or z196, LPAR
group capacity limits (group "softcaps") are available on z9 or lat
>The channel requests an I/O interrupt. It must be processed by a specific
>LPAR, but not a specific CPU.
With regard to cpenable, I believe you've missed the fact cpenable only comes
into play when you're dealing with *pending* interrupts. Using the TPI (test
pending interrupt) means that you
I trade blonde jokes with a blonde friend. A recent gem from her (nothing
personal!):
A gorgeous young redhead goes into the doctor's office and said that her
body hurt wherever she touched it.
'Impossible!' says the doctor.. 'Show me.'
The redhead took her finger, pushed on her left shoulder
I checked out an MVS Image profile on my (brand spanking new!) z196. It
looks the choice is between dedicated or shared CPs. A CF LPAR offers more
choices, but oddly fewer choices than the z10 it replaced.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
>As to whether a null reply in the reported case would have reverted SAD to
>the original values, I think we're all looking to Barbara to answer her
>own question. ;-)
I love it when you guys do that to me! :-) Especially as I was too fast to
remedy the situation by reallocating everything before
I will be out of the office starting 16/02/2012 and will return on
20/02/2012.
For anything urgent contact the Mainframe Services support number, x79371
or 04 924 9371 or email BNZ Mainframe Services.
CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information
intended only for
>Is it possible to mix shared and dedicated CPs on the same LPAR?
No. Not on a z9 and not the way you mean.
The RMF report deals with what an lpar can look like when it uses
Hiperdispatch. That is not available on a z9.
Hiperdispatch semi-dedicates logical processors to physical processors
depen
On 16/02/2012 11:04 AM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a while about
the differences between how CICS works and how IMS TM works. I couldn't find
anything on the web. Anyone have a link to a good reference?
Thanks,
Frank
They both have their +s and -s, The logging for IMS is very good. Easy to use
in recovery. I thought that CICS was quicker and also had a pretty good log
system. Some of it depends upon the application you are using. I'm a CICS
bigot but, I'm also an IMS DBA.
It's you pick and how expe
Is it possible to mix shared and dedicated CPs on the same LPAR?
I thought it wasn't, but a note on the RMF partition data report implies it is;
On WGT
Either the partition's current weighting of the shared processor resources or
one of the following indicators:
DED
Indicates that the partition
I was testing running from Rexx z/OS 1.13 IEBCOPY, which doesn't
require authorization:
0IEB1021E OMVS,*,SYSIN ,GET ,WRONG LEN RECRD,00,QSAM
17.52.11 STC09793 +IEB1021E OMVS,*,SYSIN ,GET ,WRONG LEN
RECRD,00,QSAM
\216^A\220÷Ù¯ç"\2370"\2370"\2370"\2370"\2
Thanks Radoslaw & Bob.
I figured there must be some explanation for the additional byte other than
some new extended device ranges.
This is still a DOC problem as the manual simply states these are device
addresses.
Radoslaw, are you saying there is a way of creating an IPLable device with a
>>We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a while
>>about the differences between how CICS works >>and how IMS TM works. I
>>couldn't find anything on the web. Anyone have a link to a good reference?
Try Google for "IMS DC". The IMS Transaction Manager used to be cal
I have programmed with both systems. IMS TM seems to be a bit cleaner
to me. CICS seems to be more susecptible to other program's errors.
Both feature 3270 screen handling, storing information between screen
actions, updating databases, sending updated screens.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:04 PM,
We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a while about
the differences between how CICS works and how IMS TM works. I couldn't find
anything on the web. Anyone have a link to a good reference?
Thanks,
Frank
-
I believe that IEBCOPY (and some/all? of the old DFP utilities) consider
anything in column 1 to be a label. Hence actual control keywords have to
start in column 2+.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7
There are not too many options to do something authorized from Rexx. I should
have a list somewhere...
Anyway, I was curious about that part. It was once an interest of mine.
Regards,
Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Beha
As a system programmer I have been assigned the task of taking a customer's SMS
Invision system, PA, AP, GL, etc., and restoring it to our system. We have
restored all of the data sets. Now, I have been asked to identify and run only
the PA (Patient Accounting) part of their batch schedule. A
Hi thanks for all the replies so far.
I've just read the the z/os abcs vol 10 about I/O processing and have some
thoughts about CPENABLE
First we are running (10,30) which seems to be IBMs current recommendation for
Z9.
So is this what happens?
The channel requests an I/O interrupt. It must be
Group,
We found the issue with this. The MVS Spool can hold binary PDFs. The
leading x'40' is NOT a problem. We added more of them to prove it. The
problem is with the PDF viewer.
Thank you for all your input on this matter, Dave
Dave Hansen
Eagan Software Systems Branch
651-406
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:42:08 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>I rhink the word "select" must start in column 2
>
???
I thought it could start any where from 2 through 16. But I haven't
checked the manual.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscr
Dave:
I rhink the word "select" must start in column 2
Ed
On Feb 15, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote:
Still no luck:
FCO105I COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
FCO105I SELECT MEMBER=DBOK62
FCO411A UNIDENTIFIED COMMAND OR KEYWORD
"NEWSTACK"
V1 = "COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTD
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:09:50 -0500, Joe Aulph wrote:
>Maybe it's just the biggot'd Assembler flake within but wouldn't this
>be much simpler with the COBOL program simply calling an DYNALLOC
>routine in Assembler... no authorization needed at all for this.
>
I had wondered about that, from when
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:59:29 -0600, Chris Craddock wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John wrote:
>
>> If you really want do this this: run an APF authorized TSO command from a
>> COBOL program, even one which is linked AC=1. Well, you'll need to "cheat
>> horribly". One way to cheat
I was wondering how some of you are handling the HOME field of the model userid
profile specified in the APPLDATA field of the BPX.UNIQUE.USER porfile.
The IBM examples I've seen all show /tmp for HOME. My current OEDFLTU userid
in use with the BPX.DEFAULT.USER profile uses /tmp.
Is there a
:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:>: Behalf Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
:>: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:34 PM
:>: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:>: Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
:>:
:>: Still no luck:
:>:
:>: FC
Yep, a Security program like RACF ...
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: retired mainframer
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Authorized functions
:>: -Original Message---
:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:>: Behalf Of Scott Ford
:>: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:16 AM
:>: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:>: Subject: Re: Authorized functions
:>:
:>: Walt,
:>:
:>: First , thanks for responding..
:
Sometimes the simple problems are the hardest to find
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuatio
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Craddock
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:59 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Authorized functions
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John
> > wrote:
Maybe it's just the biggot'd Assembler flake within but wouldn't this
be much simpler with the COBOL program simply calling an DYNALLOC
routine in Assembler... no authorization needed at all for this.
On 2/15/12, Chris Craddock wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John > wrote:
>
>>
Randall,
That was it. I started the SELECT in column 2!
THANK YOU!!
Dave Hansen
Eagan Software Systems Branch
651-406-1208
dave.l.han...@usps.gov
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Gross, Randall [GCG-PFS]
S
Paul,
Batch works fine because of the sysin DD:
//SYSINDD *
COPY INDD=MYDD1,OUTDD=MYDD2
SELECT MEMBER=(mem1,mem2,mem3)/ EXCLUDE member=(sf,df,sa)
/*
Just can't get the SELECT to take as a second line in REXX. The first line
works great!
Thank yo
I don't think SELECT can start in column 1..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
Still
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John wrote:
> If you really want do this this: run an APF authorized TSO command from a
> COBOL program, even one which is linked AC=1. Well, you'll need to "cheat
> horribly". One way to cheat is to run your COBOL program under TSO.
Do I even need to p
Scott,
The example didn't show a null line. I've seen EXECIO use a null line.
FCO105I S M=TRAY2LND
FCO411A UNIDENTIFIED COMMAND OR KEYWORD
FCO105I
FCO417A PRECEDING CONTROL STATEMENT(S) INVALID
FCO419A OPERATION TERMINATED
QUEUE V1
QUEUE V2
QUEUE V3
QUEUE V4
QUEUE V5
QUEUE V6
QUEUE ''
"EXECIO"
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:41:17 -0800, Scott Ford wrote:
Usually you need to queue a null line as the last line in the stack..
The count ("queued()") should make that unnecessary.
From: "Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, Febru
If you really want do this this: run an APF authorized TSO command from a COBOL
program, even one which is linked AC=1. Well, you'll need to "cheat horribly".
One way to cheat is to run your COBOL program under TSO. You run IKJEFT01.
Something like:
//STC EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,
// REGION=0M,PARM='%
In <0369520600091673.wa.joeowensstandardlife@bama.ua.edu>, on
02/15/2012
at 07:10 AM, Joe Owens said:
>My understanding of the channel program is that it moves the data
>into the page fixed I/O buffer and the interupt a cp to process the
>I/O. How is the candidate CP chosen? I know the z/
In
<90ec2e798a22854ebf67a14ec3fe093fa74c870...@scmbxc01.bcbad.state.sc.us>,
on 02/15/2012
at 10:59 AM, "Bonno, Tuco" said:
>macbeth, imo, says it even better
Perhaps Milton, repurposed to coercive monopolies:
Yet not for those
nor what the potent victor in his rage
can else inflict, do I
Dave,
Usually you need to queue a null line as the last line in the stack..
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: "Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: REX
Still no luck:
FCO105I COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
FCO105I SELECT MEMBER=DBOK62
FCO411A UNIDENTIFIED COMMAND OR KEYWORD
"NEWSTACK"
V1 = "COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1"
V2 = "SELECT MEMBER=DBOK62"
V3 = "SELECT MEMBER=DP13"
V4 = "SELECT MEMBER=LAND1CPY"
V5 = "SELECT MEMBER=SSTDN"
V6 = "
John:
So is this saying you can only do limited rexx functions from an application
program
In our case, i need to allocate a sysin and sysprint and execute a vendor's
program the output queues into sysprint.
My problem I ran into..is using BPXWDYN...once allocated in a running LE Cobol
pro
I guess that what You want is:
"NEWSTACK"
V1 = "COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1"
V2 = "S M=DBOK62"
V3 = "S M=DP13"
V4 = "S M=LAND1CPY"
V5 = "S M=SSTDN"
V6 = "S M=TRAY2LN"
Queue V1
Queue V2
Queue V3
Queue V4
Queue V5
Queue V6
"EXECIO" queued() "DISKW SYSIN (FINIS"
"DELSTACK"
"TSOEXEC IEBCOPY"
Is this even possible? here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ikj4b780/23.4.3.2
Table 122 shows the reason codes that are found in parameter 5 if IKJEFTSR
completes with a return code of 20.
...
24(18) IKJEFTSR was invoked from a non-TSO/E environmen
Group,
I have a REXX EXEC:
"NEWSTACK"
V1 = "COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1"
V2 = "S M=(DBOK62,DP13,LAND1CPY,SSTDN,TRAY2LND)"
queue V1 '+' V2
"EXECIO" queued() "DISKW SYSIN (FINIS"
"DELSTACK"
"TSOEXEC IEBCOPY"
It gets an error:
FCO105I COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1 + S M=(DBOK62,DP1
On 2/15/2012 12:38 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224116/Career_Watch_The_most_in_demand_skills_of_2012
Year-over-year changes in training spending, 2006-2011:
• 2006: 7%
• 2007: 6%
• 2008: -11%
• 2009: -11&
• 2010: 2%
• 2011: 9%
Source: The Corporate Learnin
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224116/
Career_Watch_The_most_in_demand_skills_of_2012
Year-over-year changes in training spending, 2006-2011:
• 2006: 7%
• 2007: 6%
• 2008: -11%
• 2009: -11&
• 2010: 2%
• 2011: 9%
Source: The Corporate Learning Factbook 2012, Bersin & Associates
--
And the answer to THAT is that I am trying it on my 1.10 system. SHOWM is
not a 1.10 option. Need to more the test to 1.13, which will take a couple
of days.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wedne
Walt,
First , thanks for responding..
Let me explain:
The STC is in LE Cobol..4.2
I want to call IKJEFTSR ...to call a rexx clist that will perform authorized
functions , i.e.; alloc, free
The call is below:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
My mistake. You cannot do what I was describing with the output in JESMSGLG.
You'll need to use the others' suggestions to use SDSF. I do know some other
ways, but they are even more "non standard" and require installing some other
software. Specifically, you need Dovetailed Technologies "Datase
I'm not from CA, but I believe that (at least a portion of) SRAM is shipped
with the CA common services product.
Rex
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lawrence
wrote:
> We've had SRAM from CA going back to the DOS days. In those day's we actually
> had CA-Sort. We are now Z/os and man
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:34:01 -0500, Scott Ford wrote:
>All,
>I understand that authorized programs have been talked about before, buti
>don't understand and I want to make sure I do before I start a design ..
>
>What I want Long running STC
>... Invoke a rexx cli
http://www.cconceptsinc.com/2008cci/webport/CA_corp_collateral/CA_for_brian/CA_Product_Brief.pdf
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lawrence
wrote:
> We've had SRAM from CA going back to the DOS days. In those day's we actually
> had CA-Sort. We are now Z/os and management is questioning
All,
I understand that authorized programs have been talked about before, buti don't
understand and I want to make sure I do before I start a design ..
What I want Long running STC
... Invoke a rexx clist performing alloc, calls to a program
..
Got a few minutes between con calls to play with this. I am a little
mystified.
The *only* options I am specifying are PPONLY and SHOWM.
I get the error CCN0049(W) The option "SHOWM" is not supported.
SYSUT10 has a listing that is mostly blank lines, but does seem to be the
#include-expanded sou
Kees,
My recollection is the first WSC flash mentioning this on the 3090s was to
use CPENABLE(0,0), and it has switched between 10,30 and 0,0 at least twice
since then.
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/032f6e163324983085256b79
007f5aec/80154cc31e2cc90d86256fa9000766e7/$FILE/CPE
IIRC it stands for Sort Random Access Method. It is a product that is
called by user written programs like an internal sort. However, it can
perform multiple sorts at once. I don't believe it uses any part of CA-Sort
so you could have programs that are still using it and you might not know.
You
We've had SRAM from CA going back to the DOS days. In those day's we actually
had CA-Sort. We are now Z/os and management is questioning why we still have
it since we use IBM Sort. We have other CA products but no longer have CA-Sort.
Anyone from CA know?
--
Believe me, I am the world's biggest fan of static const as opposed to
#define. I almost never use #define in my own work. I don't even like #ifdef
and its cohorts -- who needs a second "layer" of program logic to debug?
Except where performance is a big issue, or where a particular line of code
wi
Thanks. Will give that a try. Today is not the day.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael Klaeschen
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Any way to get the XLC compiler t
I'm not at all sure that I want to rub off on anyone.
Mr Tuco's quotation is apposite, although what Macbeth had in mind was
the totality of human experience, which is the sense in which Faulkner
cribbed the same text for his title.
The Tennyson pastiche is another matter. The original version o
We also define SYS1.SADMP DSNTYPE=LARGE w/o benefit of SMS. I don't think
it matters what you name the data set. We just use the 'well known' name
(I love that open systems wriggle out of the 'standard' trap). When you
IPL SAD, it goes to the DSN pointed to by SYS1.PAGEDUMP.Vxx on the IPL
v
Careful! Gilmore is rubbing off on you. :-)
= oh no, oh no; believe me, I come by that quite naturally on my own, w/o
any need for mentoring ...
/s/ tuco
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bonno, Tuco
Sent: W
Thanks Greg,
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de Greg
Shirey
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 12:48
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: Re: RES: Question about XDC BATCH and automation
Sergio's original question
Hello Mr. John.
Thanks very ,much for your help.
Not a help, but really a lesson.
I Will try do this here, but Mr. John, today, when look on CICS SYSOUT, the
ABEND messagens was in another report, i.e.
10.17.35 STC03526 +DFHSR0001 CICSP1 An abend (code 0C4/AKEA) has occurred at
offset X'18
If you upgrade to z10 / z114, you can use GCL (group capacity limits). It
allows for better flexibility without having to "hard cap".
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Sambataro, Anthony (NIH/NBS) [E] <
anthony.sambat...@nih.gov> wrote:
>
Careful! Gilmore is rubbing off on you. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Alfred, Lord Tennyson, speaks on MS-Windows
mac
All,
I thought i would provide a quick update the issue is COBOL. I will explain,
Once you allocate a file using 'optional ' in the 'select' then refer to it
dynamically
You cannot 'free it' which makes sense. My design mistake.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityfo
macbeth, imo, says it even better
but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
/s/ tuco bonno;
Graduate, College of Conflict Management;
University
Thanks Ron.
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de Ron
Hawkins
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 11:37
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: Re: RES: Question about XDC BATCH and automation
Sergio,
Select the sysout
WLM not a scheduler.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
This flash from 2008 shows CPENABLE recommendation of (10,30) but says that
it's for increased overall thru put:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/5cb5ed706d254a8186256c71006d2e0a/80154cc31e2cc90d86256fa9000766e7/$FILE/CPENABLE_vz10.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Joe Owe
Our little systems have their day; They have their day and cease to be; They
are but broken lights of thee. -- Tennyson
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthma
If you have TMON/MVS, you can run an I/O trace against several devices on the
system that you suspect has I/O elongation and the exact amount of I/O
elongation will be measured and reported on in that trace.
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:I
OK, I guess I didn't realize that there was some mirroring software that didn't
allow a changed-only resync after updates were done on the target volumes.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday, Feb
Sergio's original question was whether he could do what you described in batch.
I'm sure the short answer is yes, though I don't understand the selection
criterion, since STC03526 does not appear to be the most recent output data
set.
Sergio, have you looked at the SDSF Operation and Custom
In <586f66d0-1da1-4a0a-ba56-e0829cb47...@yahoo.com>, on 02/14/2012
at 08:13 AM, Scott Ford said:
>Very interesting article / blog, but anyone know why NASA pulled the
>plug on their last mainframe?
I don't know that they did. NASA has other sites besides MSFC.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) M
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:43:08 -0600, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>My sadump program is coded with DDSPROMPT=NO (to enable sadump autoipl) and a
>dump data set name that is NOT SYS1.SADMP (since something needed to get done
>in SMS for dsntype=large, and sys1 is not sms-managed - don't ask me about
>par
Ron,
Do you have a source for (0,0)?
What I could find was FLASH10337, which advises (10,30) for machines up
to z10. Are there later advises, especially for z196?
Kees.
"Ron Hawkins" wrote in message
news:<002401ccebe6$70595590$510c00b0$@net>...
> Joe,
>
> In the past %TPI was a good indicato
>From reading other messages in the thread, you need a way to automatically
>report CICS abends to the appropriate group. Your plan is to put this
>information to a disk dataset, then process it looking for messages such as:
DFHAC2236 02/14/2012 21:33:56 IMCM Transaction GC3# abend ABM3 in progr
A lot to go through here, but let's take it one step at a time. Comments
interspersed.
I've got a few questions about How z hardware handles I/Os and LPAR
dispatching.
I've done a fair bit of reading, but still some things I don't
understand.
We are on Z9's We are using shared CPs. We are not us
Thomas,
I don't believe this is true. There are files systems that require
pre-allocation of space.
In fact the use of a raw LUN is predefined space by definition. If you spent
some setting up arrays for large Open Systems servers where they want 120
different LUN sizes you see the similarity.
Barbara,
Why not non-sms DSNTYPE? We do.
Data Set Name . . . . : SYS1.SADMP1
General Data Current Allocation
Management class . . : **N
Sergio,
Select the sysout (S) for STC03526 and open it.
On the command line type PRT D and enter.
Complete the dataset details and enter.
When you return to the SYSOUT screen type PRT and enter.
Type PRT CLOSE and enter
You now have all the sysout in a dataset. This is all documented in the S
Joe,
In the past %TPI was a good indicator that IO was arriving for an LPAR but
it did not a logical CP dispatched by PR/SM to accept the interrupt. This
creates a "wall of interrupts" affect when the LCP is dispatched and started
finding pending interrupts with TPI process.
The recommendation fo
Hi
There is a red book
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247419.pdf
Here you can find several samples, how to read the SYSOUT.
I mean, if the CICS is ending, you can insert a jobstep to process the
CICS SYSOUT's as you need .
On 2/15/2012 1:58 PM, Sérgio Lima Costa wrote:
Hell
Hi List,
I've got a few questions about How z hardware handles I/Os and LPAR dispatching.
I've done a fair bit of reading, but still some things I don't understand.
We are on Z9's We are using shared CPs. We are not using IRD. We have 2 large
production LPARs and several smaller LPARs. The 2 prod
Hello,
Thanks very much for your help.
Sorry about my bad explanation, below, our CICS SYSOUT, that exist now in our
system :
SDSF STATUS DISPLAY ALL CLASSESLINE 1-10 (10)
COMMAND INPUT ===>SCROLL ===> CSR
PREFIX=CICSP1 DEST=(A
Hello Lizette.
We have ZOS 1.12.
Can you please show me the way from how extract data from JES2, and put to a
dataset please ?
Our CICS production is down all days at 11:00 p.m., and return next Day near
03:00 a.m.
The GDG Idea is very well, when i learn how put data from JES2 to a dataset, I
W
Natasa,
If as you say, you are synchronously mirroring your DASD, I would
make the following suggestion.
Add the new CF to your current CFRM policy at your old site and acticvate.
You'll have no connectivity
to it so you can't allocate it locally. Your CFRM CDS gets mirrored with
the
>
> Hello List,
>
> We need all days here, Access the SYSOUT from CICS under SDSF , then, give
the
> XDC command, to save the sysout on DASD, next, Edit this file, for locate
all abends,
> save this file on another file, and send this information to development
people.
>
> So, we want know, if i
Hi
Hi
With the REXX SDSF interface you can access the SYSOUT etc .
What do you mean about "last CICS JOBS on SYSOUT ?
If the CICS is ending you can insert maybe a STEP to do this save/edit
etc actions you need .
On 2/15/2012 12:59 PM, Sérgio Lima Costa wrote:
Hello List,
We need all days h
Hello List,
We need all days here, Access the SYSOUT from CICS under SDSF , then, give the
XDC command, to save the sysout on DASD, next, Edit this file, for locate all
abends, save this file on another file, and send this information to
development people.
So, we want know, if is possible, ma
My sadump program is coded with DDSPROMPT=NO (to enable sadump autoipl) and a
dump data set name that is NOT SYS1.SADMP (since something needed to get done
in SMS for dsntype=large, and sys1 is not sms-managed - don't ask me about
particulars).
When we migrated to 1.12, we were on old DASD hard
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
