Can't you save the web page displaying the PSP bucket as a text file?
Ant, Northern Territory Government, Australia.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jürgen Kehr
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2012 2:57 PM
To:
Frank Yaeger wrote:
Just a note to let everyone know I'll be retiring at the end of this month
(5/31/2012). I've been with IBM for 43+ years (plus a couple of summers in
college) and I've enjoyed my career immensely. I've especially enjoyed being
able to help people use the DFSORT/ICETOOL
Frank
You were one of the first IBMers I ever saw that went *way* beyond the call of
duty to help others.
You will be missed.
Enjoy your retirement!
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web:
From: Frank Yaeger yae...@us.ibm.com
Just a note to let everyone know I'll be retiring at the end
of this month (5/31/2012). I've been with IBM for 43+ years
Frank,
all the best to you, and a huge thanks for all your help, support
and DFSORT tricks you have been providing.
You will be
Robert Prins wrote:
Can anyone skilled in the art tell me why a compiler that probably dates back
to the late 1970'ies or early 1980'ies generates the following short and sweet
code for a PL/I BY NAME assignment, while the not completely new (but still
fairly recent) version of Enterprise PL/I
Robert,
I'm no expert but I have read that newer hardware models (Z10 and above)
are essentially RISC processors that run complex instructions in
millicode. In the
case of a MVC instruction it would have to do that in a loop which would
require branching, the enemy of pipelined exeuction
Best wishes, and thanks for all your help, support and patience.
Marco Indaco
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi Ant,
in theory that's possible, but it would be very uncomfortable to process
more than a few PSP bucket files in such way. I'm looking for a solution
where I can automate this process, for example to identify any update
change in the PSP bucket files.
Am 16.05.2012 08:48, schrieb
W dniu 2012-05-15 20:33, Mark Zelden pisze:
What's wrong???
User error? :-)Did you change the SYSID or anything like that?
When you use the LOG command do you see an ISPF short message
error?
Try SYSID ? and see what it says.
Then SYSID with no operands.
1. SYSID
SYSID *was
W dniu 2012-05-16 02:19, Kent Ramsay pisze:
Hi,
A customer recently installed a z114. When a Power-on Reset is done,
the LPAR's specified in the Partition Activation List are not
activated. This facility was working on the replaced z9. Has anyone
seen a similar occurrence? Thanks.
I had
R. Skorupka wrote:
I just noticed that syslog is dead.
Hmm, I have gone with this thread to see, but, Ok, can you perhaps explore
these other options? (if already discussed, I may have missed it, sorry) :
Did you checked your ISFPRMxx member? Or drop those exits you mentioned earlier.
Is it
Frank,
All of your SORT children will now have to grow up. I count myself among
them. Sir, you spoiled us!
You are, most definitely, leaving the SORT world a better place than you found
it; a very fine testament to your career.
Please do check back in with us from time to time. I'll smile
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA39170
It's quite fresh.
BTW: very interesting problem for lawyers:
I changed sysid to meet SCRT requirements, otherwise SCRT cannot prepare
correct report for the LPAR running this system.
I can say I cannot change sysid due to error in IBM
I've been also one of those who discovers in my begginings Frank Yaeger
helping us in our daily sorting problems.
A very very very THANK YOU
I Wish you the best of the retirements.
2012/5/16 Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov
Frank,
All of your SORT children will now have to grow
R.Skorupka wrote:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA39170
Interesting that SDSF suffers from JES2 handling of $QSE control block. Hmmm...
It's quite fresh.
Absolutely! Despite its age, it is now 'CLOSED PER'.
... and you have to carry out the local fix, which you already
Given that IBM took away ETR yesterday and has by now forced SR upon the
mainframe world - do Americans coming from servicelink also have to login again
to get to their ETRs??? Or is this 'privilege' reserved for EMEA?
Until ETR was taken away (yesterday morning our time) no extra login from
W dniu 2012-05-16 12:42, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
[...]
I changed sysid to meet SCRT requirements, otherwise SCRT cannot
prepare correct report for the LPAR running this system.
Yuck! Could you be kind to elaborate on this required change? I'm
also using this SCRT toy every month.
SCRT
On 2012-05-16 07:26, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Robert Prins wrote:
Can anyone skilled in the art tell me why a compiler that probably dates back to the late
1970'ies or early 1980'ies generates the following short and sweet code for a PL/I
BY NAME assignment, while the not completely new
Same here (US based).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Barbara Nitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Servicelink, ETR and SR
Given that IBM took away ETR yesterday and has by now
Frank,
Enjoy your time off, you have helped so many people on this list. Thank you.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so ingenious.
-- Robert Heinlein
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
R Skorupka wrote:
SCRT does require all systems to have uniques SYSID. This requirement is
described in SCRT manual.
Oh yes, I now rereaded that part. Thanks for the reminder.
SCRT is REALLY BAD product, I know several cases where it gives false results
even if you fulfill all the
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00e924b4...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 05/14/2012
at 10:34 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
About as smoothly as a Baja race.
I don't know anything about Baja races, but I assume from your comment
that they're painful.
I still have scars.
In 4fb145d3.7090...@valley.net, on 05/14/2012
at 01:50 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
However, for INTRDR the class is ignored.
No; it becomes the default MSGCLASS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In 4fb1f921.8020...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 05/15/2012
at 08:35 AM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said:
IMHO the are two secure choices:
1. NOOMVS for SPECIAL
2. UID(0) for SPECIAL.
Boggle!
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
W dniu 2012-05-16 13:42, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
[1] - You just can't go on a C ALL '= ' '=*NONE' spree without breaking
something ...
But you can split the job stream. I moved DD * content to separate
members and DO NOT change them. Also the JCL itself is (almost) not
changed. The only
Best of luck to you in your retirement, Frank.
Thank you for all your help over the years.
You've made your mark on our world, and a person can be content with that
knowledge.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703.295.1926
Hello,
Is the timemark packet send to the particulary client tn3270 port or is it just
a ping to the client ipaddr ?
I other words if we have a server with many sessions (like websphere with
HATS), is the timemark sent to every client hats-hod client or is it just the
presence of the server
On 5/16/2012 1:26 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Robert Prins wrote:
Can anyone skilled in the art tell me why a compiler that probably dates
back
to the late 1970'ies or early 1980'ies generates the following short and sweet
code for a PL/I BY NAME assignment, while the not completely new
R Skorupka wrote:
[1] - You just can't go on a C ALL '= ' '=*NONE' spree without breaking
something ...
But you can split the job stream. I moved DD * content to separate members and
DO NOT change them. Also the JCL itself is (almost) not changed. The only
change is to replace object code.
Frank,
Best wishes for your retirement.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Steve Conway
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
Best of luck to you in your retirement, Frank.
Thank you for all your help over the years.
You've made your mark on
Frank,
Enjoy your retirement...you deserve it..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGIwZccbRI0feature=related
Anton
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:27 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
He has no choice on this: all the new compilers _must_ use LE.
Even Metal C?
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Metal C does NOT use LE. And, of course, with HLASM you have the choice to not
use LE or to make your program LE compatible.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed, May 16, 2012 9:12:24 AM
Subject: Re: Comparison of
If you look on PSP bucket Upgrade CICSTS42, Subset HCI6700 you'll find
several PTFs in the service recommendation section. Because FIXCATs are
not (yet) available for CICS, you will not find any FIXCAT infos for
these PTFs.
FIXCAT HOLDs are indeed available for CICS. In the PSP bucket you
Frank,
You will be missed. Congrats and good luck, good health
Steve
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Ad multos annos! My your retirement be as fruitful for you as your
presence here has been for those who listened and learned.
Seriously jealous of all who have the option of retiring. After 5
decades, the enthusiasm wanes.
peace
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on
If you have not done so, you may also wish to join the TCPIP newsgroup
For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:14:36 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
W dniu 2012-05-15 20:33, Mark Zelden pisze:
What's wrong???
User error? :-)Did you change the SYSID or anything like that?
When you use the LOG command do you see an ISPF short message
error?
Try SYSID ?
I moved the object code out of the job stream into a parmlib like PDS. My job
scheduler was taking exception to the object code being in stream.
The JCL changes have been uncommon and not hard to hand jive.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:27:22 +0200, Jürgen Kehr kehrjuer...@t-online.de wrote:
Because FIXCATs are
not (yet) available for CICS, you will not find any FIXCAT infos for
these PTFs.
That is not correct. Are you sure you are downloading the full holddata file?
The other ones don't have FIXCAT.
On 5/16/2012 7:11 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:27 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
He has no choice on this: all the new compilers _must_ use LE.
Even Metal C?
-- gil
Well, I knew someone would raise that exception. No,
Metal C does not use LE. Not sure if SP C (Systems
On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:19:55 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA39170
It's quite fresh.
MAS panel shows:
OLD1 DRAINED,P
NEW1 ACTIVE
(system is not sysplexed, PLEXCFG=MONOPLEX)
Based on you mas display, that sounds like a
I have to login in again to get to SR.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Barbara Nitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 5:47 AM
To:
Hi Mark,
so please tell me which category is used for CICS? When I look through
the catalog at
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/smpe/fixcategory.html I could not
find any CICS category, there are some for z/OS, for DB2, for IMS etc.
but where are the CICS categories?
Am 16.05.2012
I've been using SR exclusively for some time. Until now, if I selected the
SR option on the ServiceLink main menu, I would be taken straight to the
SR main page. I just now discovered the new behavior described. I also see
this. If it was there before, I didn't notice.
You must sign into this
Hi Kurt,
thanks, that is the information I wasn't aware of, the fact that for
CICS there isn't a special category like for IMS or DB2 and that these
PTFs are all together in this generic category. So all PTFs from the
former PSP extract files are now in any category either in a specific or
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:55:48 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Well, I knew someone would raise that exception. No,
Metal C does not use LE. Not sure if SP C (Systems
Programmer C) is still around and it would be an
exception too.
I believe it's been discussed in these fora that C and PL/I
share an
David,
On 2012-05-16 08:23, David Crayford wrote:
Robert,
I'm no expert but I have read that newer hardware models (Z10 and above) are
essentially RISC processors that run complex instructions in millicode. In the
I may be wrong, but I think the z196 is the first OOO machine and Enterprise
On 2012-05-16 14:59, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:55:48 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Well, I knew someone would raise that exception. No,
Metal C does not use LE. Not sure if SP C (Systems
Programmer C) is still around and it would be an
exception too.
I believe it's been
Mr. Yaeger,
I want to say that DFSORT is very admired in mainframe environment because of
you.
Good luck in your retirement and enjoy your family.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
BANCO BRADESCO S.A.
4254 / DPCD Engenharia de Software
Sistemas Operacionais
Hi
Do you have the chance to compare the speed of the two codes ?
David,
On 2012-05-16 08:23, David Crayford wrote:
Robert,
I'm no expert but I have read that newer hardware models (Z10 and
above) are
essentially RISC processors that run complex instructions in millicode.
In
Frank, enjoy your retirement. You will be missed. And know that DFSORT is
in very good hands.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO
On Wed, 16 May 2012 17:21:25 +0200, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Do you have the chance to compare the speed of the two codes ?
Does execution speed always trump code size? Where should the
tradeoff be? For example, any loop with a fixed number of
iterations (even a million) could be flattened to
Does anyone know of any way to determine which diagnostic traps are
active? Is it possible? Since my code makes heavy use of cell pools,
IGVCPOOLFREEQ can have an impact on performance.
--Dave Day
--
For IBM-MAIN
Agreed 100%, please enjoy all the many years ahead. Speaking for myself,
I'm totally confident that staff that's taking over will provide the
excellent service we've enjoyed all these years.
Our list is losing another in that rare category of thread killer whose
response to us finishes the
Frank - You will certainly be missed. Thanks for all your help over the
years.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
This morning we had to start signing into IBM Service Request (SR)..
I opened ticket with IBM. This was their response:
We and Level 2 already aware about this issue the we need to login twice
when going to use Service Request.
Level 2 has already
See ' SYS1.MODGEN(IGVDGNB)'
ECVT---ECVTDGNBDGNB
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Elardus Engelbrecht at IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 05/16/2012 12:10:22 AM:
I'm happy to say that others on the DFSORT Team will continue to
contribute.
Could you introduce them to us?
Well, you already know David Betten, the DFSORT performance expert, who has
On Tue, 15 May 2012 20:07:52 +, Robert Prins wrote:
maybe a 16-byte
three-instruction sequence like
003FC0 E310 DF10 0158 003120 | LY r1,a1:d7952:l4(,r13,7952)
003FC6 E300 1047 0015 003120 | LGH r0,_shadow20(,r1,71)
003FCC 4000 E064003120 | STH r0,_shadow20(,r14,100)
Rob,
Thanks.
On 5/16/2012 12:48 PM, Rob Scott wrote:
See ' SYS1.MODGEN(IGVDGNB)'
ECVT---ECVTDGNBDGNB
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
On 2012-05-15 12:35, Ed Mackmahon wrote:
Hi List.
We are zOS 1.12 shop.
I compiled and linked a Rexx exec which is supposed to run under AXR (system
Rexx),
compile and link finished OK. After System Rexx server restated with the load
dataset
concatenated, I got:
AXR0113I DATA SET
Let me add to the chorus of thanks for your efforts and teaching over the
decades. You will be sorely missed.
On 2012-05-15 18:00, Frank Yaeger wrote:
Just a note to let everyone know I'll be retiring at the end
of this month (5/31/2012). I've been with IBM for 43+ years
(plus a couple of
Frank,
Congratulations on your retirement. Thank you for the immense help you have
been to me and to many others on this list. I and everyone else here will miss
you.
May the road rise up to meet you.
May the wind be always at your back.
May the sun shine warm upon your face,
and rains fall
First, I would like to thank you for starting this thread.
I posted it to the performance people of my customer, and they told me, that
they just found a similar problem with EP PL/1 3.9, that is: the PLIMOVE
calls
don't generate MVCLs any more, as in previous releases, but series of MVCs
and
Ray,
Very true, also you may gain speed in computations but not I/O that was very
clear in a Share presentation..
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On May 16, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Ray Mullins m...@lerctr.org wrote:
On 2012-05-15 12:35, Ed Mackmahon wrote:
Hi List.
We are zOS 1.12 shop.
I
Hi all,
We are currently an exclusively z/OS site with multiple LPARs sharing a
single IOCDS and DASD farm. We are about to install z/VM in a new LPAR and I'm
worried about both OSs sharing the same DASD farm. They will not be sharing at
the volume level.
I've read through the
In 4fb286ac.8030...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 05/15/2012
at 06:39 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said:
I just noticed that syslog is dead.
Maybe, and maybe not.
Any clue?
Yes; query the status of HAEDCPY, OPERLOG and SYSLOG. Then examine
your SDSF, taking the query results into
In my past life, on VM/370 (yes that far back), VM always played nice with our
MVT and MVS 3.8 system. VM has the concept of system owned volumes. You must
specify these in a control file on the IPL volume. Also, VM does not use a z/OS
type VTOC at all (well, there is a VOL1 and a 1 track VTOC
The Hercules group did some testing comparing MVCL to MVC.
If both source and destination had the same alignment to a double word
boundary, you could move 8 bytes, then increment the 4 registers to
reflect this, before being interuptable. If they aligned differently
between boundaries, each 8
On 5/16/2012 3:46 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Given that IBM took away ETR yesterday and has by now forced SR upon the
mainframe world - do Americans coming from servicelink also have to login again
to get to their ETRs??? Or is this 'privilege' reserved for EMEA?
Until ETR was taken away
Ron,
I also did the same as John has MVS at that time under VM , with no issues.
The Sungard people were great, so if you have gaps in understanding or
knowledge they help out in a DR situation. Almost all of the DR problems I have
seen, done a ton of tests, turned out to be poor planning and
Guys,
A little lost on the point of this thread , not trying be rude or flippant ,
just I see a lot about performance, is it valid with today's hardware and
software, yes there is time sensitive events and software and hardware.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On May 16, 2012, at 4:35 PM,
Oh, now i see what Bernd was talking about, sorry guys , old age
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On May 16, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Guys,
A little lost on the point of this thread , not trying be rude or flippant ,
just I see a lot about performance, is
We let z/VM sense all volumes and z/OS owns the IODF and IOCDS's. We've had
zero issues with z/VM touching volumes it isn't supposed to.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
We’ve switched to using the TS7720 as a stand-alone VTS and are planning an
outage this weekend for microcode upgrade.
In the old days, for an outage we had to:
1. Vary the libraries offline
2. Vary the drives offline
3. Vary the chanel paths offline
4. When varying
Still better, make absolutely sure that you are creating a program
object stored in a PDSE.
On 5/16/12, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Make absolutely sure you are creating a load module, not a CEXEC. The REXX
compiler has all sorts of options governing the output of the compiler,
I just submitted this question to IBM.
David G. Schlecht | Information Technology Professional
State of Nevada | Department of Administration | Enterprise IT Services
T:(775)684-4328 | F: (775) 684‐4324 | E:dschle...@admin.nv.gov -- New Address
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
George,
IBM needs you tomorrow.. because now they are asking a Magazine Editor
and a professional presenter to do, what YOU tried to do on this
list.. all on your own.. from your basement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o22i_gqAf_o
You and your Fox channel are more qualified to talk about
On 5/15/2012 8:00 PM, Frank Yaeger wrote:
Just a note to let everyone know I'll be retiring at the end
of this month (5/31/2012). I've been with IBM for 43+ years
(plus a couple of summers in college) and I've enjoyed my
career immensely. I've especially enjoyed being able to
help people use
Rick Fochtman at IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote
on 05/16/2012 03:49:01 PM:
Enjoy all the grandkids, too.
No grandkids, but granddogs, and our beloved pet rats, to enjoy :-)
Our four pet rats will be very happy to have me at home more since
that means even more
In
ofe777ba8d.c16c141f-on88257a00.00055df6-88257a00.00058...@us.ibm.com,
on 05/15/2012
at 06:00 PM, Frank Yaeger yae...@us.ibm.com said:
Just a note to let everyone know I'll be retiring at the end of
this month (5/31/2012).
Well, you've earned it, but we'll miss you. May you enjoy your
I would expect the timemark packet would have to be within the existing session
ports. Consider:
- SCANINTERVAL and TIMEMARK are used together to determine if a connection has
been lost. The connection is identified by a unique pair of ports between the
client (random port) and server (23).
-
We are trying to flash from secondary to tertiary storage and receive the
following error. From what I can see it looks like (reas=82) Wait limit
expired for startup of the indicated partner ANTUXFQE instance. The timeout
was about 30 seconds after the FC started.
18:01:39 | 'XRC='EDCPMSTR
Frank,
I'm proud to say that your IBM years have provided support for my mainframe
career since the early 80's.
Enjoy your retirement Sir.
Kevin Clark
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Frank Yaeger
Sent: Tuesday,
Anton,
Who has replied to this thread from Singapore? I lived there a decade ago so
I'm wondering if I may know them.
Of course you don't mean me because you know I live in California.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
86 matches
Mail list logo
