Pretty much the latter, with release at YI for most. EXTENDED as the default.
I have a DATACLAS=BIG vs. BIGEXT to use for the few cases that can't be
extended. Haven't seen an x37 in ages (except for some truly large SMF/PDB
files) where the required space needs a bit of hand holding. It does
My sadump program is coded with DDSPROMPT=NO (to enable sadump autoipl) and a
dump data set name that is NOT SYS1.SADMP (since something needed to get done
in SMS for dsntype=large, and sys1 is not sms-managed - don't ask me about
particulars).
When we migrated to 1.12, we were on old DASD
Hello List,
We need all days here, Access the SYSOUT from CICS under SDSF , then, give the
XDC command, to save the sysout on DASD, next, Edit this file, for locate all
abends, save this file on another file, and send this information to
development people.
So, we want know, if is possible,
Hi
Hi
With the REXX SDSF interface you can access the SYSOUT etc .
What do you mean about last CICS JOBS on SYSOUT ?
If the CICS is ending you can insert maybe a STEP to do this save/edit
etc actions you need .
On 2/15/2012 12:59 PM, Sérgio Lima Costa wrote:
Hello List,
We need all days
Hello List,
We need all days here, Access the SYSOUT from CICS under SDSF , then, give
the
XDC command, to save the sysout on DASD, next, Edit this file, for locate
all abends,
save this file on another file, and send this information to development
people.
So, we want know, if is
Natasa,
If as you say, you are synchronously mirroring your DASD, I would
make the following suggestion.
Add the new CF to your current CFRM policy at your old site and acticvate.
You'll have no connectivity
to it so you can't allocate it locally. Your CFRM CDS gets mirrored with
the
Hello Lizette.
We have ZOS 1.12.
Can you please show me the way from how extract data from JES2, and put to a
dataset please ?
Our CICS production is down all days at 11:00 p.m., and return next Day near
03:00 a.m.
The GDG Idea is very well, when i learn how put data from JES2 to a dataset, I
Hello,
Thanks very much for your help.
Sorry about my bad explanation, below, our CICS SYSOUT, that exist now in our
system :
SDSF STATUS DISPLAY ALL CLASSESLINE 1-10 (10)
COMMAND INPUT ===SCROLL === CSR
PREFIX=CICSP1
Hi List,
I've got a few questions about How z hardware handles I/Os and LPAR dispatching.
I've done a fair bit of reading, but still some things I don't understand.
We are on Z9's We are using shared CPs. We are not using IRD. We have 2 large
production LPARs and several smaller LPARs. The 2
Hi
There is a red book
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247419.pdf
Here you can find several samples, how to read the SYSOUT.
I mean, if the CICS is ending, you can insert a jobstep to process the
CICS SYSOUT's as you need .
On 2/15/2012 1:58 PM, Sérgio Lima Costa wrote:
Joe,
In the past %TPI was a good indicator that IO was arriving for an LPAR but
it did not a logical CP dispatched by PR/SM to accept the interrupt. This
creates a wall of interrupts affect when the LCP is dispatched and started
finding pending interrupts with TPI process.
The recommendation for
Sergio,
Select the sysout (S) for STC03526 and open it.
On the command line type PRT D and enter.
Complete the dataset details and enter.
When you return to the SYSOUT screen type PRT and enter.
Type PRT CLOSE and enter
You now have all the sysout in a dataset. This is all documented in the
Barbara,
Why not non-sms DSNTYPE? We do.
Data Set Name . . . . : SYS1.SADMP1
General Data Current Allocation
Management class . . :
Thomas,
I don't believe this is true. There are files systems that require
pre-allocation of space.
In fact the use of a raw LUN is predefined space by definition. If you spent
some setting up arrays for large Open Systems servers where they want 120
different LUN sizes you see the similarity.
A lot to go through here, but let's take it one step at a time. Comments
interspersed.
snip
I've got a few questions about How z hardware handles I/Os and LPAR
dispatching.
I've done a fair bit of reading, but still some things I don't
understand.
We are on Z9's We are using shared CPs. We are
From reading other messages in the thread, you need a way to automatically
report CICS abends to the appropriate group. Your plan is to put this
information to a disk dataset, then process it looking for messages such as:
DFHAC2236 02/14/2012 21:33:56 IMCM Transaction GC3# abend ABM3 in program
Ron,
Do you have a source for (0,0)?
What I could find was FLASH10337, which advises (10,30) for machines up
to z10. Are there later advises, especially for z196?
Kees.
Ron Hawkins ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net wrote in message
news:002401ccebe6$70595590$510c00b0$@net...
Joe,
In the past %TPI
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:43:08 -0600, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
My sadump program is coded with DDSPROMPT=NO (to enable sadump autoipl) and a
dump data set name that is NOT SYS1.SADMP (since something needed to get done
in SMS for dsntype=large, and sys1 is not sms-managed - don't ask
In 586f66d0-1da1-4a0a-ba56-e0829cb47...@yahoo.com, on 02/14/2012
at 08:13 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
Very interesting article / blog, but anyone know why NASA pulled the
plug on their last mainframe?
I don't know that they did. NASA has other sites besides MSFC.
--
Sergio's original question was whether he could do what you described in batch.
I'm sure the short answer is yes, though I don't understand the selection
criterion, since STC03526 does not appear to be the most recent output data
set.
Sergio, have you looked at the SDSF Operation and
OK, I guess I didn't realize that there was some mirroring software that didn't
allow a changed-only resync after updates were done on the target volumes.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday,
If you have TMON/MVS, you can run an I/O trace against several devices on the
system that you suspect has I/O elongation and the exact amount of I/O
elongation will be measured and reported on in that trace.
Bill Fairchild
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Our little systems have their day; They have their day and cease to be; They
are but broken lights of thee. -- Tennyson
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
This flash from 2008 shows CPENABLE recommendation of (10,30) but says that
it's for increased overall thru put:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/5cb5ed706d254a8186256c71006d2e0a/80154cc31e2cc90d86256fa9000766e7/$FILE/CPENABLE_vz10.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Joe
WLM not a scheduler.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks Ron.
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de Ron
Hawkins
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 11:37
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: Re: RES: Question about XDC BATCH and automation
Sergio,
Select the sysout
macbeth, imo, says it even better
but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
/s/ tuco bonno;
Graduate, College of Conflict Management;
All,
I thought i would provide a quick update the issue is COBOL. I will explain,
Once you allocate a file using 'optional ' in the 'select' then refer to it
dynamically
You cannot 'free it' which makes sense. My design mistake.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
If you upgrade to z10 / z114, you can use GCL (group capacity limits). It
allows for better flexibility without having to hard cap.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Sambataro, Anthony (NIH/NBS) [E]
anthony.sambat...@nih.gov wrote:
This
Careful! Gilmore is rubbing off on you. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Alfred, Lord Tennyson, speaks on MS-Windows
Hello Mr. John.
Thanks very ,much for your help.
Not a help, but really a lesson.
I Will try do this here, but Mr. John, today, when look on CICS SYSOUT, the
ABEND messagens was in another report, i.e.
10.17.35 STC03526 +DFHSR0001 CICSP1 An abend (code 0C4/AKEA) has occurred at
offset
Thanks Greg,
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de Greg
Shirey
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 12:48
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: Re: RES: Question about XDC BATCH and automation
Sergio's original question
Careful! Gilmore is rubbing off on you. :-)
= oh no, oh no; believe me, I come by that quite naturally on my own, w/o
any need for mentoring ...
/s/ tuco
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bonno, Tuco
Sent:
We also define SYS1.SADMP DSNTYPE=LARGE w/o benefit of SMS. I don't think
it matters what you name the data set. We just use the 'well known' name
(I love that open systems wriggle out of the 'standard' trap). When you
IPL SAD, it goes to the DSN pointed to by SYS1.PAGEDUMP.Vxx on the IPL
I'm not at all sure that I want to rub off on anyone.
Mr Tuco's quotation is apposite, although what Macbeth had in mind was
the totality of human experience, which is the sense in which Faulkner
cribbed the same text for his title.
The Tennyson pastiche is another matter. The original version
Thanks. Will give that a try. Today is not the day.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael Klaeschen
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Any way to get the XLC compiler
Believe me, I am the world's biggest fan of static const as opposed to
#define. I almost never use #define in my own work. I don't even like #ifdef
and its cohorts -- who needs a second layer of program logic to debug?
Except where performance is a big issue, or where a particular line of code
We've had SRAM from CA going back to the DOS days. In those day's we actually
had CA-Sort. We are now Z/os and management is questioning why we still have
it since we use IBM Sort. We have other CA products but no longer have CA-Sort.
Anyone from CA know?
IIRC it stands for Sort Random Access Method. It is a product that is
called by user written programs like an internal sort. However, it can
perform multiple sorts at once. I don't believe it uses any part of CA-Sort
so you could have programs that are still using it and you might not know.
You
Kees,
My recollection is the first WSC flash mentioning this on the 3090s was to
use CPENABLE(0,0), and it has switched between 10,30 and 0,0 at least twice
since then.
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/032f6e163324983085256b79
Got a few minutes between con calls to play with this. I am a little
mystified.
The *only* options I am specifying are PPONLY and SHOWM.
I get the error CCN0049(W) The option SHOWM is not supported.
SYSUT10 has a listing that is mostly blank lines, but does seem to be the
#include-expanded
All,
I understand that authorized programs have been talked about before, buti don't
understand and I want to make sure I do before I start a design ..
What I want Long running STC
... Invoke a rexx clist performing alloc, calls to a program
http://www.cconceptsinc.com/2008cci/webport/CA_corp_collateral/CA_for_brian/CA_Product_Brief.pdf
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lawrence
thomas.lawre...@gmail.com wrote:
We've had SRAM from CA going back to the DOS days. In those day's we actually
had CA-Sort. We are now Z/os and
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:34:01 -0500, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
All,
I understand that authorized programs have been talked about before, buti
don't understand and I want to make sure I do before I start a design ..
What I want Long running STC
...
I'm not from CA, but I believe that (at least a portion of) SRAM is shipped
with the CA common services product.
Rex
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lawrence
thomas.lawre...@gmail.com wrote:
We've had SRAM from CA going back to the DOS days. In those day's we actually
had CA-Sort.
My mistake. You cannot do what I was describing with the output in JESMSGLG.
You'll need to use the others' suggestions to use SDSF. I do know some other
ways, but they are even more non standard and require installing some other
software. Specifically, you need Dovetailed Technologies Dataset
Walt,
First , thanks for responding..
Let me explain:
The STC is in LE Cobol..4.2
I want to call IKJEFTSR ...to call a rexx clist that will perform authorized
functions , i.e.; alloc, free
The call is below:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
And the answer to THAT is that I am trying it on my 1.10 system. SHOWM is
not a 1.10 option. Need to more the test to 1.13, which will take a couple
of days.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224116/
Career_Watch_The_most_in_demand_skills_of_2012
Year-over-year changes in training spending, 2006-2011:
• 2006: 7%
• 2007: 6%
• 2008: -11%
• 2009: -11
• 2010: 2%
• 2011: 9%
Source: The Corporate Learning Factbook 2012, Bersin Associates
On 2/15/2012 12:38 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224116/Career_Watch_The_most_in_demand_skills_of_2012
Year-over-year changes in training spending, 2006-2011:
• 2006: 7%
• 2007: 6%
• 2008: -11%
• 2009: -11
• 2010: 2%
• 2011: 9%
Source: The Corporate
Group,
I have a REXX EXEC:
NEWSTACK
V1 = COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
V2 = S M=(DBOK62,DP13,LAND1CPY,SSTDN,TRAY2LND)
queue V1 '+' V2
EXECIO queued() DISKW SYSIN (FINIS
DELSTACK
TSOEXEC IEBCOPY
It gets an error:
FCO105I COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1 + S
Is this even possible? here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ikj4b780/23.4.3.2
quote
Table 122 shows the reason codes that are found in parameter 5 if IKJEFTSR
completes with a return code of 20.
...
24(18) IKJEFTSR was invoked from a non-TSO/E
I guess that what You want is:
NEWSTACK
V1 = COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
V2 = S M=DBOK62
V3 = S M=DP13
V4 = S M=LAND1CPY
V5 = S M=SSTDN
V6 = S M=TRAY2LN
Queue V1
Queue V2
Queue V3
Queue V4
Queue V5
Queue V6
EXECIO queued() DISKW SYSIN (FINIS
DELSTACK
TSOEXEC IEBCOPY
Regards,
Thomas
John:
So is this saying you can only do limited rexx functions from an application
program
In our case, i need to allocate a sysin and sysprint and execute a vendor's
program the output queues into sysprint.
My problem I ran into..is using BPXWDYN...once allocated in a running LE Cobol
Still no luck:
FCO105I COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
FCO105I SELECT MEMBER=DBOK62
FCO411A UNIDENTIFIED COMMAND OR KEYWORD
NEWSTACK
V1 = COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
V2 = SELECT MEMBER=DBOK62
V3 = SELECT MEMBER=DP13
V4 = SELECT MEMBER=LAND1CPY
V5 = SELECT MEMBER=SSTDN
V6 = SELECT
Dave,
Usually you need to queue a null line as the last line in the stack..
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012
In
90ec2e798a22854ebf67a14ec3fe093fa74c870...@scmbxc01.bcbad.state.sc.us,
on 02/15/2012
at 10:59 AM, Bonno, Tuco t...@cio.sc.gov said:
macbeth, imo, says it even better
Perhaps Milton, repurposed to coercive monopolies:
Yet not for those
nor what the potent victor in his rage
can else
In 0369520600091673.wa.joeowensstandardlife@bama.ua.edu, on
02/15/2012
at 07:10 AM, Joe Owens joe_ow...@standardlife.com said:
My understanding of the channel program is that it moves the data
into the page fixed I/O buffer and the interupt a cp to process the
I/O. How is the candidate CP
If you really want do this this: run an APF authorized TSO command from a COBOL
program, even one which is linked AC=1. Well, you'll need to cheat horribly.
One way to cheat is to run your COBOL program under TSO. You run IKJEFT01.
Something like:
//STC EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,
//
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:41:17 -0800, Scott Ford wrote:
Usually you need to queue a null line as the last line in the stack..
The count (queued()) should make that unnecessary.
From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February
Scott,
The example didn't show a null line. I've seen EXECIO use a null line.
FCO105I S M=TRAY2LND
FCO411A UNIDENTIFIED COMMAND OR KEYWORD
FCO105I
FCO417A PRECEDING CONTROL STATEMENT(S) INVALID
FCO419A OPERATION TERMINATED
QUEUE V1
QUEUE V2
QUEUE V3
QUEUE V4
QUEUE V5
QUEUE V6
QUEUE ''
EXECIO
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
If you really want do this this: run an APF authorized TSO command from a
COBOL program, even one which is linked AC=1. Well, you'll need to cheat
horribly. One way to cheat is to run your COBOL program under
I don't think SELECT can start in column 1..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
Paul,
Batch works fine because of the sysin DD:
//SYSINDD *
COPY INDD=MYDD1,OUTDD=MYDD2
SELECT MEMBER=(mem1,mem2,mem3)/ EXCLUDE member=(sf,df,sa)
/*
Just can't get the SELECT to take as a second line in REXX. The first line
works great!
Thank
Randall,
That was it. I started the SELECT in column 2!
THANK YOU!!
Dave Hansen
Eagan Software Systems Branch
651-406-1208
dave.l.han...@usps.gov
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Gross, Randall [GCG-PFS]
Maybe it's just the biggot'd Assembler flake within but wouldn't this
be much simpler with the COBOL program simply calling an DYNALLOC
routine in Assembler... no authorization needed at all for this.
On 2/15/12, Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Craddock
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Authorized functions
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John
Sometimes the simple problems are the hardest to find
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Scott Ford
:: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:16 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:: Subject: Re: Authorized functions
::
:: Walt,
::
:: First , thanks for responding..
::
:: Let
Yep, a Security program like RACF ...
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: retired mainframer retired-mainfra...@q.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Authorized functions
::
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:: Behalf Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
:: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:34 PM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:: Subject: Re: REXX IEBCOPY Continuation?
::
:: Still no luck:
::
:: FCO105I
I was wondering how some of you are handling the HOME field of the model userid
profile specified in the APPLDATA field of the BPX.UNIQUE.USER porfile.
The IBM examples I've seen all show /tmp for HOME. My current OEDFLTU userid
in use with the BPX.DEFAULT.USER profile uses /tmp.
Is there
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:59:29 -0600, Chris Craddock wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John wrote:
If you really want do this this: run an APF authorized TSO command from a
COBOL program, even one which is linked AC=1. Well, you'll need to cheat
horribly. One way to cheat is to
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:09:50 -0500, Joe Aulph wrote:
Maybe it's just the biggot'd Assembler flake within but wouldn't this
be much simpler with the COBOL program simply calling an DYNALLOC
routine in Assembler... no authorization needed at all for this.
I had wondered about that, from when the
Dave:
I rhink the word select must start in column 2
Ed
On Feb 15, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote:
Still no luck:
FCO105I COPY1 COPY INDD=INDD1,OUTDD=OUTDD1
FCO105I SELECT MEMBER=DBOK62
FCO411A UNIDENTIFIED COMMAND OR KEYWORD
NEWSTACK
V1 = COPY1 COPY
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:42:08 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
I rhink the word select must start in column 2
???
I thought it could start any where from 2 through 16. But I haven't
checked the manual.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Group,
We found the issue with this. The MVS Spool can hold binary PDFs. The
leading x'40' is NOT a problem. We added more of them to prove it. The
problem is with the PDF viewer.
Thank you for all your input on this matter, Dave
Dave Hansen
Eagan Software Systems Branch
Hi thanks for all the replies so far.
I've just read the the z/os abcs vol 10 about I/O processing and have some
thoughts about CPENABLE
First we are running (10,30) which seems to be IBMs current recommendation for
Z9.
So is this what happens?
The channel requests an I/O interrupt. It must
As a system programmer I have been assigned the task of taking a customer's SMS
Invision system, PA, AP, GL, etc., and restoring it to our system. We have
restored all of the data sets. Now, I have been asked to identify and run only
the PA (Patient Accounting) part of their batch schedule.
There are not too many options to do something authorized from Rexx. I should
have a list somewhere...
Anyway, I was curious about that part. It was once an interest of mine.
Regards,
Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
I believe that IEBCOPY (and some/all? of the old DFP utilities) consider
anything in column 1 to be a label. Hence actual control keywords have to
start in column 2+.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a while about
the differences between how CICS works and how IMS TM works. I couldn't find
anything on the web. Anyone have a link to a good reference?
Thanks,
Frank
I have programmed with both systems. IMS TM seems to be a bit cleaner
to me. CICS seems to be more susecptible to other program's errors.
Both feature 3270 screen handling, storing information between screen
actions, updating databases, sending updated screens.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:04 PM,
We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a while
about the differences between how CICS works and how IMS TM works. I
couldn't find anything on the web. Anyone have a link to a good reference?
Try Google for IMS DC. The IMS Transaction Manager used to be called
Thanks Radoslaw Bob.
I figured there must be some explanation for the additional byte other than
some new extended device ranges.
This is still a DOC problem as the manual simply states these are device
addresses.
Radoslaw, are you saying there is a way of creating an IPLable device with a
I was testing running from Rexx z/OS 1.13 IEBCOPY, which doesn't
require authorization:
0IEB1021E OMVS,*,SYSIN ,GET ,WRONG LEN RECRD,00,QSAM
17.52.11 STC09793 +IEB1021E OMVS,*,SYSIN ,GET ,WRONG LEN
RECRD,00,QSAM
Is it possible to mix shared and dedicated CPs on the same LPAR?
I thought it wasn't, but a note on the RMF partition data report implies it is;
On WGT
Either the partition's current weighting of the shared processor resources or
one of the following indicators:
DED
Indicates that the partition
They both have their +s and -s, The logging for IMS is very good. Easy to use
in recovery. I thought that CICS was quicker and also had a pretty good log
system. Some of it depends upon the application you are using. I'm a CICS
bigot but, I'm also an IMS DBA.
It's you pick and how
On 16/02/2012 11:04 AM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
We are a CICS shop with IMS DB (DBCTL), but I've been curious for a while about
the differences between how CICS works and how IMS TM works. I couldn't find
anything on the web. Anyone have a link to a good reference?
Thanks,
Frank
Is it possible to mix shared and dedicated CPs on the same LPAR?
No. Not on a z9 and not the way you mean.
The RMF report deals with what an lpar can look like when it uses
Hiperdispatch. That is not available on a z9.
Hiperdispatch semi-dedicates logical processors to physical processors
I will be out of the office starting 16/02/2012 and will return on
20/02/2012.
For anything urgent contact the Mainframe Services support number, x79371
or 04 924 9371 or email BNZ Mainframe Services.
CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information
intended only
As to whether a null reply in the reported case would have reverted SAD to
the original values, I think we're all looking to Barbara to answer her
own question. ;-)
I love it when you guys do that to me! :-) Especially as I was too fast to
remedy the situation by reallocating everything before I
I checked out an MVS Image profile on my (brand spanking new!) z196. It
looks the choice is between dedicated or shared CPs. A CF LPAR offers more
choices, but oddly fewer choices than the z10 it replaced.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
I trade blonde jokes with a blonde friend. A recent gem from her (nothing
personal!):
A gorgeous young redhead goes into the doctor's office and said that her
body hurt wherever she touched it.
'Impossible!' says the doctor.. 'Show me.'
The redhead took her finger, pushed on her left shoulder
The channel requests an I/O interrupt. It must be processed by a specific
LPAR, but not a specific CPU.
With regard to cpenable, I believe you've missed the fact cpenable only comes
into play when you're dealing with *pending* interrupts. Using the TPI (test
pending interrupt) means that you
Rob Schramm writes:
If you upgrade to z10 / z114, you can use GCL (group capacity limits). It
allows for better flexibility without having to hard cap.
Though there are many excellent reasons to upgrade to a z114 or z196, LPAR
group capacity limits (group softcaps) are available on z9 or later
Hi
I havent had a problem with this
/* REXX */
FREE F(INDD1)
FREE F(OUTDD1)
FREE F(SYSIN)
ALLOC FI(INDD1) DSN('x..aaa') SHR
ALLOC FI(OUTDD1) DSN('x..bbb') SHR
ALLOC FI(SYSIN) DSN('x..ccc') SHR
NEWSTACK
V1 = C I=((INDD1,R)),O=OUTDD1
V2 = SELECT
Barbara Nitz writes:
And coming from a z9 presumably to a z196, chances are very
good that you would loose physical cps to keep money down.
It's not clear yet which z9 the original poster has. Moving from a z9 BC to
a z114, no. There are more capacity models in the z114 and more
configurable
it runs with only a subset of it's LCPs enabled for interrupts
I have a definite problem with the wording of this. 'Enabled for
interrupts' in my book is quite independent of the logical/physical
cp distinction. 'enabled for interrupts' is a 7 at the appropriate
point in the psw (instead
I love it when you guys do that to me! :-) Especially as I was too
fast to remedy the situation by reallocating everything before I had
figured out what I should have answered those prompts with! Jim
Mulder must be on vacation - I had hoped he could confirm this for me.
Vacation? Not
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
