Len Rugen wrote:
We were doing some cleanup and ran across some RACF classes, $INT, $INTAPPL, $INTPROJ and $INTTBL. The only comment is something about INFOSESSION.
The $INT class has some profiles that look like:
PTI.INTEGRATOR.CONFIGURE
PTI.INTEGRATOR.HELPDESK
PTI.INTEGRATOR.RUNTIME
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]...
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/22/2005
at 09:27 AM, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It will limit the amount of virtual storage an address space can get
and thus the amount of real storage
John,
i've had managed a single HDS 9960 box that had both
MVS volumes and OPEN-3 volumes.
i had the MVS OPEN-3 vols on separate disk array groups.
- ravi.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:54:50 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Couldn't find anything in the archives on
No there is not.
And oh by the way even after you get all that you need from the Principles
of Operation, be aware that there are sections of a linkage stack within
which the entries are, and you cannot necessarily navigate from one section
to the next using architected-by-hardware structures.
In Don Ault's append, change exit to exit routine in the words. It is
MODULE or MODNAME in the command syntax.
And for IEFACTRT, as Barbara Nitz pointed out, the actual exit name is one
of SYS.IEFACTRT, SYSSTC.IEFACTRT, etc depending upon your SMF
specifications.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core
Len,
These profiles are probably for the CA (then Platinum) product INFOSESSION,
which was a client server/host integration product.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
Western Metal Supply
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On 11/22/2005 10:57 AM, Patrick Lyon wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:33:25 -0600, Dave Butts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Patrick,
I can't speak for ACF2 or RACF, but the conversion to Top Secret is
incredibly simple. One of the TSS manuals has a chapter on how to do it.
It is as simple as running
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Art Celestini
I was hoping one of the COBOL gurus would pick up on my
assembler example. I haven't tried this, so I don't know
what the compiler will generate for the INSPECT (hopefully
just a simple TRanslate
Thanks John!
I'm assuming the translate table generated by the compiler leaves
X'F0'-X'F9' unchanged. (I don't know if the compiler prints the
whole table.) If so, it looks like it should work just fine.
--Art
At 08:20 AM 11/23/2005, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Art Celestini
Thanks John!
I'm assuming the translate table generated by the compiler
leaves X'F0'-X'F9' unchanged. (I don't know if the compiler
prints the whole table.) If so, it looks like it should work
MPTS adapter numbers and slot positions:
You can specify adapter slot/device identifier in MPTS configuration.
Relation of physical slot numbers and slot/device identifiers
is given in MP3000 installation manual (SY24-6154-02), page 5-3 and
in redbook Multiprise 3000 Basic Emulated I/O Definitions
it looks like it should work just fine.
And this is as good code as you would get with an assembler routine. Better,
in a way, because you save the linkage instructions.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Art
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:22:40 -0500, Binyamin Dissen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:34:46 -0500 Schramm, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Does anyone know how much overhead is introduced by a subsys that is not
:used on a system?
:For example.. if I have
:1)10 subsys (same on all
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/22/2005
at 07:34 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
How did they rationalize ignoring the customers who, to avoid catalog
proliferation, assign multiple TSO User IDs to a single HLQ?
What customers? That's a mode of operation that IBM never supported.
I've
Replying to myself
-Original Message-
From: Chase, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Art Celestini
[ snip ]
01 WS-HEXWORK-AREA.
05 WS-HEX-INPUT-AREA.
10 WS-HEX-INPUT-ARGPIC X(4).
10
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11/22/2005
at 01:25 PM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Doesn't the LISTDSI() function run without a
TSO environment?
As I recall, it will run in a TSO or Unix environment but not in a
bare IRXJCL environment.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:16:57 -0500, Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The conversion utility is part of TSO/E, and is called RACONVRT. Look
in the TSO/E Customization manual for information.
As I recall it does not copy the user's logon command (from the logon
panel) during the conversion
Sorry,
I didn't notice the ZAP initially. If you want to pursue it, you could
try playing with the S (sign indicator) in the pictures. (Try removing
it from one or the other, or both, operands.) I believe the ZAP is added
by the compiler to ensure sign consistency. But, obviously, we don't
A question related to the topic being discussed:
Are the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROGxx) entries:
LPA ADD DSNAME(SYS1.MVS.EXITLOAD) MODNAME(...)
always processed before:
EXIT ADD EXITNAME(SYS.name) MODNAME(...)
during z/OS initialization?
Or, are they processed in as specified via PARMLIB
Is there an easy way to backup a master catalog?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Is there ab=n easy way to backup a master catalog ?
WSBrown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:28:37 -0600, Warren Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there ab=n easy way to backup a master catalog ?
WSBrown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On the DFSMS Bookshelf there is manual titled Managing Catalogs. In
that manual there is a chapter on backing up catalogs. That should
provide you with all of the information you need. The manuals are your
friends.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 08:05 -0600, Bill Neiman wrote:
All broadcast SSI requests ... run the entire SSCT chain. Having
unused subsystems defined slows down this process.
I'd be surprised if the delay was measurable. REALLY surprised.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
use this instead
10 WS-UNPK PIC 9(9)V.
10 WS-PACK.
15 WS-PACKN PIC S9(9) COMP-3.
**
* CONVERT X'FA' THRU X'FF' TO CHAR A THRU F *
* TRANSLATE TABLE
I'd be surprised if the delay was NOT measurable. But I suspect the delay
is not significant.
Don Imbriale
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:43:42 -0500, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd be surprised if the delay was measurable. REALLY surprised.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
re: ms. Nitz's last contribution (i don't this will work )
actually, i think it does work:
i'm running z/os 14, and my smfprm00 reads (in part):
exits(iefactrt,iefusi, )
and when i do a d prog.exit the output is (in part):
sys.iefactrt
sys.iefusi.
and both of
Bill Neiman wrote:
All broadcast SSI requests, which include WTO, command, and task
termination processing, run the entire SSCT chain. Having unused
subsystems defined slows down this process. Only directed SSI requests -
those sent to a particular named subsystem - use a hash table lookup.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:09:00 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Bill Neiman wrote:
All broadcast SSI requests, which include WTO, command, and task
termination processing, run the entire SSCT chain. Having unused
subsystems defined slows down this process. Only directed SSI requests -
those sent to
The user's guide for openSSH states,
sftp is an interactive file transfer program similar to ftp which performs
all operations over an encrypted ssh transport. It may also use many
features of ssh, such as public key authentication and compression. sftp
connects and logs into the specified host
In a recent note, Joel Ivey said:
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:33:14 -0600
For those who use sftp on zOS, do you enter this interactive mode using the
uss shell? I haven't made much progress trying to get an interactive
session under the uss shell, and wanted to make sure this is the
Tom Schmidt wrote:
No, but we are talking about millions of calls (especially from task
termination processing on some software - your software probably isn't task
challenged, Ed). Count the WTOs in a syslog for an estimate of the WTO
cost per subsystem. Tasks are harder to get a handle on,
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 11:25 -0600, Tom Schmidt wrote:
Count the WTOs in a syslog for an estimate of the WTO
cost per subsystem.
Taking Ed's estimate of three instructions per inactive SSCVT, and
assuming 10M WTOs per day, and ten inactive subsystems... that's roughly
a CPU second per day spent
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: sftp interactive under uss shell?
In a recent note, Joel Ivey said:
Date:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:39:14 -0500, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 11:25 -0600, Tom Schmidt wrote:
Count the WTOs in a syslog for an estimate of the WTO
cost per subsystem.
Taking Ed's estimate of three instructions per inactive SSCVT, and
assuming 10M WTOs per
It looks like someone has finally contributed the interface program
that allows running COBOL programs under z/os.e as file 727 on the CBT.
I have no idea who could have done this (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).
Hats off to Sam K and Sam G.
And the very best of the season to you, yours,
Isn't that equivelent to stealing?
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent:
In a message dated 11/23/2005 2:17:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't that equivelent to stealing?
Or violating the license agreement and voiding the warrantee(s)?
--
For IBM-MAIN
I'm actually surprised Sam would get in the middle of that with CBT.
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Running COBOL under z/os.e
Isn't that equivelent to stealing?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Running COBOL under z/os.e
In a message dated 11/23/2005 2:17:35 P.M. Central Standard
No.
The original, unmodified program CEEPIPI is documented in IBM Language
Environment for MVS VM Programming Guide Document Number SC26-4818-05.
The use is explicitly documented as allowed:
* Execution of applications written in the following languages is not
functionally supported on
In a message dated 11/23/2005 3:14:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You may not run the compiler under z/os.e. The COBOL program must have
been complied using LE runtimes. There is no restriction found as to
which compliers may be used.
Other than the one in
Found it and fixed it.
Searching on CEE5101C lead me to
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1II12870 among other APARs.
It says that the resolution is ... use the setdubdefault assembler callable
service so that new subtasks are dubbed as separate processes. It's
documented in UNIX
Joel Ivey wrote:
The user's guide for openSSH states,
sftp is an interactive file transfer program similar to ftp which performs
all operations over an encrypted ssh transport. It may also use many
features of ssh, such as public key authentication and compression. sftp
connects and logs into
It looks like if we change the S9(9)s to 9(9)s the ZAP goes away
and an Or-Immediate is added. This Or-Immediate is unnecessary (it
operates on one of the garbage bytes) but it is harmless. My POPs
also says that the second operand is checked for valid =digit= codes,
as well as valid sign. So,
Mike:
Please see my other recent post on this topic regarding the ZAP.
(I think it =does= care about X'A' through X'F' in the digit
positions.)
I also believe that using variable names in the INSPECT rather than
literals will cause the generation of a lot of additional code to
dynamically
exits(iefactrt,iefusi, )
and when i do a d prog.exit the output is (in part):
sys.iefactrt
sys.iefusi .
Exactly. *SYS*.iefactrt, not just *IEFACTRT* as Don specified. This is the
most common mistake one makes when dealing with replacing an SMF exit (I've
been down that road, myself).
48 matches
Mail list logo
