I do not have an NFS client, so I
cannot NFS mount the z/OS UNIX subdirectories which contain the jar
But you could use dfsSMB to create a Windows-type share on your mainframe
and map that to a drive letter on your PC. Requires a bit of set-up in
order to get security right (and authentication
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 23:33 -0800, Gibney, Dave wrote:
... or you broke it on some occasion or other :)
Or both vbg and maybe on purpose mbG)
Nope - anyone smart enough to break it, wouldn't have been so stoopid as
to do it deliberately.
Then again ...
--
MARCIN BLASZCZYK
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Hi Carlos,
CA CopyCat Link below. Perfect for migrating to VTS. To summarize:
BrightStor™ CA-Dynam®/TLMS Tape Management Copycat Utility provides advanced
software to assist the user with tape media conversions, media
consolidation/stacking and media replacement operations. BrightStor
--
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
authorized state official.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
I've been digging in the archives, haven't hit this yet.
We're starting to test 1.7, have 1.4 in production and on our sandbox. I
want to be able to use some HLQs that are in the 1.4 mastercat so I can
get to my OEM stuff on 1.7. I'm not ready for the mergecat step just yet,
at least I don't
I've found that the easiest and safest way is to stick to the alias', just
like the servpac creates.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Bill,
I have converted thousands VSE FTP (BSI and CSI) steps to z/OS
but can't remember experiencing the symptoms you describe.
I'd like to help, but can you send me a copy of the Unix file to run some
tests? Go to the Support page of the GSF-Soft Web site and contact me
off-line.
Happy
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:50:10 -0600, Daniel McLaughlin wrote:
We're starting to test 1.7, have 1.4 in production and on our sandbox. I
want to be able to use some HLQs that are in the 1.4 mastercat so I can
get to my OEM stuff on 1.7. I'm not ready for the mergecat step just yet,
at least I don't
First, I don't usually put OEM stuff in the master catalog unless it
absolutely positively has to be there. OEM stuff is better of in a
usercat. Doing so makes it easier to get to those products from other
systems with other mastercats.
Second, you can avoid this issue in the future by
---
Marcin, you can't get off the list by sending a message to the list
itself.
See the notes at the bottom of EVERY email on the list for unsubscribe
instructions.
Or go to this link to unsubscribe:
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=ibm-mainA=1
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer
I have to agree with Don. If something needs to be in the linklist or
LPA list, I try to find another way. For instance, in the LINKLIST, I'll
refer to the dataset with a vol-ser reference. I don't recall ever
having something that needed to be in the LPALIST, so I'm unsure how to
handle that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Catalog Question
I have to agree with Don. If something needs to be in the linklist or
When I use FTP on z/OS to retrieve files, I use the LOCSITE command to set
the DCB attributes for the target files.
For example, if I want to retrieve a large tersed file, I first issue the
BIN command to be in binary mode and then I issue
locsite recfm=fb lrecl=1024 blksize=0 cylinders
---snip
In the LPALST, the syntax is:
dsn(volser)
unsnip
Thanks, John
Rick
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crispin Hugo
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Remote Tape drives
Chaps,
Any suggestions on ways we could have a tape drive 3490 in a remote
If anyone has an well loaded, active VTS and you plan on replacing
J type cartridges with K types on the back end...
DO NOT order the same VOLSER range.
It will ruin your day.
Enjoy.
j
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Cheers John,
I thought channel extenders had a finite distance , like about 250k. I think
we are looking for something which would be IP based
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
This email has been scanned for all
Crispin Hugo wrote:
Chaps,
Any suggestions on ways we could have a tape drive 3490 in a remote
location attached to our mainframe. We are talking about 1 thousand of
miles. Speed is not important
Use ftp instead ?
Transmitted files could be:
a) recorded on CD or DVD,
b) use locally
There are 3490-compatible drives that attach to PCs (one example:
http://tapedrives-3480to3590.com/134-04-11025) . Get one, use it to read
the tape file at the PC end, then FTP the resulting file to your
mainframe.
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850)
CNT channel extender? Or do a Google search on channel
extender
I've used CNT at two companies. They're expensive but do
the job. At the first company the remote drives were about
1200 miles away.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
Again, I agree about CD but many of our customers want tape. We have to bow
to their wishes.
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
_
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs
Tim,
That would work but does require that we have people at both end available.
There may be a need to use this system over greater distances which would
cause problems with time differences
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
I will investigate CNT. Many thanks
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal
Chaps,
Any suggestions on ways we could have a tape drive 3490 in a remote
location attached to our mainframe. We are talking about 1 thousand of
miles. Speed is not important
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/ http://www.macro4.com/
Macro 4 plc, The Orangery,
You'll need people at both ends for a tape drive, too - tape drives end up
with all sorts of issues requiring operator intervention.
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209
That would work but does require that we have people at both end
Tim,
I would envisage that the 'remote' have access to the mainframe to run the
jobs they require. Mount the tape required etc. Long distance operators !
Machine would think tape is local
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crispin Hugo
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 12:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote Tape drives
Cheers John,
I thought channel extenders had a finite distance , like
Oh No. John said FlexES. Please lets not get started on lawsuits
again!!!hahahahahahahahaha...
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
12/29/2006 01:54 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carol Srna
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote Tape drives
Oh No. John said FlexES. Please lets not get started on
lawsuits
Also check out McData.com (also known as InRange) for channel
extenders. Like CNT, they have units that operate over IP
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL
What ever happened to those good old Mohawk data transfer units
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Thanks Bruce
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection
Bruce Black wrote:
Also check out McData.com (also known as InRange) for channel
extenders. Like CNT, they have units that operate over IP
CNT is a part of McDATA for quite long time
Adva is part of CNT (which is a part...)
InRange is also part of McDATA
AFAIK, also McDATA was recently
John,
I can say confidently that jar files produced on other platforms should
work fine under z/OS. We -always- produce our jars under Eclipse
(using Ant and the jar task) using both Windows and Linux.We
commonly download open source Java jars and upload them (in binary) for
use on
It is entirely possible to share those resources in a
read-only manner across SYSPLEX boundaries. It is equally
certain that writing to a dataset (improperly) shared in that
manner will result in a broken dataset and grief to the
consumers on both sides. Ask me how I know
Dave said
Having Java .class files or jars on a NFS, Samba, or other remote file
system can have negative impact on the application performance,
especially application startup times.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In a message dated 12/29/2006 1:17:46 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What ever happened to those good old Mohawk data transfer units
Or the other ones? 37 somethings that took a 3420 and xMIT'd it over 9600
bisynch...Look ma no hands
Uh, could you (or any one else) expound on this?,
usually IBM tends to rename the sys1 files, moves them to other volsers,
changes sizes of files which tend to force file to different volsers. etc.
And in our case, (just getting ready to install 1.7 into production) we went
from mod3 to mod
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:25:27 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
files. Finally, I get to my question. Is it OK for me to download the
jar files to my workstation? I have absolutely NO idea where to look
to see what the license is that would address this issue.
For CICS, as an example,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Sidler
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 3:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Use of Java jar files supplied by IBM with
z/OS products.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:25:27
Harold,
You say usually IBM tends to rename the sys1 files, moves them to other
volsers,
changes sizes of files which tend to force file to different volsers.
etc.. I may not understand what you mean by this, but I have not
really encountered these issues.
Many of the data sets are on the
Bob,
I have been exposed to two different channel extenders over the
years. Of the two each had its own weaknesses. I won't talk about
brand names other than to say they were from different parts of the US.
The first (and second) seemed to drive IOS nuts and they were guilty
of various
43 matches
Mail list logo
