For years already I read the group via a newsreader and newsserver and
also do posting via mail. I have always noticed that some posts do not
reach the newsgroup. I notified Darren when he still was in charge of
the group, but he replied that everything was echoed to the newsgroup
and it were
Maybe you recalled the CATLG_ERR parameter of ALLOCxx?
It does not do what you are looking for, but it does something with
IEF287I NOT CTLGD 2.
Kees.
Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbm1.com wrote in message
news:6cd8dd927eba514e9db1e36304be38d7117ad...@hou-mail.kbm1.loc...
Thanks to all that
Arthur T. ibmm...@intergate.com wrote in message
news:6.2.1.2.2.20100128151115.06ece...@127.0.0.1...
On 28 Jan 2010 11:46:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:blu137-w226dc0c084578fb0fd248fa3...@phx.gbl)
jayare...@hotmail.com (J R) wrote:
Ron,
I'm perplexed. I use google
Hi
Not very important , but I see 3-5 sec delay at the JOB end NOTIFY message
((between JOB ended HASP395 and HASP165)
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Info:
W dniu 2010-01-28 19:34, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) pisze:
I agree.
Delete mail without subject.
Don't follow blind links.
I also delete mail with meaningless subjects.
Give people enough info in the subject to know what it is about.
So, next time you will see a message with interesting
Mohan,
I would start from the following lecture:
IBM Communication Controller Migration Guide
SG24-6298
(redbook)
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru
Every Monday we run a job that will eject volumes from the VTS that we send
to an off site location for 7(seven) days. Volume entry is deleted from the
TCDB and RMM keeps a record of it. On the following Monday when a new
generation is created and ejected and the old volumes entered into the
A better choice of words might have been Your storage admin may have coded the
acs routine to accept a management class value passed in via jcl but don't
count on it.
Still begs the same question.
Why not?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:30 -0700 Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
:In addition to migrating to z/OS from VSE we are also migrating from CA-Top
Secret to RACF.
:Currently in Top Secret each user has some institution defined data that we
use for various things. There is a
Different trace entries take different amounts of overhead.
All trace entries that are not done directly by the machine (branch, mode
events) are made with the TRACE or TRACG instruction.
Some trace entries' front-end build a parameter area which subsequently is
used to prime the registers used
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:58:24 -0600 Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
:My naive understanding of the OS/360 multiprocessing
:paradigm is that when one unit of work WAITs, another
:is
Our box is running at 90-100% under soft capping.
TCPIP is defined with service class SYSSTC.
When capping starts the PING response times explode from approx. 15ms to
400 - 1000ms. Looking with RMF3 delay monitor at TCPIP, it shows a delay
up to 70% because of processor.
SYSSTC is the highest
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
[ snip ]
[1] This all reminds me of a plaque in a wall, written in both Chinese
and
English, near the tourist shops by the Badaling Gate. It said
something about
the famous people who had visited the
Given the situation I would say, probably, NO. You *might* be able to
move TCPIP to SYSTEM but ISTR some changes made a few releases back to
force certain system critical tasks into IBM assigned SCLASSes.
The problem is not the TCPIP is not high enough on the food chain, but
that the food chain
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:33:49 -0500, Thompson, Steve wrote:
So when you did this call to CICS, it would recognize you would need to
wait (whether you actually needed to or now, you will now) and then it
would go dispatch another transaction that was ready to run.
In effect, CICS was making
We are trying to move aways from assembler to cobol in batch.
One of the programmers has a question. He asked me if there is a cobol
equivalent to assemblers 'abend'
He has done some reading and tried what was given but is having no luck
getting the return code he wants into it
He can get it to
Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is not allowed. WLM can not
starve STCs defined in SYSSTC. Why does WLM not cut the processor for the
batch jobs which are defined DISCRETIONARY?
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
14:49:44:
I found that and it helps, but it does not do what I had mis-remembered.
Thanks for the effort.
snip
Maybe you recalled the CATLG_ERR parameter of ALLOCxx?
It does not do what you are looking for, but it does something with
IEF287I NOT CTLGD 2.
Kees.
/snip
W dniu 2010-01-28 16:27, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
Your storage admin may have coded the acs routine to accept a management class
value passed in via jcl but not likely.
Why is that not likely?
I've always allowed it.
I never allow it, I also teach why people should avoid that. Of course
some
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of larry macioce
We are trying to move aways from assembler to cobol in batch.
One of the programmers has a question. He asked me if there is a cobol
equivalent to assemblers 'abend'
He has done some reading and tried
Many people have written a subroutine in assembler to issue the abend
and just call it from the main program.
Eg CALL 'ABEND' USING ABEND-CODE.
HTH,
snip
We are trying to move aways from assembler to cobol in batch.
One of the programmers has a question. He asked me if there is a cobol
Ignorant questions:
Does TCPIP handle the Ping itself, so no other adress space is involved?
What is the delay % under normal (good) response situations?
Kees.
Werner Kuehnel werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote in message
news:ofe4dc5618.b4211958-onc12576ba.004c69dc-c12576ba.004d3...@mannheim
Check out the info apars and (very carefully!) check out segmentation
offload. You might want to bounce this off of IBM (either WLM or Comm.
Server ).
That's about all I can recommend. Please post the results when/if there
are any. I would be interested in the responses from IBM.
-Original
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 6:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: trace table overhead
Different trace entries take different amounts of overhead.
All trace entries
There's an LE370 program/service that can be invoked to cause an abend. I've
pasted in a small example of a callable COBOL program which in turn calls the
LE370 program.
LINKAGE SECTION.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is not allowed. WLM can not
starve STCs defined in SYSSTC. Why does WLM not cut the processor for the
batch jobs which are defined DISCRETIONARY?
Werner Kuehnel
The normal delay is under 10%. I can't think of another address space
than TCPIP
to handle the PING. Probably OMPROUTE, but it's also defined as SYSSTC and
is
delayed for a much higher percentage than at normal times.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb
Thanks for your help, Allen, I'll check out the APARs. Turning on offload
I'm a bit hesitant..
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
15:13:33:
Check out the info apars and (very carefully!) check out segmentation
offload. You might want
Jim, while you can assign STCs to SC SYSSTC there is no definition
in WLM and no way to set the CPU critical flag.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
15:29:24:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
Jim, while you can assign STCs to SC SYSSTC there is no definition
in WLM and no way to set the CPU critical flag.
Werner Kuehnel
Could you not set up another service class just for tcp/ip with importance 1
larry macioce wrote:
We are trying to move aways from assembler to cobol in batch.
One of the programmers has a question. He asked me if there is a cobol
equivalent to assemblers 'abend'
He has done some reading and tried what was given but is having no luck
getting the return code he wants into
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:40:21 +0100, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
Our box is running at 90-100% under soft capping.
TCPIP is defined with service class SYSSTC.
When capping starts the PING response times explode from approx. 15ms to
400 - 1000ms. Looking with RMF3 delay
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:29:24 +, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is not allowed. WLM can not
starve STCs defined in SYSSTC. Why does WLM not cut the
Well, of course I can do that but they always warn to define unachievable
SCs.
Anyway, I'll give it a try.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
15:51:43:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 09:00 -0500, larry macioce wrote:
We are trying to move aways from assembler to cobol in batch.
One of the programmers has a question. He asked me if there is a cobol
equivalent to assemblers 'abend'
Yes, here's a sample taken from one of our programs. (Ignore the
How 'bout the age-old addage of just not opening attachments or clicking
on links from unknown sources? Especially from a guy named Poon.
Common sense rules and good firewall/anti-crapware have kept me safe to
date.
Scott Harder
Mainframe Services, Inc.
R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
OK, it is Friday. And this is on topic. It may even be interesting. I was
thinking of two possible SUBSYS= subsystems to use, especially on batch jobs.
One I call TEE. The other I call UNIX.
The TEE subsystem is inspired(?) by the UNIX tee command. The tee command reads
its stdin and sends it
Listers:
Is there a way thru JCL using the COND keyword or using IF to exit a
running PROC on a particular STEP.
I have a PROC with 100 steps and would like to end execution of the proc
when STEP73 finishes.
Thank you.
Great list.
Roberto Halais
It is no measure of health to be well
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
Well, of course I can do that but they always warn to define unachievable
SCs.
Anyway, I'll give it a try.
Werner Kuehnel
BTW we don't have any application server STCs that can potentially do a
lot of work
05 abend-codepic 9(4) comp.
CALL 'ILBOABN0' USING ABEND-CODE
Enterprise COBOL for z/OS V3R4 Migration Guide
3.2.7Using ILBOABN0 to force an abend
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 01/29/2010
09:10:20 AM:
Many people have written a subroutine
Everyone,
Has anyone used a product which can convert a JES2 output to a PDF, then email
the PDF as an attachment.
This function is available in the zVSE CSI TCPIP stack, and I would like to
find a similar function in zOS.
TIA
Nigel
Put all the remaining steps inside a set of IF/ENDIF brackets and test for
condition code LT 0, which will never be true. If you ever decide to run the
remaining steps, change the comparison to GE, which will always be true.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hello everyone,
This is the final week to register for z/OS On Line classes at the Marist
Institute for Data Center Professionals.
Spring classes include:
• z/OS Associate Certificate Program (Systems Programming Track)
• DB2 Application Programming Track- Discounted Introductory
Better than my previously posted solution!
snip
There's an LE370 program/service that can be invoked to cause an abend.
I've pasted in a small example of a callable COBOL program which in turn
calls the LE370 program.
LINKAGE SECTION.
That is why I said very carefully G
snip
Turning on offload
I'm a bit hesitant..
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Hello,
I am attempting to ipl maintenance into a system and receiving the following
message very early in the ipl:
IGGN505A Specify unit for SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB on SYSR1 or cancel
The dataset is physically on the volume I am ipling from and it is also
indirectly cataloged to SYSR1 on the same
Kinda unreadable.
What is it that I have to do to read these?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Angelo Corridori
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 9:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Final Week to register for z/OS On
Werner,
I'm curious, how many CPU's?
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, Werner Kuehnel werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
From: Werner Kuehnel werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de
Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: WLM and TCPIP
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Friday, January 29, 2010, 2:30 PM
The normal delay
In a message dated 1/29/2010 9:23:12 A.M. Central Standard Time,
nigel_sal...@hotmail.com writes:
This function is available in the zVSE CSI TCPIP stack, and I would like
to find a similar function in zOS.
Lionel's XMITIP is a good start at _www.lbdsoftware.com_
I can think of a couple other solutions using out-of-the-box methods, but
neither is as clean as what you're proposing. You'd need a minimum number of
subsystem routines - JCL processing, allocation, open and close, and maybe
another couple. At OPEN time, issue OPENs for the related files,
Especially from a guy named Poon.
What's wrong with the name Poon?
From Wikepedia:
Joseph Poon is William Barton Rogers Professor of Physics at the
University of Virginia. He is famous for cross-disciplinary research
applying physics principles to design, synthesize, and investigate
John
You are about to have a Homer Simpson moment - I hope. Either that or your
reply is somewhat disingenuous!
I'll assume the former in case there are any others for whom the (British)
penny hasn't dropped.
What actually happened was that the Dutch-Canadian guy alongside whom I
was sitting
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:53:32 -0800, Kurt Eastwood kurtms...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to ipl maintenance into a system and receiving the
following message very early in the ipl:
IGGN505A Specify unit for SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB on SYSR1 or cancel
The dataset is physically on the
W dniu 2010-01-29 12:45, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
A better choice of words might have been Your storage admin may have coded the
acs routine to accept a management class value passed in via jcl but don't
count on it.
Still begs the same question.
Why not?
Because 90% users has very little idea
I can see it fine do you want me to fwd it to you
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Darth Keller darth.kel...@assurant.comwrote:
What's wrong with the name Poon?
From Wikepedia:
Joseph Poon is William Barton Rogers Professor of Physics at the
University of Virginia. He is famous for cross-disciplinary research
applying physics principles
Kurt Eastwood kurtms...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:783614.37536...@web56004.mail.re3.yahoo.com...
Hello,
I am attempting to ipl maintenance into a system and receiving the following
message very early in the ipl:
IGGN505A Specify unit for SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB on SYSR1 or cancel
In a message dated 1/29/2010 10:00:28 A.M. Central Standard Time,
kurtms...@yahoo.com writes:
tried to specify the volser of the volume I am ipling from but the same
message gets kicked out again.
If anyone has run into this before and can help with this I would
appreciate it.
Where's
I am not sure but I think the LE might be getting into your way if you are
trying to create a different return code if it something like an S0C4 or
S0C7.
Let me know if I do not understand.
Currently your assembler program may get an S0C7 but it will produce a
different return code? Is that
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
Kinda unreadable.
What is it that I have to do to read these?
Decode it (it's MIMEd). If you got it as a single posting, then your mailer
or LISTSERV is broken. If it was in a Digest, then the problem is
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Nigel Salway nigel_sal...@hotmail.comwrote:
Everyone,
Has anyone used a product which can convert a JES2 output to a PDF, then
email the PDF as an attachment.
This function is available in the zVSE CSI TCPIP stack, and I would like to
find a similar
I guess I'm addicted too John. Addicted to being able to find whatever I
want within a few seconds using the Library Server Shelf Search. I have
bookmarks for all of the shelves I use, and it amazes me how much fast it is.
I don't understand at all why IBM decided Infocenter was better. They
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:08:46 +0100, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.vern...@klm.com wrote:
I checked our SYS1 datasets and SYS1.PARMLIB is the only one cataloged to
volser **. Maybe because SYSR1 is not resolved yet. You can try this.
It's allowed. See the FM for LOADxx PARMLIB:
55-60 A
In a message dated 1/29/2010 10:25:47 A.M. Central Standard Time,
zosw...@gmail.com writes:
Decode it (it's MIMEd). If you got it as a single posting, then your mailer
or LISTSERV is broken. If it was in a Digest, then the problem is that
Or just go to the _www.idcp.org_
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of August Carideo
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 10:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Final Week to register for z/OS On line classes -- [Block
o'gibersh]
I can see it fine do you want
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Final Week to register for z/OS On line classes -- [Block
o'gibersh]
In a message dated 1/29/2010
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:58:11 -0600, Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:29:24 +, Jim McAlpine
jim.mcalp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is
At least this is working communication - unlike trying to guess what
is meant by 12:00 PM.
12:00 PM is Noon.
12:00 AM is Midnight.
Days have 24 hours; why not clocks?
Clocks were designed before computers.
It's called tradition, and it's a cultural artifact.
Most of Europe uses the 24-hour
Thank you Barry!
Worked like a charm.
On 1/29/10, Schwarz, Barry A barry.a.schw...@boeing.com wrote:
Put all the remaining steps inside a set of IF/ENDIF brackets and test for
condition code LT 0, which will never be true. If you ever decide to run
the remaining steps, change the comparison
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 11:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Final Week to register for z/OS On line classes
-- [Block o'gibersh]
-Original
12:00 PM is Noon.
12:00 AM is Midnight.
I don't like it. There's way too much wrong with it.
In any case, midnight is ambiguous. Each day has two,
one at day's start, the other at day's end.
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:28:20 +
From: eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject:
In a message dated 1/29/2010 11:23:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com writes:
I'm stuck with Outlook here at the office
Tried it with my horrid new Windows 7/laptop and had to download Quicktime
7. to view the
video but decoded fine.
I meant to add that the 24-hour clock can eliminate the abiguity.
00:00 is the midnight that starts the day, 24:00 the one that ends it.
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:43:49 -0500
From: jayare...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Re : Extracting STDOUT data from USS
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
snip
IGGN505A Specify unit for SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB on SYSR1 or cancel === then
I checked our SYS1 datasets and SYS1.PARMLIB is the only one cataloged to
volser **. Maybe because SYSR1 is not resolved yet. You can try
this. now
/snip
Appear like the DSN is changing. Initially it was
Because some sites code the ACS routines to null the classes in the ALLOC
environment and disallow user specified classes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:45 AM
To:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
I'm stuck with Outlook here at the office. I never see this at home
using Thunderbird and Linux.
Hm. By mailer I meant mailer, not mail client. I'd assume any current mail
client could read it.
Since you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of P S
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 12:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Final Week to register for z/OS On line classes -- [Block
o'gibersh]
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM,
Judging from the pay rate, IBM thinks Dubuque is in India. No offense to
our friends who live in India. This is meant as a slap to IBM. It's no
wonder they want so many people since at that rate, I don't figure they're
going to get exactly what I would call the best or what they stupidly call
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
Exchange.
Oh, and you're at Sterling Commerce -- I bet some horrible gateway broke it
(nothing against SterComm, just that big companies tend to have such
things).
Look at the message headers, see what MIME
On 1/29/2010 at 5:45 AM, in message
70m5m519u621mb1vnpg1096i0qj03f3...@4ax.com, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:30 -0700 Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
:In addition to migrating to z/OS from VSE we are also migrating from
On 29 January 2010 13:45, Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
On 1/29/2010 at 5:45 AM, in message
70m5m519u621mb1vnpg1096i0qj03f3...@4ax.com, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
Wouldn't the easiest solution be to write a TSSAPI with the same plist
which
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:30 -0700, Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
In addition to migrating to z/OS from VSE we are also migrating from CA-Top
Secret to RACF.
Currently in Top Secret each user has some institution defined data that
we use for various things. There is a
snip
:Currently in Top Secret each user has some institution defined data
that we use for various things. There is a call interface called TSSCAI
that we can call from Cobol programs to retrieve this data
unsnip
There are lots of routines running around that extract RACF fields, try
CBT
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:01:12 -0500, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
Kinda unreadable.
What is it that I have to do to read these?
In my experience, seeing that as a block of gibberish indicates that either:
(a) you're using an email client that doesn't handle MIME-encoded
Philip,
We currently do not run any such as we moved away to InforPrint Server and its
NETSPOOL function.
What other router is involved apart from 2811? Do you have a channel attached
cisco router (CIP or CPA) connected to the mainframe?
Natarajan
On 1/28/2010 at 5:45 PM, in message
I have a vanilla TSO user who uses the DL edit macro, which has been
around for years.
The DL works as follows:
While in an edit session, put the cursor on a DSN and then on the command
line, key in DL and enter.
This will put you into ISPF 3.4 and then hit enter and you get a DSLIST of
all
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Final Week to register for z/OS On line classes -- [Block
o'gibersh]
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:01:12
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:44:30 -0800, John Norgauer
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu wrote:
I have a vanilla TSO user who uses the DL edit macro, which has been
around for years.
The DL works as follows:
While in an edit session, put the cursor on a DSN and then on the command
line, key in DL and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John Norgauer
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 1:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: strange failure for a single TSO user using the old DL edit
macro
I have a vanilla TSO user who uses the
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:57:27 -0500, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
I don't know COBOL, but it might be possible to call the RACF service
IRRSEQ00 directly from COBOL. Certainly it has a pretty standard OS
parameter list.
Depending on the environment the program runs in that might actually
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:20:02 -0500, John Kelly
john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
snip
IGGN505A Specify unit for SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB on SYSR1 or cancel ===
then
I checked our SYS1 datasets and SYS1.PARMLIB is the only one cataloged
to
volser **. Maybe because SYSR1 is not resolved yet.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:52:03 -0500, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
It appears that it is an Exchange setting that I have no control over.
If you haven't checked your ibm-main list-serve settings at the ibm-main
server (nothing to do with Exchange) then I don't think you can
Have a printer...PSF..that does not stop between forms changes...(no
prompt for operator)..any particular parm in Printer setup...JES2 or the
APSW proc. I can look at..??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains
I personally prefer fastpath written by Gilbert. It supports edit, view
and browse with extended cursor sensitivity.
Gilbert Saint-Flour g...@pobox.com -- that was in doc in file183 from
cbt.
Kenneth Klein
Systems Specialist
502-868-3644
859-750-5179 (Cell)
502-868-2298 (Fax)
W dniu 2010-01-29 20:21, Natarajan Mohan pisze:
Philip,
We currently do not run any such as we moved away to InforPrint Server and its
NETSPOOL function.
What other router is involved apart from 2811? Do you have a channel attached
cisco router (CIP or CPA) connected to the mainframe?
CIP
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:28:20 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
At least this is working communication - unlike trying to guess what
is meant by 12:00 PM.
12:00 PM is Noon.
12:00 AM is Midnight.
Tecnically (will Jonh G. confirm?) Noon is 12:00 M.
-- gil
The main thing is with the printer definition in JES2. The work selection
criteria needs to have the Form as a criteria that must be matched exactly.
That is done by moving it before the '/'. The default is
(W,Q,R,PRM,LIM/F,UCS,FCB)
You need
(W,Q,R,PRM,LIM,F/UCS,FCB)
Also, make sure
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Jan MOEYERSONS
jan.moeyers...@adelior.bewrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:17:01 -0800, Anson Ye ye.an...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Yes, the client is running as root
I have no idea why the root ID needs extra setup efforts. Could you give
me
some clue? Thanks!
Ron,
Please check your Work-Selection criteria on the printer definition for F.
You could modify them using $TPRT(x) command.
Natarajan
On 1/29/2010 at 12:12 PM, in message
of7962025b.d03ebe93-on862576ba.006ee512-862576ba.006f0...@agfinance.com,
Ron Wells rwe...@agfinance.com wrote:
works fine with exception...
is there a way to have printer HALT..saying to change forms because it
is different from what was just printerd.
From:
Wissink, Brad [ITSYS] bjwi...@iastate.edu
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
01/29/2010 03:04 PM
Subject:
Re: PSF printer
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
