From: Graeme Gibson gra...@ase.com.au
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed, May 19, 2010 6:13:37 AM
Subject: Re: Of interest to the Independent Contractors on the list
How many of those Prophets of Doom knew what they were talking about but it
worked for most
I have access to a test system in Dallas as well, and it appears to function
correctly for me.
Have you made any changes to the default configuration that they supplied?
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
I have access to the Dallas system as well. I'm assuming that you mean
/u/ibmuser/.sh_history. It works for me, is there another one in another
location that you want me to test?
Sorry if things don't line up well when I paste them.
step 1:
File Directory Special_file Commands Help
When using the old parms, it's likely that they have not 'lost access but
that they have changed their settings and can't see the output because of
that.
To be sure, when they are in the output queue, they should type the PREFIX
command with no options.
If they still can't see it, they
Alan,
Have you had the user do a WHO in SDSF and confirm that you are using the
correct ISFPRM00? Maybe there is a default one shipped with the system you
do not know you are picking up? Or perhaps you need to check on if the
ISFPRM00 was compiled from before and the wrong version is in the
W dniu 2010-05-21 22:12, Steve Dover pisze:
Friday afternoon, thought I was going to be done. I have the same problem.
Freshly installed z/OS V1.11, buckets pulled and installed. Had hired help who
ran into problems before he left, so I picked up where he left off. Had to run
the HBBN700I job
Recently I first time IPLed z/OS 1.11. I followed IBM's recommendations
and completely switched to ZFS filesystem (this is default in
ServerPac). So long so good.
However, possibly after some unclean system close (this is sandbox
system) I had serious problems with IPL. OMVS could not
Radoslaw, this sounds like journal (log) replay issues.
I guessing you had the root mounted read/write. You *really* don't want to be
doing that - even
on test systems, remount as r/w only for the time you need it (say for mkdir).
zFS has had its share of latch contension issues, but I'd lean
---snip
An IDR is an IDR is an IDR. 'Translator' IDRs are not different in
format from putative 'user' IDRs; nor do they appear in some canonical
sequence that makes them distinguishable from others. That said, any
competent HLASM
All solved. There was a usermod to ISFUSER that was overlooked.
IBM gave great guidance:
The symptom looks like either the SDSF class and/or the JESSPOOL class
is activated on the system. When either one of those 2 classes is
activated, and when you have not customized the SDSF user
Chokalingam
Ideally, you would be posting in IBMTCP-L rather than IBM-MAIN since that is
where you will find the greater concentration of folk who know and use the IP
component of z/OS Communications Server - and also TCP/IP for VM.
I'm going to assume IPv4 from this point on.
This is a
On 21 May 2010 08:10, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010 06:43:42 -0400 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
:Indeed. On the flip side, not every Y2K bug was worth fixing. At NSF
:we had a monitor that showed the date as 19100; the
Has anyone had experience with z/VSE connected to DB2 on zLinux ?
If yes, it would be much appreciated to get some performance
information like number of queries per second or any other numbers.
Thank you,
Arye.
--
For
First, LIBR is a program, not a proc (VSE defaults to PGM, not PROC, on the
EXEC statement). LIBR is a VSE operating system component. LIBR can be used
to catalog, for example, an OBJ module in to a VSE library:
// EXEC LIBR,PARM='ACCESS SUBLIB=USER.PROD'
CATALOG DDAR04.OBJ REPLACE=YES
We were doing this for a few years, but in fact actually moved to DB2 on Intel
because we were having performance issues with Linux for System z. From what
I've heard on the internet I think it was simply a Linux for z tuning issue,
but the inhouse VSE/VM sysprogs and (distributed) Linux
This is very difficult to quantify, as it depends upon a great many things;
the speed of the CP that z/VSE is running on, the speed of the IFL that
Linux is running on, whether or not hipersockets is in use, the MTU size of
the link, the release of z/VSE, the release of DB2 LUW, the number of rows
Linda
Does Enterprise Extender still function with 1.11?
Has there been an IBM announcement that says Enterprise Extender (EE) has
been withdrawn? I would find this enormously surprising given the massive
investment in new functions which can be found going from z/OS
Communications Server
You should mount the sysres zFS files read only (as you should have been
doing with HFS also). But also make sure you have this in your zFS parms:
romount_recovery=on/* see APAR OA22351 */
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
You have to wonder why this is even a consideration.
The journal should be run automagically unless the customer chooses not to. In
the unlikely event a
filesystem is unmounted uncleanly *AND* the subsequent mount is changed from
R/W to R/O, the
decision not to run the journal should be the
19 matches
Mail list logo
