That did not work. In the CAS case, it was a task in CAS that held the
catalog and not something that WLM could apply the ERV to. The same
within USS.
Kees.
Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote in message
news:45e5f2f45d7878458ee5ca679697335502e25...@usdaexch01.kbm1.loc...
That is why
That is why IBM created the ERV parameter in SYS1.PARMLIB(IEAOPTxx).
This defines a period of time at for which the address space may not be
swapped to allow
Enques, locks, etc. to be released
snip
...snippage
A second reason was that in several occasions we saw the system allow
itself to be
-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From:
David Andrews d...@lists.duda.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu,
Date:
08/02/2012 00:36
Subject:
Re: WLM Capping
Sent by:
IBM
Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From:
David Andrewsd...@lists.duda.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu,
Date:
08/02/2012 00:36
Subject:
Re: WLM
://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From:
David Andrewsd...@lists.duda.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu,
Date:
08/02/2012 00:36
Subject:
Re: WLM Capping
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion ListIBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 15:51 -0500
I apologize for asking what is likely a basic performance question. It's been
about four years since we went from underpowered to having plenty and I was
frying other fish.
How can I determine from SMF when we were being capped by WLM. I have the cap
set at 16 MSU. We are preparing to run
Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: WLM Capping
I apologize for asking what is likely
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: WLM Capping
I don't know about SMF and capping, but when our processor is capped we
know about it big time. We
Run MXG on the TYPE70 records. See file TYPE70EL, variable SMF70NCA and
probably others.
Kees.
Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote in message
news:0de6a9840123e547b061ac5b6765c026324...@exmb-05.ad.wsu.edu...
I apologize for asking what is likely a basic performance question.
It's been about
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 15:51 -0500, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I don't want to imagine what WLM stomping on the brakes looks like in
your shop.
Biggest hassle for me when I started softcapping was that most of my
batch had been discretionary - I always liked the MTTW algorithm. But
when we softcapped
Subject: Re: WLM Capping
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 15:51 -0500, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I don't want to imagine what WLM stomping on the brakes looks like in
your shop.
Biggest hassle for me when I started softcapping was that most of my
batch had been discretionary - I always liked the MTTW
Subject: Re: WLM Capping
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 15:51 -0500, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I don't want to imagine what WLM stomping on the brakes looks like in
your shop.
Biggest hassle for me when I started softcapping was that most of my
batch had been discretionary - I always liked the MTTW
Shane:
I appreciate the reference and have now read portions dealing with
capping. It just never quite got to the point of telling for certain
how PR/SM cuts off service, but it hints at it being a non-dispatch of
an LCP by a real CP.
I was not surprised by capping extending into lunch. What
Rick --
You're really off here. PR/SM does not suspend logical processors for
minutes to hours at a time. As Jim Mulder wrote Wednesday, it just does
not work that way. The suspension of the processor is a short duration. The
time-slicing generally dynamic and all the logical engines get an equal
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:47 -0500, Al Sherkow wrote:
You're really off here...
The premise of your question is wrong, so it's hard to answer the question.
As Jim and Al have said, things don't work the way you postulated. In
fact, to use the vernacular - you've got it arse about.
When you
Esteemed colleges:
A topic that has occasionally graced IBM-MAIN for over a decade is
capping, and technology keeps changing so as to adjust the answer.
Having newer technology, we now have a handful of capping issues, and
IBM is coming up with new microcode (about now as I recall) to manage
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/13/2007
12:37:38 PM:
Ordinarily, as PR/SM dispatches CPs to LPARs, a Logical CP may have a
task dispatched to it, but beneath it, it has no physical CP.
Milliseconds later, the CP may well be back and the task actually runs.
But
: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PR/SM -- WLM Capping
Jim:
Thanks for the information. But always eager for deeper insights, is
there a manual or Redbook that explores this a bit further?
Thanks,
Rick
Confidentiality Notice: This email is intended
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:05 -0500, Rodie, Rick wrote:
Thanks for the information. But always eager for deeper insights, is
there a manual or Redbook that explores this a bit further?
From your initial post it seems you have a few different concepts
cross-pollinated.
There used to be a PR/SM
19 matches
Mail list logo
