During the last roadshow where the new beauties and goodies of z/OS were
advertised, one subject was how is has become possible to implement
things more dynamically without IPLs, subsystem restarts etc. I
complained that the reverse was still poorly implemented or overlooked.
One example is indeed
From my point of view is the problem that there is a password/key that exists
for the encrypted data. The possibility that the key is known/can be stolen
is a realistic risk.
As long the data is within the owners control this risk can be handled, but not
after the disk leaved the company.
Hello, I hope someone can help me.
I have read CICS's and ICSF manuals, and I have understood that if ,
my Cics worked as a Http Srver
and used a certificate imported in Racf with the option ICSF, the
handshake phase of SSL will be done by
the Cryptografic Coprocesors, and
In 1db06b2c-1d5a-4dc5-993a-b6407459b...@comcast.net, on 12/15/2012
at 12:27 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said:
A *LONG* time ago I was told by an IBM friend that the CIA (NSA?)
was able to retrieve data (in readable format) from a 3330 after
quite a few writes.
Is it still feasible
Thanks for the tip. I will try out your suggestion.
From: John Dawes jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au
To: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:47:15 AM
Subject: Fw: DFHSM - ARC6030I - CAUSES ABARS TASKS TO BE HELD
- Forwarded
Thanks for all the replies. I am evaluating the idea of providing an ISPF
dialog for generation of restore jobs. I would need to capture the information
required to list available backups for a dataset and generate the restore JCL.
One option is to parse the backup output using the SDSF REXX
W dniu 2012-12-17 15:57, Gary Snider pisze:
Thanks for all the replies. I am evaluating the idea of providing an
ISPF dialog for generation of restore jobs. I would need to capture
the information required to list available backups for a dataset and
generate the restore JCL. One option is to
The SSL handshake phase is done by the CEX2x, CEX3x, or CEX4 crypto hardware
running in Accelerator mode not Co-Processor mode
Everything else is correct
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Miguel Villar
Sent:
Thank you for correcting me... Of course what I stated worked for me but would
not have worked in all situations. Thanks again.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
SSL handshake is supported also by CEX hardware in Coprocessor mode.
Coprocessor offer same functionality as Accelerator (plus MUCH MORE),
but the speed is rougly 1/3.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2012-12-17 16:09, Steve Finch pisze:
The SSL handshake phase is done by the
I was looking in an older manual... Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:30:24 -0800, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
I never saw a reply to Lizette's post. We also have an interest in the
same topic. We want to encourage members of the technical staff to manage
our sandbox LPARs rather than pester--er, request--Operations to shut
R.S. is correct.
Crypto Express cards can be configured 2 ways... both process handshakes.
When configured as an accelerator... it only processes handshakes.
Dedicated accelerator will handle more concurrent handshakes. But you
would need to be doing a whole lot of concurrent SSL handshakes to
Thanks Walt for the doc pointers. We missed references to activation
profiles, which is the main target of my quest. Some digging is in order.
As for the need to check SAF: if HMC provided full granularity of access
control, we wouldn't even need BCPii. We could just let all Tech Support
folks
I'm trying to use APA to grok some performance issues, and I see this in the
output:
AddressSize Location Percent of CPU Time * 10.00% 0.4%
*12345678
1AACF228 64 .P000236+041640 10.88 *
1AACF268 64
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:16:06 -0800, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
As for the need to check SAF: if HMC provided full granularity of access
control, we wouldn't even need BCPii. We could just let all Tech Support
folks get to HMC and let him enforce the rules: allow Tech Support
Phil,
An obvious question: What language is the routine you are examining
written in? .P00236 and that ilk look like compiler-generated labels.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On bit.listserv.ibm-main 15 Dec 2012 Gordon de la Mare wrote:
For those of you who were long term subscribers to this
newsgroup you will have had memories of Phil.
Lots of bust ups with IBM (especially their lawyers) as
some of his postings attest.
They can rest now.
Phil decided he'd had
Whoa! I got this Re: Phil Payne before I see the
Phil Payne. Although not explicitly stated, it
seems he took his own life. Anyone know when this
happened?
I enjoyed his contributions and had a few correspondences
with him over the years. A true original, and I'll miss
him and his view of life
Roger,
Loved his blog, funny guy. Been around the block few dozen times
Regards,
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Dec 17, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Roger Bowler ibm-m...@snacons.com wrote:
On
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:42:45 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
Whoa! I got this Re: Phil Payne before I see the Phil Payne
The original message appeared on google groups. For some reason messages posted
on listserv.ua.edu are mirrored to google groups but not vice versa.
-
Sharon -
Yes, that is certainly possible. We have 7 LPARS (3 SYSPLEXs) across 2 - Z196s
utilizing both a 3584 and 3494, both including native and VTS components. If
you have specific questions, I'll be more than happy to assist. Please provide
as many specifics about your environment as you
Steve,
I had reread it, your right, boy it surges looks like he did after type 2
diabetes, been there with a late wife with type 1. It's no picnic.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Dec
On 17 Dec 2012 13:25:59 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On bit.listserv.ibm-main 15 Dec 2012 Gordon de la Mare wrote:
For those of you who were long term subscribers to this
newsgroup you will have had memories of Phil.
Lots of bust ups with IBM (especially their lawyers) as
some
He once quoted--I bowdlerise it slightly--the grim maxim that
Most human lives are a short grey arc between domestic spasm and oblivion
to me, but his was much more interesting. We of course disagreed here
on occasion, but he was one of the more attractive human beings I have
known.
His
John Gilmore wrote:
An obvious question: What language is the routine you are examining written in?
P00236 and that ilk look like compiler-generated labels.
Excellent point, and one I should have mentioned. It's mostly C (Dignus C),
with some assembler. And some open source components, also in
http://www.isham-research.co.uk/
Died Dec 5, 2012, Divorced, Broke, Diabetes, and going blind.
Isham, Northhamptonshire, UK
http://www.linkedin.com/in/philpayne
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Steve,
I had reread it, your right, boy it surges looks
Phil Smith wrote:
I'm trying to use APA to grok some performance issues, and I see this in the
output:
AddressSize Location Percent of CPU Time * 10.00% 0.4%
*12345678
1AACF228 64 .P000236+041640 10.88
After I thought I had had my say about Phil Payne I came upon the line
‘We are all the poorer that he now talks no more.’
from David Kendall's long-ago obituary of Norbert Wiener in The [London] Times.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
Dave Rivers wrote:
The routine in question appears to only be 64 bytes long?
Pretty small - any chance of looking at a dump or something and seeing what is
at that address?
No, that's the slice size that's set in APA. I've made it bigger but it made
no apparent difference. I am trying to figure
30 matches
Mail list logo
