Ed Jaffe remarks:
It's been three years since the IBM's July 2010 SOD first warned
that z196/z114 would be the last generation to offer ESCON channels.
For the record, IBM announcement letter 109-230, issued on April 28, 2009,
contained the following statement:
ESCON® channels will be phased
Hello:
Last Saturday we migrated our HFS sysplex root to zFS. We respond our own
questions:
2 .- Is it necessary execute in step 4 a pax -wr -pe -XCM ./ /newroot command
to populate the new filesystem? -- No, but the BPXWH2Z utility in batch didn't
work fine. It' canceled with sysplex root
Hi,
I know that I am doing something that IBM does not support.
My next question is how could I get the JES2AUX address space into ALE
table of my job? what is the STOKEN, at which control block does it exists?
Regards
Milard
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Rob Scott
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:00:43 +0300 Mil Hashoul smil...@gmail.com wrote:
:Hi,
:I know that I am doing something that IBM does not support.
:My next question is how could I get the JES2AUX address space into ALE
:table of my job? what is the STOKEN, at which control block does it exists?
As it is
ASSBSTKN - has the STOKEN for the address itself, I need to reach the
address space before I get to this information, it has to be reserved in
JES primary address space in order to be reached.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul
The OP seems to be under the impression that adding an foreign ASID STOKEN to
the home PASN-AL will magically grant access to all spaces on the foreign
ASID's PASN-AL.
Using the STOKEN for JES2AUX address space and adding it to the OP's job
PASN-AL using CHKEAX=NO will not grant access to the
Gentlemen
I have access to most relevant file types/systems except of ZFS (I have HFS)
I would like somebody who has both C license and ZFS files to compile the below
code and run it with PARM='/some/ZFS/file' and send me or post the results. I
need to know exactly how fldata sees that stuff.
Anyone using fwrite_unlocked() successfully? Per TFM I have
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED 1
ahead of any #includes (including stdio.h, of course).
Still, I am getting
CCN5274 (S) The name lookup for fwrite_unlocked did not find a
declaration.
Anyone
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Anyone using fwrite_unlocked() successfully? Per TFM I have
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED 1
I think the following define is required prior to including stdio.h
#define _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT 1
Sam
ahead of any
Sorry, yes, that is what I meant. Cut-and-pasted the wrong line from the
source file. Correct paste follows:
#define _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT 1
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Monday, July 29,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Sorry, yes, that is what I meant. Cut-and-pasted the wrong line from the
source file. Correct paste follows:
#define _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT 1
very odd ... I looked in sys1.cee.sceeh.h(stdio) and found
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:40:43 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote::
o Make the product comfortable to those accustomed to Perl.
o Make the product comfortable to those accustomed to MVS.
In other contexts, I've referred to the options as horizontal and
vertical consistency. ...
And I wonder
Yes, I saw that also.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 11:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Any clues on fwrite_unlocked()
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:19 AM,
This was posted on the VM newsgroup and l thought I would pass it along
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/opinion/Evolving-IT-needs-and-capabil
ities-restart-mainframe-vs-server-debate?asrc=EM_NLT_22746667utm_medium=EM
Nobody is going to want higher availability for less money! That is just
silly :)
Pete Eggebeen
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainframe Storage Management
Kohl's Corporation
(920) 207-0108 (Cell)
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.comwrote:
This was posted on the
Just for the academically inclined among us ?
a) The article was written by Sander van Vugt
b) Sander van Vlugt went to a University exactly TWENTY years ago...
c) He earns his bread money by running around and training people how to
implement LINUX
kerne...@absoftwareconsultants.com (AbsKerneels) writes:
Note: On the back of the last weeks Economist ? Oracle claims they can
give you TWICE the performance at 33% of the cost of an IBM true BLUE
solution.
note that tpc benchmarks include total cost numbers per operation ... if
the mainframe
I'm getting a few Changed File Systems messages in this health check
where I changed the mount parm in BPXPRMxx after the file system was
already mounted. Without unmounting and remounting the file systems is
there any way to clear the health check?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa,
Mike,
I really appreciate your response. I am someone that was asked to oversee RMM
and am not completely familiar with the workings of RMM and with that said I
would like to see an example supplied and discussed in the I C manual under
the chapter titled Monitoring the Space Used by the
I predict that one day everyone on Earth will be connected to one giant IBM
Mainframe and all share in the payment! Of course, I passed on a job at
Microsoft when there were 18 people working there because I didn't think
PC's going anywhere
Duf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On a z/OS 1.13 system (not mine, but a friend's who will rename unnamed). I
can't do a cut and paste from there, but I will accurately transcribe what
I see.
On a zFS filesystem
FILE /u/joarmc/ openned successfully
FILE NAME: /u/joarmc
PDS GROUP: PO 0 MEM 0 DIR 0 PDSE 0
VSAM GROUP: VSAM 0 RLS
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:50:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
And I wonder further, if I have autoconversion enabled, and I'm
processing an ASCII (tagged) file with sed or awk and my
purportedly portable script has \nnn octal escape sequences
to match nondisplayable code points, will those match
Umm, isn't that the Internet? Mainframes, Servers, and PCs able to
access almost anything.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Duffy Nightingale, SSPI
du...@soundsoftware.us wrote:
I predict that one day everyone on Earth will be connected to one giant IBM
Mainframe and all share in the payment!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
This was posted on the VM newsgroup and l thought I would pass it along
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/opinion/Evolving-IT-needs-and-capabil
Thanks John
ZA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
:: -Original Message-
:: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of Ze'ev Atlas
:: Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 6:55 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: Re: Establishing and using Unix file system and USS under z/OS
snip
:: main(int
I don't think that it can if the code is invoked from the shell itself. But
it could be if someone did an exec() passing in a 0. Why would they do
that? I don't know of any reason.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:01 PM, retired mainframer
retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote:
:: -Original Message-
Because the for statement parameters initialize c to 1, there is actually
no way for c to ever be 0 at that point. c is not an argument to the
program, it is just a local variable.
Of course, a good optimizer will eliminate the superfluous test as always
true and generate no code for it.
If
If the question
| Can this ever be false?
is really ellipsis for the question: Can this ever be false the first
time it is tested?
the answer is no. If not, not.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com (Mike Schwab) writes:
Umm, isn't that the Internet? Mainframes, Servers, and PCs able to
access almost anything.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013j.html#59 Mainframe vs Server - The Debate
Continues
major forces attempted to prevent it from happening ... and when
snip
:: main(int argc, char *argv[])
:: {
:: int c;
:: int d;
:: int i;
:: FILE * mypds;
::
:: for ( c = 1 ; c argc ; c++)
:: {
::if (c 0)
Can this ever be false?
I copied it from a code that started from zero and shortened it for the simple
thing I needed;
What does If not, not mean? Can the answer sometimes not be no? That
would mean the test evaluates to false.
The code sets the value to 1 and then increments the value some number of
times. Nowhere in the code is the value reset or decremented. How does
that allow any condition other than the
On a zFS filesystem
FILE /u/joarmc/ openned successfully
FILE NAME: /u/joarmc
PDS GROUP: PO 0 MEM 0 DIR 0 PDSE 0
VSAM GROUP: VSAM 0 RLS __NORLS
VSAM TYPE __NOTVSAM
PS GROUP: PS 0 F 0 V 0 U 1 S 0
HFS GROUP: HFS 1
This means that fldata sees ZFS the same way it sees HFS which is what I'd
thought
33 matches
Mail list logo
