Re: list of cobol load modules and their cobol version

Would AMBLIST LISTIDR be of help? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roy Reynolds Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 7:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: list of cobol load modules and their cobol version I need to

Re: list of cobol load modules and their cobol version

Have you looked at COBANAL on CBT(File 321)? In a message dated 8/6/2017 9:58:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time, roy.reyno...@ucop.edu writes: Can anyone suggest a way to best approach this? The process must not require a third party tool we probably don't have and probably can't buy. TIA

list of cobol load modules and their cobol version

I need to provide a list of cobol modules and the Cobol version they were compiled with from a REXX program. There are many large PDS libs to process. These may include non-Cobol load modules so I need to be able to identify which are Cobol. I know I can get the member list for each PDS into a

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

Thanks for the additional info, We have 40 mod-54s and 90 mod-27s - all sms managed. The program tool is ICETOOL. The volumes are most of the time empty only in use by temp data sets. I might have to monitor the usage during execution. //SPDT02 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:34:42 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >> Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ? > >Theo, > >It would be best to avoid concatenation with referback due to the >potential problems caused by the system restriction described here in

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

> Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ? Theo, It would be best to avoid concatenation with referback due to the potential problems caused by the system restriction described here in the second bullet:

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

Since I do not know this tool you are using or what it will do, it might be possible to use something like SORT to do what you want. Then you may not have this issue. 1) How man volumes are in the pool? How many 54s and how many 27s a) If not SMS, then how to do drive the allocation to

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

Some additional questions 1) How man volumes are in the pool? How many 54s and how many 27s 2) How large will the allocation be? Using 16 extents for the dataset (this may vary), then this is 2000 + (2000*15) or 32,000 cylinders total for the file. Is there sufficient space? 3) How

Vector processing instructions

Folks, Recently I was working with vector processing on z13 and noticed that we have 128bit add and sub instructions but no multiply(correct me here but the multiply is on 64bit) or divide. Any idea on how to convert the 128bit signed/unsigned binary integer to packed decimal. If

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

Thanks Bob, I will try this parameter. On our QA system the work pool consists of only model-54s and we do not have this issue. Regards Theo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: 06 August 2017

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

Oops! I meant the TEMP DDs (TEMP1 and TEMP2) Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 5:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC026I - 637-BC Theo, S637 - BC

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

Theo, S637 - BC The last known volume for the data set could not be located while reading a multivolume DASD data set. I have personally never seen the above. But based on the space you

IEC026I - 637-BC

Hi, We have a batch job that abends with the above code when creating a temp file on a model-54 volume. We are in the middle of a data migration, and model-54s are being allocated to this pool. However, we still have model-27s which will be removed at a later stage. What I have done to bypass