Mike Schwab wrote:
>Hard cap the test system, soft cap the production system?
There's no particular reason for the soft cap in this scenario, right?
In addition to the other suggestions mentioned, including the most elegant
one (which I like), sometimes it's possible to throttle the demand side
Hi
Cross posted
Is there anyone who has included XCOM logmode table in ISTINCLM. In which
line under ISTINCLM to be inserted ? Any specific ASMA90 JCL to assemble
the ISTINCLM post modifying the source code ?
Jake
--
For
With a lot of off-list help, I finally got this working. Appears that I skipped
way too many SHARE What's New in SDSF sessions over the past few years. Here's
a summary of how to get it working in z/OS 2.1+.
-- Displaying inline SYSIN will work only on the ST(atus) display, not
O(output) or
On 29/08/2018 12:28 AM, Tom Ross wrote:
You can't argue with that! Almost as easy as JavaScript:)
let obj =3D JSON.parse('{ "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"}');
Is there a COBOL equivalent to JSON.stringify?
Yes! It is the JSON GENERATE statement, available in 2016 in COBOL V6.1
Tony,
10-4 copy that Tony
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:06 PM Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I guess the question is:
>
> Why is it ok for the IOCP, but not ok for the IODEF?
>
> Sounds like someone in the z/os group IODEF programmer did not talk to
> the hardware guys.
>
> Tony Thigpen
>
> Neubert, Kevin
Until your TSO session times out or is cancelled? 15 or 30 minutes or no limit?
I was once asked how to solve a problem where two users updating the
same screen ended up creating invalid keys with some data from each
screen (a base record and one record per text line). My suggestion
was to
Hard cap the test system, soft cap the production system? Then the
test system can't exceed its percent, even if the CPU is not 100%.
The soft cap would allow the production system to get extra cycles if
the test system isn't using its full share.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:13 PM Martin Packer
On 29/08/2018 6:41 AM, Gord Tomlin wrote:
It would appear that the answer to your question is here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.izua700/IZUHPINFO_API_PutWriteDataSet.htm
Under "Custom headers":
X-IBM-Obtain-ENQ
This header is optional;
Hard to say without more info. PARMS vs RACF. Some stuff was moved to SDSFAUX
and may require additional measures.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.isfa500/resjspp.htm
In a message dated 8/28/2018 5:24:50 PM Central Standard Time,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:01:37 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>A colleague noticed that SDSF INPUT ON is not showing a SYSIN DD * data set.
>It's supposed to, right? OTOH SJ for the job shows everything including inline
>input. This is z/OS 2.3.
>
"?" display, not "O" or "H", right?
My
That's what I was afraid of, but was hoping.
Thanks, Martin.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 4:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: cross
INPUT ? shows either ON or OFF according to the most recent command, but the
SYSIN data set does not show up either way.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
Then the two WLMs can’t cooperate - and aren’t even aware of each other’s
state. :-(
Manual shifting the weights - via BCPii - might be doable.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 28 Aug 2018, at 22:11, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Sorry, no sysplex.
>
> Rex
>
> -Original
Hi Martin,
Sorry, no sysplex.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin Packer
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 3:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: cross LPAR priority and cycle stealing
Isn't it an SDSF Parm? WHO will show GROUP.
In a message dated 8/28/2018 4:02:03 PM Central Standard Time,
jesse1.robin...@sce.com writes:
It's supposed to, right? OTOH SJ for the job shows everything including inline
input. This is z/OS 2.3.
A colleague noticed that SDSF INPUT ON is not showing a SYSIN DD * data set.
It's supposed to, right? OTOH SJ for the job shows everything including inline
input. This is z/OS 2.3.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
Are these LPARs in the same Sysplex? Two beneficial effects if they are:
1) You could - with IRD Weight Management - have weights shifted between
the LPARs.
2) Sysplex PI for important works comes into play.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 28 Aug 2018, at 21:52, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
Hello list,
Hypothetical scenario is a single machine with 2 LPARs on it, each LPAR is
defined as having 50% of the capacity of the entire machine, uncapped across
the board. In this scenario, if both LPAR1 and LPAR2 are running flat out,
each LPAR will take 50% of the machine. If one of the
On 2018-08-28 16:18, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:25:57 -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The question about serialization is up to the consumer of the
REST interface. For instance, if editing a dataset the caller
can request that the ENQ on the dataset be held to keep
others from
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:25:57 -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>The question about serialization is up to the consumer of the
>REST interface. For instance, if editing a dataset the caller
>can request that the ENQ on the dataset be held to keep
>others from editing the file.
This still doesn't
Tom Sims wrote:
Greetings.
I am in the process of upgrading a client's zOS 2.1 systems to zOS 2.3,
which means among the many other challenges, configuring a working
zOSMF. It was up for some time on the 2.1 test system, however not
until the 2.2 repackaging retro-fit was applied.
A
I guess the question is:
Why is it ok for the IOCP, but not ok for the IODEF?
Sounds like someone in the z/os group IODEF programmer did not talk to
the hardware guys.
Tony Thigpen
Neubert, Kevin wrote on 08/28/2018 12:29 PM:
Don't believe FICON supports BCTC. If ESCON is no longer an
>On 28/08/2018 1:11 AM, Tom Ross wrote:
>>> On 22/08/2018 11:51 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
>>>
COBOL does not seem like a great choice either to me personally, but so=
>me=3D
folks, and especially some shops, are most comfortable with COBOL.
>> The JSON PARSE statement in COBOL is the
Don't believe FICON supports BCTC. If ESCON is no longer an option for you,
believe you'll need to look at the TCP/IP for NJE protocol instead.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent:
I ran into the exact problem yesterday and after downloading, installing in
RACF and adding them to the SHOPZ keyring everything is now working.
On 8/27/18, 9:11 AM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jousma, David"
wrote:
>So, there are a couple of certs needed. Obviously,
I am trying to move my JES2 to RSCS 'NJE over BSC' connect from ESCON to
FICON.
JES2 requires that the device is set up as BCTC.
This works on ESCON:
CHPID PATH=(CSS(0),C1),SHARED,PARTITION=((HKYPROD,UPHT),(=)),
PCHID=1C1,TYPE=CNC
CNTLUNIT
Gilson,
Did you set up this major node in vtam tables?
Dan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 10:14 AM, Gilson Cesar de Oliveira
wrote:
Dear list:
We have configured an NJE connection using the following statements in JES2
PARM:
APPL(APPL01) NODE=31
CONNECT
Greetings.
I am in the process of upgrading a client's zOS 2.1 systems to zOS 2.3,
which means among the many other challenges, configuring a working
zOSMF. It was up for some time on the 2.1 test system, however not
until the 2.2 repackaging retro-fit was applied.
A sentence I encounter
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:01:20 -0400, Edward Finnell wrote:
>https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/08/27/globalfoundries-drops-push-for-next-gen-7nm-semiconductor-tech
>
>Don't know what this means for Z. Sure there'll be more to come.
>
As I read, and remember from a few years ago:
Dear list:
We have configured an NJE connection using the following statements in JES2
PARM:
APPL(APPL01) NODE=31
CONNECT NODEA=1,MEMBA=1,NODEB=31,MEMBB=1
N(31) NAME=NODE01,PATHMGR=YES,CONNECT=(YES,30)
In VTAMLST we have the following definitions:
VBUILD TYPE=CDRSC
Tom,
The program executes in key zero & supervisor mode. this is how it get
control. Not sure I can write it in Cobol.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:16 PM Tom Ross
wrote:
> >On 22/08/2018 11:51 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> >> *Personally* I agree, but different languages for different folks. Some
>
Hi,
I submitted an RFE to add commas to large numbers is ftp client messages
The link is here
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=124103
Gadi
? ?? ? ?? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ??
??. ?? , ?? ??? ?,
32 matches
Mail list logo
