Hello everyone,
Is the format of this command output documented anywhere?
Would like to spin some automation around this and want to know how to parse
the output returned..
Thanks in advance.
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
MARKSANDSPENCER.COM
Unless
On 10/05/2018 10:55 AM, Mark Regan wrote:
> https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-mainframe-containers-grow-more-secure/
>
>From the first paragraph of the above article:
“In the 1960s, IBM's 650 mainframe operating system had two modes, MFT
and MVT, in which process got its own address space and
Messages like *** WARN 04 and !!!ERROR 04 are probably not coming from IBM or
an ISV.
However, customers can write messages like that from the IBM ACS routine or
from an allocation manger like CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement or some of
the other competitors in that area which were
Binary DL for ZZSA is located at the CBTTAPE website in Jan Jaeger's area:
http://www.cbttape.org/~jjaeger/
I don't know if source was ever available, but the Hercules Yahoo group could
probably answer that question better than I can.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Well, as usual you told me something I didn't know - the CONSOLE=SYSC
option in SA Dump :) So I looked at my JCL the last time I created
tapes for SA ICKDSF/DFDSS. ICKDSF has no options (you just IEBGENER
from SAMPLIB) but DFDSS does have the OPERCNSL option - it just doesn't
seem to have
List -
I am having a discussion on how a GDG is handled based on the DISP. I was
always working from the position that the use of MOD changes JCL behavior
slightly with a dataset. My understanding is: If using MOD then if the dataset
does not exist, it is treated as NEW and if it exists then
The default for Mounts is PRIVATE. This is controlled in VATLSTxx.
To test you can Mount a storage volume and a public volume with the MOUNT
command===>M 225,vol=(SL,TSO225),USE=STORAGE ===>M
235,vol=(SL,TEMP01),USE=PUBLIC
In a message dated 10/5/2018 4:28:57 PM Central Standard
We don't have ZZSA, so I can't comment on the original question. But we
happened to do an IPL today on a sandbox system, so I watched it on the 3270
integrated console.
I was seeing messages from the system until it was shut down. Continued
watching for a while, then got distracted. When I
Without SMS you will need to have DASD volumes mounted as
PRIVATE/PUBLIC/STORAGE. I believe without the PUBLIC or STORAGE volumes you
will have a hard time allocating new dataset or temp datasets. I would think
any datasets that are cataloged should get found through the proper catalog
How do you create your ISPF Profile Dataset?
Do you have a REXX/CLIST for your TSO Logon proc that allocates the files
needed for TSO/ISPF?
You might be able to tailor that to not use SMS.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Vinoth M
>
And, if memory serves, likely mount the volume as Storage, associate it
with an esoteric name in HCD, activate the configuration, and put the
esoteric name you chose into the TSO user profiles. But it's been a
long, long time...
Chuck Kreiter wrote:
You will probably need to put something
Is this a cloned LPAR ? Seems you have cloned the Control dataset too and
it is expecting the same behaviour.
What does
D SMS, ACTIVE says
On Fri 5 Oct, 2018, 9:18 PM Vinoth M, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have build a new system and we are bringing this system without SMS
> configuration.
> We
BMC MainView SRM StopX37/II, actually.
http://documents.bmc.com/products/documents/39/79/123979/123979.pdf
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 11:06 AM
To:
Stop x37
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for the autocorrect issues
> On Oct 5, 2018, at 13:05, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>
> STOPX-37 :(
>
>
> Carmen Vitullo
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Robert E Longabaugh"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018
And ACC/SRS from DTS Software.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jackson, Rob
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 2:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [Originated Externally]Re: S106 abends after copying into LINKLIST
[External Email]
Hah, I'll
Hah, I'll help too: BMC's MainView SRM StopX37.
Also, Tivoli Advanced Allocation Manager from IBM.
There are probably others.
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Longabaugh, Robert E
Sent: Friday,
STOPX-37 :(
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Robert E Longabaugh"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 1:03:52 PM
Subject: Re: S106 abends after copying into LINKLIST
" Now my memory is fading, what is the name of that third party product which
" Now my memory is fading, what is the name of that third party product which
could intercept x37 abends and then dynamically fix it for you? "
CA Allocate does that and many other things. Another ISV markets the one you
are thinking of, and its name matches up with what you said it does.
You will probably need to put something in VATLSTxx. Read the init and tuning
guide for that parmlib member.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vinoth M
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 1:18 PM
To:
Hi All,
We have build a new system and we are bringing this system without SMS
configuration.
We got the VTAM, TSO, TCPIP up and we are ready to login TSO, when we login
to TSO, the ISPF profiles are not getting allocated, since it’s pointing to
SMS dataset but we have disabled SMS.
May I know,
Ha ha ha. I did all of that in the early 1980's, then again in the early
1990's. Both companies were a manufacturing company.
Both cases took "month-end" from 5 days to 5 hours.
Matthew
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:10:24 +, Pesce, Andy wrote:
>That article is just full of all the right
https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-mainframe-containers-grow-more-secure/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I just tested ZZSA under Hercules and like I thought, when you connect
via Hercules TN3270 to simulate a console, after IPL no ZZSA messages
appear until you press Enter. That means ZZSA sits waiting for an
interrupt from a 3270 device, and uses that device for the rest of the
communication.
I've tested ZZSA under Hercules - Thanks to Sam Golob's fine work - but I
didn't see how to define a console as an HMC integretated console (hmcs) ?
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) <
Mainframe Systems Programmer – RavenTek
Oh... you mean HMC console. New answer: I did not try that, but prior
to going to that site I had never user ZZSA before so I tested it under
Hercules, and that simulates the HMC console I believe, so I'd bet the
answer is yes.
On 10/5/2018 8:07 AM, Tom Brennan wrote:
I used (well mostly
I used (well mostly watched) ZZSA work via ICC with no problems. That
was a couple of years ago on a new z13s with OSA 5S cards.
On 10/5/2018 4:58 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) wrote:
Does anyone know if the ZZSA tool (stand alone utilities) on the CBTTape can
use the HMC Integrated
Overallocate PDS directories! Or change IPL/NIP processing so that everhing can
be PDSE.
I had to walk to school. There were sidewalks all the way, so walking a mile or
so was no problem.
My reading of the "good old days" before my time is that they were
characterized by:
High infant
Unfortunately, crypto card utilization is a complex thing because the HSM cards
themselves can execute multiple operations simultaneously, depending on the mix
your applications are sending it. A simple example is the fact that the cards
have completely independent hardware for symmetric key
And does anybody know whether it supports the HMC 3270 interface?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) <01d7f21a6167-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
I use the CSVDYNEX interface extensively and it has been nothing but
bulletproof in all of my experience. Kudos!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 6:20 AM
To:
Practically a guarantee that **someone** out there will...
/Tom Sims
On 10/5/2018 3:45 AM, John Eells wrote:
Unlike some other memories, nobody will miss the "good
old days."
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Same here, except ZFSes are in an SMS pool (once a Coug, always a Coug!).
Tom Sims
On 10/4/2018 11:37 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
Mod-27, with the ZFS on a separate SMS managed Mod-27
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Peter Relson wrote:
>When the facility was developed, we took a stab at which existing exits that
>we thought were most likely to be of help to the most customers. And I'd hope
>that new exits use it.
That was one of the best stabs I got from Big Blue. It saved me an unneeded IPL
when one of
Otherwise you can hook the standard LOAD/LINK/ATTACH SVCs.
Please do not do that. There is a long history of applications getting
this wrong.
It is unfortunate that hooking of any SVC was ever viewed as acceptable
practice.
But in the absence of suitable exits, it can be understandable.
assuming we are careful to return R15=0 in our exit routines and not
change
anything in the passed parameters, could that still affect or override in
any way the results of the default or system exit routines already in
effect for those exit points?
No, it could not.
(Now why certain IBM
Does anyone know if the ZZSA tool (stand alone utilities) on the CBTTape can
use the HMC Integrated Console?
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) <
Mainframe Systems Programmer - RavenTek Solution Partners
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/05/the_only_way_is_up_baby_ibm_uk_sales_down_profit_down_staff_headcount_down/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
John Eells wrote:
>I expect that we will err on the side of more free space pretty soon to help
>alleviate out of space problems in this new(er) era of larger system software
>volumes, particularly because system software is such a small fraction of the
>disk space requirements for nearly any
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
I sympathize with IBM's predicament in reading the future maintenance tea
leaves. The 'fix rate' for a product might be subject to guesstimation from
past experience. But the effects of future enhancements like SPEs and customer
requirements are a bundle of
Mod-27, with the ZFS on a separate SMS managed Mod-27
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jousma, David
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:30 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SYSRES Volume Size (Was: S106 abends ...)
>
> Just to
40 matches
Mail list logo
