The input to ICKDSF when you format the volume.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Peter [dbajava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2020 12:22 AM
To:
Hello
Thank you so much
How do we determine the location of vtoc and index ? Is it possible to
place all the mod 27 in same location of cylinder and tracks ?
On Sat, 4 Jul, 2020, 9:44 PM Lizette Koehler,
wrote:
> It depends
>
> If the volume would have one dataset on it, like my SPOOL
Well, DDG claims to be an anonymous amalgamater (their IP address shows up in
the search engines, not yours.)
Neither the google search page nor the advanced search page has a verbatim
option. One of the reasons I hate google is their propensity to hide useful
features when the don't take them
Do yoi have a URL for the current PCOM for OS/2?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Grant Taylor [023065957af1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent:
On 4 Jul 2020 18:58:36 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:)
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
DDG is an amalgamater; it retains the spurious hits from,
e.g., google. It's good for what it does, but it's not a
"do what I asked for" search engine.
I use DDG, and I don't think
Search engines are definitely not my strong suit, but if you meant 'aggregator'
or metasearch engine, I don't think that is correct. Dogpile.com for example is
definitely a metasearch engine, creating the result set of hits from google+
bing+whatever else, but I don't believe DDG operates that
DDG is an amalgamater; it retains the spurious hits from, e.g., google. It's
good for what it does, but it's not a "do what I asked for" search engine.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
" Did I mention that I hate google? I wish that there were a real search
engine, one where I would be a customer rather than a product and in which I
only got hits that matched my search criteria."
I use https://duckduckgo.com/ whenever possible, and google when I have to.
-Original
If SSI doesn't support 2.4, I would suggest rewriting the code to use SAPI;
after that moving to new releases should be much easier.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
To clarify, I believe that such a co-op would need to identify the potential
issues and hash them out up front in order for the idea to be viable. In some
cases there could be a consensus, in others an arbitrary choice might be
necessary. What is important is avoiding unpleasant surprises as
> Pennies. The Toolkit is highly worth it.
I was only confirming Steve's understanding that it was sepatrly priced, not
arguing against licensing it. In fact, I consider it almost mandatory that
developers use control flow macros, and the Toolkit set is the obvious one to
standardize on.
--
> Funny though, because isn't this exactly what Time Sharing Option was,
> when it was first introduced?
TSO was a way to run unprivileged applications interactively, with internal
users, external users or a mixture. Authorized commands, TESTAUTH, etc. came
much later. CP=67 is a better model
> STCK does not show such a restriction.
You're correct. Neither does STCKE. Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Binyamin Dissen
> Before anyone gets upset,
If anybody gets upset it will be because of "just because you feel z/OS ought
to be free (as in beer"; few if any posters here have suggested such a belief.
What I have seen is posters asking for affordable hobbyist license fees.
I'm not the one suggesting the
Incorrect.
STCK does not show such a restriction.
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 23:39:44 + Seymour J Metz wrote:
:>> (Do CCWs still require doubleword alignment? PSWs? STCK? CDS?)
:>
:>Yes.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should
> Back in the olde daze, (not sure whether it is still true), loading a
> register from an address not aligned would cause an abend, or poor
> performance.
The change came with the byte oriented operand feature of the 360/85, and only
applied to unprivileged instructions. If your code depended
> (Do CCWs still require doubleword alignment? PSWs? STCK? CDS?)
Yes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
I am not sure what you are trying to achieve in the big picture but assembler
is not something you can spend a short time on and expect to have something
that works.
Rexx -- you could study it for 5 minutes and be able to write SAY "Hello World"
and you would have a working first program. Not
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 22:34:47 +0100, Rupert Reynolds wrote:
>The question on my mind is "What did you want to achieve?"
>
>If you wanted an aligned fullword for OW0007AC then you need to decide
>whether to align REPORT07 2 bytes after a fullword boundary (precede it
>with CNOP 2,4 from memory) or
Hi Nguyen,
In practice I don't think the NOALIGN option is used very frequently, probably
because some instructions have alignment dependencies and will generate an
error or warning when the instruction operand is not aligned as expected. There
are undoubtedly exceptional cases where NOALIGN
OW0007OB is only 2 bytes followed by 2 unused bytes.
The reason is that OQ0007AC is defines as a full word and thus has to be
full word aligned at address 000804. If you had defined OW0007AC as just
XL4 it would've started at 000802. Similarly, if you had defined it as D,
then it would have to
The question on my mind is "What did you want to achieve?"
If you wanted an aligned fullword for OW0007AC then you need to decide
whether to align REPORT07 2 bytes after a fullword boundary (precede it
with CNOP 2,4 from memory) or whether you want slack bytes in the record.
Back in the olde
So in REPORT07, you have: 0CL274. This will not reserve any storage,
because the multiplier is zero. (7FE).
In the next variable, you have XL2. This is hex, length 2. Notice the
location counter is at exactly the same place at REPORT07. (7FE).
In the next variable you have XL2 again. This is
Right. It is two bytes. It occupies two bytes, 804 and 805. The assembler has
then inserted two bytes of unused slack to that the following field -- defined
as a fullword -- is fullword (multiple of four) aligned.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I tried the option NOALIGN when assembling , and it is OK now.
So it means that i should examine my assembling listing to check if variables
are not separated by some bytes for the alignement ?
When i put all the variable to Character type i don't have any aligment ...
In my case i see the
It is not 4 bytes, it is just that the following field is full word aligned. If
the following field were FL4 rather than F, you will see the alignment change.
I think there is an option to turn off alignment, but don't remember ever using
it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Dear lister,
I am learning assembler on my own, i have something strange that i can't
explain , please help me to understand
Here is a section of my code :
608 DBLWORD DS DDBLE WORD
609 PATTERN6 DC X'402020202120'
610 *
611 REPORTO7 DS 0CL274
612 OW0007DB DS XL2
613
It depends
If the volume would have one dataset on it, like my SPOOL Volumes, then they
are very small
If like in my TSO Pool there are lots of tiny (15 track or less) then I make
them huge.
So it all depends on
What the intent of the volume is (1 dataset vs Many Datasets)
What size the
IBM guidelines are to support a volume filled with minimum sized
datasets (1 track / 21 cylinders EAV).
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ickug00/ick40743.htm
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 5:12 PM Peter wrote:
>
> Hello Group
>
> Apology for being ignorant.
>
Hello Group
Apology for being ignorant.
Is there a formula or any constraints for initialising a specific dasd Mod ?
How do arrive to a specific vtoc and index value while initialising a dasd ?
Please help me to understand
Peter
I was using the term 'CPU upgrade' loosely as going from one 'model' to another
with or without a change in technology. It's true that IBM offers (sometimes
deep) software discounts for technology upgrades. IBM, however, is only one
player. Not long after tiered pricing was foisted on us, ISVs
I mange a data center where we provide both 'out-sourcing' and DR
facilities. Several years ago, we tried to put some sort of co-op
together for developers or hobbyist, but nobody seemed interested.
I have extra processors on hand and I also have other processors that
are used only at
The easiest hardware upgrade by far is turning on more CPs or bumping
the aggregate CP capacity on existing hardware. Raising the MSU
capacity on existing hardware never decreases software cost and usually
increases software costs, sometimes very significantly. Note that Jesse
refers to a CPU
Thank you Giliad, good to know that there's at least one other person who cares
about fonts in 3270!
>From what I remember, PCOMM 13.x added support for font scaling, so that
>should help things look better, I'd assume.
However, as for font choice itself, I think it's still the same bunch.
Now
Hi All,
Is it possible to configure PCOMM (V6, if it matters) to use a font of choice?
Specifically, I'm interested in "Lucida Console" font, which displays better,
clearer at any size.
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I would assume the goal to be 'use PC disks as mainframe DASD'.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 3:46 AM kekronbekron
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Would love to know more about what your FICON buddy is working on Grant.
> If you wanna share (prefer off-list?), please email :)
Before anyone gets upset, this is ONLY my opinion, I'm not trying to force
anyone to do or believe things the way I do, so please don't flame me just
because you feel z/OS ought to be free (as in beer) just because you want to
use it and don't think you should have to pay. I'm sure there are
37 matches
Mail list logo
