To connect two devices, you have a fiber pair. One fiber connects in
one direction, the other fiber connects in the other direction.
Disconnect one end. If you still have the one direction working, you
have disconnected the bad fiber. If both directions are now out, you
have disconnected the
What do you mean by "see CSYSTEM and LSYSTEM"is it definition or actual
status? If actual then one CPC can connect to the other -- so the fiber
link is working, while the other side cannot see CSYSTEM (you presumably
meant production can see only LSYSTEM, as local) -- which narrows the
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:07:17 -0500, Wendell Lovewell wrote:
>...
>and while:
>//FTPXFER EXEC PGM=FTP,REGION=4M,
>//
>PARM=('ENVAR("GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2=ON","GSK_TRACE=0x","GSK_TRACE_FILE=/tmp/gskc.trc")/(EXIT')
>
>...is possible, it pushes the limits of the PARM value's max length.
>
Charles: Password is in the clear, just like it's always been. The main
security is controlled by directory permissions on the server--it's really a
"dump it here". They can't even see what they've uploaded. The download
directory (stuff from us) is read-only. Like I said, "kicking and
The dataset name contains the time and by time I mean day of week and which
week it was processed. So if I’m looking for another dataset name that has
complementary information I could figure it out right away
That’s the only reason
I had originally coded a sort to look for particular data
The location of the DCB and other information is in proprietary structures
which are not available to the user. Also, because of buffering and
read-ahead, the record you are looking at may not be in the file the DCB is
currently pointing to.
I don't know what you are trying to do, but if you
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:35:37 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Yes, you can always do multiple precision that way, but there is a performance
hit, especially from those conditional branches. Maybe we need skip
instructions such as the 7090 had.
Some computer
The data is mostly binary
Huge vb files and lots of them
> On Sep 11, 2020, at 2:26 PM, Jousma, David
> <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Syncsort is a great tool, but why reinvent the wheel? Why not just run
>
> //SEARCH EXEC PGM=ISRSUPC,
Syncsort is a great tool, but why reinvent the wheel? Why not just run
//SEARCH EXEC PGM=ISRSUPC,
//PARM=(SRCHCMP,'ANYC')
//NEWDD DD DSN=concat.dsn1.DEV1,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=concat.dsn2,DISP=SHR
//OUTDD DD SYSOUT=*
I am using syncsort to search for records
So let’s say I concatenate 100 files
And the data I’m looking for is let’s say in the 50 th file
To get The dataset name of the 50 th file
I could do RDJFCB for the dcb with exlst type X’07’ and the dataset name that
I’m currently processing would
The E11 exit will not look at any file. It is a, shall we say, dumb exit.
If your question is what files Syncsort will look at in analyzing a
concatenated SORTIN, it will look at all of them. One of the things it is
trying to do is determine the input file size and the access method required
You can also use the CEEOPTS DD. Something like this:
//CEEOPTS DD *
ENVAR("GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2=1")
[...any other LE options you wish to use...]
/*
We also use this method of specifying TLS 1.2, but I seem to recall the
"official" method is to use AT-TLS instead. At the time we wanted to
OK.
I am going to *guess* that if it all works unless the client supports only TLS
1.1 then it is the server that is refusing anything less than 1.2. I guess you
have no control over that.
By the way TLSRFCLEVEL CCCNONOTIFY is a slight security exposure that some may
balk at.
No, there is no
Hey Charles,
No nuclear secrets here. I've been pulled kicking & screaming into adding this
level of security anyway.
I'm shooting for the absolute easiest way to give any z/OS and z/VSE customer
the ability to upload a file to a server that requires a secured connection. I
don't see a way
I’m looking into that
As an additional question
We have a huge number of files
When concatenating sortin
Is there anyway to determine which file the exit is analyzing. Typically a
program can do
A Rdjfcb x’07’ to determine that but you have the DCB wonder if there is
something you provide
If I understand what you want to do is to concatenate additional files to
SORTIN, then I would strongly urge you NOT to do that in the E11. You can, but
I would not be confident in the results.
By the time the E11 exit is called a certain amount of analysis of the files
has been done in the
Hi Roger,
Thanks for pointing that out to me, I missed it when I was looking. I'm still
not clear so let me say what I *think* it's saying and you can tell me if I'm
completely missing the mark.
If the criteria is left of the slash, it's straightforward, to be selected by
the offloader
Hi
The documentation isn’t real clear on this exit outside of the fact that it
states they are entered in the beginning of their associated phase
I would like to use this exit to dynamically add files to sortin
Would any one gave more info on this exit
Thanks
Okay, so the answer to my question "what are you trying to do that
PARM/SYSFTPD/INPUT does not solve?" is "force FTP to use TLS 1.2, because that
is the only variant that seems to work no matter what their RACF/ACF2/TSS
configuration is." Is that right?
> without installing certificates used
You might check the fiber path between the buildings. I think the link
budget on a CE LR is only 7db, so if you have some lossy fiber pairs and/or
patches you might be losing too much light.
Reference:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/sites/default/files/inline-files/536468_GA23-0367-13.pdf.
-
I am trying to add a second CPC to my environment and I am having an issue
getting my 2 z14s to connect via CE LR. On the 'new' system I see CSYSTEM and
LSYSTEM as expected but on the other side (current production) I can only see
CSYSTEM.
I have cleaned cables, toggled pchids(vchids), wrap
Should of realized it was in the Environment section of the service in fact
"Disabled/Enable for I/O or .."
sorry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: can
After some thinking:
the problem is: the parameters you are specifying are LE runtime
parameters,
so the question is, if FTP uses standard LE services and the LE runtime
(then it will work),
or if FTP is built using other techniques ... then it will not and all
the parameters before
the
IMO, you can also set the environment variables directly as follows:
//FTPXFER EXEC PGM=FTP,REGION=4292K,
//PARM=('POSIX(ON) ALL31(ON)',
// 'ENVAR("GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2=ON")/(EXIT')
no need to use a file like STDENV.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 10.09.2020 um 23:58 schrieb Wendell
24 matches
Mail list logo
