on links if you do
not recognize the sender.
PDSMAN does allow member name masking. So since you've gotten rid of PDSMAN,
that is the issue.
IEBCOPY is working as designed.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Benik, John E
Sent: Monday, October 30
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Benik, John E <01ace072c099-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 9:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Changes to IEBCOPY??
We recently uploaded the latest version of Tapetools. That was a success, but
when
We recently uploaded the latest version of Tapetools. That was a success, but
when we ran our version of $$CPYLIB which is shown below we had issues.
//COPYEXEC PGM=IEBCOPY
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//PDSIBM DD DSN=,DISP=SHR
//PDSOUT DD DSN=,DISP=SHR
//SYSINDD
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Benik, John E
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LDAP with TS7700 and/or DS8K's
I imagine HMC and LDAP would be for AOS access on the DS8K's, but it also
sounds like setting up the TS7700 would
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LDAP with TS7700 and/or DS8K's
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:35:36 +, Benik, John E
wrote:
>I saw several comments about HMC and LDAP, and I am curious is anybody using
>LDAP with their TS7700's or just using the management interface for
>authentication?
I saw several comments about HMC and LDAP, and I am curious is anybody using
LDAP with their TS7700's or just using the management interface for
authentication? I would also be curious if anybody has explored this option,
or is using it on the disk side but not the tape? It seems overly
If anybody has other ideas I would appreciate hearing about them, but I believe
we are at a point now that we can only download tape tools one way through
https.
Regards,
John Benik
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Benik, John E
Sent: Wednesday
redirection be useful?
>
> Except that the obstruction seems to be the client's firewall. Perhaps
> a proxy at the client end?
>
> And is there a friendly GUI on z/OS for fetching https resources? Such
> a thing might likewise be useful for cbttape.org resources also.
>
> Charlo
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 1:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Has anybody tried downloading a new version of tapetools recently
using FTPTOOLS or FTPTOOLX job.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:10:26 +, Benik, John E
>If you have an example or if you go into option 6 what do you
rewall?
I know there were some FTP address changes announced by IBm a few months ago -
I went to our network/firewall person and asked to open this up.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:34 AM Benik, John E <
01ace072c099-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> It appears the FTP funct
; directly to the mainframe,
and it worked fine.
You do not perhaps have this blocked on your firewall?
I know there were some FTP address changes announced by IBm a few months ago -
I went to our network/firewall person and asked to open this up.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:34 AM Benik, John E <
01ace
It appears the FTP function for downloading a new version of tapetools has been
shutdown.
public.dhe.ibm.com
EZA1554I Connecting to: public.southdata.ibm.com 170.225.126.18 port: 21.
EZA2590E connect error from initIPv4Connection - EDC8127I Connection timed out.
I have asked about this but have
I was wondering if anyone has ever automated the data retrieval of the
dayhsmry.txt file into the graphics and reporting spreadsheet? I have to
manually import the data each month, and sometimes forget to do it on the 1st.
Regards,
John Benik
This e-mail, including attachments, may include
I was wondering if anybody is routing any of their Tape tools reporting to
Splunk? Especially interested if you are doing this without using some other
third party software product.
Regards,
John Benik
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary
I'm wondering if there are others out there who have used tape assist to
migrate their tape data? Soon we will be using it to migrate to an IBM TS7700,
we are running into some minor issues but don't want to put any detailed
information here. If anybody else has experience using this product
Are there any good recommendations/suggestions on retaining DB2 Image Copies?
Specifically in an environment where all data is replicated. It is my belief
that we are retaining the data for Image Copies much longer than it needs to be
in many cases, but I'm not sure if there is a best
I'm wondering if any of you are currently using the RMM retention
method(expdt)? We are using it on one system and looking at implementing it on
all of our systems running RMM now that we are z/OS 2.3. If you are using it
can you share your experiences or issues you ran into migrating to
Thank you for all the feedback. Even though we are all virtual tape, I am
under the impression that not all the data residing on tape should be. Yes
it's virtual and therefore disk, but many of the JCL used today is old and
since there is no chargeback for tape, users continue to write their
We are not speaking of HSM data, but rather Physical Sequential files that are
being directed to tape. We will more than likely use SMS to control
allocations, but need to determine if some of the tape files are better
candidates for disk. Requesting the users to change their JCL is not an
out every virtual tape vendor that exists
(and those that don't any more) so I know where most of the pitfalls are.
Brian Westerman
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:47:14 +, Benik, John E <john_e_be...@optum.com>
wrote:
>Thank you for the replies. Yes we have implemented SMS tape wi
Thank you for the replies. Yes we have implemented SMS tape with our MTL and
since the libraries have to be defined to SMS it is our understanding that OAM
would have to be used for allocation purposes. I attended an OAM session at
Share this year and was trying to investigate if there is
We are using a DLM for our virtual tape library and have them defined as MTLs.
OAM starts without object tape support, I would like to know if this is
something we should look at adding, or does it not have any impact one way or
another?
Here is what OAM shows at startup.
22.16.22 S0169252
question
On 2/14/2018 12:23 PM, Benik, John E wrote:
> Yes I know that but our company is also moving away from VRS's in my opinion
> doing something like this...
>
> MCATTR(ALL)/* USE SMS MANAGEMENT. */ -
> RM(EXPDT(GDG(WHILECATALOG(UNTILEXPIRED),RETPD(0)) -
>
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Conley
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMM question
On 2/14/2018 11:18 AM, Benik, John E wrote:
> From: Benik, John E
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:22 AM
> To: 'IBM
From: Benik, John E
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:22 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: RMM question
We have been looking at changing from VRSEL to Retention Method processing.
However our understanding is that in Z/OS 2.3 a lot of the functionality
performed
25 matches
Mail list logo
