Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Regarding IEFA110I: Sadly, I see that the book mentions that this is "new" but the message itself isn't in the book. I will have someone look into that. I was surprised to see that the display did not show XCFAS (unless someone had used the PROGxx LNKLST UNALLOCATE statement), since by default

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

and that force The TMP to be on the LINKLST -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of CM Poncelet Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? Sure, Steve. I assumed

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? If the routine's APF'd loadlib is added to an APF'd STEPLIB, the STEPLIB will override the LNKLST CBT requirement. Meanwhile, APF-authorizing/unauthorizing a loadlib 'on the fly' can be done in batch with: "//* APF-AUTHORIZE: " "//ADDAPF EXE

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:09:38 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: On 2016-03-15 15:09, Tony Harminc wrote: >>> >> That probably needs an RFE, not an SR. Really, it should clarify: >> IKJ56236I PATH /usr/bin INVALID, FILENAME STEPLIB RESTRICTED > > Better yet, > IKJ56236I PATH /usr/bin INVALID, DDNAME

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On 15 March 2016 at 14:57, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > >alloc ddname(steplib) path('/usr/bin') > >IKJ56236I PATH /usr/bin INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED > > > >which is still complaining about STEPLIB, not '/usr/bin'. > > > >This surely calls for one

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:00:15 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >And just to be completely clear on the original message > >IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED > >This really does mean just what it says. It's the four DDNAMEs JOBLIB, >STEPLIB, JOBCAT, and STEPCAT themselves that are

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On 15 March 2016 at 12:46, Lindy Mayfield wrote: > > Thanks for the new stuff I learned by asking a mixed up question. But I > got it now. And just to be completely clear on the original message IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED This really does

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Beaver Sent: tiistaina 15. maaliskuuta 2016 17.34 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? CM - you are assuming that the guy with the question can issue console commands. I would NEVER let a general user near my console much less

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

f Of Dan D > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 8:32 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? > > CBT file 452 contains the STEPLIB TSO command. > > Dan D. (CBT File owner) > > "Steve Horein" <steve.hor...@gmail.com> wrote in me

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

, March 14, 2016 11:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? If the routine's APF'd loadlib is added to an APF'd STEPLIB, the STEPLIB will override the LNKLST CBT requirement. Meanwhile, APF-authorizing/unauthorizing a loadlib 'on the fly' can be done in batch

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

" "//* " Just my ha'pennyworth ... CP (retired sysprog) Steve Beaver wrote: The STEPLIB TMP will work -- The caveat this routine MUST be placed on the LNKLST

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

yworth ... CP (retired sysprog) Steve Beaver wrote: The STEPLIB TMP will work -- The caveat this routine MUST be placed on the LNKLST in an APF Authorized library. Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan D

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? CBT file 452 contains the STEPLIB TSO command. Dan D. (CBT File owner) "Steve Horein" <steve.hor...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<camjizqv9uxodkfmhiqp8quvs77sqbqrfgexcy3girxkbhvt...@mail.gmail.com>... > DSC is a product of

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield > > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 3:50 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: (External):Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? > > > > I love

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 3:50 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: (External):Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? > > I love Linux, but my real love is mainframe. I had a senior moment, and I > haven't been on mainframe a

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

323-715-0595 Mobile 626-302-7535 Office robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Cannot allocate Steplib

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

I love Linux, but my real love is mainframe. I had a senior moment, and I haven't been on mainframe as much as I like to be. It was SYSPROC that was commonly reallocated by CLIST and Rexx scripts in order to do testing in the right order test/dev/prod or whatever. Not STEPLIB. I think there

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Another little cutie that wiggled it's way in was CONCAT. For merging new DSNs to existing allocations. May have been on CBT first then some vendors started enhanced versions. In a message dated 3/13/2016 3:03:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time, eamacn...@yahoo.ca writes: about TSOLIB. It's

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Edward Finnell Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 1:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? Maybe that's why we got TSOLIB and ALTLIB for ISPF. Been so long, I wanna say mid eighties... In a message dated

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 08:13:11 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: >>What happens if the program that employs such a product was fetched from a >>program object with the (newfangled?) deferred/incremental load protocol? > >This is only one of the reasons that reallocating STEPLIB (and perhaps any >other

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 08:13:11 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: >If you don't like the STEPLIB that you're running with, then you ought to >design your application to run under a subtask that you can attach with a >TASKLIB that you open, so that module fetches will use the tasklib first. Or allocate

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

>What happens if the program that employs such a product was fetched from a >program object with the (newfangled?) deferred/incremental load protocol? This is only one of the reasons that reallocating STEPLIB (and perhaps any other system-allocated DD) is not supported. The operating system

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

I saw some documentation, dated 1981, talking about TSOLIB. It's been around a long time. -teD   Original Message   From: Edward Finnell Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 03:25 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib? Maybe that's why

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Maybe that's why we got TSOLIB and ALTLIB for ISPF. Been so long, I wanna say mid eighties... In a message dated 3/13/2016 12:31:22 A.M. Central Standard Time, eamacn...@yahoo.ca writes: products that allow(ed) dynamic allocation of steplib, but you never could do it with raw (native)

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

: Cannot allocate Steplib? On 12 March 2016 at 17:21, Lindy Mayfield <lindy.mayfi...@sas.com> wrote: > I just started getting this error, though I cannot remember the last time > I tried to (re)allocate steplib. > > IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED > This ha

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On 12 March 2016 at 17:21, Lindy Mayfield wrote: > I just started getting this error, though I cannot remember the last time > I tried to (re)allocate steplib. > > IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED > This has been the case since before the dawn of

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:39:24 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote: > >STEPLIB (or JOBLIB) is allocated and opened at step initiation, and it remains >open. >In order to change the allocation, I think you would first have to find the >DCB and >close it. Then you could change the allocation, and open the

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:21:46 +, Lindy Mayfield wrote: >I just started getting this error, though I cannot remember the last time I >tried to >(re)allocate steplib. > >IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED I think that reallocating STEPLIB is not so simple as performing

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Company -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 4:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Cannot allocate Steplib? I just started getting this error, though I cannot remember

Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?

Your TSOlogon proc would be a good place to look. Possibly a typo on the steplib concatenation. Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone -- Original message-- From: Lindy Mayfield Date: Sat, Mar 12, 2016 5:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU; Subject:Cannot allocate Steplib? I just

Cannot allocate Steplib?

I just started getting this error, though I cannot remember the last time I tried to (re)allocate steplib. IKJ56236I FILE STEPLIB INVALID, FILENAME RESTRICTED Something's funny because I'm sure I converted a clist to rexx 20+ years ago to loop through a listcat, pick out the steplibs, and put