Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-07 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Buckton, T. (Theo) wrote: >We have 40 mod-54s and 90 mod-27s - all sms managed. The program tool is >ICETOOL. The volumes are most of the time empty only in use by temp data >sets. I might have to monitor the usage during execution. This is totally different from your QA system with only

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Buckton, T. (Theo)
ilto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: 06 August 2017 05:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC026I - 637-BC Since I do not know this tool you are using or what it will do, it might be possible to use something like SORT to do what you want. Then you may

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Giliad Wilf
On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:34:42 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >> Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ? > >Theo, > >It would be best to avoid concatenation with referback due to the >potential problems caused by the system restriction described here in

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Sri h Kolusu
AIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 08/06/2017 02:11 AM > Subject: IEC026I - 637-BC > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > Hi, > > We have a batch job that abends with the above code when creating a > temp file on a model-54 volume. We a

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
to these volumes? Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 7:21 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IEC026I - 637-BC > > Some additiona

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
allocations (and where) is being done. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. > Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 2:50 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IEC026I

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Buckton, T. (Theo)
11:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC026I - 637-BC Oops! I meant the TEMP DDs (TEMP1 and TEMP2) Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 5:47 AM To: IBM

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Richards, Robert B.
Oops! I meant the TEMP DDs (TEMP1 and TEMP2) Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 5:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC026I - 637-BC Theo, S637 - BC

Re: IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Richards, Robert B.
: IEC026I - 637-BC Hi, We have a batch job that abends with the above code when creating a temp file on a model-54 volume. We are in the middle of a data migration, and model-54s are being allocated to this pool. However, we still have model-27s which will be removed at a later stage. What I have

IEC026I - 637-BC

2017-08-06 Thread Buckton, T. (Theo)
the issue is to disable the model-54s as I noticed that batch job does not abend if the temp file is written to the model-27s. Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ? IEC710I 82AF,APWKA2,NDCP351Z,SPDT02,CONCAT ANOTHER VOLUME EXPECTED IEC026I 637-BC,IFG0553P