n...@sce.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF term
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:47:38 +, Mick Graley wrote:
>
>I wish IBM would enhance ISPF so that it would set the screen mode to
>80x24 when I swap to my edit screen and back to 132x27 when I swap
>back to SDSF. I don't see that being too big a deal if you're not
>actually showing 2 logical screens
On 17/03/2016 5:08 AM, Patrick Loftus wrote:
Vista 3270 doesn't even have to be installed, either.
Once you've installed it on one machine, I've found you can dump the relevant
folders onto a USB stick, copy onto the work machine, and just execute the
vistaTN3270.exe file. I've not tried
On 19/03/2016 1:56 AM, nitz-ibm wrote:
Hi Barbara,
I use Attachmate Extra also. Depending on what I am doing, I use mod 2 (24x80),
mod 3 (32x80), mod 4 (43x80), or mod 5 (24x132). It depends de on what I am
doing. I also have 12 sessions defined, some with different background colors
that I
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Linda
Sent: perjantaina 18. maaliskuuta 2016 5.26
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Hi Skip,
I much prefer Tom's Vista3270 as well. But at work, there is only Attachmate.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
Hi Barbara,
I use Attachmate Extra also. Depending on what I am doing, I use mod 2 (24x80),
mod 3 (32x80), mod 4 (43x80), or mod 5 (24x132). It depends de on what I am
doing. I also have 12 sessions defined, some with different background colors
that I only use for one lpar. Open your session
W dniu 2016-03-17 o 13:27, David Crayford pisze:
On 17/03/2016 5:08 AM, Patrick Loftus wrote:
Vista 3270 doesn't even have to be installed, either.
Once you've installed it on one machine, I've found you can dump the
relevant folders onto a USB stick, copy onto the work machine, and
just
Hi All,
At my old employers we used Eicon Aviva for terminal emulation and it
was quite good, I liked it, lots of customization possible and it was
fast. At my current employer we use Microfocus Rumba and I'm not very
impressed with it! At home I've used X3270 on Linux and WC3270 on
Windows to
No. That's what I've got set.
Cheers,
Mick.
On 18 March 2016 at 18:09, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:47:38 +, Mick Graley wrote:
>>
>>I wish IBM would enhance ISPF so that it would set the screen mode to
>>80x24 when I swap to
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 6:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
W dniu 2016-03-17 o 14:15, David Crayford pisze:
> On 17/03/201
David Crayford wrote:
>> From the other hand, IBM PCOMM is huge, slow and damn expensive. It's quite
>> good as well, but I wouldn't want to pay for it.
>We have PComm here and I won't use it.
>It has keyboard lag
Perhaps it is your PC/Laptop operating system which has a very slow key
t; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
>
>
>> Maybe I'm bei
On 17/03/2016 9:04 PM, R.S. wrote:
And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally
giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that
price and customers would still bite his hand off!
AFAIK Nexus 3270 is even cheaper (and definitely the ...fastest, and
Anyone tried the WEBified ISPF with z/OSMF? Good, bad, indifferent?
I was looking at some of Peter van Dyke's Hidden treasures in ISPF. It
looks promising with default screen size of 264x160 and up to 4 sessions ala
3290. Guess if first showed up in 1.3. The session I was
looking at was
W dniu 2016-03-17 o 14:15, David Crayford pisze:
On 17/03/2016 9:04 PM, R.S. wrote:
And you can't beat the price, at $30 it's a steal. Tom is literally
giving it away, an amazing act of altruism. He could double that
price and customers would still bite his hand off!
AFAIK Nexus 3270 is
Well, it works, and is better than I expected, but if you're working all day in
ISPF, I'd choose a dedicated 3270 emulator.
TN3270 Plus I found was excellent - multiple tabbed sessions in 1 window.
That's the only other thing I wish Vista had.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:13:34 -0400, Edward
On 17/03/2016 9:36 PM, R.S. wrote:
Last, but not least for me: it is one of very few 3270 emulator which
*correctly* support polish characters.
Now that's a game changer!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
> Hi Barbara,
>
> I use Attachmate Extra also. Depending on what I am doing, I use mod 2
> (24x80), mod 3 (32x80), mod 4 (43x80), or mod 5 (24x132). It depends de on
> what I am doing. I also have 12 sessions defined, some with different
> background colors that I only use for one lpar. Open
Vista 3270 doesn't even have to be installed, either.
Once you've installed it on one machine, I've found you can dump the relevant
folders onto a USB stick, copy onto the work machine, and just execute the
vistaTN3270.exe file. I've not tried running it from a USB stick.you never
know,
Edward Finnell writes:
> LOGMODE D4C32XX3 is a standard VTAM logmode that has the "query terminal
> size" bit turned on. Works for any 3270 screen size whether standard or
> custom.
D4C32XX3 is fine for use with remote SNA LUs (which are how the
Comms Server TN3270E server presents its
I use 90x160 with TSO/ISPF/SDSF and with NetView, of course I'm using 24"
monitors when doing so.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM David Crayford wrote:
> We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web,
> Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we
On 12/03/2016 4:08 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Maybe switch out completely different UIs based on the detected screen
size?
If you detect 24x80, you could use a mode where each screen is like:
= Acme Product Interface (snarky mode) ===
What do you want to do?
a)
b)
c)
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:39:19 +, Robert Prins wrote:
>Tom Brennans's Vista tn3270, 62x160, on a full HD screen. Would like to set it
>even higher, but for some reason that fails.
I assume that you mean that the larger size is rejected by the host, not that
Vista fails.
I've configured Vista
Ditto concerning Vista3270.
99x134 for me.
Regards,
Silvio Camplani
zSeries Sr. Analyst, Systems Support
Bombardier
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, at 01:04 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> Tom Brennan is too modest to peddle his product, so I'll do it. Get a
> copy of Vista3270. Screen size
Maybe switch out completely different UIs based on the detected screen
size?
If you detect 24x80, you could use a mode where each screen is like:
= Acme Product Interface (snarky mode) ===
What do you want to do?
a)
b)
c)
Type a letter HERE> __ and press ENTER
On 2016-03-10 13:45, David Crayford wrote:
We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, Eclipse
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real estate
for todays customer.
I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots of
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:50:00 -0800, John Mattson wrote:
>I use Mod-5 and have been an advoc
On 3/11/2016 1:50 AM, Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform) wrote:
My one bugbear is products that don't support screen sizes greater than 24x80 -
someone mentioned Control-M, and that was certainly one of them that causes me
issues. Xpediter/TSO is another, I had to raise an issue with Compuware
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:50:00 -0800, John Mattson wrote:
>I use Mod-5 and have been an advocate for it because most emulators support
>it, Most zOS sites just give everyone Mod-2 because that is the usual
>emulator default. Everyone I have shown that they can use Mod-5 is usually
>delighted with
I use Mod-5 and have been an advocate for it because most emulators support
it, Most zOS sites just give everyone Mod-2 because that is the usual
emulator default. Everyone I have shown that they can use Mod-5 is usually
delighted with it and never go back. Just being to see the fully sysout or
I have used 84x160 (under PComm) and now we've been migrated to Attachmate's
Reflection 2014, I use 82x160, because Attachmate's font handling isn't quite
as good as PComm - although it offers a wider choice. Both in PComm and in
Reflection, I remove all the window decorations (using the
On 11/03/2016 1:39 AM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 3/10/2016 5:45 AM, David Crayford wrote:
I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots
of the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool
work much better with that model.
My 3270 displays are all 68x80 default
Gil,
But I get:
IKJ56710I INVALID USERID, applid(tso)
IKJ56703A REENTER THIS OPERAND -
Means your USSTAB has special code for LOGON keyword.
It may have support for
L APPLID(TSO) LOGON(D4C32XX3)
or "=" instead of "()"
Regards
Bruce
Using Tom Brennan's Vista TN3270.
makes it real easy to select "strange" screen sizes.
Mostly I use 60x160 at home, and 52x140 on the smaller monitor at work.
I use 70 x 80 for Omegamon MVS Classic screens.
As Tom knows, I sometimes have many TN3270 sessions open and hit his screen
count
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to Attachmate
release 9.3) have not found a way.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Paul Gillis wrote:
>I use the -oversize option as -oversize 134x60.
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Packer
>Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
>
>Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
>not because of the
half Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get t
> Pity. I can hope that the new emulation they want to use can handle it.
> (Saying in German: Hope dies last - die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt).
We're using Reflection from Attachmate (if I'm not totally wrong). This handles
any screen dimensions I wanted to use so far.
--
Peter Hunkeler
orks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Alan Young <ayo...@teleport.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/03/2016 21:04
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Ah, y
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:17:11 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>Thanks. But -oversize 132x43 (not order) got rejection from TSO.
>
And yet I'm working with:
ZTERMCP5 is: 01047
ZTERMCID is: 01047
ZTERMCS5 is: 00697
ZENVIR is: ISPF 7.2MVS TSO
ZOS390RL is: z/OS 02.02.00
ZGUI is:
cker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Alan Young <ayo...@teleport.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/03/2016 21:04
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe
07
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Try adding the -oversize option as -oversize 43x132.
Alan
Martin Packer wrote:
Yes. And it gives invidious choices: 43 x 80 an
Didn’t IBM VTAM commercials back in the 70's user Terminal Models?
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
: humana.com
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 714-8615, (502) 476-2538
ge: INFO IBM-MAIN
The
yo...@teleport.com>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 10/03/2016 20:07
> Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
> you use
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>
>
>
> Try adding t
.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Alan Young <ayo...@teleport.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/03/2016 20:07
Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
3/2016 17:04
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do
you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Isn't there a -model option something like:
-model n
Where n is 2 for mod 2, 3 for mod 3, etc.
I don't have access to x3270 ri
Anybody use a web3270 app? bluezone now Rocket used to have a fairly
decent one.
In a message dated 3/10/2016 1:39:03 P.M. Central Standard Time,
peter.far...@broadridge.com writes:
LOGMODE D4C32XX3 is a standard VTAM logmode that has the "query terminal
size" bit turned on. Works for
: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
Cheers, Martin
--
This message and an
I am forced into 62x160 because of fixed 3270 definitions used
where I work. My other options are MOD2-5, which do not give me
the viewing space I am used to having (at least 43 lines and 133
wide).
However, with 62x160, VM and TSO/ISPF work OK.
But keep a watch on ISPF. Some releases ago,
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set
> screen characteristics...
ISPF options 0, when you only have 24 lines it is on the second screen.
Additionally, your 'logmode' has to match and yo
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Tom Bre
> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
> characteristics...
ISPF options 0, when you only have 24 lines it is on the second screen.
Additionally, your 'logmode' has to match and you have to have your emulation
set to accept the largest screen size it can
> Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to
> Attachmate release 9.3) have not found a way.
Pity. I can hope that the new emulation they want to use can handle it. (Saying
in German: Hope dies last - die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt).
Barbara
> Can anyone tell me where this is? Don't see it under Options, 6. Set screen
characteristics...
When writing ISPF Settings I meant ISPF option 0
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Barbara - I've been trying to find a way and so far (at least up to
Attachmate release 9.3) have not found a way.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 8
Duh. Never mind.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Can anyone tell me
-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Subject: AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80
> -
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
Not at a te
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:47:46 +0100, nitz-ibm wrote:
>... Does anyone know if I can fool attachmate into a larger screensize (like I
>could with PComm before it offered 62x160) by editing the parameter file?
>Having only 27 lines severely limits my productivity. :-(
>
Probably not. The older
ough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of nitz-ibm
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David C
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:48:40 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 -
>and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the
>z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
>
Something about LOGMODE.
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>
>What screen size do you use?
>
I would love to use the standard 62x162 screensize (and have for the past 7
years or so), but unfortunately my new employer uses an attachmate extra
emulation that can only do 27x132. Does anyone know
alf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 12:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: AW: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80
> -
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know h
On 10 March 2016 at 08:45, David Crayford wrote:
> What screen size do you use?
43x132
Tony H.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
On 3/10/2016 5:45 AM, David Crayford wrote:
I use a custom 60x160 which seems to be the norm in our office. Lots
of the tools we use, especially debuggers like z/XCD and DebugTool
work much better with that model.
My 3270 displays are all 68x80 default size and 68x142 alternate size. Why?
I
>It wasn't private.
Yep, and when I finished reading I wondered what secrects he wanted to
keep. Nothing dramatic was unveiled. IMHO.
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I use a 60x162 session for when I am attempting to much about in a USS file.
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday,
>I have used Mod 4 (43x80) for years. There are times when a wider screen would
>be useful, but Mod 5 e.g. shrinks characters to Lilliputian scale. Maybe if I
>had a giant 4K monitor I would jack up the density...
You don't need a 4K monitor. A cheap standard 24" or 27" monitor allows for
IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: "Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)" <lionel.d...@va.gov>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/03/2016 17:04
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal mo
>BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application
simply supported it. That wasn't case at least for ControlM panels
("illegal" resolutions caused abend).
Control-D is no better. I remember well when I had to start working with
Control-M roughly 10 years ago. I found
It wasn't private.
-teD
Original Message
From: Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
David,
I'm replying privately rather than to the list so
> Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 -
and not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the
z/OS TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
Not at a terminal now, but there is a setting in "ISPF Settings" wiht options
STD,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web,
>Eclipse etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the
>screen real estate for todays customer.
>
>What screen size do you use?
>
Various. Once
: (External):Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
TSO/ISPF environment I'm using to take advantage of more.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
h 10, 2016 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Maybe I'm being thick here but with X3270 I think I'm stuck at 32 x 80 - and
not because of the emulator but because I don't know how to get the z/OS
TSO/ISPF environment I'm u
62x160, 27x132, 24x80. Like others, I prefer to use a "non-standard" screen
size (the 62x160 is what I use mostly) but I have a couple applications that
only support the mod2-5 scenario so I normally have 2 sessions running all the
time, one with my big screen and another sitting at a mod5.
U
Date: 10/03/2016 16:23
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
24x80
Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen res
24x80
Yes, I have colour monitor, flat one, actually two of them, 27" each.
And still the most popular (3270) screen resolution I use is 24x80.
Atavism ;-)
I also use 43x80 and rarely 24x132 or 42x132.
BTW: I wish I would have any resolution *I want* and my application
simply supported it.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>What screen size do you use?
90 x 142
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
David,
I'm replying privately rather than to the list so as to avoid publishing this
data to the world.
--
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information
David,
I'm replying privately rather than to the list so as to avoid publishing this
data to the world.
Personally I use two different terminal models on a regular basis:
50x160 for editing and batch development (SDSF, ISPF, etc.). I don't use
60x160 because the font is a tad small for my
Use 327x-2 as default, but allow for "all" 327x types, as well as "custom
types" that do not match the 327x model descriptions.
We're building a new product which will have several UI's; ISPF, Web, Eclipse
etc. For the ISPF we're wondering how we should optimize the screen real estate
for
82 matches
Mail list logo