] On
Behalf Of william janulin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question
To list;
OK. I modified a dataclass to specify extended addressability but I still
get the 110 error:
DEFINE -
CLUSTER -
( -
NAME
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of william janulin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question
Would not modifying an existing DATACLASS to specify Extended
Addressability do the same thing?
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:32 AM, Blake, Daniel J
Subject: Re: VSAM question
You might need to show us the code for your dataclass routine but before that
can you confirm that you used ISMF to:
translate the routine without error into a working SCDS dataset after
updating the source;
validate the routine
test the routine
You got it.
Dan Blake
2967
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of william janulin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question
Would not modifying an existing DATACLASS
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of william janulin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question
Would not modifying an existing DATACLASS to specify Extended
Addressability do the same thing?
On Tuesday, July 21
To list;
OK. I modified a dataclass to specify extended addressability but I still get
the 110 error:
DEFINE -
CLUSTER -
( -
, July 21, 2015 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question
To list;
OK. I modified a dataclass to specify extended addressability but I still get
the 110 error:
DEFINE -
CLUSTER -
( -
NAME(WAS850.ZFS) -
LINEAR -
CYL(8000
the total size is greater than 4 GB).
Dan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of william janulin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question
To list;
OK. I modified
Beginning in z/OS V2R1, you can have non-SMS managed VSAM Linear Data Sets that
are larger than 4GB, with the Extended Addressability attribute.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.e0zm100/newdasd.htm
Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM
So you can do the DEFINE CL command and include the DATACLAS parameter that
points to a Data Class that allows Extended Format
DEF CL (name) DATACLAS(efformat name)
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of
Thank you for the info from those who have responded to my question.
Bill J.
On Monday, July 20, 2015 4:49 PM, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
So you can do the DEFINE CL command and include the DATACLAS parameter that
points to a Data Class that allows Extended
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 8:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
On 20 May 2014 14:25:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
(3,3)
While I don't have the VSAM manuals handy, I
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Clifford
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
Rex,
Have you tried using REPRO (IDCAMS) to unload it to a flat file
(vb/9160
: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
Rex,
Have you tried using REPRO (IDCAMS) to unload it to a flat file
(vb/9160/27998) and see if it goes clean or issues an error message which
may be more informational. If no error, try to repro 'reuse
7:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
I have a question pertaining to DCB info when doing 'REPRO (IDCAMS) to unload
it to a flat file'. John specified '(vb/9160/27998)' how is this determined?
tks Matt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Dazzo, Matt mda...@pch.com wrote:
I have a question pertaining to DCB info when doing 'REPRO (IDCAMS) to
unload it to a flat file'. John specified '(vb/9160/27998)' how is this
determined? tks Matt
Your LISTCAT showed a MAXLRECL or 9156. With RECFM=VB, there
AVERAGE KEY LENGTH: 0.0
This looks suspicious, but is not supported by any of the other doc you have
supplied.
The listcat shows a KEYLEN of 30, not zero.
You might try a print of the INDEX component and see if it shows anything,
otherwise, I am at a loss.
If it really gives you that
I don't know VSAMUTIL, but it likely looks at the catalog statistics. With
VSAM, the catalog statistics are _NOT_ guaranteed to be correct. In fact,
your LISTC has this warning it the listing:
STATISTICS (* - VALUE MAY BE INCORRECT)
The only way to fix this is to delete/define/reload the data
something like this
before.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
AVERAGE KEY LENGTH: 0.0
Rex,
Have you tried using REPRO (IDCAMS) to unload it to a flat file
(vb/9160/27998) and see if it goes clean or issues an error message which
may be more informational. If no error, try to repro 'reuse' back over the
file with the unloaded record. Being there are some counts in the splits
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
I don't know VSAMUTIL, but it likely looks at the catalog statistics. With
VSAM, the catalog
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
Rex,
Have you tried using REPRO (IDCAMS) to unload it to a flat file
(vb/9160/27998) and see if it goes clean or issues an error message which
may be more informational. If no error, try to repro 'reuse' back over the
file
: Re: VSAM question/problem
Rex,
Have you tried using REPRO (IDCAMS) to unload it to a flat file
(vb/9160/27998) and see if it goes clean or issues an error message which
may be more informational. If no error, try to repro 'reuse' back over the
file with the unloaded record. Being there are some
What are SHR options?
In a message dated 5/20/2014 4:21:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com writes:
I can't say for sure, but my guess is there's something 'not-quite-right'
in the enqueueing logic that is supposed to be protecting the dataset from
being updated by
(3,3)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
What are SHR options?
In a message dated 5/20/2014 4:21:17 P.M
Hi:
I can't say for sure, but my guess is there's something
'not-quite-right' in the enqueueing logic that is supposed to be protecting the
dataset
from being updated by CICS and batch simultaneously.
ATTRIBUTES
KEYLEN30 AVGLRECL2965
Pommier, Rex wrote:
REPRO'ing with the REUSE reset the statistics and did the mini reorg. This
leads me to further believe there was an application hiccup that caused the
problem in the first place. I can't say for sure, but my guess is there's
something 'not-quite-right' in the enqueueing
, May 20, 2014 4:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
Hi:
I can't say for sure, but my guess is there's something
'not-quite-right' in the enqueueing logic that is supposed to be protecting the
dataset
from being updated by CICS and batch simultaneously
:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
I don't know VSAMUTIL, but it likely looks at the catalog statistics. With
VSAM, the catalog statistics are _NOT_ guaranteed to be correct. In fact,
your LISTC has this warning it the listing:
STATISTICS (* - VALUE MAY
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
What are SHR options?
In a message dated 5/20/2014 4:21:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com writes:
I can't say for sure, but my guess
30 matches
Mail list logo
