Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-27 Thread Seymour J Metz
edu> on behalf of Edward Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 8:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs. > On May 25, 2018, at 12:39 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com> > wrote: > > I

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread Edward Gould
> On May 25, 2018, at 12:39 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson > wrote: > > I'm sympathetic to the argument that new stuff should be investigated, but > the problem is whether that really happens in practice. We've all met the > sysprog who meticulously codes parameter defaults as

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 11:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs. On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:39:03 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > >As for getting inconsistent results, I suspect that SMP/E resul

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:39:03 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > >As for getting inconsistent results, I suspect that SMP/E results can be >influenced by the particular mix of elements being processed in a given run. >That is, applying SYSMOD-A and SYSMOD-B in the same step might uncover a

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread John McKown
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:43 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > My song "PUT Process" was motivated by real incidents. JES2 service was > especially bad; they would issue a PTF with a packaging error and the fix > would again have a packaging error. > ​Yeah, I remember "JES2 level

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread John McKown
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:39 PM Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > I'm sympathetic to the argument that new stuff should be investigated, but > the problem is whether that really happens in practice. We've all met the > sysprog who meticulously codes parameter defaults as a kind

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs. I'm sympathetic to the argument

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs. (It's Friday; SPAM is above suspicion.) On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:41:56 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >I don't see any problem with the BYPASS statement except that it's needlessly >specific.

Re: smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs.

2018-05-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
(It's Friday; SPAM is above suspicion.) On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:41:56 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >I don't see any problem with the BYPASS statement except that it's needlessly >specific. BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM) without the list of types should not only >suffice--it does for me--but also hedges