How would this work for ++MOD elements in RELFILE format. Should
I supply the IDENTIFY as input to Binder when I link the ++MOD
element so Binder will imbed it in the IDR? Same for ACCEPT into
DLIB?
Yes.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
OTOH, we're already digesting SYSLIN to generate CSECT parameters
for SMP/E ++MOD MCS. It would be quite natural to append Binder
IDENTIFY commands at that point. But I believe SMP/E doesn't
recognize Binder commands appearing in SYSLIN.
Huh? I assume you're talking about the SYSLIN for a
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:13:56 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
OTOH, we're already digesting SYSLIN to generate CSECT parameters
for SMP/E ++MOD MCS. It would be quite natural to append Binder
IDENTIFY commands at that point. But I believe SMP/E doesn't
recognize Binder commands appearing in
In 8902901628988927.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/30/2014
at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
Can this information be supplied from HLASM
Yes.
(but this would be harder for us to automate.)
Why can't you pass the necessary
In
CAE1XxDHQB8Mn99LQZcydqGc5QHGPR5HJC-bNPmv0H==um7c...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/30/2014
at 01:19 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
AINSERT is then used to
'save' them, and AREAD is used to put them into the output.
That's not even wrong! He needs a PUNCH or REPRO to get them into
the
Shmuel was, of course, entirely correct in saying that a PUNCH or
REPRO statement is necessary to get them into the output; but this
surpassingly obvious observation is not very interesting.
The AINSERTs and AREADs are needed to sequence IDENTIFY binder
control statements properly: They must
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:32:45 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
Can this information be supplied from HLASM
Yes.
Can it be more straightforward than JWG's suggestion?
(but this would be harder for us to automate.)
Why can't you pass the necessary
In
CAE1XxDG4NRGnr2hk-=cdsgdxqs1nuv7ucbru4ntyy_ebkmx...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/01/2014
at 11:18 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
surpassingly obvious
It should have been obvious *before* you incorrrecvtly described the
roles in AINSERT and AREAD.
The AINSERTs and AREADs are needed to
At 11:18 -0500 on 12/01/2014, John Gilmore wrote about Re: SMP/E and
IDR (was: Binder SETSSI ...?):
Shmuel was, of course, entirely correct in saying that a PUNCH or
REPRO statement is necessary to get them into the output; but this
surpassingly obvious observation is not very interesting
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 11:51:39 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:03:18 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
The availability of control-section specific IDRs and the IDENTIFY
binder control statement have, however, made SETSSI obsolescent.
Does SMP/E support the Binder IDENTIFY statement?
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:19:31 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
One formats the text of an IDENTIFY control statement as a sequence of
character set symbols that are card images. AINSERT is then used to
'save' them, and AREAD is used to put them into the output.
Feels a lot like PUNCH. This really
It sure does.
Ed
On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:03:18 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
The availability of control-section specific IDRs and the IDENTIFY
binder control statement have, however, made SETSSI obsolescent.
Does SMP/E support the Binder
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:05:04 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
It sure does.
Cite?
Thanks,
gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
A large percent (all?) of IBM SMP maintenance comes along with a
setssi card.
Not exactly what I was looking for but I think it will do:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/gim3rf01.pdf
v The only IMASPZAP control statements allowed in a SYSMOD are:
Control statements
ABSDUMP DUMP NAME
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:53:22 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
A large percent (all?) of IBM SMP maintenance comes along with a
setssi card.
Not exactly what I was looking for but I think it will do:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/gim3rf01.pdf
v The only IMASPZAP control statements allowed in a
Paul:
I am not going to do your homework.
IDENTIFY is a valid binder control statement so it must work in SMPE.
Ed
On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:10 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:53:22 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
A large percent (all?) of IBM SMP maintenance comes along with a
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.gim1000/lmodacc.htm?lang=en
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
Paul:
I am not going to do your homework.
IDENTIFY is a valid binder control statement so it must work in SMPE.
17 matches
Mail list logo
