On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:32:19 -0500, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>can you run a WTO command directly from JCL?
>I want to execute a WTO directly from my job.
>
How about:
//X EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,
// PARM='SH echo "some text" >/dev/console'
(Beware au
Well, crap! Never even occurred to me, and I've used the send command to issue
messages to the console. Unbelievable, a WTO is a WTO, after all.
If it makes me look less idiotic, I also have versions for highlighted messages
and WTORs. Can't do that with send. (I hope. :))
First Tennessee
solutions.
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2019 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JCL for WTO
[External Email]
can you run a WTO command directly
Many sites have a program that takes as a parm the WTO message. I’m sure one
can be found on the CBT tape.
Lionel B. Dyck
Senior Software Engineer
21st Century Software
From the Leaders in Data Stewardship™
THIS E-MAIL MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED
Tso batch with send command (cn operand) will do the job. You can use jcl
command (or jes /*), but it will be issued at job read without your control.
ITschak
בתאריך שבת, 6 באפר׳ 2019, 22:32, מאת Bill Giannelli <
billgianne...@gmail.com>:
> can you run a WTO command directly from JCL?
can you run a WTO command directly from JCL?
I want to execute a WTO directly from my job.
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message
*
>
> /* REXX */
>
> trace i
>
> 'PIPE SAFE * | STEM MSG.'
>
> TODataset = Word( Msg.3,3 )
>
> WTO.CONSNAME ='CNDVMSTR'
>
> WTO.DESC = '010001000000'/* WHITE */
>
> WTO.DESC = '00100010'/* RED */
>
&
* | STEM MSG.'
TODataset = Word( Msg.3,3 )
WTO.CONSNAME ='CNDVMSTR'
WTO.DESC = '01000100'/* WHITE */
WTO.DESC = '00100010'/* RED */
WTO.MCSFLAG = ''
WTO.TEXT = 'FDI' TODataset
WTO
mvs "send 'FDI DATAST NAME IS "TODataset"',user=(TS06,OP11
MSG IS' mtxt
C>L> "CONSOLE TEST MSG IS"
C>V> "- STARTED - TIME=07.19.45"
C>O> "CONSOLE TEST MSG IS - STARTED - TIME=07.19.4
C 12 *-* WTO
C>L> "WTO"
C 13 *-* exit
>
IS' TODataset
WTO
MVS "send 'FDI DATAST NAME IS "TODataset"',user=(AB55,AB54),logon"
exit
and output from netview log is
CNM493I DSITBL01 : #247 : FDIREXX
" SVTM052I STEP01 COPY TDNBK001( 31,976) PNODE=SIG.BA
<http://sig.ba/>
" SVTM052I FROM
WTO.DESC = '00100010'/* RED */
>
>WTO.MCSFLAG = ''
>
>WTO.TEXT = 'CONSOLE TEST MSG IS' mtxt
>
>WTO.
>
>exit
>
>But, I checked with operator and they didn't receive any message on their
>console. Are we missing anything in this.
Remove
Hello,
I trigger event and below rexx should have been executed
/* REXX */
parse arg mtxt . mtxt
WTO.CONSNAME = 'CNDVMSTR'
WTO.DESC = '01000100'/* WHITE */
WTO.DESC = '00100010'/* RED */
WTO.MCSFLAG = ''
WTO.TEXT = 'CONSOLE TEST MSG IS' mtxt
WTO
)
WTO.CONSNAME = ''
WTO.DESC = '00100010'/* RED */
WTO.DESC = '01000100'/* WHITE */
WTO.MCSFLAG = ''
WTO.TEXT = 'OPSMSG01 FIB DATASET NAME IS' TODataset
WTO.
EXIT
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Steve Horein
wrote:
> /* REXX */
> 'PIPE SAFE * | ST
/* REXX */
'PIPE SAFE * | STEM MSG.'
TODataset = Word( Msg.3,3 )
WTO.CONSNAME = ''
WTO.DESC = '00100010'/* RED */
WTO.DESC = '01000100'/* WHITE */
WTO.MCSFLAG = ''
WTO.TEXT = 'OPSMSG01 FIB DATASET NAME IS' TODataset
WTO.
EXIT
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018
e the full messge via:
/* REXX */
'PIPE SAFE * | STEM MSG.'
TODataset = Word( Msg.3,3 )
mvs "send 'FIB DATASET NAME IS "TODataset"',CON=CNDVMSTR"
in this rexx, where do I need to add WTO.TEXT to display TODataset as WTO
message on operator console.
Can anybody suggest to im
I suppose it's rude to advise OP that the goal is of dubious value. It's not
1978.
We can however state that the goal is not achievable within the scope of the
mechanism(s) proposed. Some kind of automation tool is called for. The
'cheapest' would be an RYO WTO exit that changes the message
1. The TSO SEND command has very limited control over the WTO; for what you're
doing,
you should read up on console areas and multi-line WTO, and code a
REXX-aware
external function in assembler. Or use the support in NetView.
2. You should seriously consider whether a non-scrollable
I hope, i am able to explain my requirement. Thank you all for reply.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Lucas Rosalen
wrote:
> Right tool for the right job.
>
> Read about WTO (REXX) comma
Right tool for the right job.
Read about WTO (REXX) command in Netview commands manual.
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / lucas.rosal...@ibm.com
http
Re: Issue WTO message using MVS SEND command
Do you actually have "operators" who sit waiting for instructions to appear on
the console?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Fri
ERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Issue WTO message using MVS SEND command
There is a way to do this, but not by specifying a console name, check the TSO
HELP on the SEND command and it's options.
with the fast processors and the amount of work process, and design of your
complex, being a single syste
proceed. my .002 cents
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "saurabh khandelwal"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 11:31:38 PM
Subject: Issue WTO message using MVS SEND command
Hello Group,
/* REXX */
'PIPE SAFE * | STEM MSG.'
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 07:31:38 +0300, saurabh khandelwal wrote:
>We used CN operand with send command to send message to operator console
>and now i receive output as required.
Why do you want to do that?
IMO, on systems today with several dozen to hundreds of jobs running, along
with thousands
s message is visible in green color which get disappeared as other
message comes on console.
But, I would like to have these message in white color ( not sure if we can
say as WTO), so that until operator intervention, these message will be on
console itself.
Can you please sugges
from Ops about what 'they' are supposed to do.
We have an ancient WTO exit that is supposed to do that, but it's not working.
For the record, these are the relevant instructions:
MVC CTXTDC1(L'CTXTDC1+L'CTXTDC2),SETSTATS
OICTXTRFB1,CTXTRCRC+CTXTRCDC CHANGE CODES NOW
> I'm trying to debug a WTO exit defined in MPFLSTxx. (It's not
> IEAVMXIT.) The user-named module is in the link list, but I can't
> find it in storage. An MPF WTO exit is apparently loaded somewhere
> initially and on SET MPF=xx. If I name a nonexistent exit, I get
>
&
There might be some official way of locating that information, but by
brute-force you can locate the "MPFT" and the MPFT entries.
>From CVT (pointed to by location x'10'), Offset x'64' is the address of
UCMBASPT
>From UCMBASPT, offset
Peter
rel...@us.ibm.com
1-845-435-8390
Afaik it is loaded in the console asid.
ITschak
נשלח מה-iPad שלי
ב-11 בספט׳ 2015, בשעה 02:30, J O Skip Robinson <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com>
כתב/ה:
> I'm trying to debug a WTO exit defined in MPFLSTxx. (It's not IEAVMXIT.) The
> user-named module is in the link list, but
Oops, hit send too soon.
There might be some non-brute-force method. But in case not, this might
get you started
>From CVT(location x'10') offset x'64' is the address of UCMBAS.
>From UCMBAS, offset x'F0' is the address of UCMFX
>From UCMFX, offset x'54' is the address of MPFT (which is in a
have an ancient WTO exit that is supposed to do that, but it's not working.
For the record, these are the relevant instructions:
MVC CTXTDC1(L'CTXTDC1+L'CTXTDC2),SETSTATS
OICTXTRFB1,CTXTRCRC+CTXTRCDC CHANGE CODES NOW
...
SETSTATS DCAL1(CTXTDC04),X'00' SYSTEM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 5:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Finding an MPF WTO Exit
Oops, hit send too soon.
There might be some non-brute-force
<jo.skip.robin...@sce.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a WTO exit defined in MPFLSTxx. (It's not IEAVMXIT.) The
> user-named module is in the link list, but I can't find it in storage. An MPF
> WTO exit is apparently loaded somewhere initially and on SET MPF=xx. If I
> name a nonex
I'm trying to debug a WTO exit defined in MPFLSTxx. (It's not IEAVMXIT.) The
user-named module is in the link list, but I can't find it in storage. An MPF
WTO exit is apparently loaded somewhere initially and on SET MPF=xx. If I name
a nonexistent exit, I get
IEE028I WTO INSTALLATION EXIT
It look like this is a vendor product, not a standard rexx. Have u tried
sendind message to the console? (Send 'msg text') console(xxx)
ITschak
בתאריך 8 בנוב 2014 01:18, JoAnn Kulcyk jkulc...@glhec.org כתב:
I have a REXX exec that issues a WTO with routing and descriptor codes
both equal to 2
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:17:41 -0600 JoAnn Kulcyk jkulc...@glhec.org wrote:
:I have a REXX exec that issues a WTO with routing and descriptor codes both
equal to 2. When I run it from my TSO userid, the message is written to the
console (highlighted), but when I run it from a batch job (either
I have a REXX exec that issues a WTO with routing and descriptor codes both
equal to 2. When I run it from my TSO userid, the message is written to the
console (highlighted), but when I run it from a batch job (either IKJEFT01 or
IRXJCL), the message appears in my joblog and in OPERLOG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of JoAnn Kulcyk
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 4:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Multiline WTO using REXXTOOLS in batch does not show up on console
I have a REXX exec
WTO is a lazy way to write something without all those OPEN/WRITE/PUT/CLOSE
macros. ;-)
WTO / WTOR is the means to communicate with the operator, either human or
automated. The system provides that communication path. It does not need an
setup on the program / JCL side. It should
Hunkeler, Peter wrote:
WTO is a lazy way to write something without all those OPEN/WRITE/PUT/CLOSE
macros. ;-)
Did you see my smiley? ;-)
Really, when I write a brand new program, I sometimes use WTO for debugging
purposes during development, say for example, to see whether a branch
File 127 at cbttape.org contains a handy macro named SYSPUT.
Just code the macro in your working storage; then when you want to write a line;
load the address of the line in R1 and BAL R14 to the macro tag.
The specified dcb (automagically defined within the macro) is opened at first
use.
The
Thanks all...I will consider doing it right. At the very least, I'll stop
looking for another way!
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Tim Deller ists...@bonton.com wrote:
File 127 at cbttape.org contains a handy macro named SYSPUT.
Just code the macro in your working storage; then when you want
I’m missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running in Batch,
wants to write a message to the job log. I’m doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real option? Seems
like it should be easy to write to SYSPRINT, but I can’t find a way to do
WTO doesn't write to SYSPRINT. Use normal OPEN - WRITE/PUT - CLOSE to the
SYSPRINT DCB processing.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of zMan
Sent: Friday, 20 December 2013 9:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
to the job log. I’m doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real option? Seems
like it should be easy to write to SYSPRINT, but I can’t find a way to do
that!
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use
WTL won't help either. It's just a more specific form of WTO.
Jon Perryman.
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: WTO confusion
zMan, did you look at the WTL macro
Jon,
So all you can do is define a DCB, open it and issue a PUT ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
WTL won't help either. It's just a more specific form of WTO
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:41 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running in Batch,
wants to write a message to the job log. I’m doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real option? Seems
: Thursday, December 19, 2013 6:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: WTO confusion
I'm missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running in Batch,
wants to write a message to the job log. I'm doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
It's a crazy shortcoming of z/OS and why the console is littered with
OPENING MASTER INPUT FILE messages: way easier to write a message to the
console than to SYSPRINT.
Too bad HLASM did not include some of the ASSIST
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: WTO confusion
I'm missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running
in Batch,
wants to write a message to the job log. I'm doing WTO with
ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real
option? Seems
like it should be easy to write
zMan wrote:
Assembler program, running in Batch, wants to write a message to the job log.
I'm doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11, which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that
my only real option? Seems like it should be easy to write to SYSPRINT, but I
can't find a way to do that!
Neither me
201 - 251 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
