OTH - if this module makes no system calls or other subroutine calls, then
it does not need a save area of its own, so it can use the caller's
provided area (as the protocol requires).
The question is not whether or not the code *can* use the caller's save area.
The code *shall* use the
Newport News Shipbuilding in Newport News, Virginia is looking for a
z/OS System Programmer with CICS and/or DB2 experience. To apply online
check the corporate web site at
http://www.huntingtoningalls.com/careers/search, or to skip a couple of
links,
More precisely
@REC2USING IREC,IREC2
TM @REC2. ISTAT,SDLET
DROP @REC2
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:08:18 -0400 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
:In 002d01ce7107$493d31a0$dbb794e0$@austin.rr.com, on 06/24/2013
: at 01:18 PM, Kenneth Wilkerson
In 9730290756779688.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
06/25/2013
at 03:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
What went wrong?
It started early: George Mealy is alleged to have called it The rape
of the design integrity of OS/360 and blamed it on a lack of
standards
Thanks to all. I have done an initial rewrite. I chose to simply not set up
a new save area. Due to lack of registers to store R13, I cannot save R13
in another register and zero it. So R13 will stay pointing to the caller
supplied save area. I chose this option because it requires the minimal
In 4175885956046643.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
06/25/2013
at 07:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Yup. That was one of my first mistakes:
//STEP EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYSUID..LINKLIB(DUMMY)
//SYSUT1 DD
In 51ca273b@aim.com, on 06/25/2013
at 05:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
BTW, I am exceedingly unhappy with the 200 status codes from the
last two SITE commands, but IBM has some twisted logic according to
whichthe behavior is proper.
WTF? It's not in accordance with RFC
Cross Posted to IBMTCP-L too.
We've just started the process of working with our Firewall team to allow us to
use FTPS with IBM, i.e. to testcase.boulder.ibm.com. For anyone who has gone
through the set up, I would appreciate hearing how things have worked out and
what kind of gotchas to be
Does anyone know what know what a cond code of 04 from the INIT proc (IEFIIC)
means? I don't think it's anything to be concerned about but we see it
occasionally and our operations staff have asked about it and I haven't been
able to find anything documented.
In
caajsdjj1mguxrkr_mpko7nybvyuc_vhs+8a971mlpenrjbw...@mail.gmail.com,
on 06/26/2013
at 07:02 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
Thanks to all. I have done an initial rewrite. I chose to simply not
set up a new save area. Due to lack of registers to store R13, I
cannot save R13
We can barely comprehend the difference between AMODE(24) and AMODE(31).
Nobody is worrying about AMODE(64). But I will go with what another replier
said: If you use it, you must restore it. The caller has a right to
expect all the registers to come back after the CALL with the same contents
that
If you go into syslog do you see any messages around when the INIT gets the
RC04?
Do you keep your STC JCL on JES? If so have you browsed the output for
messages?
Do you have any JES or MVS Exits the affect INIT?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Okay, I am feeling little dense this morning/week.
I am trying to decode how to determine the best value to set for MAXMSG. Having
read and re-read applicable sections of Setting Up A Sysplex, I am still not
getting it.
Reason for being there? From the SR:
EZZ4338I ERROR REPORTED ON INTERFACE
Running z/OS V1.12
If we have a TS7720 Tape system only, is it possible to attach a J70
Controller with J1A tape drives should I want to have physical tape?
Pros/Cons?
Any comments or guidance is appreciated.
Lizette
--
For
We are running a TS7720 with an ATL with drives in it that we can use for
offloading data from the VTS and as native drives.
Pros - can expand your TS7720 capacity to be virtually limitless
Cons - tapes and tape drives break
Pete Eggebeen
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainframe Storage Management
Works great. Do it all the time for sending dumps, etc. If you are going to
get that setup, then you might as well start using SMPE RECEIVE ORDER, then
besides FTP access through the firewall, you will also need HTTPS access.
If the firewall people are going to require specific destinations
Peter,
Are you sure you are referring to a TS7720, not to a TS7740? AFAIK the
TS7720 is the TS7740 with only (disk)cache and without tapedrives.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Eggebeen
Sent: Wednesday,
Yes, I am asking about the virtual TS7720. So if I did not want to buy a
TS7740 solution (Both virtual and tape) but instead repurpose my older J70
with J1A drives and attach them to the new TS7720 - would that work?
I am not really good with hardware and the IBM manuals are vague. So just
You are correct - had a 7720 at my last job and got the device types mixed
up :)
Pete Eggebeen
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainframe Storage Management
Kohl's Corporation
(920) 207-0108 (Cell)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.comwrote:
Yes, I am asking about
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:59:27 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
Okay, I am feeling little dense this morning/week.
I am trying to decode how to determine the best value to set for MAXMSG.
Having read and re-read applicable sections of Setting Up A Sysplex, I am
still
W dniu 2013-06-26 16:10, Peter Eggebeen pisze:
We are running a TS7720 with an ATL with drives in it that we can use for
offloading data from the VTS and as native drives.
Pros - can expand your TS7720 capacity to be virtually limitless
Cons - tapes and tape drives break
Duplicated copies
The text of health check XCF_DEFAULT_MAXMSG says this:
CHECK PARM: 2000
IXCH0426I The XCF transport class MAXMSG value is currently equal to or
larger than the owner specified value 2000.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:47:09 -0500, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
I'm was surprised to see GRS utilising XCF still on ESCON these days, but ring
is still out there. In this town of less than a handful of sites, one recently
had to do the ESCON to FICON in a hurry to get a couple of
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:45:20 -0500, John McKown wrote:
I will go with what another replier
said: If you use it, you must restore it.
That was me.
The caller has a right to
expect all the registers to come back after the CALL with the same contents
that they had before the call. With the
Hi dear IBM-MAINers,
First of all a BIG THANK YOU for your 30+ reactions !!!
This situation is one between z/OSs!
The other site is zipping with PKZIP.
GIMZIP is charming my client.
Question though:
While PKZIP en GIMZIP have both zipin common in their namings,
is GIMZIP's zip-format
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:26:21 +, Hunkeler, Peter (TLSG 4) wrote:
The question is not whether or not the code *can* use the caller's save area.
The code *shall* use the caller's save area to save the caller's register
content.
That is one way to save the caller's registers, not the only
H Skip,
Since I never tripped it, that check came in (whenever it did) and I forgot
about
it. With the 186 checks I see on my system, I don't know or remember
all of them that run these days (unless they trip of course). :-)
There is another related check which states the ROT I quoted in
A quick internet search came up with a presentation by Sam Knutson
ftp://ftp.cbttape.org/pub/present/SHARE97_Fully_Wired.pdf
ftp://ftp.cbttape.org/pub/present/SHARE98_Fully_Wired.pdf
This presentation is from 2001/2 but may help answer some questions.
. GIMZIP Free from IBM available as PTF
FTPS is an issue separate from 'getting through a firewall' to exchange
data with IBM. We've performed data exchange with IBM and other vendors
for years *without* FTPS, i.e. not using TLS security, which requires
additional commands in the FTP stream. In our case we use an appliance to
'punch
Skip, thanks for pointing that out. I read the original email as FTP plural,
as in FTP's, vs FTPS, or FTPSecure.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI
Dear Portlisters,
We are running z/OS V1R13. If I go to TSO and enter Netstat Portl my
display is not limited by MAXRECs from the Global Configuration:
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,CONFIG
GLOBAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
TCPIPSTATS: NO ECSALIMIT: 000K POOLLIMIT: 000K
MLSCHKTERM: NO
Thanks for the help.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nick Jones
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 5:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Need to move some DASD volumes that have system logger datasets on
On 24 May 2013 09:15:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Guys and Gals:
I just received a problem from a customer and its odd. I will try to explain.
1. Customer is on z/OS 1.13 ..Put ( i dont know we have asked)
2. We have a STC that does this:
a. We issue a Storage Obtain
Tom Marchant wrote:
begin extract
That is one way to save the caller's registers, not the only
documented Linkage convention.
/end extract
and this is formally correct. There is, however, something of an
obligation to use a caller-/invoker-supplied save area when one is in
fact supplied.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.cawrote:
On 24 May 2013 09:15:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
snip
As I read the code it is obtaining 9 bytes and releasing 10 bytes. Is
this a transcription error?
Clark Morris
No. In the LENGTH=(?),
My default is also 2000.
I am trying to determine what value to increase it to *and* the effect on
anything of increasing it.
What is a good upper limit value?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent:
My health check says the same, of course.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skip Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCF MAXMSG
The text of health check
I've had some to time to go back and make this work properly through X11
forwarding. I've followed the Ported Tools guide to setup X11 forwarding,
which included compling the xauth program and changing some parameters in
the sshd_config. But when I connect via PuTTY with X11 forwarding turned
on
Hi,
I disagree with the assertion that increasing MAXMSG will not cause
XCF to consume more storage. Yes, XCF only uses what it needs. So in that
sense a MAXMSG value bigger than what is needed does not cause any
additional storage to be consumed. But if you are getting no buffer
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:05:13 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
My default is also 2000.
I am trying to determine what value to increase it to *and* the effect on
anything of increasing it.
What is a good upper limit value?
(waiting for the real expert - Mark Brooks
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:52:13 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
A quick internet search came up with a presentation by Sam Knutson
ftp://ftp.cbttape.org/pub/present/SHARE97_Fully_Wired.pdf
ftp://ftp.cbttape.org/pub/present/SHARE98_Fully_Wired.pdf
This presentation is from 2001/2 but may help answer
Is anyone using Cyberark to control access to their mainframe? If so, what
are your results?
TIA
Bill Johnson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Do u mean leting Cubersrk retrieving the mf passord fot processes?
בתאריך 26 ביונ 2013 21:55, מאת Bill Johnson mellonb...@yahoo.com:
Is anyone using Cyberark to control access to their mainframe? If so,
what are your results?
TIA
Bill Johnson
Hi all,
We are running in Z/os 1.11 . I am trying to install IBM SDK 64 bit
for z/OS JAVA2 Technology Edition V7 . In the current environment , i
see only 2 ZFS filesystems (one for java31 and other for java64) .But
when downloaded v7 , i got some additional datasets , ie , some
loadlibs and
The program directory documents all the files. The NON Unix System
Services files are there to support JZOS (PROC, LOAD, SAMP). In a lot of
environments these are merged into the z/OS LINKLIB, SAMPLIB and PROCLIB
since there are no conflicting modules and one per release level.
Craig
Still getting the
Error_perm : 501 invalid data set name. Use ma's dsname conventions.
I made the dsname on the pc hlq.test.jcl and I set up the same name on the
mainframe
I used FTP.voidcmd(SITE FILETYPE=JES)
Any other ideas? Hopefully?
Thanks .. Really a stumper
Finally found it. It was a problem with the make file.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had some to time to go back and make this work properly through X11
forwarding. I've followed the Ported Tools guide to setup X11 forwarding,
which included
Check x11DisplayOffset value. If should be set to something like 10 if
you want to forward directly via port 6010,
or set to 0 if you want to tunnel through your SSH port 22 connection.
My DISPLAY is set to 127.0.0.1:0 and my x11DisplayOffset is 0.
--
Donald J.
dona...@4email.net
On Wed,
The following worked for me. Entire script. (with host/user/password
changed).
#!/usr/bin/python
from ftplib import FTP;
ftp=FTP('host');
ftp.login(user,password);
ftp.voidcmd(site filetype=jes);
f=open(test.jcl,r);
ftp.storlines(STOR what.ever,f);
f.close();
ftp.quit();
I think you needed the
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:21:20 -0500, don isenstadt wrote:
Still getting the
Error_perm : 501 invalid data set name. Use ma's dsname conventions.
I made the dsname on the pc hlq.test.jcl and I set up the same name on the
mainframe
I used FTP.voidcmd(SITE FILETYPE=JES)
Any other ideas? Hopefully?
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:40:38 -0500, John McKown wrote:
The following worked for me. Entire script. (with host/user/password
changed).
#!/usr/bin/python
from ftplib import FTP;
ftp=FTP('host');
ftp.login(user,password);
ftp.voidcmd(site filetype=jes);
f=open(test.jcl,r);
ftp.storlines(STOR
Thanks I just tried it and it works fine.. Via FTP from windows CID window.
I used Put because there is no stor.
Got 200 port request ok
125 sending job to JES internal reader fixrecfm 80
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Exactly. There was a post here lamenting a lack of standards enforcement at
IBM that I have unfortunately deleted.
At some early point a group of wise men and women at IBM should have sat
down and said okay, 18 words off R13 is inadequate. Let's poll all of the
groups and design a single new
Thank you so much If you google it or in my case ddg.gg it you will not see
the syntax.
I never would have found it.. I am one happy camper!
:-))
-don
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Lizettte, The J70 is a controller for attaching the J1A drives to the host
system (ie z/OS).
The J1A when attached to TS7700 virtual tape library is attached to the virtual
library not to the host.
To use J70+J1A host attached you could copy from virtual tape to physical tape
using the host
Lizette, As I have no future IBM product knowledge in this area, - just can
base thoughts on what has happened in recent years.. I cant get in trouble
- hopefully!
TS7700 is a family of products made up of different product parts - both
hardware and software. Each piece can be upgraded -
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:34:45 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
begin extract
That is one way to save the caller's registers, not the only
documented Linkage convention.
/end extract
and this is formally correct. There is, however, something of an
obligation to use a
Tom and I differ about this, profoundly.
My view, which I have already tried to make clear, is that a routine
[or a routine entry and its associated code path] must [almost always]
follow the conventions of the environment in which it is to be
invoked and executed and that failure to do so
In 1122827743987211.wa.don.isenstadtgmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
06/26/2013
at 03:21 PM, don isenstadt don.isenst...@gmail.com said:
Any other ideas?
Try using FTP directly, with explicit SITE and PUT commands. Also try
QUOTE SITE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
I believe that in OS/360's time the designers then couldn't do much better.
In Germany we had at that time a machine called Telefunken TR 440, and
there were even different machine instructions to do the subroutine call,
some that used so called index cells (in memory) to store the return
I looked at all the categories and saw zero sales people, zero vice presidents,
and zero high level people in any category.
Sobering, indeed.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder
acceptable, and to give the appearance of
From what I understand of the product, if you need to make a change to some
system software, you need to contact the cyberark administrator, tell them
what you need, they give you temporary permission through cyberark for the
datasets and other resources needed and then when you are done,
Gil
To answer the one question
But GIMZIP/GIMUNZIP require SMP/E RACF authorization (WHY!?) which may be an
obstacle in some environments.
Because many of us asked for IBM to do this. We found that groups outside of
Sysprogs were using SMPE to verify fixes. We did not want them altering
You need to determine what defaults are in place and what you have customized.
If everything in your current configuration is vanilla and it matches what the
manual says is the default for LE, then you do not need to do anything.
The only time I uncomment an LE parm is if I am altering the
Dear Lizette
Thanks for your quick response!
We could list system-level default options for CEEDOPT by running IGYWIVP1
Could you tell us how to list system-level default options for
CEECOPT,CELQDOPT,CEEROPT and CELQROPT
Thanks a lot!
From: Lizette Koehler
Date: 2013-06-27 08:57
To:
Look at 'D CEE,ALL' ...you can also specify which options you want to see
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Jun 26, 2013, at 9:17 PM, mvsmain mvsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Lizette
Thanks for your quick response!
We could list
Dear
The output of 'D CEE,ALL' is just the options that we have customized.
Thanks a lot!
Jason Cai
From: Scott Ford
Date: 2013-06-27 09:21
To: IBM-MAIN
Subject: Re: Do we need to remove the comment characters from the all LE
options?
Look at 'D CEE,ALL' ...you can also specify which
I do not copy forward my CEEPRMs until I have done an ISPF Compare (or other
compare process). Then I know if IBM has changed anything on my new system
compared to what I have currently running.
If you have the TLIB for SYS1.PARMLIB from your z/OS V1.12 system, use the le
parms from z/OS
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:53:00 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
To answer the one question
But GIMZIP/GIMUNZIP require SMP/E RACF authorization (WHY!?) which may be an
obstacle in some environments.
Because many of us asked for IBM to do this. We found that groups outside of
Sysprogs were using
LC R should have been LCR both times. I don't know how that happened.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original Message -
From: DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:06:03 PM
Subject: Re: z/OS subroutine in assembler, used in
Neat idea.
On Jun 26, 2013 10:11 PM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
LC R should have been LCR both times. I don't know how that happened.
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original Message -
From: DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent:
Don:
I noticed in your entry you did not have the fully qualified name
HLQ.yourname.
Could that be the issue?
Ed
On Jun 26, 2013, at 3:21 PM, don isenstadt wrote:
Still getting the
Error_perm : 501 invalid data set name. Use ma's dsname conventions.
I made the dsname on the pc
On 6/26/2013 8:06 PM, DASDBILL2 wrote:
Instead of zeroing your caller's R13, how about doing a LC R 13,13? Then if
someone adds to your module and attempts to store into your module's
(non-existent) save area, the new code will likely get a S0C4 on the store.
Then when your original code
73 matches
Mail list logo
