Where I disagree is when you compare a "backup with air gap" to a "replicated
copy". A replicated copy is corrupted at the same time that primary is
corrupted. A "backup with air gap" is not. Now, can you create a "backup with
air gap" on DASD - yes, I believe you can now. However, a "backup on
In the Interactive Storage Management Facility (ISMF) option in ISPF; you can
use option 1 (dataset) and enter a storage group in the selection panel. This
will list all the datasets within that storage group and give you a reasonable
idea if what datasets (naming conventions) are going to what
Carmen (and others):
As you know, I've been "vocal" about getting KC (at least on the internet) to a
point where I can better do my job. We do have some RFEs out there which you
might want to vote on and which I agree with:
Currently at 19 votes as an Uncommitted Candidate, "IBM
I have voted for these.
Will these be for ALL Knowledge Centres, or just the z/OS ones?
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
There is no such thing as the Cloud. It is just somebody else’s computer.
If you don't have time to do it right, when
I did NOT say "replicated copy".
Backup on DASD means some form of *backup*, but on DASD.
"Replicated copy" - I understand it as remote copy, like PPRC, SRDF,
TrueCopy, etc. - it is NOT a backup. Such copy protect my data against
datacenter disaster, but not against software or human error.
On 12/7/2018 9:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-sells-software-portfolio-including-notes-and-domino-to-hcl-for-1-8b/
I think it's wonderful they got so much money for it.
--
Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of
https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/07/ibm-selling-lotus-notes-domino-business-to-hcl-for-1-8b/
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1, USNR-Retired
1969-1991
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Just voted for both!
BobL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Marna WALLE
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 7:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Knowledge Centre - (was Re: Rant) [ EXTERNAL ]
Carmen (and
https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-sells-software-portfolio-including-notes-and-domino-to-hcl-for-1-8b/
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
IBM has a tool called ADDI and I believe Compuware might have one as well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of scott Ford
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Code vulnerability
Hi Steve,
This happened with a link to another page in the same PDF? Which release
are you using? We overhauled our linking structure for V2R3, so I'm
especially curious if that's where you notice the quirks.
Regardless, the best way to consume PDF material when offline is with
the Adobe
All,
We write in Enterprise Cobol and HLASM and had a reseller asked us if we
scanned our Cobol code and HLASM code for vulnerabilities ..Does software
for this exist ? I know according to one of our people Sonarcube can do
Cobol scans, but is expensive , like $5.
Has anyone heard on any
What is "It didn’t take much for Sammet to become the lead programmer at Sperry
Gyroscope, but the future would make her cross path with one of computing
greatest, Grace Hopper.", chopped liver? But it doesn't mention that CODASYL
had a short range committee and a long range committee, with
Scott,
Unless your code runs authorized, is an SVC or a PC I don't think it can
cause vulnerabilities that threaten your system. The system does a pretty
good job of isolating problem state code such that it will not cause
problems.
Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural
Ray Overby at Key Resources, Inc.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of scott Ford
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Code vulnerability
All,
We write in Enterprise
Keep in mind that COBOL came from the short range committee at CODASYL; it was
never intended to be around for more than a few years.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
I remember when IBM bought up Lotus for $3.5 billion (iirc). I don't
suppose 1-2-3, Ami Pro, and Symphony are worth much anymore.
sas
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:51 PM Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> On 12/7/2018 9:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
>
I currently work for Micro Focus, and we have the "Fortify" product line. I am
NOT in that group, however, and I really don't know if it does what you are
looking for or not - although I know it does have support for scanning
mainframe COBOL for vulnerabilities. I don't know about HLASM.
I believe that "first previous" is equivalent to the relative -1 generation.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2018, at 5:38 PM, retired mainframer wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
>> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
>> Sent: Saturday, December 01,
Depends on what kind of vulnerability you're looking for. z/OS itself
isn't the only valuable thing you have.
sas
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> Ray Overby at Key Resources, Inc.
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
We had to dump the z/OS Tivoli backup for Lan. They dropped large
block support and the backups took 10 times as long and did not
complete before the next business day (5pm - 8am). Went back to the
previous version then switched to software on the LAN.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:51 AM Jack J.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis
sob., 8 gru 2018 o 09:47 Richard Way napisał(a):
>
> I currently work for Micro Focus, and we have the "Fortify" product line. I
> am NOT in that group, however, and I really don't know if it does what you
> are looking for or
I have voted for the 2 RFE's - I really did not know or recall these RFEs were
submitted, thank you
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Marna WALLE"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 8:50:03 AM
Subject: Re: Knowledge Centre - (was Re: Rant)
...it has been awhile since I have played around with SMS ACS routines. I do
not recall assigning an aliases to a storage groups? Dataset names and wild
carding yes, but not aliases. Is this done?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I have a question on KC producing PDFs.
Has it been fixed to stop putting in hot links in a generated PDF
that send one back to KC, for something that is the same manual?
Example (made up here): One is reading something about DDNames in
the JCL Ref and there is a hot link to UNIT=AFF.
So
IMHO, the air gap for tape in ATL or even more for virtual tape is as
(in)secure as copy on DASD.
Disclaimer: I understand "air gap" as "physical separation" backup from
the system, just to be sure the backup cannot be destroyed by human
mistake or any other error. I hope I understood this
26 matches
Mail list logo
