Thanks so much for pointing me to CSVQUERY Could it be any easier than
that to get what I needed? :-)
As for using IC/ICM... I opted to test the length at the top of my loop,
then just point to the next one at the bottom of the loop. I prefer exiting
the loop from one place, at the expense
Hi
Seems this is a APAR for the C++ compiler
TITLE: PI13158: THE WRONG CASE IS TAKEN ON A SWITCH STATEMENT.
- Title: PI13158: DER FALSCHE CASE VERWENDET mit einer SWITCH STATEMENT.
-
URL:http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PI13158myns=z000mynp=OCSWG90mync=E
On 18.02.2014
Maybe IBM elected a new chairman that evening?
Chris hoelscher
Technology Architect | Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
123 East Main Street |Louisville, KY 40202
choelsc...@humana.com
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 - office
(502) 714-8615 - blackberry
Keeping CAS and
jcew...@acm.org (Joel C. Ewing) writes:
And the IBM 4341 supported System/370 architecture, so VM/370 was
indeed supported on the 4341 and was probably what the author intended.
I believe the CP-40 and CP-67 precursors of VM/370 required more than
just S/360 architecture; namely, a S/360
On 3/9/2014 4:53 AM, Donald Russell wrote:
Re ICM vs IC ...
Is it possible for the TIOT to have no entries?
I'm not seeing the advantage of ICM over IC, because at that point the code
knows the length is not zero, so what's the point of setting the condition
code? Adding the length at the bottom
l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) writes:
lots of customers had been convinced to order 360/67 to run the
official ibm virtual memory operating system, tss/360 ... however
tss/360 had difficulty making it to production level ... so many
locations just ran the machine as 360/65 with os/360.
l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) wrote:
begin extract
one of the things that I did have lots of problems with was supporting
position independent code (mentioned in the tss/360 wiki article)
...constantly having to hack code to make in position independent
/end extract
Is 'position
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014d.html#16 [OT ] Mainframe memories
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014d.html#22 [OT ] Mainframe memories
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014d.html#23 [OT ] Mainframe memorie
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014d.html#25 [OT ] Mainframe memorie
univ ran fortran student
jwgli...@gmail.com (John Gilmore) writes:
begin extract
one of the things that I did have lots of problems with was supporting
position independent code (mentioned in the tss/360 wiki article)
...constantly having to hack code to make in position independent
/end extract
Is 'position
Was the smoke black or white?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Chris Hoelscher
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [OT ] Mainframe memories
Maybe IBM elected a new chairman
In 531be625.2040...@acm.org, on 03/08/2014
at 09:55 PM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org said:
I believe the CP-40 and CP-67 precursors of VM/370 required more than
just S/360 architecture;
For CP-40 the extension was nonstandard, but for CP-67 the extension
was part of a standard 360/67, even
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014 08:52:02 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
on 03/08/2014 at 09:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
The syntactic restrictions are different. There are parameter
strings that I can pass with EXEC that % disallows.
Such as?
A string containing an
l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) writes:
With regard to ACS (IBM's advance computing effort) by Amdahl ... this
has account of many of the features ... but was killed off by IBM
management because they were worried it would advance computing
state-of-the-art too fast and they would loose
On 9 March 2014 09:01, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
Much earlier, someone decided that the power unit for the 650 was of a
convenient height for drying socks. A Selenium rectifier blew out.
Not a pleasant smell (the rectifier; no comment on the socks), as
anyone
We are running z/os 1.11 and also have SAS 8.2 in our shop .Each time after
IPL ,automation issues the start command for SAS server3 started task
repeatedly ( more than 100 times).But the fun part is that , the task is
actually started with one of the start commands issued initially . But
This is how OPS/,VS would work based on status on STCTBL.. if start
command is made by COMMDxx then remove it from OPS/MVS or make it passive.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:27 AM, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.comwrote:
We are running z/os 1.11 and also have SAS 8.2 in our shop .Each time after
16 matches
Mail list logo
