For me,
the breakthrough here is that IBM is agreeing to license z/OS to ANYONE,
That's not how it works for us. An RDT system (and I have been maintaining
ours for almost two years now, but RDT has been around longer than that) has
licenced the z1090 code (RDT) and that code only. That's
Hi All,
We are in need to increase the region size of TSO 4M to 8M and we need to do it
globally instead of editing manually in the TSO logon screen.
Please guide me
Regards,
Vinoth M
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On 08/07/14 06:40, Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW wrote:
Hi All,
We are in need to increase the region size of TSO 4M to 8M and we need to do it
globally instead of editing manually in the TSO logon screen.
Please guide me
Regards,
Vinoth M
From my experience no, a manual cleanup must be initiated. The FIXCDS command
does fix some records which apply
a patch e.g.ERR 24. For others such as ERR 03 the records the FIXCDS does not
do the cleanup.
On Wed, 8/6/14, retired mainframer
VM of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
08/07/2014 05:40:17 AM:
From: Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW vinoth.meenak...@bestbuy.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/07/2014 05:40 AM
Subject: TSO Logon region size increase
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi John,
We are using CA-Top Secret security tool.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TSO Logon region size increase
VM
AFAIK accessing the Integrated 3270 session is impossible from an HMC
browser session. It is also tricky mounting a DVD in the HMC drive if
you want to Gen a new z/VM system in a first level Logical Partition.
You can use a device on an OSA-ICC to be the 3270 console for z/VM IPL.
The
I'm not sure what knowing if you're in any z/OS instance of a SYSPLEX
buys you, but if you want to know:
If you're talking about a programming solution, the name of the SYSPLEX
can be gotten from field ECVTSPLX (which is a programming interface).
It is also accessible by system symbol SYSPLEX,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I'm not sure what knowing if you're in any z/OS instance of a SYSPLEX
buys you, but if you want to know:
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I agree that is not very useful information, but that is not what I'm
On 08/07/14 08:55, Jim McAlpine wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I'm not sure what knowing if you're in any z/OS instance of a SYSPLEX
buys you, but if you want to know:
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I agree that is not very useful
I would use ENQ
1. Add a DD statement to the job that you want to test for.
//TESTDD DD DSN=hlq.jobname.LOCK,DISP=(NEW,DELETE,DELETE),etc.
2. Issue ENQ with TEST on SYSDSN for the lock dataset name from the assembler
cics program.
Thanks,
Tim Deller
What concerns Integrated 3270-Session usage from a remote HMC I have to admit
that
it is possible with the right Browser- and Java-Setup (i.e. Mozilla Firefox
31.0).
It works for me quite fine i.e. for z/OS Console Sessions or z/VM IPL'ing.
Or did I miss the point here ?
ciao Lutz
Hi,
Do we need to define the region size in Security tool, CA-TSS is tool we are
using.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 4:57 PM
To:
Vinoth,
Ask your Top-Secret Security Administrator if there is a global option to
set the default TSO logon region. If not, you may have to define it for
each userid.
Regards,
John K
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
08/07/2014 08:25:20 AM:
From: Meenakshi,
Regarding use of RDT for System z for a sysplex configuration: If I'm reading
everything correctly, the sysplex support (with virtualized CF) is available
only if you license RDT in the RVU (Resource Value Unit) license
configuration, rather than using the Authorized User license. With the RVU
Perpetual is forever
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding use of RDT for System z for a sysplex configuration: If I'm
reading everything correctly, the sysplex support (with virtualized CF) is
available only if you license
You could contact CA TSS support group and get faster answers. They are
very helpful.
Or join the MYCA Community forum for TSS and have a more specific group that
could help answer your questions.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hello Vinoth, here is a method that I have used in the past to change this
value for all users that currently have a TSO segment.
1. Obtain a list of all user ACIDs that have a TSO segment. The TS
database unload can be used to create this list. If you need further
advice on this task
Hi All,
Thanks all for valuable inputs, it worked.
Thank you..!!
Vinoth M
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of TonyIcloud-OPERA
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 7:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TSO Logon
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net wrote:
Perpetual is forever
Correct. $37,200 for the perpetual (forever) license. But if you want
to get _upgrades_ or maintenance, that costs 15%, or $5,580, per year
to receive. Without maintenance, you are stuck at whatever
Glad it worked! I should have mentioned that you can quite easily produce
a list of users with a TSO segment by reading the TSSCFILE unload output
file and getting the user ACID from the type 3500 record.
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:48:34 -0500, Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW
Hi,
One cannot reliably assume that a sysplex name of LOCAL implies
that the system is not running in a multisystem sysplex. LOCAL is the name
of the sysplex that XCF supplies in the default COUPLE00 parmlib member
that would cause the system to come up in what is called XCF-LOCAL mode.
Just curious,
If your tasks had a first step that mod'd a common dataset and then CICS
would query that data set, could you set it up that way?
The data set could contain the info you need
Date Time Task_Name Plex_name Startup/Shutdown state.
Plex_name could also include LPAR name
So first
Barbara,
Does the RDT license allow you to get updated ADCD images when they become
available? E.G., when an ADCD version is made available for z/OS 2.1, can you
load it on your RDT system?
Can't the ADCD system be adjusted to use larger than MOD3 disks, just as one
would do in a real
My experience is that FIX on the AUDIT commands will generate/execute fixes
that can be fixed with a FIXCDS command. Other errors require other commands
to repair.
My experience is also that the DFHSM manuals discussing AUDIT, FIXCDS and
especially the ERR reference are usually pretty clear as
Has anyone experienced any issues with 3490 devices while running on z/OS 1.13?
Our mounts are just sitting there and we have to cancel the jobs; our virtual
tapes (3590) work fine.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public
NOPE. Check for outstanding allocation recoveries, outstanding swaps,
snip
Has anyone experienced any issues with 3490 devices while running on z/OS 1.13?
Our mounts are just sitting there and we have to cancel the jobs; our virtual
tapes (3590) work fine.
/snip
When you say 'just sitting there', what do you mean? Are you not getting the
mount messages on the console? Nothing showing up on the 3490 displays?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday,
We are getting
*IEF233A M 0D61,PRIVAT,SL,TS00P43T,STEP0,SCCTSO.TS00P43.JCLLIB
and the tape drive is ready.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 3:06 PM
To:
They work OK for us. Been on 1.13 since January 2012.
--- sharon.lo...@nc.gov wrote:
From: Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo...@nc.gov
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.13 and 3490 tape drives
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:55:47 +
Has anyone experienced any issues
==ds qt,d60,4
There's also a qlib
Then look to see if there spares in the pool with ISMF.
EREP is your friend. Look for temp errors on D6x.
In a message dated 8/7/2014 2:08:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sharon.lo...@nc.gov writes:
*IEF233A M
Is this the first try with these drives on z/OS 1.113?
What is your Tape Management product?
Did you insure you had the TM product updated for z/OS 1.13?
Did you get the TM products mount exits correctly migrated to z/OS 1.13?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Does the mount message show up on the drive display?
Silly question - did somebody bump the auto-load switch on the drive being
requested to manual?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday,
Thanks to all...it might be the fact that we are back leveled on the microcode
for our escon/ficon converter.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 3:32 PM
To:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo...@nc.gov wrote:
Has anyone experienced any issues with 3490 devices while running on z/OS
1.13? Our mounts are just sitting there and we have to cancel the jobs;
our virtual tapes (3590) work fine.
Are your 3490s real tapes, either in
Make sure you properly secure the HMC. Paul Robichaux (from NewEra Software)
and Barry Schrager (from xBridge Systems, and ACF2 fame) did a presentation at
Share in San Francisco in 2013 titled 'The HMC is a Fantastic Tool But Are You
Making It Secure?' Session 12255. They had found a number
http://www.ibmmainframes.com/about59585.html
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Rajesh Janakiraman
rajesh.janakira...@hdfcbank.com wrote:
Hi All,
Please help on restoring multi-volume GDG dataset. I've used the below
JCL.
//MULTPS JOB 'DUMP',CLASS=A,NOTIFY=SYSUID,
// REGION=0M
//REST
Hello all, I have found two assembler programs that are supposed to convert
data to base64. They do not seem to be working correctly. I have gone to two
sites on the internet that do online base64 conversions. I place a 32 byte
string of data into the input area and press the encode button. The
ASCII vs. EBCDIC?
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Hello all, I have found two assembler programs that are supposed to
convert data to base64. They do not seem to be working correctly. I have
gone to two sites on the internet that do online base64
Dear mike,
This was not that issue.
The link which you gave was same from our production box and now we are
facing different one.
Dataset tracks are getting allocated, but %Used is 0
Thanks Regards,
Rajesh Janakiraman
Mainframe System Analyst
From: Mike Schwab
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 21:59:16 -0400, zMan wrote:
ASCII vs. EBCDIC?
That's my first guess. Might the OP post a 32-byte tet string (presumably text)
and the output from the internet sites and from the mainframe?
And perhaps the (relevant sections of) the assembler code or links to
their source?
On 7 August 2014 21:59, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
ASCII vs. EBCDIC?
Almost certainly. Base64 is a way of representing arbitrary byte
values using a set of characters that is less likely than many to be
mangled in transmission. Think of it as a more efficient way of
representing byte
42 matches
Mail list logo
