Re: IBM z/OS Product Documentation 2016

2016-03-24 Thread Munish Sharma
Please enable download all for complete z/OS versions e.g. z/OS 2.1 --->> donwload all 2. Bring back bookshelf with download all as well. Believe me.. it helps alot -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions

Re: CSSMTP sorry for the typo

2016-03-24 Thread michelbutz
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:27 PM, michelbutz wrote: > > Hi > > Does anyone know if you can use CSSTMP > > To put text in the body of the e-mail > > Have found anything like a CSSTMP users guide anywhere > > Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > >

CSSTMP

2016-03-24 Thread michelbutz
Hi Does anyone know if you can use CSSTMP To put text in the body of the e-mail Have found anything like a CSSTMP users guide anywhere Thanks Sent from my iPhone -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruc

Re: Your Feedback: Take Our IBM z/OS Product Documentation 2016 Survey

2016-03-24 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
Iris, is this the same survey you asked us take recently? I know it's only 14 minutes, but I'm afraid you might find my answers inconsistent. ;-) . . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-302-7535

Your Feedback: Take Our IBM z/OS Product Documentation 2016 Survey

2016-03-24 Thread Iris Rivera
Hi Everyone, Please take our 14 minute survey to help us improve IBM z/OS product documentation for you. The results are used to drive improvements into existing documentation and to direct our documentation delivery strategy. We want to make sure you get the information you need to do your job qu

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Don Poitras
Janet, You lost CASE(MIXED). Anywho, I'd open an ETR with IBM as there's nothing I see wrong with what you're doing. In article <9358801852986859.wa.janet.graffyahoo@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote: > I switched to LIST(IMP) > >Try running LIST(IMP) to see that the binder is reading the side

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Janet Graff
I switched to LIST(IMP) >Try running LIST(IMP) to see that the binder is reading the side deck >correctly. z/OS V1 R12 BINDER 13:45:21 THURSDAY MARCH 24, 2016 BATCH EMULATOR JOB(JIGJAVA ) STEP(LKED) PGM= IEWBLINK IEW2278I B352 INVOCATION PARAMETE

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Don Poitras
Try running LIST(IMP) to see that the binder is reading the side deck correctly. In article <7533080143224129.wa.janet.graffyahoo@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote: > Frank, > I added CASE(MIXED) but got the same result > IEW2278I B352 INVOCATION PARAMETERS - > LIST(NOIMP),AMODE=31,MAP,RENT,DYNAM

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Don Poitras
I think it's due to the CASE binder option. Here's what we use: IEW2278I B352 INVOCATION PARAMETERS - MAP,RENT,DYNAM=DLL,CASE=MIXED,COMPAT=CURR,LIST=NOIMP In article <8733596917227127.wa.janet.graffyahoo@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote: > Thanks Don! > I switched the SYSLIN to include t

Re: ISPF Anomaly: ISPP352

2016-03-24 Thread Dave Salt
Thanks for the update. I was half expecting something "surprising", but not quite THAT surprising! Dave Salt SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it! http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:51:21 -0400 > From: ste...@copper.net > Subject

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Janet Graff
Frank, I added CASE(MIXED) but got the same result IEW2278I B352 INVOCATION PARAMETERS - LIST(NOIMP),AMODE=31,MAP,RENT,DYNAM(DLL),CASE(MIXED) IEW2322I 1220 1INCLUDE'/u/Java6_31/J6.0/bin/j9vm/libjvm.x' IEW2322I 1220 160INCLUDE OBJECT

Re: ISPF Anomaly: ISPP352

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Thompson
On 03/23/2016 04:16 PM, Dave Salt wrote: Hi Steve, If you get the user to run this small REXX procedure, what value does it return? /* REXX */ address ispexec "VGET (ZSCREEND) SHARED" say zscreend Dave Salt SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it! Well, I had the user run this once they had

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Try adding CASE(MIXED) to your binder parms. > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:29:18 -0500 > From: 004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Thanks Don! > > I switched the SYSLIN to include the .x file > > //SYSLIN DD

Re: PLEASE HELP TLS 1.2

2016-03-24 Thread Donald J.
he is on CICS 5.2, not 5.3. -- Donald J. dona...@4email.net On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 09:16 AM, McCabe, Ron wrote: > IBM would prefer that you use MINTLSLEVEL... > > The ENCRYPTION system initialization parameter has been deprecated. Use the > MINTLSLEVEL system initialization parameter ins

Re: What happens with no working SE?

2016-03-24 Thread Jim Mulder
> We happen to have a failed SE at the moment. It's the 'alternate', > so no immediate impact at all. But the question has been raised, > what would happen if the primary failed also? I remember a case > years ago (1990s) when there was only one SE in a box, and it went > bad. Just meant that w

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Janet Graff
Thanks Don! I switched the SYSLIN to include the .x file //SYSLIN DD * INCLUDE '/u/Java6_31/J6.0/bin/j9vm/libjvm.x' INCLUDE OBJECT NAMECALLJAVA(R) //*

Re: Resolving JNI_CreateJavaVM

2016-03-24 Thread Janet Graff
Actually I've had the JNI code finished for a while. I'm trying to call the JNI Code from a C program at this point. Janet >It sounds like you're trying to build a JNI program that hasn't been ported >to z/OS rather than just writing new code. This can be very complex and you >should probably s

Re: PLEASE HELP TLS 1.2

2016-03-24 Thread McCabe, Ron
IBM would prefer that you use MINTLSLEVEL... The ENCRYPTION system initialization parameter has been deprecated. Use the MINTLSLEVEL system initialization parameter instead. For more information about the MINTLSLEVEL system initialization parameter, see MINTLSLEVEL. If you specify the ENCRYPTIO

Re: PLEASE HELP TLS 1.2

2016-03-24 Thread Donald J.
ENCRYPTION=ALL Allows the use of TLS v1.1 and v1.2 in addition to the protocols allowed by STRONG (TLS v1.0). ENCRYPTION=TLS12FIPSAllows the use only TLS v1.2 with FIPS 140-2 standards ENCRYPTION=STRONG A

Re: PLEASE HELP TLS 1.2

2016-03-24 Thread Lizette Koehler
Whenever something changes, you should be seeing error messages. Look in Cics, z/os syslog, and IP messages. It would be very helpful to post those error messages, complete error messages. You will probably want to engage this agency in your resolution process. They are probably the one gro

Re: PLEASE HELP TLS 1.2

2016-03-24 Thread Brian France
Check your list of ciphers. There are ciphers specific to tls 1.2. On 3/24/2016 11:37 AM, Lopez, Sharon wrote: A federal agency changed to TLS v1.2 over the weekend and now we are not able to connect to them via CICS 5.2. We have on the TLS V1.2 ptf for z/OS 1.13 and we are starting with the

PLEASE HELP TLS 1.2

2016-03-24 Thread Lopez, Sharon
A federal agency changed to TLS v1.2 over the weekend and now we are not able to connect to them via CICS 5.2. We have on the TLS V1.2 ptf for z/OS 1.13 and we are starting with the correct SIT within CICS. We are missing something but cannot figure this out. Anyone else experiencing this? A

Re: CSVFETCH exit

2016-03-24 Thread Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
In fact, I use LLA exit1, not exit2, because exit1 has the details of each fetch. Kees. -Original Message- From: Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: 24 March, 2016 8:23 To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: RE: CSVFETCH exit Leo, We move the modules to a LNKLST library, so we are

Re: What happens with no working SE?

2016-03-24 Thread Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
You have the same situation, when IBM installs microcode updates. Both HMCs are locked so you can't IPL or do any other things. Also the BCPII interface is blocked. IBM don't tell you with that many words, but by strongly pulling out the consequences of an upgrade action few years ago, we final

Re: CSVFETCH exit

2016-03-24 Thread Leonardo Vaz
Ok! Thanks for the clarification! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSVFETCH exit We use it for modules under

Re: What happens with no working SE?

2016-03-24 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
Gizmo is fixed now. No impact during SE replacement, which took longer than I expected. As is often the case, CEC was in Service mode the whole time, which would have been a problem if we had needed an emergency IPL or some such. I just checked that the STP screens are available from the Workpla

Re: CSVFETCH exit

2016-03-24 Thread Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
We use it for modules under our control, so we know the only version is in this specific library. Kees. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Leonardo Vaz Sent: 24 March, 2016 15:53 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re:

Re: CSVFETCH exit

2016-03-24 Thread Leonardo Vaz
Still, you wouldn't know if the old module is still being used from a (non-LLA) steplib, right? Am I missing something? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:23 AM

Re: z890 in my basement

2016-03-24 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 3/24/2016 6:02 AM, John Eells wrote: And, it was a lot of fun to hear the story again! And you, my friend, are easily recognized in Ross Mauri's tweet! -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ --

Re: SMP/E Accept - LINK-EDIT defaults

2016-03-24 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
In link-edit JCLIN one can specify a maximum RC on the NAME statement. But that applies to target zone. Is there a way to do likewise for DLIB zone? No, you cannot specify the maximum acceptable RC for linking a module into a distribution library. Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development

Re: z890 in my basement

2016-03-24 Thread John Eells
Neale Ferguson wrote: > For those who saw Connor at SHARE or Hillgang. He spoke at POK today: > > https://twitter.com/rossmauri/status/712740819376193536 > And, it was a lot of fun to hear the story again! -- John Eells IBM Poughkeepsie ee...@us.ibm.com ---

Re: FTP Error

2016-03-24 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, John McKown wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Ron Thomas wrote: > >> Hi . >> >> We are getting a FTP error when we try to trigger the job that resides in >> AS400 system . Could someone let me know where the issue is ? >> >> >> EZA1460I Command: >> EZA173

Re: Knowledge Center (again; was: SMP/E Accept ...)

2016-03-24 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:07:58 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >(for example) On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:27:31 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: >> >>... And in 5.18: ... >> >I'm looking at the Commands manual in: > > http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/api/content/nl/en-us/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r

Re: FTP Error

2016-03-24 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Ron Thomas wrote: > Hi . > > We are getting a FTP error when we try to trigger the job that resides in > AS400 system . Could someone let me know where the issue is ? > > > EZA1460I Command: > EZA1736I QUOTE RCMD SBMJOB CMD(CALL PGM(NMCUS72/CFNAR094H)) JOB(HOSARIN

FTP Error

2016-03-24 Thread Bill Woodger
The error is on the AS/400. Someone there needs to look at the messages on the log associated with the SBMJOB. Plain wild guess, from the 550 message, the command was too long, truncated, becoming meaningless. On Thursday, 24 March 2016 12:44:20 UTC, Ron Thomas wrote: > Hi . > > We are gettin

FTP Error

2016-03-24 Thread Ron Thomas
Hi . We are getting a FTP error when we try to trigger the job that resides in AS400 system . Could someone let me know where the issue is ? EZA1460I Command: EZA1736I QUOTE RCMD SBMJOB CMD(CALL PGM(NMCUS72/CFNAR094H)) JOB(HOSARINV) + EZA1736I JOBD(NMCFL72/NMCJOBD) EZA1701I >>> RCMD SBMJOB CMD(

Re: What happens with no working SE?

2016-03-24 Thread R.S.
No SE at all means your z/OS (or any other) system is still working, but no HW changes are possible, no IPL, many HW command will fail, etc. Deep sh*t. One of two SE failed means you can peform everything you want, including STP. Maybe STP setup would be impossible (I haven't checked), but I'd

IBM Introduces the IBM z/OS Platform for Apache Spark

2016-03-24 Thread Timothy Sipples
A couple days ago IBM has announced the new IBM z/OS Platform for Apache Spark, and it is available March 25, 2016. More details are available here: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/apache-spark.html Also refer to the IBM announcement letter, available here: http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_

Re: CSVFETCH exit

2016-03-24 Thread Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Leo, We move the modules to a LNKLST library, so we are sure they are seen by LLA when they are fetched. Yes, CSVFETCH has more capabilities, but just for the task of catching certain, old, modules, the LLA trick is more simple. Kees. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L