I already offered a HPO 5 with IBMs blessing. If they still need it, they know
what to do.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Maybe I'm not seeing something here, but is there any reason why you don't add
an A and MX record for your HMC to DNS? Do that, and the problem goes away. The
name just has to resolve at the receiving end; doesn't imply any connectivity
or access to the HMC.
Assuming you are using the reserved
The issue is with the USB licensing / sw protection system (sentinel by
gemalto) and it’s interaction with either a kernel code/module, or library
update (like a libc etc)
For CentOS anyway, I’ve almost got it narrowed down to the exact update
(presume it’ll be the same for RedHat etc). When i
On 1/20/2017 6:00 PM, Robert Prins wrote:
On 2017-01-20 17:50, Tom Conley wrote:
On 1/20/2017 12:34 PM, Robert Prins wrote:
On 2017-01-20 15:10, Tom Conley wrote:
and the Pop-Up that appears after the search tells me
Robert,
I use TSOLIB from the READY prompt, and then enter ISPF. You can
Hi Roland,
On 2017-01-20 15:10, Roland Schiradin wrote:
Hi Bob,
Please, please, please, don't call me Bob!
I'm also working on Sam system. I would try to rename the ISPCFIGU in the
linklist. Do a /F LLA,REFRESH. New logon and verify again. If it works
contact Sam and ask him.
You may also t
On 2017-01-20 17:50, Tom Conley wrote:
On 1/20/2017 12:34 PM, Robert Prins wrote:
On 2017-01-20 15:10, Tom Conley wrote:
and the Pop-Up that appears after the search tells me
Robert,
I use TSOLIB from the READY prompt, and then enter ISPF. You can
verify the
options and the active ISPCFIGU
Yeah, that was the early comment where I thought it was going to be silly.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Great! (Except for the "some of it running on 1970's mainframes.").
>
> Charles
> -Original Message-
>
http://www.livingcomputers.org/
is looking for help/assistance
forwarded:
We have a 4361 we recently purchased in running condition from the
original owner in Sacramento. Our plan is to put VM/370 (or possibly
VM/SP, we have an in within IBM who is working on that) on the system
and run it as o
On 1/20/2017 12:53 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Is this issue not analogous to "I made changes on my z/OS system, and now
some critical software product is broken?"
In that case, you would use SMP/E or volume backups to go back. Isn't
linux essentially the same (only different)?
For my Linux desktop
Great! (Except for the "some of it running on 1970's mainframes.").
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 10:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Blockchain
Based o
Based on previous interest on Bitcoin, I was suspicious of "Blockchain" as
vendor marketing bandwagon-ism and/or finance industry panic.
But I recently watched this short Ted talk on "Blockchain", which I
initially thought would be just fluff. Some of the ideas near the end
lead me to think that
Is this issue not analogous to "I made changes on my z/OS system, and now
some critical software product is broken?"
In that case, you would use SMP/E or volume backups to go back. Isn't
linux essentially the same (only different)?
For my Linux desktop (Ubuntu), with the package manager (synapt
On 1/20/2017 12:34 PM, Robert Prins wrote:
On 2017-01-20 15:10, Tom Conley wrote:
and the Pop-Up that appears after the search tells me
Robert,
I use TSOLIB from the READY prompt, and then enter ISPF. You can
verify the
options and the active ISPCFIGU either on the main menu for ISPCCONF,
o
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:11:13 +0100, Roland Schiradin wrote:
>I would try to rename the ISPCFIGU in the linklist.
That is not necessary. The search order is
TASKLIB (ISPLLIB)
STEPLIB/JOBLIB
LNKLST
It was loaded from ISPLLIB. The question is why it doesn't have the content he
expected.
--
Tom
On 2017-01-20 15:10, Tom Conley wrote:
On 1/20/2017 9:36 AM, Robert Prins wrote:
I've been given access to a z/OS 2.2 system (tanks Sam G), and one of the
first things I've been trying to do is to use several levels of command
tables - the system only seems to use ISRCMDS and ISPCMDS, and the la
We aren't yet on z13's but are planning to go this year - This will certainly
impact us and the way we receive HMC alerts in e-mail. You can add us as an
impacted site to if it helps.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
623 869 5523
Corporate Tieline -
I got a S0C1 and I do have an FRR the SVC is in
CSA since I can set a breakpoint in CSA
I have been using WTO's from what I see the FRR
Never got control
Regardless it seems I can't use this service in the SVC
Thanks
On Jan 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>> That's what I thoug
>That's what I thought Peter Relson seemed to imply that Suspend may not
necessarily mean
>The Suspend macro in which case IEAVPSE2 wouldn't work
>
>I asked if that is what he meant and I didn't hear anything
I thought that I did more than "imply". I pretty directly stated my
opinion.
I did no
Hi Bob, I'm also working on Sam system. I would try to rename the ISPCFIGU in
the linklist. Do a /F LLA,REFRESH. New logon and verify again.
If it works contact Sam and ask him.
You may also try my and Norbert Haas logon proc Procedure ===> SPFPROCS.
It invoke the REXX SYS1.LOGON.CLISTS(ISPFZ
On 1/20/2017 9:36 AM, Robert Prins wrote:
I've been given access to a z/OS 2.2 system (tanks Sam G), and one of the
first things I've been trying to do is to use several levels of command
tables - the system only seems to use ISRCMDS and ISPCMDS, and the latter
seems to be a version that's been c
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:36:50 +, wrote:
>Any clues how (or even *if*) I can make my copy the default one, at least
>for me?
I do this, you should be able to do it too.
I use ispcconf to make mine and put into my ISPLLIB concatenation. It works
fine for me.
You might use ispcconf option 7, C
I've been given access to a z/OS 2.2 system (tanks Sam G), and one of the
first things I've been trying to do is to use several levels of command
tables - the system only seems to use ISRCMDS and ISPCMDS, and the latter
seems to be a version that's been carried forward ever since, which is a
friend
Kees,
I do think that current support is causing problems for customers (including
the recent append from David, I see that three customers are having a problem),
but unfortunately, that is way the function currently works in the field. So,
all I can do today is explain how it works and to sa
Tom,
I am a little suprised by your answer/explanation:
a) because 'a' customer asked for it. From z/OS software I am used to an
implementation that leaves the default as it was or at least make it downward
compatible.
b) we also had to massage emails sent from batch jobs in such a way that the
Brian,
I am sorry that the IBMFE wasn't has helpful as they should have been. Our
Product Engineering team was made aware of this and they are following up. You
should be contacted again.
But, in the meantime, I can talk about the "FROM:" name some more. As I
stated, the current format is
I guess an obligatory call to the Duty Manager is appropriate:
1.CE is untrained on current level
2.Doc doesn't match software
3.We' re losing money fumbling around after maint is performed
All are unacceptable behavior.
In a message dated 1/20/2017 1:42:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
bri
26 matches
Mail list logo
