On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:53:45 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>How about doing a portion of the dataset, FTP the result, delete the
>intermediate file. Repeat for each segment. I. E. last 1 or 2 digits
>of an account number, etc. Using the high order digits could lead to
>some groups being pretty
How about doing a portion of the dataset, FTP the result, delete the
intermediate file. Repeat for each segment. I. E. last 1 or 2 digits
of an account number, etc. Using the high order digits could lead to
some groups being pretty large, I.E. SS#s. Or X number of records.
2nd run skip X,
Seems like those two would be great candidates for PowerExchange mapping, since
it sounds like it fits in to their current job descriptions. But what do I
know! :-(
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John McKown
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:26:14 -0500, Joel M Ivey wrote:
. . .
>+972 4140 0004
>+976 1904
>+978 4770 C986 <-
>+97C 5802
>+980 41F0 0004
>+984 07FE
>
I don't have the luxury of your assembly listing, but the ESTAE in the source
code from cbttape.org looks like
l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes:
> For the 3090, they originally planned on using a 4331 with a highly
> modified version of vm370/cms release 6 as the service process ... with
> all service screens done in CMS IOS3270. This was upgraded to a pair of
> redundant 4361s. The 3092
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) writes:
> BTW:
> What about LPARs?
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#80 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#81 GREAT presentation on the history of
the mainframe
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#82 Great mainframe
John McKown wrote:
No HMC. The console looked like a 3270 which was "built into" the machine.
Was that the specialized console where I used to type things like L1 and
A2 (or whatever it was) to set the load address and IPL? I don't
remember the exact commands - from 3084 days. And then
I totally agree with the dismay expressed at omission of 9672/9674. I've only
been in this biz since the late 70s, but I was blown away at the architectural
upheaval represented by the move from bipolar to CMOS. Yet the 9672 still ran
decades-old programs without even recompile, let alone
l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes:
> Endicott then complains tht the 5-way 370/125 SMP has better
> performance and better price/performance than 370/148 and I'm required
> in escalation meetings to argue both sides. Endicott wins ... and the
> 5-way SMP 370/125 is never announced.
re:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Frank Swarbrick <
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Sad.
>
>
> It's my observation that the best person to create the PowerExchange maps
> is someone who knows the mainframe data. But if they won't let you or
> another mainframer do it, and they won't / can't
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:44 PM, R.S.
wrote:
> W dniu 2017-03-24 o 18:04, Pommier, Rex pisze:
>
>> The only thing I wish he would have included in the presentation was the
>> original 9672/9674 which was a huge shift from the GA-AS technology to
>> silicon.
>>
>
>
Sad.
It's my observation that the best person to create the PowerExchange maps is
someone who knows the mainframe data. But if they won't let you or another
mainframer do it, and they won't / can't do it themselves, well it sounds like
they are once again screwing themselves. (Do you have
I was wondering if you have looked at the sample SYS1.SAMPLIB for member
IEEACTRT
We typically used the sample IBM Supplied
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: Joel M Ivey
>Sent: Mar 24, 2017 12:26 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: 0C4, 071, 822 abends in
W dniu 2017-03-24 o 18:04, Pommier, Rex pisze:
The only thing I wish he would have included in the presentation was the
original 9672/9674 which was a huge shift from the GA-AS technology to silicon.
I wish I hadn't worked on pre-9672 machines.
Was it really non-silicon? I was pretty sure it
After migrating to zOS 2.2, a vendor-customized IEFACTRT routine
started getting 0c4, 071, and 822 abends in certain highly-used
initiators. We discovered that the vendor portion was supposed
to have been removed prior to 2.2 so we removed their custom
module. Abends still occurred. We
Cross posted in CA-Communities
Does anyone have a sample RESOURCE ACCESS VALIDATION EXIT (TSSINSTX)? We are
trying to determine the best way to protect keys in ICSF. We have a resource
class defined as CSFKEYS. The CICS regions are bypassing the CSFKEYS check due
to the option of NORESCHK.
arno...@us.ibm.com (Todd Arnold) writes:
> 360 processors with special microcode were used in a number of things.
> Early in my career, I worked on development of the IBM 3890 high-speed
> check sorter. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_3890) The controller
> in that sorter was a 360 mod 25,
Some articles posted regarding the 2015 OPM Breach at the Department of the
Interior Data Center implied that DOI Mainframes were hacked. This is not the
case.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
The only thing I wish he would have included in the presentation was the
original 9672/9674 which was a huge shift from the GA-AS technology to silicon.
Rex
The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from
disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of
I had thought that the 3890 check sorter used a S/3 CPU because
of right-left movement (which those machines did). As I recall,
with SCI code, one had to think the reverse of what a S/360 did
in a move. Granted, I didn't do very much 3890 programming, but I
did a lot of CPCS programming to
I hope I am not violating forum decorum by posting this. If so, then I would
ask that the forum administrators kill it.
I am putting this out there in case anyone within commuting distance of
Trenton, NJ is interested in a full-time contract that would most likely lead
to full-time
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Frank Swarbrick <
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com> wrote:
> There is a true ETL tool component, PowerExchange by Informatica that
> allows the actual ETL Tool (PowerCenter) to read IMS and VSAM files as if
> they were relational tables. In general I would recommend
There is a true ETL tool component, PowerExchange by Informatica that allows
the actual ETL Tool (PowerCenter) to read IMS and VSAM files as if they were
relational tables. In general I would recommend this, but I don't have a sense
of the "permanence" of the process you are concerned about.
I'd like to thank everyone responded to this quest. Very educational!
It looks like the team has decided to cache this file locally, i.e. in each and
every address space accessing data, so nothing exciting is going to transpire
this time around.
Ah, well, back to the daily routine...
Thanks
Hi Victor.
Why should it be a problem state program? the idea is a single load, many
reads, isn't it? after IPL, run a STC to load the data and create the
name-token pair. later on, all users can access the data. As I wrote in my
original response, there are several product that does that
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:08:33 -0500, John McKown wrote:
> >>
> >> Do whatever it takes to create the actual data set you want to transmit,
> >> *then* invoke ftp to transmit it.
> >>
> THis
> 303x external channels (channel director) was 158 engine with integrated
> channel microcode (and no 370 microcode).
360 processors with special microcode were used in a number of things. Early
in my career, I worked on development of the IBM 3890 high-speed check sorter.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:08:33 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>>
>> Do whatever it takes to create the actual data set you want to transmit,
>> *then* invoke ftp to transmit it.
>>
THis may depend on the denizens' of the target system having the
privilege and skill to do this.
>... We do have
John McKown wrote:
>Steve Smith wrote:
>> Do whatever it takes to create the actual data set you want to transmit,
>> *then* invoke ftp to transmit it.
>As the OP for this thread, I would generally concur with the above.
I stayed out of this thread to see what others said. I agree 100% with
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
> I am over my self-imposed daily limit on IBM-MAIN replies and it's not even
> 08:00 yet. However, I see no reason to "enhance" ftp. In fact, I think
> the capability to convert to/from ASCII is misguided (as it's used by
Steve Smith wrote:
>Don Poitras wrote:
>> 'after sunset' is a new one on me. With the days getting shorter, your
>> batch window is closing fast.
>> :) (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
Haha. That is a 'sunset' joke. Sorry and sorry... ;-)
>> Only in the
I am over my self-imposed daily limit on IBM-MAIN replies and it's not even
08:00 yet. However, I see no reason to "enhance" ftp. In fact, I think
the capability to convert to/from ASCII is misguided (as it's used by
mistake as often as on purpose - see above).
Do whatever it takes to create
I'll second Lizette's suggestion for RLS. It should do exactly what you
want with far less change and trouble.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Victor Gil
wrote:
> Thanks Denis, an interesting approach!
>
> Will have to do some reading as this is my "terra
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Don Poitras wrote:
> In article <7157494272622550.wa.nitzibmgmx@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> 'after sunset' is a new one on
> me. With the days getting shorter, your batch window is closing fast.
> :) (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
>
> Only
The IBM Destination z community is pleased to announce the winners of the
annual IBM Destination z Enterprise Computing Scholarship for 2016. To be
considered for this scholarship, students must have demonstrated excellence in
their enterprise computing coursework, with plans for continued
Dear listers,
I am a DB2 sysprog and our DB2 statistics report shows a high number of "Pagein
for read I/O" (+5000/ minute) , just a single peak and nearly nothing around
the interval , so maybe not accurate.
I am trying to correlate this with RMF data (The DB2 i am looking on is DB2I) .
On
36 matches
Mail list logo